Endothelial dysfunction in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors: changes over time.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is estimated to comprise about 290,560 new cases in 2022. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are recommended as adjuvant treatment for estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women, which includes approximately two-thirds of all women with breast cancer. AIs inhibit the peripheral conversion of androgens to estrogen by deactivation of the aromatase enzyme, leading to a reduction in serum estrogen level in postmenopausal women with ER+ breast carcinoma. Estrogen is known for its cardiovascular (CV) protective properties through a variety of mechanisms including vasodilation of blood vessels and inhibition of vascular injury resulting in the prevention of atherosclerosis. In clinical trials and prospective cohorts, the long-term use of AIs can increase the risk for hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Studies demonstrate mixed results as to the impact of AIs on actual CV events and overall survival. METHODS: A single arm longitudinal study of 14 postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer prescribed adjuvant AIs at the University of Minnesota (UMN). Subjects with a history of known tobacco use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes were excluded to eliminate potential confounding factors. Participants underwent routine labs, blood pressure assessments, and vascular testing at baseline (prior to starting AIs) and at six months. Vascular assessment was performed using the EndoPAT 2000 and HDI/PulseWave CR-2000 Cardiovascular Profiling System and pulse contour analysis on two occasions as previously described. Vascular measurements were conducted by one trained vascular technician. Assessments were performed in triplicate, and the mean indices were used for analyses. All subjects were on an AI at the follow-up visit. The protocol was approved by the UMN Institutional Review Board and all participants were provided written informed consent. Baseline and follow-up characteristics were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). RESULTS: After six months of AI treatment, EndoPAT® ratio declined to a median 1.12 (Q1: 0.85, Q3: 1.86; p = 0.045; Figure 1) and median estradiol levels decreased to 2 pg/mL (Q1: 2, Q3: 3; p=0.052). There was no evidence of association between change in EndoPAT® and change in estradiol level (p = 0.91). There were no statistically significant changes in small or large arterial elasticity. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesize that long-term use of AI can lead to persistent endothelial dysfunction, and further investigation is necessary. In our study, patients were on AI for approximately 5-10 years. As a result, we do not have data on whether these changes, such as EndoPAT® ratio and the elasticity of small and large arterial, are reversible with discontinuation of AI. These findings set the stage for a larger study to more conclusively determine the association between AI exposure and cardiovascular outcomes. Further studies should evaluate for multivariate associations withmodifiable risk factors for CV disease.

Endothelial Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors on Aromatase Inhibitors: Changes over Time.

Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are recommended as adjuvant treatment for estrogen-receptor positive breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women. Studies demonstrate mixed results as to the impact of AIs on cardiovascular (CV) events and overall survival. With the increasing number of pre- and postmenopausal women on AIs for five to ten years, understanding the long-term impact of AIs on blood vessels and CV risk in cancer survivors is vital. Methods: A single arm longitudinal study of 14 postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer prescribed adjuvant AIs at the University of Minnesota. Subjects with a history of tobacco use, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia were excluded. Participants underwent routine labs, blood pressure assessments, and vascular testing at baseline (prior to starting AIs) and at six months. Vascular assessment was performed using the EndoPAT 2000 and HDI/PulseWave CR-2000 Cardiovascular Pro ling System and pulse contour analysis on two occasions as previously described. Vascular measurements were conducted by one trained vascular technician. Assessments were performed in triplicate, and the mean indices were used for analyses. All subjects were on an AI at the follow-up visit. The protocol was approved by the UMN Institutional Review Board and all participants were provided written informed consent. Baseline and follow-up characteristics were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Results: After six months of AI treatment, EndoPAT® ratio declined to a median 1.12 (Q1: 0.85, Q3: 1.86; p=0.045) and median estradiol levels decreased to 2 pg/mL (Q1: 2, Q3: 3; p=0.052). There was no evidence of association between change in EndoPAT® and change in estradiol level (p=0.91). There were no statistically significant changes in small or large arterial elasticity. Conclusion: Endovascular dysfunction is an early sign for atherosclerosis and vascular impairment. This study suggests that postmenopausal breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitor therapy develop endothelial dysfunction as early as six months which is a predictor of adverse CV disease. We hypothesize that long-term use of AIs can lead to persistent endothelial dysfunction. It is unclear if these changes are reversible once AI use is discontinued and further investigation is necessary.

Early cardiovascular structural and functional abnormalities as a guide to future morbid events.

AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate the predictive value of a battery of 10 non-invasive tests of cardiovascular structural and functional health on the future risk of cardiovascular morbid events. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1900 asymptomatic adults concerned about their risk for cardiovascular disease underwent non-invasive assessment with 10 tests of vascular and cardiac structure and function. A disease score (DS) was calculated for each individual based on these 10 tests. Follow-up (mean 9.2 years) for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was available for 1442 individuals (mean age 53.2 years, 48.2% women). Those in the lowest DS tertile (0-2) experienced 0.16 cardiovascular events per 100 patient-years (PY), those in the middle tertile (3-5) experienced 0.86 events per 100 PY, and those in the highest tertile (6+) experienced 1.3 events per 100 PY (p < .001). Sensitivity analysis, assuming a neutral effect of DS on projected events in subjects not followed, did not alter statistical significance. Risk assessment using the Framingham risk score (FRS) also predicted morbid events but the two methods differed in identifying individuals at high risk. The net reclassification index was improved by 0.11 (p = 0.01) when DS was added to FRS. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing the biological disease process in the arteries and heart of asymptomatic adults provides a guide to the risk of a future cardiovascular morbid event. Larger and longer studies are needed to determine whether risk factor algorithms, the severity of the biological process or some combination is the optimal method for identifying individuals in need of intervention to delay morbid events.

Effect of nebivolol or atenolol vs. placebo on cardiovascular health in subjects with borderline blood pressure: the EVIDENCE study.

Pharmacotherapy to protect the arteries may be appropriate for individuals with high-normal blood pressure who are at risk for future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nebivolol (NEB) in contrast to atenolol (ATE) may have a beneficial effect on endothelial function and may be more effective than ATE in preventing CVD. Sixty subjects with preHTN or borderline BP and abnormal small artery elasticity (SAE) underwent evaluation with 10 tests, including large and small artery elasticity, resting and treadmill exercise BP, carotid intimal-media thickness, retinal vascular photography, micro-albuminuria, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level. Each test scored as normal (0), borderline (1), or abnormal (2), and the total disease score (DS) was calculated by adding the test scores. Subjects were randomized double-blind to placebo (PLAC, n = 22), NEB 5/10 mg/day (n = 20), or ATE 25/50 mg/day (n = 18) once daily for 9 months. After 9 months, in the group receiving NEB the mean (standard deviation) DS decreased from baseline 4.3 (2.6) to 2.8 (2.4) (P < 0.007), with ATE from 5.4 (2.5) to 3.5 (1.9) (P = 0.0006), and with PLAC from 5.2 (3.0) to 4.5 (2.6) (P = 0.18). SAE increased in the NEB group from 6.0 (2.2) to 8.4 (3.4) ml/mmHg × 100 (P = 0.0001), whereas there was no significant change in the ATE and PLAC groups. Thus, nebivolol improves small artery function more than atenolol in asymptomatic subjects with preHTN or borderline BP, despite their similar BP-lowering effect.

Vascular function in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been shown to reduce breast cancer-related mortality in women with estrogen positive (ER+) breast cancer. The use of AIs, however, has been associated with higher rates of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular (CV) events. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 25 healthy postmenopausal women and 36 women with curative intent breast cancer on an AI was performed to assess endothelial dysfunction, an indicator of risk for CV events. Consented subjects underwent vascular testing using the HDI/Pulse Wave CR-2000 Cardiovascular Profiling System and the EndoPAT2000 system. RESULTS: Mean age was 61.7 and 59.6 years (cases, controls). Most subjects were Caucasian and overweight. Controls had a lower mean systolic blood pressure (128.6 mmHg vs. 116.2 mmHg, p = 0.004). Median estradiol levels were reduced in cases (2 vs. 15 pg/ml, p < 0.0001). EndoPAT ratio (0.8 vs. 2.7, p < 0.0001) was significantly reduced in cases as compared to controls. Median large artery elasticity (12.9 vs. 14.6 ml/mmHg × 10, p = 0.12) and small artery elasticity (5.2 vs. 7.0 ml/mmHg × 100, p = 0.07) were also reduced though not statistically significant. There was no correlation between use of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, type of AI, or duration of AI use and endothelial function. When adjusting for differences in blood pressure, results remained significant. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer cases on AIs have reductions in endothelial function, a predictor of adverse CV disease. IMPACT: Vascular function changes in breast cancer cases on AIs compared to postmenopausal women. Further work is needed to evaluate vascular changes over time.

Vascular and cardiac functional and structural screening to identify risk of future morbid events: preliminary observations.

Risk factors have served to identify patients in need of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy. Because of their limited sensitivity and specificity, we developed a screening program using noninvasive testing and a scoring system aimed at detecting functional and structural cardiovascular abnormalities in asymptomatic individuals. Ten cardiovascular tests were performed in 1 hour by a single technologist. Tests were scored as normal (0), borderline abnormal (1), or abnormal (2). Total disease score (DS) could range from 0 (all tests normal) to 20 (all tests abnormal). Scores of 0-2 were classified as normal, 3-5 as early disease, and 6+ as advanced disease. Morbid events during follow-up of 6 months to 8 years were determined from mailed questionnaires. Framingham risk scores (FRS) were calculated using published algorithms. Thirty-five morbid events (1 of 169 in the "normal" group, 8 of 214 in the "early disease" group, and 26 of 230 in the "advanced disease" group) occurred during the follow-up period among the 613 individuals who completed the questionnaire. Risk for morbid events was highly significantly different between the Kaplan-Meier curves based on disease detection (log rank 21.75, P ≤ .0001). FRS were significantly different but less discriminating, with five morbid events in the 227 subjects with FRS <10, eight in 162 with FRS 10-13, and 22 of 227 with FRS >13 (log rank 9.80, P = .0074). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve for DS (0.74) surpassed that of FRS (0.66) and was not improved when both were included in the model. Neither blood pressure levels nor low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels provided adequate discrimination. Identifying early disease in asymptomatic individuals provides a better guide to the need for preventive therapy than traditional risk factor assessment.

