Investigation and Decontamination of an Urban Monkeypox Occurrence.

Before the described monkeypox virus (MPXV) case in this article, limited cases of human MPXV had occurred within the United States. Lessons learned from prior outbreaks contributed to a successful approach to decontamination and containment of an adult case of MPXV in Dallas, Texas. This case report provides an overview of the characteristics of the monkeypox virus, its effects on the human body, and a primary focus on a successful protocol for household decontamination. Additional information is provided on methods related to public relations and information management that were utilized during this incident.

Improving Emergency Medical Services Information Exchange: Methods for Automating Entity Resolution.

The 21st century has seen an enormous growth in emergency medical services (EMS) information technology systems, with corresponding accumulation of large volumes of data. Despite this growth, integration efforts between EMS-based systems and electronic health records, and public-sector databases have been limited due to inconsistent data structure, data missingness, and policy and regulatory obstacles. Efforts to integrate EMS systems have benefited from the evolving science of entity resolution and record linkage. In this chapter, we present the history and fundamentals of record linkage techniques, an overview of past uses of this technology in EMS, and a look into the future of record linkage techniques for integrating EMS data systems including the use of machine learning-based techniques.

Variations in Presentation and Management of COVID-19 Inpatients by Race and Ethnicity in a Large Texas Metroplex.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess variations in presentation and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across race/ethnicity at a large Texas metroplex hospital. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. RESULTS: Although COVID-19 patients demonstrated significant socioeconomic disparities, race/ethnicity was not a significant predictor of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (P = 0.067) or case fatality (P = 0.078). Hospital admission varied by month, with incidence among Black/African-American and Hispanic/Latino patients peaking earlier in the pandemic timeline (P < 0.001). Patients reporting Spanish as their primary language were significantly more likely to be admitted to the ICU (odds ratio, 1.75; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients do not demonstrate significant racial/ethnic disparities in case fatality, suggesting that state-wide disparities in mortality rate are rooted in infection risk rather than hospital course. Variations in admission rates by race/ethnicity across the timeline and increased ICU admission among Spanish-speaking patients demonstrate the need to pursue tailored interventions on both a community and structural level to mitigate further health disparities throughout the pandemic and after.

Protocols for Personal Protective Equipment in a COVID-19 Medical Shelter.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has greatly impacted health-care systems worldwide, leading to an unprecedented rise in demand for health-care resources. In anticipation of an acute strain on established medical facilities in Dallas, Texas, federal officials worked in conjunction with local medical personnel to convert a convention center into a Federal Medical Station capable of caring for patients affected by COVID-19. A 200,000 square foot event space was designated as a direct patient care area, with surrounding spaces repurposed to house ancillary services. Given the highly transmissible nature of the novel coronavirus, the donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) was of particular importance for personnel staffing the facility. Furthermore, nationwide shortages in the availability of PPE necessitated the reuse of certain protective materials. This article seeks to delineate the procedures implemented regarding PPE in the setting of a COVID-19 disaster response shelter, including workspace flow, donning and doffing procedures, PPE conservation, and exposure event protocols.

Intravenous Low-Dose Ketamine Provides Greater Pain Control Compared to Fentanyl in a Civilian Prehospital Trauma System: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

