ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Psychiatric patient boarding in emergency department (ED) is a severe and growing problem. In July 2013, Minnesota implemented a law requiring jailed persons committed to state psychiatric facilities be transferred within 48-h of commitment. This study aims to quantify the effect of this law on a large ED's psychiatric patient flow. METHODS: A pre- and post- comparison of 2011-2015 ED length of stay (LOS) for adult psychiatric patients was performed using electronic medical record data. Comparisons of the median LOS were assessed using a segmented regression model with time series error, and risk differences (RD) were used to determine changes in the proportion of patients with LOS ≥3 and ≥5days. Changes in patient disposition proportions were assessed using risk ratios. RESULTS: The median ED LOS for patients admitted for psychiatric care increased by 5.22h from 2011 to 2015 (95% CI: (4.33, 7.15)), while the frequency of patient encounters remained constant. Although no significant difference in the rate of ED LOS increase was found pre- and post- implementation, the proportion of adults with LOS ≥3days and ≥15days increased (RD 0.017 (95% CI: (0.013, 0.021)); 0.002 (95% CI: (0.001,0.004)), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of ED adult psychiatric patients experiencing prolonged LOS increased following the implementation of a statewide law requiring patients committed through the criminal justice system be transferred to a state psychiatric hospital within 48h. Identifying characteristics of subsets of psychiatric patients disproportionally affected could suggest focused healthcare system improvements to improve ED psychiatric care.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Adult , Humans , Minnesota , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pharmacologic strategies are often required to help manage agitated patients with delirium. First-and second-generation antipsychotic medications (such as haloperidol, quetiapine, and olanzapine) are commonly used. OBJECTIVE: On the psychiatric consultation service in our hospital, thiothixene has been used based on its favorable potency, sedative, and cost profiles. Little has been written about the utility of this drug for management of delirium. METHODS: We reviewed our experience with thiothixene in this setting using pharmacy records to identify patients who received at least 1 dose between July 2011 and March 2014. We scrutinized the relevant medical records (n = 111) and recorded the following data: age, sex, medical diagnoses, signs and symptoms of delirium, dosing of thiothixene, and response to thiothixene in terms of both apparent benefit as well as side effects. RESULTS: Resolution or improvement was documented in 78% of patients and good tolerability in 82% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although further data from a randomized, controlled trial would be ideal, our experience suggests that thiothixene could be a safe and effective pharmacologic treatment for agitation and psychosis due to delirium.