Beneficial effects of valsartan in asymptomatic individuals with vascular or cardiac abnormalities: the DETECTIV Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: We studied the efficacy of valsartan (Val) to slow cardiovascular disease progression in asymptomatic high-risk prehypertensive or hypertensive patients with blood pressure (BP) controlled to <140/90 mm Hg and with evidence for functional or structural alterations in the cardiovascular system. BACKGROUND: Identifying individuals with early markers for cardiovascular disease raises the possibility for pharmacotherapy to slow progression and delay or prevent future morbid events. METHODS: Seventy-six subjects with a Rasmussen Disease Score (RDS) of 6 or higher were randomized double-blind to receive placebo (Plac) or Val 160 mg once daily for 6 months followed by 6 months of single-blind Val in both groups. A panel of 10 tests, including large and small artery elasticity, resting and treadmill exercise BP, carotid intimal-media thickness, retinal vascular photography, micro-albuminuria, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide, was performed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Each test result was scored as normal (0), borderline (1), or abnormal (2), and the total RDS was calculated by adding all the scores of the individual tests. RESULTS: Valsartan significantly reduced the RDS after 6 months versus Plac (p < 0.03) and at 12 months (either 12 or 6 months of Val, p < 0.0001). The major contribution in risk score reduction was due to an increase in small artery elasticity and a decrease in BP, and after 12 months there was a reduction in left ventricular mass index (p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Valsartan can slow progression and/or reverse early cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic high-risk patients with prehypertension or BP controlled to <140/90 mm Hg.

Chronic heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: diagnostic and prognostic value of left atrial size.

BACKGROUND: Almost 40% of patients with heart failure (HF) have preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and prognosis similar to those with reduced EF. Data on prognostic markers in such patients are limited. We analyzed the prevalence and prognostic value of left atrial (LA) size in this condition. METHODS: 89 normal subjects (Group I), 38 asymptomatic hypertensive patients (Group II) and 183 HF patients with preserved EF (EF >45%) (Group III) were studied. LA diameter (LAD), LV diastolic (LVD) and systolic (LVS) dimensions and mass (LVmass) and EF were measured. E and A wave velocities and E/A were measured. The primary end point was all cause mortality in group III patients. RESULTS: Groups did not differ in age, gender or EF. Group III patients had larger LAD (4.6+-1.0 cm) compared with both Group I (3.7+/-0.6) and Group II (3.7+/-0.5 cm) (p<0.0001). A markedly enlarged (arbitrarily defined as LAD higher or equal 5 cm) had an odds ratio of 34 (95% CI 8-144) in distinguishing HF patients from normals. After a mean follow-up period of 29+/-27 months, 40 patients (21.9%) died. In Cox univariate analysis, NYHA class (HR 2.8 95% C.I. 1.8-4.3; p<0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (HR 0.92 95% C.I. 0.88-0.96; p<0.0001), age (HR 1.059 95% C.I. 1.01-1.11; p=0.02) and LAD (HR 1.72 95% C.I. 1.27-2.3; p=0.0005) were predictors of mortality. LAD predicted survival independently of other variables. CONCLUSION: The left atrium is frequently dilated in HF patients compared with controls despite similar EF. LAD showed powerful prognostic value independent of clinical variables.

Screening for early detection of cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic individuals.

OBJECTIVE: Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease has been aimed at risk factor identification and treatment without efforts to document early cardiovascular disease. The objective of the current study is to screen individuals with vascular and cardiac tests aimed at identifying early abnormalities likely to progress and to measure risk contributors susceptible to therapy. METHODS: A center was established for comprehensive screening of an asymptomatic population with 10 tests designed to detect early vascular and cardiac abnormalities and blood tests to identify potential targets for risk contributor intervention. The first 396 individuals screened in the center have been analyzed. RESULTS: Using a scoring system from 0 (no disease) to 20 (advanced disease), 49% of the population exhibited scores of > or =5 and 39% exhibited scores of > or =6. These scores appear indicative of early disease mandating initiation of or change in medical therapy, which was recommended to the individuals screened and to their primary care physicians. CONCLUSION: The screening tests utilized are effective in uncovering unsuspected early cardiovascular disease in which targeted treatment could be effective in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events in susceptible individuals. Documentation of the sensitivity and specificity of this approach requires longitudinal study.