ABSTRACT
AIMS: Poor sleep is a frequent occurrence in the critical illness. Evaluate sleep quality and test the effect of a multi-intervention sleep care protocol in improving sleep quality in a coronary care unit (CCU). METHODS AND RESULTS: Quasi-experimental study, carried out in two phases. During the first phase, the control group (n = 58 patients) received usual care. Baseline sleep data were collected through the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) and the Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit Questionnaire (SICUQ). During the second phase (n = 55 patients), a sleep care protocol was implemented. Interventions included actions to promote analgesia, reduce noise, brightness, and other general measures. Sleep data were collected again to assess the impact of these interventions. The intervention group had better scores in overall sleep depth [median (interquartile range)] [81 (65-96.7) vs. 69.7 (50-90); P = 0.046]; sleep fragmentation [90 (65-100) vs. 69 (42.2-92.7); P = 0.011]; return to sleep [90 (69.7-100) vs. 71.2 (40.7-96.5); P = 0.007]; sleep quality [85 (65-100) vs. 71.1 (49-98.1); P = 0.026]; and mean RCSQ score [83 (66-94) vs. 66.5 (45.7-87.2); P = 0.002] than the baseline group. The main barriers to sleep were pain [1 (1.0-5.5)], light [1 (1.0-5.0)], and noise [1 (1.0-5.0)]. The most rated sources of sleep-disturbing noise were heart monitor alarm [3 (1.0-5.25)], intravenous pump alarm [1.5 (1.0-5.00)]. and mechanical ventilator alarm [1 (1.0-5.0)]. All were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the baseline group. CONCLUSION: A multi-intervention protocol was feasible and effective in improving different sleep quality parameters and reducing some barriers to sleep in CCU patients.
Subject(s)
Coronary Care Units , Sleep Quality , Critical Illness , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Sleep , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Systemic inflammation and metabolic disorders are among the mechanisms linking obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). In 109 patients with severe OSA and no overt CVD, biomarkers of inflammation (C reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-α and its receptors, adiponectin, leptin and P-selectin), glucose and lipid metabolism, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, were measured before and after 2 months of treatment with a mandibular advancement device (MAD) (n=55) or a sham device (n=54). MAD reduced the Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (p<0.001) but had no effect on circulating biomarkers compared with the sham device, despite high treatment adherence (6.6 hour/night). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01426607.
Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Inflammation/blood , Interleukin-6/blood , Mandibular Advancement/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/blood , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is a highly prevalent condition carrying increased risk for impaired cognitive and cardiovascular function. The standard diagnosis consists of full-night polysomnography (PSG), but limited access to PSG leads to substantial under-diagnosis. The use of a validated and simple diagnostic screening tool to predict OSAS could prioritise night sleep recordings in children at risk of OSAS, and help in clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to prospectively assess the performance of the French version of the severity hierarchy score (SHS) in paediatric OSAS. This score consists of a discriminative subset of six respiratory items, and has already been validated in English for screening OSAS in the general paediatric population. METHODS: A total of 96 children (mean age 7.1 ± 2.4 years; BMI z-score: -0.03 ± 1.50) were recruited; they had been were referred to two academic sleep centres in France for the putative diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing. The parents completed the SHS questionnaire prior to PSG. Sensitivity and specificity of the SHS for detecting moderate OSAS, defined by an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) of ≥5/hours of total sleep time (TST), were assessed, and ROC analysis was performed. RESULTS: An SHS score of >2.75 exhibited an 82% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 92% negative predictive value for detecting an AHI of ≥5/hour TST in the cohort. CONCLUSION: The French version of the SHS emerged as favourably suited for the screening for OSAS in children.
