External fixation as definitive treatment or external fixation followed by early fixation in open fractures of the tibial shaft: A descriptive study.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for open tibial shaft fractures include external fixation with or without early conversion to internal fixation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe 1) early conversion to internal fixation and definitive external fixation and 2) in case of conversion, to identify risk factors for complications. METHODS: Seventy-two external fixations of open fractures of the tibial shaft (Gustilo classification, 7 fractures (9.7 %) grade I, 25 fractures (34.7 %) grade II, 40 fractures (55.6 %) grade III (31 grade IIIA and 9 grade IIIB)) were included in a continuous non-randomised study. Thirty-three fractures without infection signs were converted to internal fixation at a mean time of 40.5 +/-15 days (IF group). External fixation was maintened in the remaining 39 fractures (EF group). RESULTS: In the "IF" group, the union rate was 69.7 % at 6.3 +/-3.6 months (3-16). All patients had complete union at 16 months, requiring 2.8 +/-0.8 reoperations. Fixation with external fixation only ("EF" group) showed a union rate of 51.3 % at 8.9 +/-4 (5-22) months and 96 % at 16 months after 3.7 +/-0.9 reoperations. Superficial infection (12.1 %; p = 0.011) and numerous surgeries (2.76; p = 0.004) were found to be risk factors for deep infection. Time to wound closure >7 days (p = 0.049), time to reoperation >28 days (p = 0.00), numerous surgeries (2.76; p = 0.004) and deep infection (6.1 %; p = 0.027) were found to be union failure factors. CONCLUSION: Early conversion of external fixation to internal fixation is an effective option to achieve bone union of open tibial fractures in selected patients.

Full weight bearing after internal fixation of isolated distal fibular fractures with anatomically contoured locking plates: Our institutional experience.

Isolated fractures of the distal fibula mainly affect young, active people. In most cases, fixation is by open reduction with or without casting for six weeks without weight bearing. The current trend is to reduce this period of non-weight-bearing in order to promote earlier functional rehabilitation. The improved mechanical stability resulting from the use of plates with locking screws has changed the postoperative management of many fractures, but there is little evidence for the ankle. Between October 2013 and August 2015, 36 patients were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate the performance of internal fixation of isolated distal fibular fractures using a lateral anatomically contoured titanium locking plate (InitialA® plate from Newclip Technics, Haute Goulaine, France) with immediate mobilisation and full weight bearing. No patient required further surgery due to mechanical failure or non-union. The bone healing rate was 100 % at 3 months. Two patients had septic complications requiring plate removal and antibiotic treatment and were eventually cured. The use of anatomically contoured locking plates provides strong and stable fixation, allowing immediate full weight-bearing. Such a technique has the advantage of a short recovery time and an early return to work without additional complications.

No benefit of direct anterior over posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility acetabular component for femoral neck fracture.

Aims: Dual-mobility acetabular components (DMCs) have improved total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability in femoral neck fractures (FNFs). In osteoarthritis, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has been promoted for improving early functional results compared with the posterolateral approach (PLA). The aim of this study was to compare these two approaches in FNF using DMC-THA. Methods: A prospective continuous cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing operation for FNF using DMC by DAA or PLA. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Parker score at three months and one year. Perioperative complications were recorded, and radiological component positioning evaluated. Results: There were 50 patients in the DAA group and 54 in the PLA group. The mean HHS was 85.5 (SD 8.8) for the DAA group and 81.8 (SD 11.9) for the PLA group (p = 0.064). In all, 35 patients in the DAA group and 40 in the PLA group returned to their pre-fracture Parker score (p = 0.641) in both groups. No statistically significant differences between groups were found at one year regarding these two scores (p = 0.062 and p = 0.723, respectively). The DAA was associated with more intraoperative complications (p = 0.013). There was one dislocation in each group, and four revisions for DAA and one for PLA, but this difference was not statistically significant. There were also no significant differences regarding blood loss, length of stay, or operating time. Conclusion: In DMC-THA for FNF, DAA did not achieve better functional results than PLA, either at three months or at one year. Moreover, DAA presented an increased risk of intra-operative complications.

Revision total knee arthroplasty with periprosthetic distal femoral fracture.

Treatment strategies for periprosthetic distal femoral fracture depend on the type of fracture, level with respect to the prosthesis, and prosthesis fixation. The usual treatment is internal fixation by nail or locking plate. This can be more difficult when the fracture is close to the joint, is destabilizing the prosthesis or is associated with reduced bone stock, and implant exchange should be considered, depending on the patient's health status. The aim is to obtain the fastest possible recovery while limiting complications and minimizing surgery time for often frail and elderly patients. The present study details the implant revision technique in periprosthetic distal femoral fracture, which requires experience in traumatology and prosthetic revision and material adapted to the situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

Minimally invasive surgery of femoral periprosthetic fractures increases the rate of consolidation and decreases time to bone healing without a higher rate of complications.

