Dosimetric considerations for moldable silicone composites used in radiotherapy applications.

Due to their many favorable characteristics, moldable silicone (MS) composites have gained popularity in medicine and recently, in radiotherapy applications. We investigate the dosimetric properties of silicones in radiotherapy beams and determine their suitability as water substitutes for constructing boluses and phantoms. Two types of silicones were assessed ( ρ $\rho \;$ = 1.04 g/cm3 and ρ $\rho \;$ = 1.07 g/cm3 ). Various dosimetric properties were characterized, including the relative electron density, the relative mean mass energy-absorption coefficient, and the relative mean mass restricted stopping power. Silicone slabs with thickness of 1.5 cm and 5.0 cm were molded to mimic a bolus setup and a phantom setup, respectively. Measurements were conducted for Co-60 and 6 MV photon beams, and 6 MeV electron beams. The doses at 1.5 cm and 5.0 cm depths in MS were measured with solid water (SW) backscatter material (DMS-SW ), and with a full MS setup (DMS-MS ), then compared with doses at the same depths in a full SW setup (DSW-SW ). Relative doses were reported as DMS-SW /DMS-SW and DMS-MS /DSW-SW . Experimental results were verified using Monaco treatment planning system dose calculations and Monte Carlo EGSnrc simulations. Film measurements showed varying dose ratios according to MS and beam types. For photon beams, the bolus setup DMS-SW /DSW-SW exhibited a 5% relative dose reduction. The dose for 6 MV beams was reduced by nearly 2% in a full MS setup. Up to 2% dose increase in both scenarios was observed for electron beams. Compared with dose in SW, an interface of MS-SW can cause relatively high differences. We conclude that it is important to characterize a particular silicone's properties in a given beam quality prior to clinical use. Because silicone compositions vary between manufacturers and differ from water/SW, accurate dosimetry using these materials requires consideration of the reported differences.

Contamination Resulting From a Broken 125I Seed During a Brachytherapy Procedure.

ABSTRACT: Brachytherapy programs within radiation therapy departments are subject to stringent radiation safety requirements in order to ensure the safety of the staff and patients. Training programs often include brachytherapy-specific radiation safety training modules that address the specific risks associated with radioactive sources, emergency procedures, and regulatory requirements specific to the use of radioisotopes. Unlike other uses of radioactive materials, brachytherapy uses sealed sources and therefore under routine operations does not encounter radioactive contaminants. This article presents an unusual clinical situation in which an 125I brachytherapy seed was damaged during routine clinical workflow, resulting in radioactive contamination within the clinical environment. Decisions made at the time of the incident resulted in contamination that spread beyond the initial location. The incident highlighted a shortcoming of the radiation safety program in preparing staff for the possibility of having to deal with unsealed radioactivity. Brachytherapy programs would be strengthened by including training specific to radioactive contamination in their emergency training to equip staff to respond to unexpected damage to the sealed sources.

Can we rely on surgical clips placed during oncoplastic breast surgery to accurately delineate the tumor bed for targeted breast radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) is gaining popularity among surgeons for breast-conserving surgery treatments. OBS relies on complex relocation and deformation of breast tissue involving the tumor bed (TB). In this study, we investigate the validity of using surgical clips with OBS for accurate TB delineation in adjuvant, targeted breast radiotherapy. METHODS: Different OBS techniques were simulated on realistic breast phantoms. Surgical clips were used to demarcate the TB. Following tumor resection and closure, the true TB (TBTrue) was extracted. Each phantom was CT imaged at several phases of surgery in order to record pre- and post-OBS closure surgical clip displacements. Two senior radiation oncologists (ROs) were asked to delineate TBs on CTs by relying on surgical clips placed as per standard protocol, and by referring to operative notes. Their original contours, as well as those expanded using 5-15 mm margins, were compared with the accurate TBTrue using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), and over- and under-contoured volumes. Inter- and intra-RO contour agreements were also evaluated. RESULTS: Post-OBS surgical clips were significantly displaced outside the original breast quadrant. Inter- and Intra-RO TB contours were consistent, yet systematically differed from TBTrue (DSC values range = 0.38 to 0.69, and maximum HD range = 17.8 mm to 38.0 mm). Using expansion margins did not improve contour congruence and caused significant over-contoured volumes. CONCLUSION: Following OBS, surgical clips alone are not reliable radiographic surrogates of TB locations and accurate TB delineation is challenging. For complex OBS cases, indication of any type of partial breast irradiation is very questionable.

Geometric inaccuracy and co-registration errors for CT, DynaCT and MRI images used in robotic stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning.