Subject(s)
Pediatrics/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , France , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Endothelial dysfunction, a major predictor of late cardiovascular events, is linked to the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment with mandibular advancement device, the main alternative to continuous positive airway pressure, improves endothelial function in patients with severe OSA. METHODS: In this trial, we randomized patients with severe OSA and no overt cardiovascular disease to receive 2 months of treatment with either effective mandibular advancement device or a sham device. The primary outcome, change in reactive hyperemia index, a validated measurement of endothelial function, was assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. An embedded microsensor objectively measured treatment compliance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (86% males; mean [SD] age, 54 [10] yr; median [interquartile range] apnea-hypopnea index, 41 [35-53]; mean [SD] Epworth sleepiness scale, 9.3 [4.2]) were randomized to effective mandibular advancement device (n = 75) or sham device (n = 75). On intention-to-treat analysis, effective mandibular advancement device therapy was not associated with improvement of endothelial function compared with the sham device. Office and ambulatory blood pressure outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Effective mandibular advancement device therapy was associated with significant improvements in apnea-hypopnea index (P < 0.001); microarousal index (P = 0.008); and symptoms of snoring, fatigue, and sleepiness (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) objective compliance was 6.6 (1.4) h/night with the effective mandibular advancement device versus 5.6 (2.3) h/night with the sham device (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In moderately sleepy patients with severe OSA, mandibular advancement therapy reduced OSA severity and related symptoms but had no effect on endothelial function and blood pressure despite high treatment compliance. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01426607).
Subject(s)
Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Mandibular Advancement , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Acute Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Poor sleep quality is a consistently reported by patients in the ICU. In such a potentially hostile environment, sleep is extremely fragmented and sleep architecture is unconventional, with a predominance of superficial sleep stages and a limited amount of time spent in the restorative stages. Among the causes of sleep disruption in the ICU are factors intrinsic to the patients and the acute nature of their condition, as well as factors related to the ICU environment and the treatments administered, such as mechanical ventilation and drug therapy. Although the consequences of poor sleep quality for the recovery of ICU patients remain unknown, it seems to influence the immune, metabolic, cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurological systems. There is evidence that multifaceted interventions focused on minimizing nocturnal sleep disruptions improve sleep quality in ICU patients. In this article, we review the literature regarding normal sleep and sleep in the ICU. We also analyze sleep assessment methods; the causes of poor sleep quality and its potential implications for the recovery process of critically ill patients; and strategies for sleep promotion.
RESUMO O sono de má qualidade é uma situação persistentemente descrita em UTIs. O sono nesse ambiente potencialmente hostil é caracterizado pela sua extrema fragmentação e arquitetura não convencional, com predomínio de fases leves e limitada quantidade de tempo nos estágios reparadores. Entre as causas da privação do sono na UTI estão fatores intrínsecos aos pacientes e à condição aguda de sua doença, assim como fatores relacionados ao ambiente da UTI e ao tratamento em curso, como o suporte ventilatório e a terapia medicamentosa. Embora as consequências da má qualidade do sono no processo de recuperação desses pacientes ainda sejam desconhecidas, ela parece influenciar os sistemas imune, metabólico, cardiovascular, respiratório e neurológico. Evidências sugerem que intervenções multifacetadas, focadas na minimização das perturbações do sono noturno, promovem melhora na qualidade do sono nesses pacientes. Este artigo revisa a literatura acerca do sono normal e do sono na UTI. Também analisa seus métodos de avaliação, as causas da má qualidade do sono, suas potenciais implicações no processo de recuperação de pacientes críticos e estratégias para sua promoção.
Subject(s)
Humans , Intensive Care Units , Sleep Deprivation/etiology , Critical Care , Polysomnography , Risk Factors , Sleep Deprivation/classification , Sleep Deprivation/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Sleep bruxism (SB) is a common sleep-related jaw motor disorder observed in 8% of the adult population. SB diagnosis is based on history of tooth grinding and clenching and is confirmed by the polysomnographic recording of the electromyographic activity of jaw muscles during sleep. SB may be associated with orofacial pain, headaches, and sleep-disordered breathing. Managing SB cannot be done without a comprehensive clinical and, when indicated, polysomnographic differential diagnosis of other comorbidities, which need to be taken into account to select the best treatment approach.
