Autoimmune encephalitis: what the radiologist needs to know.

Autoimmune encephalitis is a relatively novel nosological entity characterized by an immune-mediated damage of the central nervous system. While originally described as a paraneoplastic inflammatory phenomenon affecting limbic structures, numerous instances of non-paraneoplastic pathogenesis, as well as extra-limbic involvement, have been characterized. Given the wide spectrum of insidious clinical presentations ranging from cognitive impairment to psychiatric symptoms or seizures, it is crucial to raise awareness about this disease category. In fact, an early diagnosis can be dramatically beneficial for the prognosis both to achieve an early therapeutic intervention and to detect a potential underlying malignancy. In this scenario, the radiologist can be the first to pose the hypothesis of autoimmune encephalitis and refer the patient to a comprehensive diagnostic work-up - including clinical, serological, and neurophysiological assessments.In this article, we illustrate the main radiological characteristics of autoimmune encephalitis and its subtypes, including the typical limbic presentation, the features of extra-limbic involvement, and also peculiar imaging findings. In addition, we review the most relevant alternative diagnoses that should be considered, ranging from other encephalitides to neoplasms, vascular conditions, and post-seizure alterations. Finally, we discuss the most appropriate imaging diagnostic work-up, also proposing a suggested MRI protocol.

MOG-IgG testing strategies in accordance with the 2023 MOGAD criteria: a clinical-laboratory assessment.

BACKGROUND: Live cell-based assay (LCBA) is the gold standard for MOG-IgG detection, and fixed CBA (FCBA) is a widely used commercial alternative. Recent criteria attributed a diagnostic value to MOG-IgG titration with both LCBA and FCBA, with low-titre samples requiring additional supporting features for MOGAD diagnosis. However, FCBA titration is not validated. We aimed to assess the impact of the criteria-based MOG-IgG testing in MOGAD diagnosis. METHODS: Thirty-eight serum samples of LCBA MOG-IgG1-positive MOGAD patients were titred on MOG-IgG LCBA and FCBA, and the presence of supporting features for MOGAD assessed. MOGAD criteria were evaluated in four testing scenarios: (a) FCBA without titration; (b) FCBA with titration; c) LCBA without titration; (d) LCBA with titration. RESULTS: FCBA without titration failed to reach MOGAD diagnosis in 11/38 patients (28.9%, negative results in 5, lack of supporting features in 6). Patients with unconfirmed diagnosis had optic neuritis (ON, n = 8), or transverse myelitis (TM, n = 3). FCBA with titration allowed MOGAD diagnosis in 4 additional patients. Correlation between LCBA and FCBA titres was moderate (Spearman's rho 0.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FCBA yields high rate of misdiagnosis mainly due a lower analytical sensitivity. FCBA titration provides a moderate diagnostic advantage in FCBA positive patients.

Patient With Rigidity and Fasciculations: Steroid-Responsive Presentation of Anti-IgLON5 Disease

An 82-year-old man presented with 2-year lasting widespread muscular fasciculations, cramps, and limb stiffness, with spontaneous movements in the right lower limb, unsteady gait (Video 1), and falls. Neurophysiologic studies disclosed signs of neuromuscular hyperexcitability. CSF analysis showed high tau protein concentration (543 pg/mL; reference values, <404) and unique-to-CSF oligoclonal bands. Serum and CSF anti-IgLON5 antibodies were positive (Figure 1). He carried the anti-IgLON5 disease-associated HLA-DRB1*10:01 allele.1 Brain MRI, thoracoabdominal CT, whole-body FDG-PET, and video-polysomnography were unremarkable. No sleep disturbances, bulbar symptoms, parkinsonism, or dementia were detected. Intravenous methylprednisolone (500 mg/d for 5 days), followed by oral benzodiazepines, prompted rapid functional recovery, with limb stiffness and gait improvement (Video 1), which persisted at 6-month follow-up. Anti-IgLON5 disease has progressive course and protean clinical presentations,2 representative, in our patient, for overlapping signs and symptoms of neuromuscular hyperexcitability and rigidity. Identification of rare phenotypes is important because prompt recognition and treatment can improve prognosis.

