Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 33
Filter
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; : 10781552241250010, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751088

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Due to the high toxicity of antineoplastic drugs, handling their packaging could lead to the chemical contamination of hospital environments and exposure risks to healthcare professionals and patients. This study aimed to assess the contamination of two main surfaces: the outer primary packaging of oral antineoplastic drug formulations (n = 36) available on the Swiss market and the surface of secondary packaging of injectable antineoplastic drug preparations (n = 60) produced by the pharmacy of a Swiss hospital and carriers used for transport (n = 5). METHODS: Samples were collected using a validated wipe sampling method. The simultaneous analysis of 24 antineoplastic drugs: 5-fluorouracil, busulfan, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, daunorubicin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, etoposide, gemcitabine, idarubicin, ifosfamide, irinotecan, methotrexate, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, raltitrexed, topotecan, treosulfan, vinblastine, vincristine) and 1 antiviral compound (ganciclovir) was performed by UHPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS: A total of 58% and 90% positive results were obtained for the primary packaging of oral chemotherapies and for the secondary packaging of injectable preparations, respectively. The highest quantities found on the primary packaging for oral chemotherapies and on the surface of closed leak-proof bags were 111 ng of methotrexate and 19 ng of gemcitabine, respectively. Gemcitabine (69%) and cyclophosphamide (38%) were the two most common contaminants found on the packaging of injectable preparations and carriers, regardless of the chemotherapy preparations. CONCLUSION: Trace levels (ng) of antineoplastic drugs can be found on most surfaces of all evaluated pharmaceutical products. Thus, suitable personal protective equipment is mandatory for healthcare professional handling antineoplastic drugs.

2.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 7: 1480-1489, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34648387

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Chemotherapies are considered high-risk drugs for patient and staff safety. Considering the rising burden of cancer and the increasing use of chemotherapy drugs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), promoting continuous improvements in the safety and quality of practices in these settings is essential. This paper describes the development and proof of concept of a toolkit to audit chemotherapy handling practices in the health care facilities of LMICs. METHODS: A steering committee defined the audit method and the toolkit content. Several checklists were developed to facilitate the audit and data collection. Items included in checklists were derived from key reference works on safe handling. Different tools were validated using Delphi surveys and expert reviews. Audits of pilot sites were performed to test the toolkit's applicability and relevance. RESULTS: The toolkit contains a 134-item global assessment tool for the different processes at each step of the medication pathway and three step-specific observation checklists to assess different health workers' practices during the prescription, preparation, and administration of chemotherapies. The toolkit also proposes using a surface-wipe sampling method to measure any cytotoxic contamination of the immediate environment. The toolkit was tested in three teaching hospitals in Africa. CONCLUSION: The toolkit developed was successfully implemented in a variety of LMIC settings, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the quality and safety of the chemotherapy drug handling practices in participating health care facilities. This toolkit can help facilities in LMICs to implement a new approach to continuously improving the quality and safety of their practices and ultimately ensure patient and staff safety.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Africa , Developing Countries , Health Personnel , Humans
3.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 28(2): 94-99, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33608437

