"Non-metastatic, Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Treatment Recommendations by an Expert Panel from Brazil".

INTRODUCTION: Non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an important clinical stage of prostate cancer, prior to morbidity and mortality from clinical metastases. In particular, the introduction of novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) has changed the therapeutic landscape in nmCRPC. Given recent developments in this field, we update our recommendations for the management of nmCRPC. METHODS: A panel of 51 invited medical oncologists and urologists convened in May of 2021 with the aim of discussing and providing recommendations regarding the most relevant issues concerning staging methods, antineoplastic therapy, osteoclast-targeted therapy, and patient follow-up in nmCRPC. Panel members considered the available evidence and their practical experience to address the 73 multiple-choice questions presented. RESULTS: Key recommendations and findings include the reliance on prostate-specific antigen doubling time for treatment decisions, the absence of a clear preference between conventional and novel (i.e., positron-emission tomography-based) imaging techniques, the increasing role of ARSis in various settings, the general view that ARSis have similar efficacy. Panelists highlighted the slight preference for darolutamide, when safety is of greater concern, and a continued need to develop high-level evidence to guide the intensity of follow-up in this subset of prostate cancer. DISCUSSION: Despite the limitations associated with a consensus panel, the topics addressed are relevant in current practice, and the recommendations can help practicing clinicians to provide state-of-the-art treatment to patients with nmCRPC in Brazil and other countries with similar healthcare settings.

Evaluation of prognostic factors in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective analysis from a South American cancer centre.

INTRODUCTION: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare tumours with regional differences. Prognostic factors are poorly understood. Gemcitabine + platinum (GP) is the standard first-line chemotherapy in metastatic patients. We aimed to search for prognostic factors in patients with advanced disease in a cancer centre in South America. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced BTC treated with chemotherapy. Variables were age (< or ≥70 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0/1 versus 2/3), gender, primary site (intrahepatic (IHC), extrahepatic (EHC), gallbladder (GB)), staging (locally advanced versus metastatic), metastatic sites, albumin (>3.5 g/dL versus <3.5 g/dL), biliary obstruction and first-line chemotherapy (GP, 5FU-based or single-agent). Cox regression method was used to explore factors. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, 104 patients were included. Median age was 62 years (32-86) and 22.1% were older than 70 years. Most patients had ECOG performance status 0/1 (63.4%), were female (51.9%) and were metastatic (82.7%). Bone metastases were found in 19.2%. Primary IHC, EHC and GB were 54.8%, 36.5% and 8.7%, respectively. GP was used by 79.8%. Median follow-up was 32.4 months. Median overall survival (mOS) was 11.4 months. In univariate analysis, male (p = 0.007), albumin < 3.5 g/dL (p = 0.001), biliary obstruction (p = 0.006), 5FU-based (p = 0.006) and single-agent (p < 0.0001) were associated with worse OS. ECOG performance status 2/3 (p = 0.058) and bone metastases (p = 0.051) were marginally related. In multivariate analysis, male (p = 0.003), bone metastases (p = 0.023), biliary obstruction (p = 0.001), 5FU-based (p = 0.016) and single-agent (p = 0.023) were independently associated with inferior OS. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, we observed that male patients, bone metastases, biliary obstruction and regimens other than GP had worse survival. Larger studies should be conducted to confirm our findings.

HER2-low status and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 negative early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Knowledge on whether low expressions of HER2 have prognostic impact in early-stage breast cancer (BC) and on its response to current chemotherapy protocols can contribute to medical practice and development of new drugs for this subset of patients, changing treatment paradigms. This study aims to evaluate the impact of HER2-low status on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and survival outcomes in early-stage HER2-negative BC. METHODS: Records from all BC patients treated with NACT from January 2007 to December 2018 in a single cancer center were retrospectively reviewed. HER2-negative (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0, + 1, or + 2 non-amplified by in situ hybridization [ISH]) patients were included. HER2-low was defined by IHC + 1 or + 2 ISH non-amplified and HER2-0 by IHC 0. The coprimary objectives were to compare pathological complete response (pCR) and relapse-free survival (RFS) between luminal/HER2-low versus luminal/HER2-0 populations and between triple negative (TNBC)/HER2-low versus TNBC/HER2-0. RESULTS: In total, 855 HER2-negative patients were identified. The median follow-up was 59 months. 542 patients had luminal subtype (63.4%) and 313 had TNBC (36.6%). 285 (33.3%) were HER2-low. Among luminal patients, 145 had HER2 IHC + 1 (26.8%) and 91 had IHC + 2/ISH non-amplified (16.8%). In TNBC, 36 had HER2 IHC + 1 (11.5%) and 13 had IHC + 2/ISH non-amplified (4.2%). Most patients had locally advanced tumors, regardless of subtype or HER2-low status. For luminal disease, pCR was achieved in 13% of HER2-low tumors versus 9.5% of HER2-0 (p = 0.27). Similarly, there was no difference in pCR rates among TNBC: 51% versus 47% in HER2-low versus HER2-0, respectively (p = 0.64). HER2-low was also not prognostic for RFS, with 5-year RFS rates of 72.1% versus 71.7% (p = 0.47) for luminal HER2-low/HER2-0, respectively, and 75.6% versus 70.8% (p = 0.23) for TNBC HER2-low/HER2-0. CONCLUSION: Our data does not support HER2-low as a biologically distinct BC subtype, with no prognostic value on survival outcomes and no predictive effect for pCR after conventional NACT.

Immunotherapy as Single Treatment for Patients With NSCLC With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-the META-L-BRAIN Study.

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases (BMs) occur in 40% of patients with lung cancer. The activity of immunotherapy in these patients, however, remains controversial, as the cornerstone treatment is radiotherapy (RT). Because RT is associated with adverse events that may impair the quality of life, the possibility of substituting it with a single systemic approach is attractive. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the potential benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with NSCLC with untreated BM (unBM). METHODS: Studies that enrolled patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs and specifically allowed for unBM were identified by searching the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and other databases. The outcomes evaluated were intracerebral overall response rate (icORR) and intracerebral disease control rate (icDCR) for unBM, and grades 3 and 4 toxicity rate. RESULTS: We included 12 studies with a total of 566 individuals in the final analysis. Anti-programmed cell death protein-1 therapy seems to be active in the central nervous system, with an icORR of 16.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.8%-24%; I2 = 33.17%) and an icDCR of 45% (95% CI: 33.4%-56.9%; I2 = 46.91%). In the meta-analysis for icORR (risk ratio = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.57-2.79) and icDCR (risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.55-1.43) we did not observe any difference among patients with BM who were treated with RT before ICI start and those who were treated with ICI only. CONCLUSIONS: ICI seems to be effective as a single treatment for active BM in selected patients with advanced NSCLC.