ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To show that augmented reality (AR) visualization of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) data in 3D can be used to accurately localize targets in the head and neck region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight head and neck styrofoam phantoms were painted with a mixture of radioactive solution (Tc-99m) detectable with a handheld gamma probe and fluorescent ink visible only under ultraviolet (UV) light to create 10-20 simulated lymph nodes on their surface. After obtaining SPECT/CT images of these phantoms, virtual renderings of the nodes were generated from the SPECT/CT data and displayed using a commercially available AR headset. For each of three physician evaluators, the time required to localize lymph node targets was recorded (1) using the gamma probe alone and (2) using the gamma probe while wearing the AR headset. In addition, the surface localization accuracy when using the AR headset was evaluated by measuring the misalignment between the locations visually marked by the evaluators and the ground truth locations identified using UV stimulation of the ink at the site of the nodes. RESULTS: For all three evaluators, using the AR headset significantly reduced the time to detect targets (P = 0.012, respectively) compared to using the gamma probe alone. The average misalignment between the location marked by the evaluators and the ground truth location was 8.6 mm. CONCLUSION: AR visualization of SPECT/CT data in 3D allows for accurate localization of targets in the head and neck region, and may reduce the localization time of targets.
Subject(s)
Augmented Reality , Melanoma , Sentinel Lymph Node , Humans , Melanoma/diagnostic imaging , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
Our purpose was to investigate the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in melanoma patients before beginning therapy with antibodies to the programmed cell death 1 receptor (anti-PD-1). Methods: Imaging parameters including SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume, and the ratio of bone marrow to liver SUVmean (BLR) were measured from baseline PET/CT in 92 patients before the start of anti-PD-1 therapy. The association with survival and imaging parameters combined with clinical factors was evaluated. Clinical and laboratory data were compared between the high-BLR group (>median) and the low-BLR group (≤median). Results: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that BLR was an independent prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival (P = 0.017 and P = 0.011, respectively). The high-BLR group had higher white blood cell counts and neutrophil counts and a higher level of C-reactive protein than the low-BLR group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with a high BLR were associated with poor progression-free and overall survival, potentially explained by evidence of systemic inflammation known to be associated with immunosuppression.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Adult , Aged , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Humans , Middle Aged , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , PrognosisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: 18F-Fluciclovine scans of 165 consecutive men with BCR after primary definitive treatment with prostatectomy (n = 102) or radiotherapy (n = 63) were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy patients had concurrent imaging with at least one other conventional modality (CT (n = 31), MRI (n = 31), or bone scan (n = 26)). Findings from 18F-fluciclovine PET were compared with those from conventional imaging modalities. The positivity rate and impact of 18F-fluciclovine PET on patient management were recorded. In 33 patients who underwent at least one other PET imaging (18F-NaF PET/CT (n = 12), 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT (n = 5), 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT (n = 20), and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI (n = 5)), additional findings were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall positivity rate of 18F-fluciclovine PET was 67 %, which, as expected, increased with higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (ng/ml): 15 % (PSA < 0.5), 50 % (0.5 ≤ PSA < 1), 56 % (1 ≤ PSA < 2), 68 % (2 ≤ PSA < 5), and 94 % (PSA ≥ 5), respectively. One hundred and two patients (62 %) had changes in clinical management based on 18F-fluciclovine PET findings. Twelve of these patients (12 %) had lesion localization on 18F-fluciclovine PET, despite negative conventional imaging. Treatment plans of 14 patients with negative 18F-fluciclovine PET were changed based on additional PET imaging with a different radiopharmaceutical. CONCLUSION: 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT remains a useful diagnostic tool in the workup of patients with BCR PC, changing clinical management in 62 % of participants in our cohort.
Subject(s)
Carboxylic Acids , Cyclobutanes , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Prognosis , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiopharmaceuticals , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and other metabolic tumor parameters, obtained from baseline and first restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive melanoma patients (M, 57; F, 28) treated with ICIs who underwent PET/CT scans before and approximately 3 months after the start of immunotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Metabolic tumor parameters including MTV for all melanoma lesions were measured on each scan. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses of metabolic parameters combined with known clinical prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves for patients dichotomized based on median values of imaging parameters were generated. RESULTS: The median OS time in all patients was 45 months (95% CI 24-45 months). Univariate analysis demonstrated that MTV obtained from first restaging PET/CT scans (MTVpost) was the strongest prognostic factor for OS among PET/CT parameters (P < 0.0001). The median OS in patients with high MTVpost (≥ 23.44) was 16 months (95% CI 12-32 months) as compared with more than 60 months in patients with low MTVpost (< 23.44) (P = 0.0003). A multivariate model including PET/CT parameters and known clinical prognostic factors revealed that MTVpost and the presence of central nervous system lesions were independent prognostic factors for OS (P = 0.0004, 0.0167, respectively). One pseudoprogression case (1.2%) was seen in this population and classified into the high MTVpost group. CONCLUSION: Whole-body metabolic tumor volume from PET scan acquired approximately 3 months following initiation of immunotherapy (MTVpost) is a strong prognostic indicator of OS in melanoma patients. Although the possibility of pseudoprogression must be considered whenever evaluating first restaging PET imaging, it only occurred in 1 patient in our cohort.