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Optimise a wipe sampling procedure to evaluate the surface contamination for 23 antineoplastic drugs used in the hospital pharmacy. METHODS: The influence of various parameters (ie, sampling device, sampling solution, desorption modes) was evaluated using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method able to quantify 23 antineoplastic drugs widely used in the hospital pharmacy: 5-fluorouracil, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, daunorubicin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, etoposide, etoposide phosphate, fludarabine phosphate, ganciclovir, gemcitabine, idarubicin, ifosfamide, irinotecan, methotrexate, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, raltitrexed, topotecan and vincristine. Best conditions were tested with real samples from a hospital pharmacy chemotherapy compounding unit. RESULTS: Polyester swabs (TX714 and TX716) gave satisfactory results for the desorption step for all compounds with mean recoveries of 90% and 95%, respectively. For the wiping step, higher recoveries were obtained using TX716 and isopropanol 75% as wiping solution. As anticipated, most intense contaminations were found close to the chemotherapy production site, on surfaces the most frequently in contact with operators' hands. CONCLUSION: Wipe sampling method was successfully developed and applied to real samples to determine surface contamination with 23 antineoplastic agents in trace amounts.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Antineoplastic Agents/analysis , Chromatography, Liquid , Ifosfamide/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods
5.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0235131, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32569333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Residual contamination by intravenous conventional antineoplastic drugs (ICAD) is still a daily issue in hospital facilities. This study aimed to compare the efficiency (EffQ) of 4 different solutions to remove 23 widely used ICADs from surfaces. METHOD AND FINDINGS: A solution containing 23 ICADs (4 alkylating agents, 8 antimetabolites, 2 topo-I inhibitors, 6 topo-II inhibitors and 3 spindle poisons) was spread over 100 cm2 stainless steel. After drying, decontamination was carried out using 10×10 cm wipes moistened with 300 µL of one of the following solutions: 70% isopropanol (S1); ethanol-hydrogen peroxide 91.6-50.0 mg/g (S2); 10-2 M sodium dodecyl sulphate/isopropanol 80/20 (S3) or 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (S4). Six tests were performed for each decontamination solution. Two modalities were tested: a single wipe motion from top to bottom or vigorous wiping (n = 6 for each modality). Residual contamination was measured with a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection method. Solution efficiency (in %) was computed as follows: EffQ = 1-(quantity after decontamination/quantity before decontamination), as median (min-max) for the 23 ICADs. The overall decontamination efficiency (EffQ) of the 4 solutions was compared by a Kruskall-Wallis test. Decontamination modalities were compared for each solution and per ICAD with a Mann-Whitney test (p<0.05). EffQ were significantly different from one solution to the next for single wipe motion decontamination: 79.9% (69.3-100), 86.5% (13.0-100), 85.4% (56.5-100) and 100% (52.9-100) for S1, S2, S3 and S4 (p<0.0001), respectively. Differences were also significant for vigorous decontamination: EffQ of 84.3% (66.0-100), 92.3% (68.7-100), 99.6% (84.8-100) and 100% (82.9-100) for S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively (p<0.0001). Generally, vigorous decontamination increased EffQ for all tested solutions and more significantly for the surfactant. CONCLUSION: Decontamination efficiency depended on the solution used but also on the application modality. An SDS admixture seems to be a good alternative to sodium hypochlorite, notably after vigorous chemical decontamination with no hazard either to materials or workers.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/isolation & purification , Decontamination , Drug Contamination , Solutions , Stainless Steel , Surface Properties
6.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 64(2): 114-124, 2020 02 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31848570

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Over the past 40 years, numerous actions have been undertaken to decrease the contamination of hospital facilities by intravenous conventional antineoplastic drugs (ICADs) such as centralizing compounding in pharmacies, using personal protective equipment, specific compounding, or infusion devices. As recently proposed in the monograph, an additional specific decontamination step must be envisaged. A recent literature review analysed and discussed the different solutions tested in terms of decontamination efficacy. This article aims to discuss the performance of these solutions in the framework of aseptic compounding. METHODS: The same dataset used in the previous literature review was reanalysed according to other parameters so as to select decontamination solutions: overall decontamination efficiency (EffQ), tested contaminants, and the risks of use in daily practice. RESULTS: Using an EffQ threshold of 90% resulted in discarding 26 out of the 59 solutions. Solutions were tested differently: 8 on 1 contaminant, 11 on 2 contaminants, and 14 solutions on between 3 and 11 contaminants. Three risks were identified to help make choices in routine practice: the mutagenicity of degradation products, the safety of operators and facilities, and respect for the aseptic environment. CONCLUSIONS: From the results, performance is discussed according to specific situations: a one-time incident or the basic chemical contamination due to daily practice. Accordingly, the decontamination solution selected then required a risk analysis and an evaluation before implementing it in the daily practice of a compounding unit.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations , Antineoplastic Agents , Decontamination , Humans , Occupational Exposure/analysis
7.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 172: 139-148, 2019 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31035095

