Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 62(3): 576-582, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36922315

ABSTRACT

The primary objective of this study was to assess the negative predictive value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swabs in MRSA diabetic foot infections. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 1, 2020. The following search string was used: (methicillin-resistant S. aureus OR MRSA) AND (nasal OR nares) AND (diabetic OR foot OR diabetic foot infections). All studies that contained data comparing MRSA nasal swab positivity to wound cultures from diabetic foot infections and met the inclusion criteria were included. Among the 86 relevant studies, 6 studies with 8706 diabetic patients were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline extension for Diagnostic Test Accuracy reviews was followed. The primary meta-analysis outcomes were the negative and positive predictive values of MRSA nasal swabs for MRSA diabetic foot infections. The pooled specificity and pooled sensitivity were determined by generating hierarchical summary receiver characteristic operating curves. In the bivariate meta-analysis, involving the 6 studies, pooled sensitivity and specificity was 41.7% (95% confidence interval = 32.9, 51) and 94.1% (95% confidence interval = 89.5, 96.8), respectively. In low-moderate MRSA prevalence levels (<15%), negative predictive value of MRSA nasal swab was >90% and positive predictive value was <55%. This meta-analysis suggests that in patients with diabetic foot infections, the nasal swab MRSA screen has a poor positive predictive value but an excellent negative predictive value in regions of low to moderate prevalence of MRSA diabetic foot infections.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Nasal Cavity , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus
2.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 61(6): 1341-1347, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35705455

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to appraise and combine the available systematic reviews reporting nonunion incidence and prevalence in foot and ankle arthrodesis procedures. The Cochrane Library and MEDLINE were searched for relevant systematic reviews from inception to January 2022. Two independent reviewers selected and reviewed eligible studies. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews or meta-analyses reporting nonunion incidence and prevalence in foot or ankle arthrodesis procedures. Fourteen systematic reviews of 8 types of joint arthrodesis procedures were included for meta-analysis. These reviews comprised 138 studies with 5793 joint arthrodesis procedures. Quality of the included reviews were assessed using the AMSTAR2 checklist. Overall and subgroup meta-analysis of prevalence were performed using random effects model. Publication bias was determined by evaluation of a DOI plot with the Luis Furuya-Kanamori index of asymmetry. The pooled prevalence for foot and ankle nonunion rate was 8.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5%-9.9%). Overall prevalence of nonunion for single joint foot and ankle joint arthrodesis was 6.1% (95% CI 4.8%-7.6%). Subgroup analysis found that the highest rate of nonunion occurred during tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with 27.1% (95% CI 19.4%-35.2%). We have reported the first meta-analysis of systematic reviews on nonunion rates in foot and ankle arthrodesis procedures. The overall nonunion rate for foot and ankle arthrodesis procedures was 8.1%. For single joint fusion procedures, the nonunion prevalence was 6.1%. Our reported nonunion rates are lower than previously published numbers.

3.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc ; 111(2)2021 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872357

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is well established and accepted that fungi are a major contributing factor in nail dystrophy. It has also been recognized that bacteria play a crucial role in onycholysis. However, the bacteria and fungi that can be grown on culture media in the laboratory are only a small fraction of the total diversity that exists in nature. Contemporary studies have revealed that fungi and bacteria often form physically and metabolically interdependent consortia that harbor properties and pathogenicity distinct from those of their individual components. Metagenomic DNA "shotgun" sequencing has proved useful in determining microbial etiology in clinical samples, effective for not only bacteria but also fungi, archaea, and viruses. METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive nail and subungual debris samples with suspected onychomycosis were sent for laboratory analysis using three examination techniques: DNA sequencing, polymerase chain reaction analysis, and standard fungal culture. The nail plate and surrounding areas were disinfected with an ethyl alcohol swab before nail sampling. Samples from 16 patients were analyzed for suspected onychomycosis with DNA sequencing, searching a database of 25,000 known pathogens. These results were compared with 15 real-time polymerase chain reaction screening assays and eight fungal cultures sampled with the same methods. RESULTS: The DNA sequencing detected 32 species of bacteria and 28 species of fungi: 50% were solely bacterial, 6.3% were solely fungal, and 43.7% were mixed communities of bacteria and fungi. CONCLUSIONS: Toenails tested with DNA sequencing demonstrated the presence of both bacteria and fungi in many samples. Further work is required to fully investigate its relevance to nail pathology and treatment.


Subject(s)
Nails , Onychomycosis , Bacteria/genetics , Fungi/genetics , Humans , Onychomycosis/diagnosis , Sequence Analysis, DNA
4.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc ; 110(5)2020 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33179069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this investigation was to objectify perceived stresses of students enrolled at a US college of podiatric medicine. METHODS: Following preliminary pilot data collection and representative student interviews, the Perceived Stress Scale and a newly developed survey consisting of 46 potential stresses were administered to students. Participants were asked to identify up to ten items from the survey that caused them the most stress and to further identify up to three of these ten that they considered to be the most stressful. RESULTS: A response rate of 71.5% (261 of 365) was observed. Specific results demonstrate that levels of perceived stress in podiatric medical students are higher than those in the general population, as well as some potential trends with respect to specific perceived stresses that change over time. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation provide quantitative evidence of perceived levels of stress and specific stresses of students enrolled at a US college of podiatric medicine. We hope that these findings increase awareness of stress in podiatric medicine, lead to colleges of podiatric medicine taking active steps to improve student stress education, and lead to future investigations of stress and mental health in the field of podiatric medicine.


Subject(s)
Podiatry , Students, Medical , Humans , Stress, Psychological , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL