ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on outcomes following resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from inception to 30th January 2023 for studies that compared LND with no LND (NLND) among patients with ICC. To limit the effect of unbalanced covariates, only studies that utilized propensity score-based methods were included. Subgroup analysis of patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) ICC was analyzed. RESULTS: Among 3776 patients with ICC, individuals in the LND versus NLND cohorts had comparable overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.06, P = 0.11), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.70-1.01, P = 0.07) and risk of major complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95 % CI 0.70-1.62, P = 0.75). Subgroup analysis of cN0 patients, OS was significantly higher in patients who underwent LND (HR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.50-0.74, P < 0.01), with a non-significant trend towards improved DFS (HR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.65-1.01, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This study found no differences in long-term survival or morbidity following LND for ICC. Subgroup analysis of cN0 patients, who underwent LND detected improved OS with a trend towards better DFS, compared to patients with NLND.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholangiocarcinoma , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Lymph Nodes/surgery , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate thulium fiber laser (TFL) safety and efficacy compared to high-power (HP) Holmium:YAG laser in pediatric patients who have undergone retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from pediatric patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones between 2018 and 2020. Complications were assessed 4-6 weeks postoperatively. Stone-free (SF) was defined as the absence of visible fragments or as the presence of a single residual fragment ≤2 mm at 3 months postoperative imaging. Student's t-test for continuous variables, and χ2 and Fisher's Exact Test for categorical variables were used to compare outcomes between patients treated with HP Holmium:YAG (group 1) and TFL (group 2). Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) logistic regression analyses were performed to predict SF-associated factors. RESULTS: Data from 126 pediatric patients were analyzed, 97 in group 1 and 29 in group 2. Preoperative characteristics were similar between cohorts. No major complication occurred in both groups. Group 2 had a shorter operative time (mean time 49.5 vs. 64.3 min, P=0.024). SF rate was 81.4% and 89.7% (P=0.45) and reintervention rate was 14.4% and 6.89% (P=0.046) in group 1 and 2, respectively. At UVA and MVA, the type of laser did not influence SF rate. However, prestenting and single stones were positively associated with SR rate. CONCLUSIONS: Both laser technologies are safe and effective and showed similar SF rates. TFL showed less operative time and lower re-intervention rate compared to HP Holmium:YAG. Further prospective studies are needed to corroborate our findings.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endourologic interventions for urolithiasis in patients with anomalous kidneys can be challenging, and comparisons between these interventions are not well studied. We aim to compare the safety, outcomes and complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with urolithiasis in anomalous kidneys. METHODS: A propensity score-matched pair analysis (PSM) was performed on pooled patient data from 20 centers. 569 patients with anomalous kidneys (horseshoe kidney [HSK], ectopic kidney, malrotated kidney) and urolithiasis who received either PCNL or RIRS as the primary modality of intervention from 2010 to 2020 were analyzed. Patients were matched based on calculated propensity scores by a regression model using age, sex, comorbidities, stone size, and renal anomaly type as co-variates. Multivariate logistic regression of factors (mode of treatment [PCNL or RIRS], comorbidities, stone size) and their effects on outcomes of stone-free rate (SFR), need to abandon surgery due to intraoperative difficulty, postoperative hematuria and sepsis and were analyzed when applicable. RESULTS: After PSM, there were a total of 127 pairs in each group. Overall, PCNL conferred a higher SFR compared to RIRS (OR=3.69, 95% CI 1.91-7.46, P<0.001), particularly in HSK (OR=3.33, 95% CI 1.22-9.99, P=0.023), and ectopic kidneys (OR=18.10, 95% CI 3.62-147.63, P=0.002), with no significant difference in malrotated kidneys. There was no significant difference in postoperative sepsis observed. Surgery was abandoned more often in RIRS than PCNL (6.3% vs. 0%, P=0.014). Although PSM provides a robust analysis due to baseline differences in the unmatched cohorts, this study was limited by an inevitable degree of selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: While both modalities are safe and efficacious, PCNL yields better SFR than RIRS in patients with anomalous kidneys, with no difference in postoperative sepsis rates. Patients may benefit from personalized management best carried out in high volume endourology centers.