ABSTRACT

The validation and uncertainty assessment of the analytical method developed for the simultaneous determination of 25 anticancer drugs commonly handled in hospital pharmacy was reported. Selected compounds were 5-fluorouracil, cytarabine, fludarabine phosphate, ganciclovir, gemcitabine, dacarbazine, methotrexate, pemetrexed, busulfan, raltitrexed, etoposide phosphate, topotecan, ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, irinotecan, doxorubicin, epirubicin, daunorubicin, idarubicin, vincristine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, docetaxel and paclitaxel. Accuracy and uncertainty profiles were obtained for all compounds. Quantitative performances were satisfactory in term of specificity, sensitivity, precision and accuracy. Repeatability (1.9-25.4%) and intermediate precision (2.7-29%) were determined for all target compounds. Lower limits of quantification between 1 and 25 ng/mL were obtained. Uncertainty associated to measurement of routine samples was evaluated. The multi-targeted method was specific and reliable and was successfully applied to wipe samples from hospital pharmacy chemotherapy compounding unit and to the determination of outside contamination of vials from pharmaceutical manufacturers.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/analysis , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Hazardous Substances/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Decontamination , Drug Compounding/standards , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Uncertainty
8.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 25(4): 929-946, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30786823

ABSTRACT

Although considerable efforts have been made over the last 40 years, occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs is still a daily concern, since eradicating such contamination from workplaces seems unattainable. Considerable data are currently available on the risks associated with their use at work. Hospital facilities are often cleaned with marketed antimicrobials whose chemical decontamination efficacy certainly differs but remains unknown. To keep compounding facilities sterile, alcohol-based solutions are frequently used but with very limited efficiency. It would be particularly useful if a decontamination method could be added to the means already available so that all conventional antineoplastic drug contamination could be removed. Several degradation methods or desorption methods have previously been experimented, with varying success. They have never been compared or discussed in terms either of efficiency or usability. This review aims to analyse and discuss the results of each degradation or decontamination procedure and to compare them. This should facilitate selection of the method to be implemented in daily practice.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/analysis , Decontamination/methods , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Humans , Workplace
9.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 164: 395-401, 2019 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30439666

ABSTRACT

This study reports the use of retention modeling software for the successful method development of 24 injectable antineoplastic agents. Firstly, a generic screening of several stationary and mobile phases (using various organic modifiers and pH) was achieved. Then, an optimization procedure of mobile phase temperature, gradient profile and mobile phase binary composition was conducted through only 28 real experiments using retention modeling software for data treatment. Finally, the optimized separation was achieved with a mobile phase consisting in 10 mM acetic acid at pH 5.1 (A) and acetonitrile (B). A Waters CORTECS® T3 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.6 µm) operated at 25 °C with a gradient time of 17.5 min (0-51%B) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min was used. The prediction offered by the retention model was found to be highly reliable, with an average error lower than 1%. A robustness testing step was also assessed from a virtual experimental design. Success rate and regression coefficient were evaluated without the need to perform any real experiment. The developed LC-MS method was successfully applied to the analysis of pharmaceutical formulations and wiping samples from working environment.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/analysis , Chemical Safety/methods , Models, Chemical , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/methods , Safety Management/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/instrumentation , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Computer Simulation , Drug Compounding , Software , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/instrumentation , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Temperature
10.
Med Sci (Paris) ; 35(12): 1146-1152, 2019 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31903929

ABSTRACT

Biosimilars marketing authorization requires a strict demonstration of similarity with the reference antibody, through preclinical and clinical studies. This article reviews the panel of in vitro physicochemical and functional analyses, which are performed prior to clinical studies. For each critical attribute of the antibody, we detail the commonly used analytical techniques, their working principle and the type of information they may give.


