Independent effect of fat-to-muscle mass ratio at bioimpedance analysis on long-term survival in patients receiving surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Introduction: Malnutrition and alteration of body composition are early features in pancreatic cancer and appear to be predictors of advanced stages and dismal overall survival. Whether specific patient characteristics measured at the preoperative bioimpedance analysis (BIA) could be associated with long-term outcomes following curative resection has not been yet described. Methods: In a prospective multicenter study, all histologically proven resected pancreatic cancer patients were included in the analysis. BIA was measured for all patients on the day before surgery. Demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes were prospectively collected. Patients who experienced 90-day mortality were excluded from the analysis. Survival data were obtained through follow-up visits and phone interviews. Bioimpedance variables were analyzed according to the overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier curves and the univariate and multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Overall, 161 pancreatic cancer patients were included. The median age was 66 (60-74) years, and 27.3% received systemic neoadjuvant treatment. There were 23 (14.3%) patients malnourished in the preoperative evaluation. Median OS was 34.0 (25.7-42.3) months. Several bioimpedance variables were associated with OS at the univariate analysis, namely the phase angle [HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98)], standardized phase angle [HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-0.99)], and an increased ratio between the fat and lean mass (FM/FFM) [HR 4.27, 95% CI 1.10-16.64)]. At the multivariate analysis, the FM/FFM ratio was a confirmed independent predictor of OS following radical resection, together with a positive lymph nodal status. Conclusion: Alteration of body composition at the preoperative bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) can predict dismal oncologic outcomes following pancreatic resection for cancer.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Reduces the Rate of Surgical Site Infection in Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Surgical site infection occurs with high frequency in gastrointestinal surgery, contributing to the high incidence of morbidity and mortality. The accepted practice worldwide for the prevention of surgical site infection is providing single- or multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, most suitable antibiotic and optimal duration of prophylaxis are still debated. The aim of the systematic review is to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis in controlling surgical site infection rate following esophagogastric surgery. PubMed and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until 31 October 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing different antimicrobial regimens in prevention surgical site infections. Risk of bias of studies was assessed with standard methods. Overall, eight studies concerning gastric surgery and one study about esophageal surgery met inclusion criteria. No significant differences were detected between single- and multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Most trials assessed the performance of cephalosporins or inhibitor of bacterial beta-lactamase. Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is effective in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection. Multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis is not recommended for patients undergoing gastric surgery. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of antimicrobial prophylaxis in esophageal cancer patients.

Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: Multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted liver resections (LLR and RALR) are known in comparison to open surgery. The aim of the present retrospective comparative study is to investigate the role of RALR and LLR according to different levels of difficulty. METHODS: The institutional databases of six high-volume hepatobiliary centers were retrospectively reviewed. The study population was divided in two groups: LLR and RALR. The procedures were stratified for difficulty levels accordingly to three classifications. A propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate selection bias. Short-term outcomes were the object of comparison. RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-six LLR and 403 RALR were collected. RALR exhibited fewer cases of intraoperative blood loss, lower transfusion and conversion rates (especially for oncological radicality) than LLR in the setting of highly difficult operations, whereas LLR had lower postoperative morbidity and fewer low-grade complications. For intermediate and low-difficulty resections, the intraoperative advantages of RALR gradually decreased to nonsignificant results and LLR remained associated with lower postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted liver resections do not show operative nor clinically significant benefits over LLR for low- and intermediate-difficulty resections. By reducing conversion rates, RALR can favour the operative feasibility of difficult resections possibly extending the indications of minimally invasive approaches for liver resection.

Minimally invasive robotic-assisted combined colorectal and liver excision surgery: feasibility, safety and surgical technique in a pilot series.