Objective: A few studies report comparable analgesic efficacy between low-dose ketamine and opioids such as morphine or fentanyl; however, limited research has explored the safety and effectiveness of intravenous low-dose ketamine as a primary analgesic in a civilian prehospital setting. The objective of this study is to compare pain control between low-dose ketamine and fentanyl when administered intravenously (IV) for the indication of severe pain. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational review of prehospital adult patients (≥18 years) who presented with severe pain (numeric rating scale, 7-10) and were treated solely with either low-dose ketamine IV or fentanyl IV between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016. Propensity matched analysis was performed adjusting for all baseline variables with p ≤ 0.10 and for baseline pain score to match ketamine and fentanyl patients on a one-to-one ratio. The primary outcome was change in pain score from baseline to after treatment and evaluated with a paired t-test. Secondary outcomes were changes in vital signs and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) from baseline to after treatment, as well as incidence of clinically significant adverse events (AEs); AEs were followed from scene arrival through emergency department discharge. Results: Propensity matched analysis produced 79 matched pairs. Ketamine IV patients, receiving a mean (SD) dose of 0.3 (0.1) mg/kg, showed a significantly larger mean decrease in pain after treatment, compared to the fentanyl IV patients (-5.5 (3.1) vs. -2.5 (2.4), p < 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving ketamine IV achieved at least a 50% reduction in pain compared to those receiving fentanyl IV (67% vs. 19%, p < 0.001), marking 52 ketamine IV patients as responders to treatment. Vital signs demonstrated a nonsignificant decrease in blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, and GCS. No clinically significant AEs were reported for patients receiving ketamine IV. Conclusion: The significant reduction in pain, significantly high proportion of ketamine responders, and the lack of clinically significant AEs characterizing patients receiving low-dose ketamine IV compared to fentanyl IV, all provide further support for its use as an effective prehospital analgesic. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic.

Evolution and revolution in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the evolution of the technique of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including presenting important research that has made substantial improvements in patient outcome. RECENT FINDINGS: The last half century has seen the arising of guidelines for performing CPR increasingly based on good scientific evidence. Improvements in the technique, including teaching citizens 'compressions only CPR', have simplified the process of rescue while improving survival. SUMMARY: Numerous scientific studies and the better understanding of physiology have contributed to enhanced outcomes while creating community-based systems of care.

Reassessing After-Hour Arrival Patterns and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Differences in after-hours capability or performance of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) centers has the potential to impact outcomes of patients presenting outside of regular hours. METHODS: Using a prospective observational study, we analyzed all 1,247 non-transfer STEMI patients treated in 15 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities in Dallas, Texas, during a 24-month period (2010-2012). Controlling for confounding factors through a variety of statistical techniques, we explored differences in door-to-balloon (D2B) and in-hospital mortality for those presenting on weekends vs. weekdays and business vs. after hours. RESULTS: Patients who arrived at the hospital on weekends had larger D2B times compared to weekdays (75 vs. 65 minutes; KW=48.9; p<0.001). Patients who arrived after-hours had median D2B times >16 minutes longer than those who arrived during business hours and a higher likelihood of mortality (OR 2.23, CI [1.15-4.32], p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Weekends and after-hour PCI coverage is still associated with adverse D2B outcomes and in-hospital mortality, even in major urban settings. Disparities remain in after-hour STEMI treatment.

CPR & Beyond. How will IPR therapy impact the way we treat patients in the future?.

Scientific advances are bringing new revelations to the management of critical conditions such as cardiac arrest and shock. Harnessing the mechanics of IPR and understanding their effect is resulting in improvements in cardiac resuscitation and therapy for hypotension in both hemorrhage and non-trauma shock states. Perfusion is improving. Our understanding of the relationship of IPR and cerebral perfusion is also expanding. Therapies that can improve forward flow and perfusion of vital organs are being utilized by BLS personnel. Noninvasive bridging tools that capture the benefit of IPR hold further potential to improve hemodynamics. In the years to come, these and other insights gained through careful research will allow medical providers the world over to find new opportunities to save thousands of lives that would otherwise have been lost.