TITLE: Anticorps monoclonaux biosimilaires - Étude comparative des qualités analytique et fonctionnelle. ABSTRACT: La mise sur le marché de biosimilaires requiert une démonstration stricte de la similarité avec l'anticorps de référence, au travers d'études précliniques et cliniques. Cet article synthétise l'ensemble des analyses physicochimiques et fonctionnelles mises en œuvre in vitro, préalables à la réalisation d'études cliniques. Pour chaque caractéristique critique de l'anticorps, nous avons détaillé les techniques analytiques communément employées, leur principe de fonctionnement, ainsi que le type d'informations que ces techniques permettent d'obtenir.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/pharmacology , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/standards , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/standards , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Quality Control , Research Design
11.
PLoS One ; 13(8): e0201335, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30089139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of closed system drug transfer devices (CSTD), residual contamination from antineoplastic drugs is still detected inside isolators. The aim of this study was to compare the decontamination level obtained using a CSTD + standard cleaning procedure with a CSTD + standard cleaning procedure + specific decontamination procedure. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A comparative and prospective study was carried out in a newly opened compounding unit. Compounding was performed with a CSTD (BD-Phaseal, Becton-Dickinson). In the Control isolator (C), the cleaning process was completed daily with a standard biocide solution (AnioxysprayTM, Anios, France). In the Intervention isolator (I), weekly decontamination with a homemade admixture of sodium dodecyl sulfate 10(-2) M/70% isopropanol (80/20, v/v) was added. Monitoring was performed via a validated LC-MS/MS method. Eight drugs (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, fluorouracile, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, irinotecan and methotrexate) were monitored daily over 14 consecutive weeks on three sites inside the isolators: gloves, workbench and window. Results are presented as the odds-ratio (OR) of contamination and as overall decontamination efficiency (EffQ, %). The proportion of EffQ ≥ 90% was assessed by a Fisher's exact test (p<0.05). Overall contamination rates (CR, %) were significantly different from one isolator to the other (CRC = 25.3% vs. CRI = 10.4%; OR = 0.341; p<0.0001). Overall EffQ values (median; 1st and 3rd quartiles) were higher in the intervention isolator (I: 78.3% [34.6%;92.6%] vs. C: 59.5% [-5.5%;72.6%]; p = 0.0015) as well as the proportion of days with an EffQ ≥ 90% (I: 42.9% vs. C: 7.1%; p = 0.077) but very variable depending on drugs. CONCLUSION: Adding a decontamination protocol with a tensioactive agent to a CSTD leads to better control of chemical contamination inside isolators. Improving decontamination by increasing decontamination frequency or modifying the protocol will be further studied.


Subject(s)
2-Propanol/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Decontamination/methods , Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate/chemistry , Prospective Studies
12.
Electrophoresis ; 39(20): 2512-2520, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29427392

ABSTRACT

Two capillary electrophoresis (CE) methods were developed for the analysis of 16 antineoplastic drugs contained in injectable pharmaceutical formulations. A capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) method coupled to UV was developed with a background electrolyte (BGE) made of a 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 2.5 containing 50% v/v of acetonitrile and dynamic coating of capillaries with Ceofix®. This method allowed the analysis of doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, daunorubicin, irinotecan, topotecan, vincristine, vindesine, vinblastine, and vinorelbine in less than 8 min. A micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) method coupled to UV was also developed for the determination of methotrexate, pemetrexed, etoposide, etoposide phosphate, fludarabine phosphate, and 5-fluorouracil. A run time of 16 min was obtained with a BGE made of 50 mM borate buffer at pH 9.2 with 80 mM of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 20% v/v of acetonitrile. For both methods, the applied voltage was 30 kV and the sample injection was performed in the hydrodynamic mode. All analyses were carried out in fused silica capillaries with an internal diameter of 50 µm and a total length of 64.5 cm. Both methods were validated and trueness values between 99.4 and 101.3% were obtained with repeatability and intermediate precision values of 0.5-1.8% for all drugs. These methods were found appropriate for controlling injectable pharmaceutical formulations containing antineoplastic drugs and successfully applied in quality control.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/analysis , Electrophoresis, Capillary/methods , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet/methods , Linear Models , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
13.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 147: 493-505, 2018 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28688616