Subject(s)
Sleep Bruxism/diagnosis , Sleep Bruxism/therapy , Humans , Sleep Bruxism/complications , Sleep Bruxism/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The association between obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction and LV geometry remains controversial because of coexisting disorders. AIMS: To evaluate LV diastolic dysfunction and its independent predictors in a real-life cohort of OSAS patients, by a standardized approach. METHODS: We consecutively included 188 OSAS patients after an overnight polysomnography to undergo clinical evaluation, ambulatory blood pressure measurement and complete echocardiography, combining M-mode, two-dimensional Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging modes. Correlations between OSAS severity and clinical and echocardiographical variables were assessed, and logistic regression models were used to identify possible determining factors of LV diastolic dysfunction. RESULTS: Most patients were hypertensive (n=148, 78.7%) and already receiving treatment by continuous positive airway pressure (n=158, 84.5%). The prevalence of LV hypertrophy, defined by LV mass index (LVMi) normalized by height (2.7), was 12.4%, with a significant correlation with hypertension (P=0.004). The apnoea-hypopnoea index was correlated with body mass index (P<0.0001), 24-hour systolic blood pressure (P=0.01) and LVMi normalized by height (2.7) (P=0.03). Diastolic function assessed by a global approach was impaired for 70 patients (37.2%) and none of the OSAS severity variables was a determining factor after multivariable analysis with adjustment for age and sex. CONCLUSION: Diastolic dysfunction assessed by a standardized approach is common in OSAS and should be routinely evaluated; it is independently predicted by none of the respiratory severity variables.
Subject(s)
Diastole , Echocardiography, Doppler , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Function, Left , Chi-Square Distribution , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/diagnostic imaging , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/epidemiology , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/physiopathology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Polysomnography , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/epidemiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Poor sleep quality is a consistently reported by patients in the ICU. In such a potentially hostile environment, sleep is extremely fragmented and sleep architecture is unconventional, with a predominance of superficial sleep stages and a limited amount of time spent in the restorative stages. Among the causes of sleep disruption in the ICU are factors intrinsic to the patients and the acute nature of their condition, as well as factors related to the ICU environment and the treatments administered, such as mechanical ventilation and drug therapy. Although the consequences of poor sleep quality for the recovery of ICU patients remain unknown, it seems to influence the immune, metabolic, cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurological systems. There is evidence that multifaceted interventions focused on minimizing nocturnal sleep disruptions improve sleep quality in ICU patients. In this article, we review the literature regarding normal sleep and sleep in the ICU. We also analyze sleep assessment methods; the causes of poor sleep quality and its potential implications for the recovery process of critically ill patients; and strategies for sleep promotion.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Sleep Deprivation/etiology , Critical Care , Humans , Polysomnography , Risk Factors , Sleep Deprivation/classification , Sleep Deprivation/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Despite its high prevalence and major public health ramifications, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) remains underdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to determine whether the involvement of a community pharmacist (CP) in the care pathway of a patient at risk of OSAS, through the implementation of a community pharmacist (CP) intervention, was effective, i.e. increased the use of diagnostic tests in this population. We compared a cohort of patients included in a research protocol (exposed to a CP intervention) with patients having the same characteristics taken from a general population database who did not receive the intervention (unexposed group). The aim of the CP intervention was to educate patients about the risk of untreated OSAS, encouraging them to consult their general practitioner, and urging the doctor to continue investigations. We included 782 patients at risk of OSAS, i.e. taking one or more anti-hypertensive drugs, being overweight (body mass index >25) and snoring almost every night (88 in the exposed group and 694 in the unexposed group). After a 6-month follow-up, the number of patients who underwent an OSAS diagnostic test was significantly higher in the exposed group compared to the unexposed group (22.7 versus 11.4%, P = 0.003). Being exposed to the pharmacist intervention was associated with a higher chance of undergoing a diagnostic test for OSAS, adjusted odds ratio: 2.24 (1.25-4.01). In conclusion, these findings provide arguments for the implementation of a CP OSAS screening intervention in CP routine practice.