BACKGROUND: Knee periprosthetic femoral fractures (KPPFF) are becoming more frequent due to the increasing number of arthroplasties and the aging population, for whom maintaining autonomy and function remains a challenge. The use of locking plates has improved functional results and promoted the development of "minimally invasive" surgical (MIS) approaches. Despite the availability of literature comparing between different types of osteosynthesis for KPPFF, there is a paucity of information available on the complications of osteosynthesis using locking plates, depending on the approach. We therefore carried out a retrospective multicenter study (nine centers: Dijon, Grenoble, Lille, Marseille, Nice, Paris, Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg, Colmar) as part of a Symposium of the French Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SOFCOT). Following osteosynthesis of KPPFF by locking plates carried out by a standard approach or by a minimally invasive approach (MIS), the objectives were: (1) to compare the complications, (2) to evaluate whether the radiological and clinical results (rate and time of consolidation, resumption of weight bearing, lack of reduction, postoperative autonomy) were comparable in the two groups. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis was that performing an MIS approach in these indications does not confer more complications than a standard approach, and rather, the MIS approach offers better functional and radiological results. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Five hundred and seventy-three patients presented with KPPFF over the periods studied (retrospective series from January 2012 to December 2016, then prospective series from January to December 2019). After applying the inclusion criteria (KPPFF by locking plate) and exclusion criteria (tumor context, infectious, intraoperative fractures, fractures on loose prostheses, other osteosynthesis methods, treatment by prosthetic revision, patients under the age of 18, follow-up less than 1-year, incomplete files), a global series of 306 patients was retained. Two groups were created according to the approach performed: a standard approach group (S, n=228) and a minimally invasive approach group (MIS, n=78). The demographic data of the population were recorded, as was the criteria for autonomy (Parker score, place of living). Postoperative complications were sought (infection, mechanical complication, surgical revision). Finally, the radiological and clinical results were evaluated (rate of, and time to consolidation, resumption of weight bearing, lack of reduction, postoperative autonomy). RESULTS: The comparison of the two subgroups, S and MIS, found complication rates are comparable in the two groups in terms of infections [S group: n=18 (7.9%), MIS group: n=2 (2.6%)], mechanical complications [S: n=23 (10.1%), MIS: n=2 (2.6%)], and surgical revision [S: n=33 (14.5%), MIS: n=7 (8.9%)], and a lack of difference in postoperative autonomy [Parker; S group: 4.7±2.4 (0-9) vs. MIS group: 5±2, 7 (0-9)]. On the other hand, the time to return to weight bearing was shorter in the MIS group [4.3±3.5weeks (0-12) versus 10.1±10.1weeks (0-110), p<0.001]. The rate of nonunion was lower in the MIS group [n=1 vs. n=20, i.e. 1.7% vs. 11.1% (p=0.031)] and the time to consolidation was shorter [7.5±4.3weeks (6-30) versus 15.2±9.4weeks (5-78) (p<0.001)]. CONCLUSION: Performing an MIS approach in the management of KPPFF by locking plate osteosynthesis does not cause any more complications than a standard approach. In addition, higher consolidation rates can be obtained in shorter periods of time. This study suggests that it proposing osteosynthesis using the MIS approach as a primary surgery is a reasonable choice when treatment using locking plates is chosen for a KPPFF, subject to technical expertise. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; observational study.

Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasties using locking plates or intramedullary nailing. Comparative study of 567 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal femur fractures in elderly patients pose a common problem that requires surgical management. The main objective of this study was to compare the results of treatment by locked plate (LP) and by anterograde (AIN) or retrograde (RIN) intramedullary nailing. The secondary objective was to analyze the complications related to each group. The hypothesis of this study was that the radiological and clinical results of each group were comparable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 438 patients from 8 centers were studied retrospectively with 365 LP and 69 cases of intramedullary nailing (49 AIN and 20 RIN). The groups were comparable in terms of mean age (75±2years), mean preoperative Parker score (5.3±0.5) and mean KOOS score (74±2). Most patients lived at home before their fracture [n=375 (86%)]. At follow-up, the joint range of motion, the KOOS and Parker scores, living premises, the time required to regain full weight-bearing, the time required for consolidation as well as the reduction alignment: frontal, sagittal, horizontal. RESULTS: The average follow-up was: 79±2weeks (65 to 82). The functional and radiological results were comparable, although nailing allowed a faster return to weight-bearing (1±2weeks for nailing versus 7±2weeks for LP, p=0.048) and a better postoperative Parker score (5.5±0.5 for nailing versus 4.7±0.2 for LP, p=0.045). Rotational malalignment in femoral nailing was often in the direction of internal rotation, compared to the LP (p=0.045). Complications were comparable with the exception of mortality, which was more frequent for LP [22.5% in the LP group versus 13% in the nailing group (p=0.045)]. Complications were categorized as: mechanical complications 6.8% of LP, 5.7% of nailing (p>0.05), infections [11% of LP, 5.8% of nailing (p>0.05)], surgical revisions [2% of LP, 10% of nailing (p>0.05)]. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The hypothesis was refuted. These results show that nailing conferred a faster recovery of weight-bearing, a better Parker score, and is associated with a lower mortality rate. The morbidity rate is comparable between the two techniques. Indeed, when the indication for osteosynthesis by LP or by nailing is made, and both choices are technically justifiable, it would be prudent to favor the technique, which carries the least risk, which in this case is nailing. This conclusion must, however, be taken in to consideration with regard to the reduced number of nailing. A larger series of nailing, particularly retrograde, would be necessary to be able to confirm this last difference between the 2 groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; comparative retrospective study.