ABSTRACT

Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs) are innovative biopharmaceuticals gaining increasing attention over the last two decades. The concept of ADCs lead to new therapy approaches in numerous oncological indications as well in infectious diseases. Currently, around 60 CECs are in clinical trials indicating the expanding importance of this class of protein therapeutics. ADCs show unprecedented intrinsic heterogeneity and address new quality attributes which have to be assessed. Liquid chromatography is one of the most frequently used analytical method for the characterization of ADCs. This review summarizes recent results in the chromatographic characterization of ADCs and supposed to provide a general overview on the possibilities and limitations of current approaches for the evaluation of drug load distribution, determination of average drug to antibody ratio (DARav), and for the analysis of process/storage related impurities. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), reversed phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and multidimensional separations are discussed focusing on the analysis of marketed ADCs. Fundamentals and aspects of method development are illustrated with applications for each technique. Future perspectives in hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), HIC, SEC and ion exchange chromatography (IEX) are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/analysis , Biopharmaceutics/trends , Chromatography, Reverse-Phase/trends , Immunoconjugates/analysis , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/chemistry , Biopharmaceutics/methods , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/trends , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Chromatography, Liquid/trends , Chromatography, Reverse-Phase/methods , Humans , Immunoconjugates/chemistry
14.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 74(22): 1887-1894, 2017 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29118046

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The stability of busulfan solution in 0.9% sodium chloride and stored in polypropylene syringes or infusion bags was evaluated. METHODS: Busulfan solutions (0.54 mg/mL) were prepared and transferred to 50-mL polypropylene syringes and 100- and 500-mL polypropylene infusion bags and stored at 2-8 and 23-27 °C. Chemical stability was measured using a stability-indicating, ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method. The stability of busulfan was assessed by measuring the percentage of the initial concentration remaining at the end of each time point of analysis. The initial busulfan concentration was defined as 100%. Stability was defined as retention of at least 90% of the initial busulfan concentration. A visual inspection of the samples for particulate matter, clarity, and color without instrumentation of magnification was conducted at each time point of analysis. RESULTS: The visual inspection demonstrated no influence of the storage container when busulfan infusions diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride injection were stored at 23-27 °C. No color change or precipitate was observed at this temperature; however, a rapid decrease of the busulfan content in all containers stored at room temperature was observed. Busulfan in syringes was chemically stable for 12 hours, while busulfan in infusion bags (100 and 500 mL) was stable only for 3 hours at 23-27 °C. CONCLUSION: Busulfan 0.54-mg/mL solution in 0.9% sodium chloride injection was physically and chemically stable for 30 hours when stored in 50-mL polypropylene syringes at 2-8 °C and protected from light.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/chemistry , Busulfan/chemistry , Pharmaceutical Solutions/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/analysis , Busulfan/analysis , Drug Packaging , Drug Stability , Drug Storage , Syringes
15.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; : 1078155217732629, 2017 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28975863

ABSTRACT

Purpose Ganciclovir is increasingly provided by hospital pharmacy production unit in a ready-to-use form, in order to improve the safety of healthcare workers and the efficiency of the organisation. The objective of this study was to develop a stability-indicating method to assay ganciclovir and determine the stability of ganciclovir in syringes (5 mg/mL) and infusion bags (0.25 and 5 mg/mL) at two different temperatures. Method Ganciclovir solutions (0.25 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL) in 0.9% sodium chloride were prepared in 50 mL polypropylene syringes or 100 mL polypropylene infusion bags and stored at 2-8℃ and 23-27℃. The chemical stability was measured using a stability-indicating Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method. Physical stability was assessed by visual inspection. Results No significant loss of ganciclovir under any of the tested conditions was observed in this study. All solutions remained clear through the study period. Conclusion All tested formulations remained stable for at least 185 days independently of container type, temperature or concentration studied.

