A Decision-oriented Approach to Evaluating a Leadership Curriculum in Fellowship.

Background: Graduate Medical Education (GME) emphasizes the role of the annual program evaluation to identify opportunities, create action plans, and track improvements longitudinally. There is a lack of a systematic approach to the evaluation of educational curricula. Comprehensive curriculum evaluation can inform the educators about specific modifications to achieve high standards, desired outcomes, and the anticipated objectives. Objective: To evaluate a leadership in quality improvement program in a pulmonary/critical care fellowship training program using the context, input, process, product (CIPP) model. The CIPP model, given its focus on evaluating different aspects of a program, provides concrete and targeted feedback to guide improvement decisions. Methods: Evaluation questions addressing the four focused areas were created, pilot tested, and revised. The questions were framed toward optimization of alignment (e.g., program activities with stated objectives, program goals with theoretical perspective, program curriculum with trainee needs) and gaining information about the efficacy of the program in achieving the desired outcomes. To enhance the validity of the results, we triangulated the data-gathering approach by administering surveys and conducting interviews and focus groups by random selection from the eligible participants. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and categorized into themes aligning with the four aspects of the CIPP model. Results: We interviewed 9 participants and conducted three focus groups with 20 participants. The surveys provided vital quantitative information that was cross-verified with the qualitative data; 23 of the 25 (92%) participants completed the survey. The results of qualitative thematic analysis were organized in the CIPP format. The context evaluation of the program revealed that the fellows and faculty were unfamiliar with the guiding principles of the course. The input evaluation highlighted the competing interests that hampered the engagement of the fellows during the evening weekly report-outs. The process evaluation revealed clustering of didactic sessions at the start of the course. The product evaluation stressed the difficulty in completing the quality improvement projects in the allotted timeframe. Conclusion: Conducting a robust evaluation of an educational curriculum provides insights into gaps in the various stages of the program. Time and resources needed for conducting evaluation by using the CIPP model should be considered.

Differentiated Instruction as a Viable Framework for Meeting the Needs of Diverse Adult Learners in Health Professions Education.

Health professions education (HPE) instructors are often challenged with simultaneously teaching adult learners of varying educational levels, needs, and backgrounds. With an increased focus on interprofessional education, instructors may be tasked with teaching extremely diverse audiences during a single educational session. While some aspects of differentiated instruction (DI) have been implemented within HPE contexts, the DI framework appears to be relatively unknown in many fields. Evidence from a range of educational fields outside of HPE supports the use of DI as a framework to enhance fairness, diversity and inclusion while meeting core instructional needs. In this Monograph, we explore DI and offer strategies for implementation amenable to many HPE settings.

A Professionalism Curricular Model to Promote Transformative Learning Among Residents.

BACKGROUND: Using the frameworks of transformational learning and situated learning theory, we developed a technology-enhanced professionalism curricular model to build a learning community aimed at promoting residents' self-reflection and self-awareness. The RAPR model had 4 components: (1) Recognize: elicit awareness; (2) Appreciate: question assumptions and take multiple perspectives; (3) Practice: try new/changed perspectives; and (4) Reflect: articulate implications of transformed views on future actions. OBJECTIVE: The authors explored the acceptability and practicality of the RAPR model in teaching professionalism in a residency setting, including how residents and faculty perceive the model, how well residents carry out the curricular activities, and whether these activities support transformational learning. METHODS: A convenience sample of 52 postgraduate years 1 through 3 internal medicine residents participated in the 10-hour curriculum over 4 weeks. A constructivist approach guided the thematic analysis of residents' written reflections, which were a required curricular task. RESULTS: A total of 94% (49 of 52) of residents participated in 2 implementation periods (January and March 2015). Findings suggested that RAPR has the potential to foster professionalism transformation in 3 domains: (1) attitudinal, with participants reporting they viewed professionalism in a more positive light and felt more empathetic toward patients; (2) behavioral, with residents indicating their ability to listen to patients increased; and (3) cognitive, with residents indicating the discussions improved their ability to reflect, and this helped them create meaning from experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that RAPR offers an acceptable and practical strategy to teach professionalism to residents.