Different strategies may be adopted in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (LM). The role of laparoscopy has been investigated to define the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in a single-stage operation. In our study, we report our experience of 28 Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted combined Colorectal and Liver Excision Surgery (MIRACLES). From October 2012 to December 2019, 135 Robotic liver resections and 218 Robotic Colorectal resections were performed in our center. Twenty-eight patients underwent MIRACLES resection with 37 nodules removed. Fifty-two lesions in 28 patients were resected in minimally invasive robot-assisted surgery. Eighteen lesions were located in postero-superior liver segments (eight in segment VII, two in segment VIII, eight in segment IVa). Nine right colectomies, seven left colectomies, ten anterior rectal resections, one Hartmann and one MILES procedures were performed. The median surgical time of MIRACLES procedures was 332 min. Two conversions to open approach were necessary. Four major complications (> III) were observed. No postoperative mortality was recorded. The median hospital stay was 8 days. The median overall survival was 27.5 months. The MIRACLES approach is feasible and safe for colorectal resection and hepatic nodules located in all segments, with a low rate of postoperative complications. Surgical technique is demanding and should be reserved, presently, to tertiary centers.

Robot-assisted Toupet fundoplication and associated cholecystectomy in symptomatic giant hiatal hernia with situs viscerum inversus-A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Giant hiatus hernia is defined as migration of >30% of the stomach with or without other intra-abdominal organs into the chest. Situs Viscerum Inversus is a rare congenital condition in which the major visceral organs are reversed from their normal arrangement; they are translated (completely or partially) on the opposite side of the body. Diagnosis is often incidental. We report a Robot-assisted Toupet fundoplication for a giant hiatal hernia with gastro oesophageal reflux disease and cholelithiasis, in a 63-years-old woman with situs viscerum inversus. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 63-year-old woman with Situs Viscerum Inversus was diagnosed with giant sliding hiatus hernia. We performed a Robot-assisted procedure of reduction of hiatal hernia in abdomen and Toupet fundoplication with Bio A mesh placement and gastropexy procedure associated to cholecystectomy. The operation time was of 190min. The patient was discharged on third postoperative day after X-ray check and he tolerated a solid food. DISCUSSION: Minimally invasive surgery represents, nowadays, the standard approach for hiatal hernia and cholelithiasis. CONCLUSION: In challenging cases as the giant hernias ad rare anomaly as situs viscerum inversus, the surgical treatment can be facilitated by the use of robotic technology.

Robot-assisted liver surgery in a general surgery unit with a "Referral Centre Hub&Spoke Learning Program". Early outcomes after our first 70 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes of our first 70 consecutive patients treated by robotic-assisted liver resection after a reversal proctoring between a high HPB volume centre and our well-trained center in minimally invasive General Surgery. Six surgeons were involved in this Hub&Spoke learning program. METHODS: From September 2012 to December 2016, 70 patients underwent robotic-assisted liver resections (RALR). We treated 18 patients affected by colorectal and gastric cancer with synchronous liver lesions suspected for metastases in a one-stage robotic-assisted procedure. For the first 20 procedures we had a tutor in the operatory room, who was present also in the next most difficult procedures. RESULTS: The 30- and 90-day mortality rate was zero with an overall morbidity rate of 10.1%. Associated surgical procedures were performed in about 65,7% of patients. The observed conversion rate was 10%. The results of the first 20 cases were similar to the next 50 showing a shortned learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive robot-assisted liver resection is a safe technique; it allows overcoming many limits of conventional laparoscopy. This innovative, time-enduring Hub&Spoke may allow patients to undergo a proper standard of care also for complex surgical procedures, without the need of reaching referral centres.

Robot-assisted surgery in elderly and very elderly population: our experience in oncologic and general surgery with literature review.