16.
Analyst ; 142(13): 2273-2321, 2017 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28560370

ABSTRACT

The number of patients suffering from cancer is constantly increasing and, consequently, the number of different chemotherapy treatments administered is increasing. Given the high reactivity and toxicity of antineoplastic drugs, analytical methods are required in all pharmaceutical fields, from drug development to their elimination in wastewater; including formulation quality control, environment and human exposure and therapeutic drug monitoring. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the analytical methods available for the determination of antineoplastic drugs in different matrices such as pharmaceutical formulations, biological and environmental samples. The applicability and performance of the reported methods will be critically discussed, with focus on the most commonly used antineoplastic drugs. Only conventional compounds and small molecules for targeted therapy will be considered in the present review.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Quality Control
17.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 23(2): 83-92, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26637408

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives Centralized chemotherapy preparation units have established systematic strategies to avoid errors. Our work aimed to evaluate the accuracy of manual preparations associated with different control methods. Method A simulation study in an operational setting used phenylephrine and lidocaine as markers. Each operator prepared syringes that were controlled using a different method during each of three sessions (no control, visual double-checking, and gravimetric control). Eight reconstitutions and dilutions were prepared in each session, with variable doses and volumes, using different concentrations of stock solutions. Results were analyzed according to qualitative (choice of stock solution) and quantitative criteria (accurate, <5% deviation from the target concentration; weakly accurate, 5%-10%; inaccurate, 10%-30%; wrong, >30% deviation). Results Eleven operators carried out 19 sessions. No final preparation (n = 438) contained a wrong drug. The protocol involving no control failed to detect 1 of 3 dose errors made and double-checking failed to detect 3 of 7 dose errors. The gravimetric control method detected all 5 out of 5 dose errors. The accuracy of the doses measured was equivalent across the control methods ( p = 0.63 Kruskal-Wallis). The final preparations ranged from 58% to 60% accurate, 25% to 27% weakly accurate, 14% to 17% inaccurate and 0.9% wrong. A high variability was observed between operators. Discussion Gravimetric control was the only method able to detect all dose errors, but it did not improve dose accuracy. A dose accuracy with <5% deviation cannot always be guaranteed using manual production. Automation should be considered in the future.


Subject(s)
Drug Compounding/methods , Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Quality Control , Drug Compounding/standards , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/chemistry , Phenylephrine/administration & dosage , Phenylephrine/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Simulation Training/methods , Specific Gravity , Syringes
18.
Sci Total Environ ; 547: 244-253, 2016 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26789362

