ABSTRACT
Background: Body image disturbance and anxiety are core features of anorexia nervosa (AN), a psychiatric disorder with one of the highest mortality rates. This study examined the efficacy of a novel non-pharmacological treatment, floatation-REST (Reduced Environmental Stimulation Therapy) on body image disturbance and anxiety in inpatients with AN. Methods: This parallel group randomised controlled trial compared floatation-REST vs. care as usual in women and girls hospitalised for treatment of AN in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. Participants were randomised on a 2:1 ratio to receive eight, twice-weekly, 60-min floatation-REST sessions for 4 weeks, in addition to care as usual, or to receive care as usual. The primary outcome was the average change in body dissatisfaction from pre- to post-float as measured by the Photographic Figure Rating Scale. The secondary outcome was the average change in anxiety from pre- to post-float as measured by the state version of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Longitudinal effects of floatation-REST on body dissatisfaction were also examined. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat principle. Planned linear mixed models tested the effect of floatation-REST vs. care as usual. The trial was preregistered (clinicaltrials.govNCT03610451). Findings: Between March 16, 2018 and February 25, 2021, 133 participants were screened for eligibility, and 86 were consented. Eighteen were excluded after consent, for a final randomisation sample of 68 participants (45 floatation-REST; 23 care as usual). There were two session by condition interactions on body dissatisfaction (p = 0.00026) and state anxiety (p < 0.0001), such that the floatation-REST group exhibited acute (i.e., pre- to post-session) reductions in body dissatisfaction (floatation-REST group mean change (Δm) = -0.43; 95% CI -0.56 to -0.30, p < 0.0001, Cohen's d = 0.23), and acute reductions in anxiety (floatation-REST group Δm = -15.75; 95% CI -17.95 to -13.56, p < 0.0001, Cohen's d = 1.52); however, the care as usual group exhibited no significant changes. With regard to longitudinal results, there was a significant time by treatment interaction between baseline and immediately post intervention (p = 0.012) and baseline and six-month follow up (p = 0.0019). At immediately post intervention, there was a trending reduction in body dissatisfaction for the floatation-REST group (Δm = -0.41, 95% CI -0.86 to 0.03, p = 0.068) and care as usual group (Δm = 0.61; 95% CI -0.04 to 1.27, p = 0.070). At six-months post-intervention, the floatation-REST group exhibited lower body dissatisfaction (Δm = -0.91; 95% CI -1.37 to -0.45, p = 0.0020, Cohen's d = 0.53) whereas the care as usual group reported no change in body dissatisfaction (Δm = 0.35; 95% CI -0.28 to 0.98, p = 0.96) relative to baseline. There were no adverse events related to the trial during the study. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that Floatation-REST decreased body dissatisfaction compared to care as usual acutely after each float session and at six-month follow-up. Floatation-REST has potential utility for the treatment of body image disturbance and anxiety in AN. These results may be limited by some generalisability concerns given the recruitment of a modest sample receiving inpatient treatment at a single site. Funding: The William K. Warren Foundation.
ABSTRACT
Whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) shows promise for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Because MDD is associated with increased inflammation, and anti-inflammatory agents show some promise as antidepressants, the current study sought to identify the acute and longer-term immune effects of WBH in participants with MDD and to explore whether these effects associate with the procedure's antidepressant properties. Thirty participants who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD were randomized to receive a single session of WBH (n = 16) or sham treatment (n = 14). Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores were assessed at baseline and 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-treatment (WBH vs. sham), and plasma cytokine concentrations were assessed at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and 1 and 4 weeks post-treatment. As previously reported, WBH produced a rapid and sustained antidepressant effect. When compared to sham, WBH increased plasma interleukin (IL)-6 immediately post-treatment (time by treatment: χ2(3, N=108) = 47.33, p < 0.001), while having no effect on other cytokines acutely and no impact on IL-6, or any other cytokine, at 1 or 4 weeks post treatment. In the study sample as a whole, increased IL-6 post-treatment was associated with reduced HDRS depression scores over the 6 weeks of follow-up (F(1, 102.3) = 6.74, p = 0.01). These results suggest a hitherto unrecognized relationship between hyperthermia, the immune system, and depression, and may point to WBH as a novel modality for exploring behavioral effects of IL-6 when the cytokine is activated in isolation from the inflammatory mediators with which it frequently travels.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Hyperthermia, Induced , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Cytokines , Interleukin-6 , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Compared to microbiomes on other skin sites, the bacterial microbiome of the human hand has been found to have greater variability across time. To increase understanding regarding the longitudinal transfer of the hand microbiome to objects in the built environment, and vice versa, 22 participants provided skin microbiome samples from their dominant hands, as well as from frequently and infrequently touched objects in their office environments. Additional longitudinal samples from home environments were obtained from a subset of 11 participants. We observed stability of the microbiomes of both the hand and built environments within the office and home settings; however, differences in the microbial communities were detected across the two built environments. Occupants' frequency of touching an object correlated to that object having a higher relative abundance of human microbes, yet the percent of shared microbes was variable by participants. Finally, objects that were horizontal surfaces in the built environment had higher microbial diversity as compared to objects and the occupants' hands. This study adds to the existing knowledge of microbiomes of the built environment, enables more detailed studies of indoor microbial transfer, and contributes to future models and building interventions to reduce negative outcomes and improve health and well-being.