Aspirin resistance in patients with ventricular assist devices-A follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Despite combined anticoagulation therapy consisting of a vitamin K antagonist and an antiplatelet agent, thromboembolic complications often occur in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). In addition, bleeding events are also common. Resistance to antiplatelet drugs is a well-known phenomenon; however, the utilization of laboratory chemistry testing for the presence of such resistance, and then switching therapy, is controversial. METHODS: We tested 132 patients with LVAD (HeartWare n = 57, HeartMate II n = 22, HeartMate 3 n = 53) on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) therapy for resistance and followed them for a maximum of 7 years regarding pump thrombosis. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and impedance aggregometry (IPA) were performed for testing platelet function. RESULTS: We could show that patients with ASA resistance displayed an increased risk of pump thrombosis, regardless of the test used (LTA: OR = 6.20, CI [1.86-20.64], p = 0.003; IPA: OR = 12.14, CI [3.00-49.07], p < 0.001). In patients with a HeartMate 3, we could not detect any pump thrombosis associated with aspirin resistance. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in bleeding events between patients with ASA resistance and ASA responders. CONCLUSION: Laboratory testing of ASA resistance seems to be a good tool to detect an increased risk of pump thrombosis, at least for patients with a HeartWare or HeartMate II. The extent to which these thromboses can be prevented with a change of medication has to be investigated in further studies. No pump thrombosis was detected in patients with a HeartMate 3, and the question should be asked as to what constellation of underlying and concomitant diseases must be present to justify ASA therapy for these patients.

Treatment Algorithm for Patients With von Willebrand Syndrome Type 2A and Congenital Heart Disease-A Treatment Algorithm May Reduce Perioperative Blood Loss in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.

OBJECTIVES: In children with congenital heart disease (CHD), excessive perioperative bleeding is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, thus making adequate perioperative hemostasis crucial. We investigate the prevalence of acquired von Willebrand syndrome type 2A (aVWS) in CHD and develop a treatment algorithm for patients with aVWS and CHD (TAPAC) to reduce perioperative blood loss. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center study. PATIENTS: A total of 627 patients with CHD, undergoing corrective cardiac surgery between January 2008 and May 2017. INTERVENTIONS: The evaluation of perioperative bleeding risk was based on the laboratory parameters von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen, ristocetin cofactor activity, platelet function analyzer (PFA) closure time adenosine diphosphate, and PFA epinephrine. According to the bleeding risk, treatment was performed with desmopressin or VWF. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: aVWS was confirmed in 63.3 %, with a prevalence of 45.5% in the moderate and 66.3 % in the high-risk group. In addition, prevalence increased with ascending peak velocity above the stenosis (v max ) from 40.0% at less than or equal to 3 m/s to 83.3% at greater than 5 m/s. TAPAC reduced mean blood loss by 36.3% in comparison with a historical control cohort ( p < 0.001), without increasing the number of thrombotic or thromboembolic events during the hospital stay. With ascending v max , there was an increase in perioperative blood loss in the historical cohort ( p < 0.001), which was not evident in the TAPAC cohort ( p = 0.230). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of aVWS in CHD seems to be higher than assumed and leads to significantly higher perioperative blood loss, especially at high v max . Identifying these patients through appropriate laboratory analytics and adequate treatment could reduce blood loss effectively.

Humoral and cellular immune response levels at a 1-year follow-up after mild COVID-19.

The primary objective of this study was to establish a 1-year follow-up of patients after mild COVID-19 with no or only short-term detection of antibodies shortly after disease. At 1 year after disease, cellular memory against SARS-CoV-2, as measured by IFN-γ release by T cells, was detected in 76% (38/50) of participants. The data suggest that even if antibody levels decline after the primary infection has resolved, a cellular immune response may be detectable for longer.