PURPOSE: To measure the combined errors due to geometric inaccuracy and image co-registration on secondary images (dynamic CT angiography (dCTA), 3D DynaCT angiography (DynaCTA), and magnetic resonance images (MRI)) that are routinely used to aid in target delineation and planning for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Three phantoms (one commercial and two in-house built) and two different analysis approaches (commercial and MATLAB based) were used to quantify the magnitude of geometric image distortion and co-registration errors for different imaging modalities within CyberKnife's MultiPlan treatment planning software. For each phantom, the combined errors were reported as a mean target registration error (TRE). The mean TRE's for different intramodality imaging parameters (e.g., mAs, kVp, and phantom set-ups) and for dCTA, DynaCTA, and MRI systems were measured. RESULTS: Only X-ray based imaging can be performed with the commercial phantom, and the mean TRE ± standard deviation values were large compared to the in-house analysis using MATLAB. With the 3D printed phantom, even drastic changes in treatment planning CT imaging protocols did not greatly influence the mean TRE (<0.5 mm for a 1 mm slice thickness CT). For all imaging modalities, the largest mean TRE was found on DynaCT, followed by T2-weighted MR images (albeit all <1 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The user may overestimate the mean TRE if the commercial phantom and MultiPlan were used solely. The 3D printed phantom design is a sensitive and suitable quality assurance tool for measuring 3D geometric inaccuracy and co-registration errors across all imaging modalities.

Radiological, dosimetric and mechanical properties of a deformable breast phantom for radiation therapy and surgical applications.

The displacement of tumor bed walls during oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) decreases the accuracy of using surgical clips as the sole surrogate for tumor bed location. This highlights the need for better communication of OBS techniques to radiation oncologists. To facilitate OBS practice and investigate clip placement reliability, a realistic silicone-based breast phantom was constructed with components emulating a breast parenchyma, epidermis, areola, nipple, chest wall, and a tumor. OBS was performed on the phantom and surgical clips were placed to mark the tumor bed. The phantom was imaged with CT, MRI, and ultrasound (US). The parenchyma's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and clips to parenchyma's contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. The phantom's CT Hounsfield Unit (HU), relative electron density (RED), and mass density were determined. 6 and 10 MV photon beam attenuation measurements were performed in phantom material. The Young's Modulus and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the phantom parenchyma and epidermis were measured. Results showed that the breast phantom components were visible on all imaging modalities with adequate SNR and CNR. The phantom's HU is 130 ± 10. The RED is 0.983. Its mass density is 1.01 ± 0.01 g cm-3. Photon attenuation measurements in phantom material were within 1% of those in water. The Young's Moduli were 13.4 ± 4.2 kPa (mechanical) and 30.2 ± 4.1 kPa (US elastography) for the phantom parenchyma. The UTS' were 0.05 ± 0.01 MPa (parenchyma) and 0.23 ± 0.12 MPa (epidermis). We conclude that the phantom's imaging characteristics resemble a fibroglandular breast's and allow clear visualization of high-density markers used in radiation therapy. The phantom material is suitable for dose measurements in MV photon beams. Mechanical results confirmed the phantom's similarity to breast tissue. The phantom enables investigation of surgical clip displacements pre- and post-OBS, and is useful for radiation therapy quality assurance applications.

Arterial input functions determined from MR signal magnitude and phase for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the human pelvis.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is often used to measure the transfer constant (Ktrans) and distribution volume (ve) in pelvic tumors. For optimal accuracy and reproducibility, one must quantify the arterial input function (AIF). Unfortunately, this is challenging due to inflow and signal saturation. A potential solution is to use MR signal phase (ϕ), which is relatively unaffected by these factors. We hypothesized that phase-derived AIFs (AIFϕ) would provide more reproducible Ktrans and ve values than magnitude-derived AIFs (AIF|S|). We tested this in 27 prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies (echo time=2.56 ms, temporal resolution=13.5 s), using muscle as a standard. AIFϕ peak amplitude varied much less as a function of measurement location (inferior-superior) than AIF|S| (5.6±0.6 mM vs. 2.6±1.5 mM), likely as a result of ϕ inflow insensitivity. However, our main hypothesis was not confirmed. The best AIF|S| provided similar reproducibility versus AIFϕ (interpatient muscle Ktrans=0.039±0.021 min(-1) vs. 0.037±0.025 min(-1), ve=0.090±0.041 vs. 0.062±0.022, respectively).

Determination of the venous output function from MR signal phase: feasibility for quantitative DCE-MRI in human brain.

For dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies in the human brain, it is useful to measure the venous output function (VOF). The purpose of this work was to explore the feasibility of measuring the VOF using the MR signal phase (in absolute units of gadolinium concentration) in the superior sagittal sinus. Phantom experiments were performed to validate the technique for different superior sagittal sinus angles (theta = 0-48 degrees relative to the main magnetic field), different curvatures (straight or radius = 45 mm), and different spatial resolutions (2.2-5.5 mm, to study partial-volume effects). Additionally, the technique was tested on three patients. The phantom experimental results (echo time = 5.5 ms, theta