Temporal compliance trends in a cluster randomization with crossover trial of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Low compliance to randomized nondrug interventions can affect treatment estimates of clinical trials. Cluster-randomized crossover may be appropriate for increasing compliance in the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest setting. PURPOSE: The purpose was to determine whether the elapsed time from start of a nonblinded treatment period to episode enrollment date in a cluster-randomized crossover trial is associated with compliance to either a period of brief cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm analysis or a period of longer CPR with a delayed ECG rhythm analysis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium PRIMED Analyze Late (AL) versus Analyze Early (AE) trial was a cluster-randomized crossover trial at 10 North American regional sites. Clusters were created based on local service preference with treatment periods varying from 3 to 12 months depending on the expected enrollment rate of each randomizing unit. Episodes on the AL arm had a target of 180 s from CPR start to shock assessment and were deemed compliant if total time was between 150 and 210 s. Episodes on the AE arm had a target of <30 s from CPR start to shock assessment and were deemed compliant if total time was <60 s. We used logistic regression to examine the association between compliance (yes/no) and the elapsed number of days from the start of the treatment period to the episode in the framework of generalized estimating equations, controlling for randomized treatment (Late, reference = Early) and treatment period length (reference = 3, 4-5, 6, 7-11, and 12 months). RESULTS: We had 8769 episodes in our analysis population. Overall compliance to the randomized arm was 63.5%. After adjusting for treatment arm and treatment period length, the odds of compliance for episodes occurring >300 days from treatment period start were 33% lower (odds ratio (OR): 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52, 0.86) than for those <60 days from treatment period start. There was no significant difference in compliance between episodes before and immediately after a cluster crossed over to the opposite arm (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.57, 1.16). LIMITATIONS: A major challenge was the lack of synchronicity between training cycles and agency crossover dates. CONCLUSION: We found a significant decrease in compliance to the AL versus AE cardiac arrest intervention as the elapsed time from start of treatment period increased. We did not find a difference in compliance immediately before and after a crossover. While these results suggest that future cluster with crossover trials in the out-of-hospital setting be designed with short treatment periods and frequent crossovers, provider logistical concerns must also be considered.

Early versus later rhythm analysis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: In a departure from the previous strategy of immediate defibrillation, the 2005 resuscitation guidelines from the American Heart Association-International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation suggested that emergency medical service (EMS) personnel could provide 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before the first analysis of cardiac rhythm. We compared the strategy of a brief period of CPR with early analysis of rhythm with the strategy of a longer period of CPR with delayed analysis of rhythm. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomized trial involving adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at 10 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium sites in the United States and Canada. Patients in the early-analysis group were assigned to receive 30 to 60 seconds of EMS-administered CPR and those in the later-analysis group were assigned to receive 180 seconds of CPR, before the initial electrocardiographic analysis. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with satisfactory functional status (a modified Rankin scale score of ≤3, on a scale of 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). RESULTS: We included 9933 patients, of whom 5290 were assigned to early analysis of cardiac rhythm and 4643 to later analysis. A total of 273 patients (5.9%) in the later-analysis group and 310 patients (5.9%) in the early-analysis group met the criteria for the primary outcome, with a cluster-adjusted difference of -0.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -1.1 to 0.7; P=0.59). Analyses of the data with adjustment for confounding factors, as well as subgroup analyses, also showed no survival benefit for either study group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, we found no difference in the outcomes with a brief period, as compared with a longer period, of EMS-administered CPR before the first analysis of cardiac rhythm. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ROC PRIMED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00394706.).

Role of rapid sequence induction for intubation in the prehospital setting: helpful or harmful?

Use of rapid sequence induction for intubation was introduced to the prehospital environment in the hope of enhancing patient outcome by improving early definitive airway management. Varying success has been achieved in both air and ground transport emergency medical services systems, but concern persists about the potential to cause patients harm. Individual emergency medical services systems must determine the need for rapid sequence induction for intubation and their ability to implement a rapid sequence induction for intubation protocol effectively with minimal adverse events. Therefore, the value of rapid sequence induction for intubation is dependent on each emergency medical services system design in their ability to establish personnel requirements and ongoing training, expertise in airway management skills, medical direction and supervision, and a quality assurance program. If these principles are strictly adhered to, rapid sequence induction for intubation may be safely used as an advanced airway management technique in the prehospital setting.