Retrospective analysis of 426 donors of a convalescent collective after mild COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread across the world. The aim of our study was to characterize mild courses and to determine the antibody status for these patients. METHODS: We initiated an appeal for convalescent plasma donations. 615 people contacted us, and we ultimately included 426 in our analyses, in whom it was possible to assume COVID-19 based on detection of specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies or virus detection during the disease using RT-PCR. RESULTS: The median duration of the disease was 12 days and the most common symptoms were fatigue, cough and olfactory and gustatory dysfunction. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was detected in 82.4% of the persons and IgA antibodies were found in 73.9%. In 10.8%, no antibodies were detectable despite a positive RT-PCR result during the disease. Nevertheless, of 24 persons with asymptomatic courses of COVID-19, antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 could be detected in 23 (96%). Furthermore, there was a correlation between the duration of the disease and the detection of IgG antibodies. In addition, a correlation between the determined IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies was shown. CONCLUSION: In this study, we were able to describe mild COVID-19 courses and determine antibody statuses for them. It could be shown that, despite SARS-CoV-2 detection during the disease, not all individuals developed antibodies or their level of antibodies had dropped below the detection limit shortly after the end of the disease. The extent to which immunity to re-infection is given in persons with undetectable antibodies (IgG, IgA) needs to be investigated in future studies.

Direct oral anticoagulants and cardiac surgery: A descriptive study of preoperative management and postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Recommendations for perioperative management of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment in cardiac surgery are lacking. To establish a standardized approach for these patients, we compared hemorrhagic complications and clinical outcomes in patients on DOAC medication, patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and patients without preoperative anticoagulation. METHODS: All 3 groups underwent major cardiac surgery and were retrospectively analyzed: patients on DOAC were advised to take their last DOAC dose 4 days before hospital admission, and DOAC plasma levels were measured the day before surgery. In patients with plasma levels of >30 ng/mL, surgery was postponed until plasma level was below this threshold level. Postoperative chest tube drainage, bleeding complications, use of blood products, and thromboembolic events were collected for all groups. RESULTS: A total of 5439 patients no anticoagulation, 239 patients on VKA, and 487 patients on DOAC medication were included between April 2014 and July 2017. Adjusted postoperative chest tube drainage did not differ between the DOAC and VKA groups for the strategy applied in this study (380 mL/12 hours vs 360 mL/12 hours). Moreover, secondary endpoint measures, such as rethoracotomy (30 [6.16%] vs 15 [6.28%]), 30-day-mortality 12 [2.46%] vs 7 [2.93%]), blood-product use, and stroke, were not significantly different through implementation of our standardized study management (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our standardized management for perioperative discontinuation of DOAC therapy may provide a safe approach to minimize hemorrhagic complications in cardiac surgery in patients on DOACs.

Direct oral anticoagulants and heparins: laboratory values and pitfalls in 'bridging therapy'.

Objectives: The three direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban are now widely used in clinical practice. For patients requiring perioperative interruption of DOACs, heparin bridging is still under discussion. Here we show, for the first time, the influence of concomitantly used DOACs and heparins on laboratory assays. Methods: For spiking experiments, 10 healthy donors and nine patients treated with DOACs were investigated. The measurement of DOACs and heparins was performed with routine methods on the ACL TOP [HEMOCLOT ® direct thrombin inhibitor (CoaChrom Diagnostica, Austria), COAMATIC ® Heparin (Chromogenix, USA) calibrated with rivaroxaban, apixaban, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), additionally PT reagent RecombiPlasTin 2G and aPTT reagent SynthASil (Instrumentation Laboratory, Germany)] and the DOACs were additionally quantified with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A linear regression model has been used to estimate the effect of DOAC prestimulation. Results: No influence of dabigatran could be demonstrated in the anti-Xa testing methods for LMWH, UFH, rivaroxaban or apixaban. All FXa-inhibiting drugs affected all the anti-Xa testing methods in their own specific ways. Compared with heparin alone, measurement of heparins in samples with a basic concentration of DOACs (200 ng/ml) displays a more dramatic increase. Samples of patients with therapeutic intake of DOACs spiked with UFH and LMWH showed the expected pharmacokinetic profiles, but increased pharmacodynamic effects. Conclusions: Direct thrombin and FXa inhibitors exhibit distinct effects on assay results when used concomitantly with heparins. These interactions must be considered in the interpretation of assay results during bridging therapy.

UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry Method for Measurement of the Coagulation Inhibitors Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban in Human Plasma and Its Comparison with Functional Assays.

INTRODUCTION: The fast, precise, and accurate measurement of the new generation of oral anticoagulants such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban in patients' plasma my provide important information in different clinical circumstances such as in the case of suspicion of overdose, when patients switch from existing oral anticoagulant, in patients with hepatic or renal impairment, by concomitant use of interaction drugs, or to assess anticoagulant concentration in patients' blood before major surgery. METHODS: Here, we describe a quick and precise method to measure the coagulation inhibitors dabigatran and rivaroxaban using ultra-performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) mode (UPLC-MRM MS). Internal standards (ISs) were added to the sample and after protein precipitation; the sample was separated on a reverse phase column. After ionization of the analytes the ions were detected using electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. Run time was 2.5 minutes per injection. Ion suppression was characterized by means of post-column infusion. RESULTS: The calibration curves of dabigatran and rivaroxaban were linear over the working range between 0.8 and 800 µg/L (r >0.99). Limits of detection (LOD) in the plasma matrix were 0.21 µg/L for dabigatran and 0.34 µg/L for rivaroxaban, and lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) in the plasma matrix were 0.46 µg/L for dabigatran and 0.54 µg/L for rivaroxaban. The intraassay coefficients of variation (CVs) for dabigatran and rivaroxaban were < 4% and 6%; respectively, the interassay CVs were < 6% for dabigatran and < 9% for rivaroxaban. Inaccuracy was < 5% for both substances. The mean recovery was 104.5% (range 83.8-113.0%) for dabigatran and 87.0% (range 73.6-105.4%) for rivaroxaban. No significant ion suppressions were detected at the elution times of dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Both coagulation inhibitors were stable in citrate plasma at -20°C, 4°C and even at RT for at least one week. A method comparison between our UPLC-MRM MS method, the commercially available automated Direct Thrombin Inhibitor assay (DTI assay) for dabigatran measurement from CoaChrom Diagnostica, as well as the automated anti-Xa assay for rivaroxaban measurement from Chromogenix both performed by ACL-TOP showed a high degree of correlation. However, UPLC-MRM MS measurement of dabigatran and rivaroxaban has a much better selectivity than classical functional assays measuring activities of various coagulation factors which are susceptible to interference by other coagulant drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we developed and validated a sensitive and specific UPLC-MRM MS assay for the quick and specific measurement of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in human plasma.

Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, argatroban and fondaparinux and their effects on coagulation POC and platelet function tests.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, several selectively acting anticoagulants, including the direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI; argatroban, dabigatran) and the factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, fondaparinux), have been developed. With their clinical application increasing, it is of interest to evaluate their interference with classical haemostaseological point-of-care tests. Additionally, the effect of the investigated anticoagulants on platelet function tests will come increasingly more into focus for monitoring not only hereditary platelet dysfunction, but also antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Blood samples from healthy volunteers were spiked with therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations of the drugs listed above and investigated with regard to their effects on the following POCTs: activated clotting time (ACT), thromboelastometry with ROTEM, PFA and Multiplate. Light-transmission aggregometry (LTA) was used for a platelet function assay. RESULTS: At supratherapeutic concentrations, ACT and ROTEM analysis were always influenced after administration of the drugs listed above (except fondaparinux in EXTEM-CT). Therapeutic concentrations showed differential effects on these assays. LTA measurements revealed a distinct decrease in α-thrombin-induced platelet aggregation for both DTIs (therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations), while argatroban reduced platelet function in supratherapeutic concentrations. None of the drugs seemed to have any influence on PFA or Multiplate. CONCLUSIONS: Selective thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors exhibit distinct effects on POCTs and platelet function tests. This must be considered in assessing assay results when taking medical decisions.