Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aust Health Rev ; 48: 142-147, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566394

ABSTRACT

We present a case study on the design and implementation of a value-based bundled package of care for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated in the private health sector in Australia. Value-based healthcare is an essential change to how we deliver healthcare, shifting the focus from paying for individual services provided to a focus on the health outcomes gained over a full cycle of care. The Australian health system has unintentionally created barriers to value-based cancer care through fragmented care pathways and complex funding arrangements where patients can unexpectedly encounter high out-of-pocket costs. A team of clinicians, service providers, health systems and funding experts, private health insurers and consumers have collaborated to design and pilot a complete bundled package of care for breast cancer patients which aims to address these challenges. With 40 patients recruited to date, early evaluation results show positive patient experience of 'joined-up' care and financial transparency. This case study provides a high-level overview of the approach taken to design and implement the Breast Cancer Bundle and the lessons learned for its expansion in both public and private settings.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Pilot Projects , Australia , Delivery of Health Care , Health Facilities
2.
Ann Surg ; 245(6): 867-72, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17522511

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. AIMS: This study evaluates the use of a multimodal package in colorectal cancer surgery in the context of an RCT. METHODS: Patients for elective resection for colorectal cancer were offered trial entry. Participants were stratified by sex and requirement for a total mesorectal excision and centrally randomized. Multimodal patients received intravenous fluid restriction, unrestricted oral intake with prokinetic agents, early ambulation, and fixed regimen epidural analgesia. Control patients received intravenous fluids to prevent oliguria, restricted oral intake until return of bowel motility, and weaning regimen epidural analgesia. Adherence to both regimens was reinforced using a daily checklist and protocol guidance sheets. Discharge decision was made using pre-agreed criteria. The primary endpoint was postoperative stay, and achievement of independence milestones. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications, readmission rates, and mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Seventy patients were recruited. Approximately one fourth underwent TME. Median ages were similar (69.3 vs. 73.0 years). The median stay was significantly reduced in the multimodal group (5 vs. 7 days; P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients in the control arm were 2.5 times as likely to require a postoperative stay of more than 5 days. Patients in the multimodal group had less cardiorespiratory and anastomotic complications but more readmissions. There were 2 deaths, both controls. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT provides level 1b evidence that a multimodal management protocol can significantly reduce postoperative stay following colorectal cancer surgery. Morbidity and mortality are not increased.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Critical Pathways , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesia, Epidural , Defecation/drug effects , Diet , Early Ambulation , Female , Fluid Therapy/methods , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...