Subject(s)
Pharmacists , Primary Health Care/methods , Professional Role , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Disease Susceptibility , Female , France , Health Education , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Overweight/complications , Probability , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Snoring/complications , WorkforceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy following uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) to prevent blood pressure (BP) elevation during sleep. METHODS: Sixteen normotensive patients with OSA were subjected to UPPP with or without septoplasty. These patients were instrumented for 24 h of ambulatory BP recording, polysomnography, nocturnal urinary catecholamine and pain evaluation using a visual analogue scale in the day prior to surgery (D-1), following the surgery (D+1) and 30 days later (D+30). For the D+1, the patients were divided into two groups: the without CPAP therapy group and the with CPAP therapy group. RESULTS: The apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) significantly increased in the patients without CPAP therapy compared with the D-1 (74 ± 23 vs. 35 ± 6 times/h, p < 0.05), and in the CPAP group, there was a significant reduction in the average AHI value to 14 ± 6 times/h, p < 0.01. During D+1, we observed an increase in the nocturnal systolic BP (10 %), diastolic BP (12 %) and heart rate (14 %) in the group without CPAP. These metrics were re-established in the CPAP group to values that were similar to those that were observed on the D-1. The absence of nocturnal dipping in the group without CPAP was followed by a significant increase in nocturnal norepinephrine (42 ± 12 µg/l/12 h) and epinephrine (8 ± 2 µg/l/12 h) levels compared with the D-1 (norepinephrine 17 ± 3; epinephrine 2 ± 0.3 µg/l/12 h, p < 0.001). In the patients who used the CPAP treatment, the nocturnal catecholamine levels were similar to D-1. The effectiveness of intravenous analgesic therapy was verified by a significant decrease in the pain scores in patients both with and without CPAP therapy. CONCLUSION: These data confirm an increase in the AHI on the night following UPPP with or without septoplasty. This increase promotes an absence of nocturnal dipping and a significant increase in urinary catecholamine levels. CPAP therapy was effective to prevent the transitory increase in BP.
Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Hypertension/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Adult , Blood Pressure/physiology , Catecholamines/urine , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Septum/surgery , Pain Measurement , Palate, Soft/surgery , Pharynx/surgery , Polysomnography , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiopathology , Tonsillectomy , Uvula/surgeryABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to assess changes in the profile of adult male patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) with maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery and to measure patient perception of changes compared with that of different panels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive apneic patients displaying a wide variety of morphological types, mean age 42 years (20-59), a BMI of 26.60 kg/m(2) (22-29), a mean initial Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) of 50.9 (19-85), underwent MMA. Assessment was done by facial photography, lateral cephalographs (Tweed analysis modified by Riley and Delaire architectural analysis), polysomnographic records and a validated self-assessment questionnaire. Patients' pre- and postoperative profiles were taken from photographs using Photoshop 7™ software. Their darkened outlines were shown randomly in positions A or B (pre- and postoperative) to panels composed of orthodontists (n=40), fine arts students (n=50) and lay persons (n=50) who were requested to choose the most attractive profiles. RESULTS: The MMA success rate for OSAS was 80% (12/15) for an AHI less than 15, with no surgical complications. All patients reported a reduction of their symptoms and 14 out of 15 were satisfied with the esthetic outcome. Mean advancement was 8.4mm (3.0-10.0) for the maxilla and 10.8mm (10.0-13.0) for the mandible. Following MMA, 12 out of 15 exhibited maxillary protrusion and six out of 15 mandibular protrusion. The mean change in the nasolabial angle was -5.7° (-27°; 14°). The postoperative profiles were preferred by 85% of the combined panels (P=<0.001), showing no significant difference from one panel to another. No skeletal characteristic could be correlated with the esthetic preference. Upper lip retrusion, open nasolabial angle and dolichofacial type emerged as positive preoperative predictors of esthetic preference. CONCLUSION: The profile changes following MMA were favorably perceived in the majority of cases. However, specific orthodontic preparation could be offered to patients with pronounced preoperative protrusion.
Subject(s)
Esthetics, Dental , Face/anatomy & histology , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Adult , Humans , Male , Mandibular Advancement , Maxilla/surgery , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Photography, Dental , Self Report , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Despite its high level of effectiveness, initial acceptance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and regular use in patients with obstructive sleep apneoa syndrome (OSAS) are still an issue. Alternatively, oral appliances (OAs) can be recommended. To improve patient engagement in their treatment, physicians are advised to take into account patient preferences and to share the therapeutic decision. We aimed to determine patients' preferences for OSAS treatment-related attributes, and to predict patients' demand for both CPAP and OAs. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed in 121 newly diagnosed patients consecutively recruited in a sleep unit. RESULTS: Regression parameters were the highest for impact on daily life and effectiveness ahead of side effects. In the French context, the demanding probabilities for CPAP and OAs were 60.2% and 36.2%, respectively. They were sensitive to the variation in the amount of out-of-pocket expenses for both CPAP and OAs. CONCLUSIONS: This first DCE in OSAS emphasises the importance to communicate with patients before the implementation of treatment.
Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Sleep/physiology , Choice Behavior , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Insomnia related to sleep apnoea (IA) is highly prevalent, and its proper treatment is still debated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that long-term auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) treatment improves IA symptoms. 80 patients (mean±sd age 54.9±10.6 yrs, respiratory disturbance index (RDI) 45.0±24.6 events·h(-1)) receiving APAP treatment were followed prospectively for 24 months. Somnolence and depression were assessed at baseline (T0) with the Epworth and the QD2A scales, respectively. Nightly APAP use was measured after 24 months of treatment (T24). The assessment of insomnia at T0 and T24 used the insomnia severity index (ISI). The combination of ISIT0 ≥15 and ISIT0-ISIT24 ≥9 defined the APAP-responding insomnia (APAP-RI) group. A logistic regression analysis identified the factors independently associated with the APAP-RI group. The ISI (13.7±5.7 versus 8.2±6.3) decreased significantly from T0 to T24 (p = 0.0001) for the patients as a whole, with a mean decrease of 13.5±2.9. Among the 39 insomniac subjects (T0), 20 belonged to the APAP-RI group (51%). The Epworth score (OR 1.536, 95% CI 1.093-2.159; p = 0.01) and the RDI (OR 1.080, 95% CI 1.010-1.154; p = 0.02) increased the risk of belonging to the APAP-RI group. IA symptoms improved with APAP treatment, and improvement was associated with the initial severity of the disease and somnolence in our population.
Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/adverse effects , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/etiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/physiopathology , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Compliance , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of symptoms evocative of obstructive sleep apnea (SE-OSA) and the magnitude of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underdiagnosis. METHODS: We used data from a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2008 in a representative sample of the French general population. Data were collected through interviews and self-administrated questionnaires and were complete for 12,203 adults (≥16 years old). SE-OSA was defined by snoring almost every night plus witnessed apneas or excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale score>10). RESULTS: The prevalence of SE-OSA was 4.9% (95% CI: 4.5-5.3), and that of self-reported OSA diagnosis was 2.4% (2.1-2.7). The prevalence of SE-OSA was 8% among people with hypertension and 11% among obese people. A previous sleep monitoring session was reported by 2.7% (2.4-3.0) of the participants and by 15.1% of people with SE-OSA. This latter proportion increased with age (24% in people with SE-OSA aged 60 years or over) and was higher in obese people (26%) and in those with chronic diseases (27% among people with hypertension). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of SE-OSA is high in France and OSA remains underdiagnosed, even in people with obesity or hypertension. Further efforts are needed to improve the diagnosis of OSA.
Subject(s)
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/epidemiology , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Prevalence , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to develop a tool to help clinicians inform patients about mechanical treatment options, continuous positive airway pressure and oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, and to assess its validity, reliability and acceptability. Continuous positive airway pressure is always indicated as a first-line treatment in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. However, oral appliances might be an effective treatment option in patients who fail treatment attempts, and also as a first-line treatment for patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea. To help patients choose their initial treatment, we developed an electronic decision board to present information regarding the potential benefits and side effects of the two treatment options, using the best available evidence. In 34 healthy volunteers, to test validity we evaluated the extent to which the respondents' preferences for a treatment changed predictably when the rate of effectiveness and side effects were modified. Reliability was tested by readministering the decision board 2 weeks afterwards (kappa test). The decision-board acceptability was evaluated in 99 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. We found that the decision board was valid. Reliability was excellent (κ = 0.94). Concerning acceptability, 72% of the patients were satisfied with the information provided in the decision board and 71% indicated that it helped them to make a decision. The average score of true/false test of knowledge was 7.9 of 10 (range 3-10). The decision board we developed is a valid, reliable and acceptable tool to assess patients' preferences.