BACKGROUND: Although there is no agreement on a definition of elderly, commonly an age cutoff of ≥65 or 75 years is used. Nowadays most of malignancies requiring surgical treatment are diagnosed in old population. Comorbidities and frailty represent well-known problems during and after surgery in elderly patients. Minimally invasive surgery offers earlier postoperative mobilization, less blood loss, lower morbidity as well as reduction in hospital stay and as such represents an interesting and validated option for elderly population. Robot-assisted surgery is a recent improvement of conventional minimally invasive surgery. AIMS: We provided a complete review of old and very old patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery for oncologic and general surgery interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery in our General Surgery Unit from September 2012 to June 2016 was conducted. Analysis was performed for the entire cohort and in particular for three of the most performed surgeries (gastric resections, right colectomy, and liver resections) classifying patients into three age groups: ≤64, 65-79, and ≥80. Data from these three different age groups were compared and examined in respect of different outcomes: ASA score, comorbidities, oncologic outcomes, conversion rate, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, geriatric events, mortality, etc. RESULTS: Using our in-patient robotic surgery database, we retrospectively examined 363 patients, who underwent robot-assisted surgery for different diseases (402 different robotic procedures): colorectal surgery, upper GI, HPB, etc.; the oncologic procedures were 81%. Male were 56%. The mean age was 65.63 years (18-89). Patients aged ≥65 years represented 61% and ≥80 years 13%. Overall conversion rate was of 6%, most in the group 65-79 years (59% of all conversions). The more frequent diseases treated were colorectal surgery 43%, followed by hepatobilopancreatic surgery 23.4%, upper gastro-intestinal 23.2%, and others 10.4%. DISCUSSION: Robot-assisted surgery is a safe and effective technique in aging patient population too. There was no increased risk of death or morbidity compared to younger patients in the three groups examined. A higher conversion rate was observed in our experience for patients aged 65-79. Prolonged operative time and in any cases steep positions (Trendelenburg) have not represented a problem for the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In any case, considering the high direct costs, minimally invasive robot-assisted surgery should be performed on a case-by-case basis, tailored to each patient with their specific histories and comorbidities.

Outcome of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly.

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical features and the perioperative and long-term outcomes after primary surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the elderly population with those observed in younger patients. All the patients over the age of 55 who underwent primary surgery for CRC in our clinic from 1988 to 2008 were included in this study and divided into two age groups: 55-75 and >75 years considering the age of diagnosis. 914 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study (352 > 75 years). In the elderly group, tumors were predominantly right sided, and the overall number of comorbidities was statistical more frequent. Elderly patients underwent emergency surgery more than the control group (p = 0.0008). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of curative and palliative resections. The overall operative mortality rate was 5.9% in the study group compared with 2.1% in the control study (p = 0.0033). The overall 3-year, 5-year and 10-year survival rates were, respectively, 37, 16.2 and 5.1% in the study group, when compared with 52.3, 35.1 and 24.7% in the control group (p = 0.022, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001, respectively). More patients were lost during the follow-up in the elderly group (p = 0.0003) and more deaths unrelated to cancer were found in the study group compared with the control group (p = 0.0005). The cancer specific mortality was similar between the two groups. In conclusion, elderly patients that underwent major colorectal resection have an acceptable perioperative morbidity, mortality and survival rate when compared with younger patients. Age alone should not be considered a reason to deny surgery to these patients.

Care with regard to details improves the outcome of Longo mucoprolapsectomy: long term follow up.

In this study we evaluated the results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy considering the histological features of the resected tissue obtained after the intervention, the staple line height and the improvement of the quality of life after the treatment. From January 2003 to December 2006, 72 patients with symptomatic grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoid that underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy in our clinic were enroled in the study. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics of the patients were evaluated, including demographics, staple line height, specimen histology, complications, recurrence, day to return to work, quality of life (QoL) score and use of analgesics. Staple line height was always above 2.5 cm from the dentate line. Smooth muscle fibers were observed in 97.2%. The complication rate was 18%. Bleeding was observed in 5.5%. Fecal urgency was referred in 6.9%. Recurrence rate was 6.9%. Mean follow-up was 68 months. Hemorrhoidopexy is safe and effective but extreme attention must be paid to some critical details. We consider the placement of the purse string suture as a critical factor in the outcome of the patients. We find that some amount of the muscle fibers would invariably be involved in the resected specimen, without any significant impact in the clinical outcome or in the quality of life improvement.