ABSTRACT
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of PET/CT in the preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer in predicting long-term survival and diagnostic performance, validated by histopathology following surgical resection. Methods: Between 02/2009 and 08/2011, 255 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were included in this single-center prospective study. All underwent 18F FDG-PET/CT for pre-operative staging, and in 243 patients complete surgical resection was possible. Regarding lymph node involvement and extrathoracic metastases, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using the histopathological staging as reference. Median follow-up for censored patients was 9.1 years. Results: Overall 5-year survival rate of all patients was 55.6%, and of patients who had complete surgical resection it was 58.2%. In multivariate analysis of all surgically resected patients lymph node involvement (p=0.029) and age >61 years (p=<0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors. SUVmax and SUVmean cut-offs between SUV 2 and 11, however, were not associated with better or ;worse survival. The PET-CT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for predicting lymph node involvement were 57, 95, 88, and 76%, respectively. Furthermore, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting extrathoracic metastases were 100, 58, 98, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: In this study, tumor 18F FDG-uptake values did not provide additional prognostic information. Age>61 years and lymph node metastasis were associated with worse long-term survival in surgically resected patients. 18F FDG-PET/CT scans allow for improved patient selection. However, in staging mediastinal lymph nodes, there is a high rate of false positives and false negatives, suggesting that tissue biopsy is still indicated in many cases.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This prospective study assessed the role of F-18-FDG-PET/CT in clinical staging for patients with colorectal cancer planned for pulmonary metastasectomy by thoracotomy or video-assisted surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In addition to conventional imaging, we performed 86 F-18-FDG-PET/CT studies in 76 patients with potentially resectable metastatic colorectal lung metastases. We then investigated the effect that PET/CT had on further clinical management. Based on the results from the 47 thoracotomies performed, we compared the number of pulmonary metastases discovered after histologic examination with the number predicted by the conventional computed tomography (CT) as an independent part of the F-18-FDG-PET/CT examination and by the F-18-FDG-PET component. RESULTS: F-18-FDG-PET/CT led to changes in treatment regime and diagnostic planning in many patients. In five patients PET/CT revealed previously undetected local recurrence of the primary colorectal cancer, in four patients hepatic metastases, in three patients bone metastases, in two patients soft-tissue metastases, and in three patients histologically preoperatively proven N2 or N3 station lymph node involvement. These all constituted exclusion criteria, and consequently the previously planned pulmonary metastasectomy was not performed. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for detection of pulmonary metastases were 84.2% and 36.4% for CT and 75.0% and 61.6% for F-18-FDG-PET study. The calculated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of F-18-FDG-PET/CT for detecting thoracic lymph node involvement were 85.7%, 93.0%, 66.7%, and 97.5%, respectively. Furthermore, we found that F-18-FDG-PET/CT may predict thoracic lymph node involvement based on the SUV of pulmonary nodules. CONCLUSIONS: F-18-FDG-PET/CT has a clear role in the diagnostic workup for pulmonary metastatic colorectal cancer and may save patients from futile surgery. It cannot, however, be relied on to detect all possible pulmonary and nodal metastases, which surgeons must always consider when making treatment decisions.