Subject(s)
Communication , Decision Making , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Physician-Patient Relations , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Reproducibility of Results , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome (OSAS) and insomnia are common pathologies sharing a high comorbidity. CPAP is a cumbersome treatment. Yet, CPAP compliance must remain optimal in order to reverse excessive daytime sleepiness and prevent the cardiovascular consequences of OSAS. But chronic insomnia could negatively affect CPAP compliance. OBJECTIVE: To assess the consequences of insomnia symptoms on long-term CPAP use. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 148 OSAS patients (RDI=39.0+/-21.3/h), age=54.8+/-11.8years, BMI=29.1+/-6.3kg/m(2), Epworth Score=12.2+/-5.4, on CPAP. Using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) as an indicator of insomnia (ISI14=moderate to severe insomnia) and baseline data (anthropometric data, sleeping medication intakes, CPAP compliance, Epworth, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality and ISI scores, polygraphic recording data), Data Mining analysis identified the major rules explaining the features "High" or "Low ISI" and "High" or "Low Use" in the groups defined, according to the median values of the ISI and the 6th month-compliance, respectively. RESULTS: Median ISI was 15 and median 6th month-compliance was 4.38h/night. Moderate to severe insomnia complaint was found in 50% of patients. In the "High" and "Low ISI," the 6th month-compliance was not significantly different (3.7+/-2.3 vs 4.2+/-2.3h/night). In the classification models of compliance, the ISI was not a predictor of CPAP rejection or of long-term use, the predictor for explaining CPAP abandonment being the RDI, and the predictor of the 6th month-compliance being the one month-compliance. CONCLUSION: Insomnia symptoms were highly prevalent in OSAS patients, but had no impact on CPAP rejection or on long-term compliance.
Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/statistics & numerical data , Data Mining/methods , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This French, multicenter, randomized double-blind controlled trial tested the hypothesis that pressure reduction during exhalation (C-Flex; Respironics; Murrysville, PA) would improve continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compliance, comfort, and quality of life. METHODS: Two hundred eighteen newly diagnosed sleep apnea patients (seven centers; mean [+/- SD] age, 55 +/- 11 years; mean body mass index, 31 +/- 6 kg/m(2); mean apnea-hypopnea index, 44 +/- 21 events/h) were randomly assigned to receive 3 months of treatment with CPAP (108 patients) or C-Flex (110 patients). Objective compliance, generic quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-36) scores, disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (Grenoble Sleep Apnea Quality of Life [GrenobleSAQOL]) scores, and visual analog scales for CPAP comfort and side effects were determined at baseline and after 3 months. After 3 months, patients in the CPAP arm were moved to the C-Flex arm for 3 additional months (open study). RESULTS: An intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that there were no differences at 3 months between C-Flex and CPAP use in terms of compliance, the rate of side effects, and comfort. Low compliers receiving CPAP therapy (< 4 h of use) significantly improved this outcome during the open study (p = 0.04). There was a significant improvement in six of eight of the SF-36 domain scores and in all of the domains of the GrenobleSAQOL scores in both groups using either CPAP or C-Flex. CONCLUSION: In unselected sleep apnea patients, C-Flex was associated with similar outcomes to standard CPAP. Low compliers receiving CPAP therapy improved their adherence when moving to C-Flex. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Register Identifier: 08065291.
Subject(s)
Air Pressure , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Exhalation/physiology , Quality of Life , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/therapy , Adult , Body Mass Index , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Polysomnography , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) constitutes a non-negligible risk which requires management by specialists of the upper airways. When OSAS is diagnosed, it needs to be treated and different resources are listed. Different forms of treatment can be envisaged: positive pressure ventilation (VCPP), mandibular advancement devices (MAD), and surgery (soft and hard tissues). The authors focus especially the treatments for MAD, outlining their positive and negative impact on ventilation, TMJ, the bony base and interarch relationships.