ABSTRACT

The wastewater contamination of a Swiss university hospital by active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) residues was evaluated with a three months monitoring campaign at the outlet of the main building. Flow-proportional samples were collected with an automatic refrigerated sampler and analyzed for 15 API, including antibiotics, analgesics, antiepileptic and anti-inflammatory drugs, by using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The metals Gd and Pt were also analyzed using ICP-MS. Measured concentrations were compared to the predicted ones calculated after the drug average consumption data obtained from the hospital pharmacy. The hospital contribution to the total urban load was calculated according to the consumption data obtained from city pharmacies. Lastly, the environmental hazard and risk quotients (RQ) related to the hospital fraction and the total urban consumption were calculated. Median concentrations of the 15 selected compounds were ranging from 0.04 to 675 µg/L, with a mean detection frequency of 84%. The ratio between predicted and measured environmental concentrations (PEC/MEC) has shown a good accuracy for 5 out of 15 compounds, revealing over- and under-estimations of the PEC model. Mean daily loads were ranging between 0.01 and 14.2g/d, with the exception of paracetamol (109.7 g/d). The hospital contribution to the total urban loads varied from 2.1 to 100% according to the compound. While taking into account dilution and removal efficiencies in wastewater treatment plant, only the hospital fraction of the antibiotics ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole showed, respectively, a high (RQ>1) and moderate (RQ>0.1) risk for the aquatic ecosystems. Nevertheless, when considering the total urban consumption, 7 compounds showed potential deleterious effects on aquatic organisms (RQ>1): gabapentin, sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin, ibuprofen, diclofenac and mefenamic acid. In order to reduce inputs of API residues originating from hospitals various solutions can be envisioned. With results of the present study, hospital managers can start handling this important issue.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Hospitals, University , Pharmaceutical Preparations/analysis , Wastewater/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Ecosystem , Risk Assessment , Switzerland , Waste Disposal, Fluid
19.
Chimia (Aarau) ; 69(11): 684-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26671054

ABSTRACT

A multi-residue analytical method was developed and validated for the quantification of 11 selected active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and 2 human metabolites in hospital effluents using solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Targeted analytes belong to different therapeutic classes: non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), analgesics, antibiotics and psychiatric drugs. Solid-phase extraction recoveries ranged between 21 and 101% for the selected API. Calibration curves were built with 6 standard samples prepared in ultrapure water ranging from 0.05 to 10 µg/L and showed regression coefficients above 0.994. The instrumental detection limits (IDL) varied between 0.05 and 5 µg/L, and the method detection limits (MDL) between 0.1 and 100 ng/L. Precision of the method, evaluated with spiked water samples at four different concentrations, varied between 84 and 117% for all compounds and an overall variability below 20%, with the exception of carbamazepine (71-123%). Except for two compounds, recoveries of spiked hospital wastewaters at four different concentrations (0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µg/L) varied between 44 and 133%, with relative standard deviation (RSD) between 0.6 and 28.5%. The evaluation of the matrix effects showed that diluted samples exhibit lower signal suppression. Analysis of effluent samples from a Swiss university hospital resulted in a mean detection frequency of 92% for the selected compounds, with concentrations up to 1535 µg/L for the analgesic paracetamol.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Hospitals, University , Pharmaceutical Preparations/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Wastewater/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Reference Standards , Switzerland
20.
J Environ Manage ; 160: 324-32, 2015 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26144564

ABSTRACT

The important number of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) available on the market along with their potential adverse effects in the aquatic ecosystems, lead to the development of prioritization methods, which allow choosing priority molecules to monitor based on a set of selected criteria. Due to the large volumes of API used in hospitals, an increasing attention has been recently paid to their effluents as a source of environmental pollution. Based on the consumption data of a Swiss university hospital, about hundred of API has been prioritized following an OPBT approach (Occurrence, Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity). In addition, an Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) allowed prioritizing API based on predicted concentrations and environmental toxicity data found in the literature for 71 compounds. Both prioritization approaches were compared. OPBT prioritization results highlight the high concern of some non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antiviral drugs, whereas antibiotics are revealed by ERA as potentially problematic to the aquatic ecosystems. Nevertheless, according to the predicted risk quotient, only the hospital fraction of ciprofloxacin represents a risk to the aquatic organisms. Some compounds were highlighted as high-priority with both methods: ibuprofen, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, ritonavir, gabapentin, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, raltegravir, propofol, etc. Analyzing consumption data and building prioritization lists helped choosing about 15 API to be monitored in hospital wastewaters. The API ranking approach adopted in this study can be easily transposed to any other hospitals, which have the will to look at the contamination of their effluents.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Pharmaceutical Preparations/chemistry , Wastewater/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Hospitals , Humans , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...