Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 102(7): 867-872, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27717747

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of the semitendinosus tendon alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction keeps the gracilis muscle intact and decreases anterior pain in comparison with the use of the patellar tendon. Recently, Lubowitz described a new all-inside technique with an ST4 tendon fixed with a cortical button in both femoral and tibial sides. We hypothesized that this type of graft with cortical button fixation provides well-controlled residual anterior tibial translation (<3mm). The aim of this study was to assess the results obtained with this technique in terms of laxity and IKDC score at more than 1 year of follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective single-center study to evaluate the results with this procedure with at least 1 year of follow-up. The primary endpoint was the objective IKDC score and side-to-side anterior tibial translation difference. The secondary endpoint was the subjective assessment using the subjective IKDC and Lysholm scores. Tunnel positioning was assessed using the Aglietti criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included and reviewed with a mean follow-up of 19.7 months. Sixty-three percent of the patients were male and the mean age at the procedure was 28 years. The IKDC score was A or B in 43% of the patients and C or D in 57%; 54% of the patients had a residual side-to-side anterior tibial translation difference less than 3mm and 29% presented significant pivot shift (grade C or D). Five patients underwent revision surgery, including one for rupture of the ACL reconstruction. The meniscal status did not influence postoperative laxity and the IKDC grade. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis was not verified and the postoperative stability of the knee was insufficient. Postoperative side-to-side anterior tibial translation difference remained greater than 3mm for 16 patients and the analysis seems to indicate that the distal cortical fixation of the graft with an adjusted loop is insufficient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective study - Level IV.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Hamstring Tendons/transplantation , Joint Instability/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Adult , Female , Femur/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnosis , Male , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Tibia/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 101(5): 539-42, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26047753

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Harvesting of a 4-strand semitendinosis (ST4) graft during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be performed through either a posterior or anterior approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate the recovery of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles as a function of the graft harvesting method. We hypothesized that posterior harvesting (PH) would lead to better recovery in hamstring strength than anterior harvesting (AH). METHODS: In this prospective study, the semitendinosus was harvested through an anterior incision in the first group of patients and through a posterior one in the second group of patients. The patients were enrolled consecutively, without randomization. Isokinetic muscle testing was performed three and six months postoperative to determine the strength deficit in the quadriceps and hamstring muscles of the operated leg relative to the uninjured contralateral leg. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included: 20 in the AH group and 19 in the PH group. The mean quadriceps strength deficit after three and six months was 42% and 26% for AH and 29% and 19% for the PH, respectively (P=0.01 after three months and P=0.16 after six months). The mean hamstring strength deficit after three and six months was 31% and 17% for AH and 23% and 15% for the PH, respectively (P=0.09 after three months and P=0.45 after six months). After three months, the PH group had recovered 12% more quadriceps muscle strength than the AH group (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Our hypothesis was not confirmed. Harvesting of a ST4 graft for ACL reconstruction using a posterior approach led to better muscle strength recovery in the quadriceps only after three months. CASE CONTROL STUDY: Level 3.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Muscle Strength/physiology , Tendons/transplantation , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Young Adult
3.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 99(4): 399-404, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23623438

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nailing using long or modular nails is the most reliable mean of achieving femorotibial fusion. Here, we report the operative, clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of 17 long intramedullary nail arthodeses in patients with infection. HYPOTHESIS: Clinical and functional outcomes after long intramedullary nailing are at least as good as those obtained using other implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reevaluated 17 patients after unilateral two-stage knee arthrodesis with a long titanium intramedullary nail and autologous bone grafting. We evaluated satisfaction, leg length discrepancy, and function (Lequesne and WOMAC indices). Radiographs were obtained to assess fusion, time to fusion, and femorotibial angles. RESULTS: No cases of material failure were recorded. One or more complications occurred in seven patients. Mean limb shortening was 27.6mm. Of the 17 patients, 15 were satisfied with the procedure. The mean Lequesne index was 10.5/24 and the mean overall WOMAC score was 26/88. Fusion was achieved in 16 patients, with a mean time to fusion of 5 months. Mean femorotibial angles were 178.6° of varus and 1.9° of flexion. DISCUSSION: This simple and rapid surgical technique provides functional outcomes similar to those obtained using modular nails. The fusion rate is high. Nail extraction is simple and causes minimal damage, in contrast to modular nails. Increased attention to misalignment is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious/surgery , Arthrodesis/instrumentation , Bone Nails , Knee Joint/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...