COVID-19-associated serum and cerebrospinal fluid cytokines in post- versus para-infectious SARS-CoV-2-related Guillain-Barré syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with Coronavirus-2-related severe acute respiratory syndrome (COV-GBS) occurs as para- or post-infectious forms, depending on the timing of disease onset. In these two forms, we aimed to compare the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum proinflammatory cytokine profiles to evaluate differences that could possibly have co-pathogenic relevance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of 26 patients with either post-COV-GBS (n = 15), with disease onset occurring > 7 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection, or para-COV-GBS (n = 11), with disease onset 7 days or less. TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 were measured in the serum with SimplePlex™ Ella™ immunoassay. In addition to the para-/post-COV-GBS patients, serum levels of these cytokines were determined in those with non-COVID-associated-GBS (NC-GBS; n = 43), paucisymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection without GBS (COVID, n = 20), and in healthy volunteers (HV; n = 12). CSF cytokine levels were measured in patients with para-/post-COV-GBS, in those with NC-GBS (n = 29), or with Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 24). RESULTS: Serum/CSF cytokine levels did not differ in para- vs post-COV-GBS. We found that SARS-CoV-2 infection raises the serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8, as well as an increase of IL-6 (in serum and CSF) and IL-8 (in CSF) in either NC-GBS or COV-GBS than controls. CSF and serum cytokine levels resulted independent one with another. CONCLUSIONS: The change of cytokines linked to SARS-CoV-2 in COV-GBS appears to be driven by viral infection, although it has unique characteristics in GBS as such and does not account for cases with para- or post-infectious onset.

General features, pathogenesis, and laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune encephalitis.

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a group of inflammatory conditions that can associate with the presence of antibodies directed to neuronal intracellular, or cell surface antigens. These disorders are increasingly recognized as an important differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and of other common neuropsychiatric conditions. Autoantibody diagnostics plays a pivotal role for accurate diagnosis of AE, which is of utmost importance for the prompt recognition and early treatment. Several AE subgroups can be identified, either according to the prominent clinical phenotype, presence of a concomitant tumor, or type of neuronal autoantibody, and recent diagnostic criteria have provided important insights into AE classification. Antibodies to neuronal intracellular antigens typically associate with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and poor prognosis, whereas antibodies to synaptic/neuronal cell surface antigens characterize many AE subtypes that associate with tumors less frequently, and that are often immunotherapy-responsive. In addition to the general features of AE, we review current knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these disorders, focusing mainly on the potential role of neuronal antibodies in the most frequent conditions, and highlight current theories and controversies. Then, we dissect the crucial aspects of the laboratory diagnostics of neuronal antibodies, which represents an actual challenge for both pathologists and neurologists. Indeed, this diagnostics entails technical difficulties, along with particularly interesting novel features and pitfalls. The novelties especially apply to the wide range of assays used, including specific tissue-based and cell-based assays. These assays can be developed in-house, usually in specialized laboratories, or are commercially available. They are widely used in clinical immunology and in clinical chemistry laboratories, with relevant differences in analytic performance. Indeed, several data indicate that in-house assays could perform better than commercial kits, notwithstanding that the former are based on non-standardized protocols. Moreover, they need expertise and laboratory facilities usually unavailable in clinical chemistry laboratories. Together with the data of the literature, we critically evaluate the analytical performance of the in-house vs commercial kit-based approach. Finally, we propose an algorithm aimed at integrating the present strategies of the laboratory diagnostics in AE for the best clinical management of patients with these disorders.

Ambroxol as a disease-modifying treatment to reduce the risk of cognitive impairment in GBA-associated Parkinson's disease: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial. The AMBITIOUS study protocol.

Background: Heterozygous mutations in the GBA gene, encoding the lysosomal enzyme ß-glucocerebrosidase (GCase), are the most frequent genetic risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD). GBA-related PD (GBA-PD) patients have higher risk of dementia and reduced survival than non-carriers. Preclinical studies and one open-label trial in humans demonstrated that the chaperone ambroxol (ABX) increases GCase levels and modulates α-synuclein levels in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Methods and analysis: In this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial, we randomise patients with GBA-PD in a 1:1 ratio to either oral ABX 1.2 g/day or placebo. The duration of treatment is 52 weeks. Each participant is assessed at baseline and weeks 12, 26, 38, 52 and 78. Changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score and the frequency of mild cognitive impairment and dementia between baseline and weeks 52 are the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures include changes in validated scales/questionnaires assessing motor and non-motor symptoms. Neuroimaging features and CSF neurodegeneration markers are used as surrogate markers of disease progression. GCase activity, ABX and α-synuclein levels are also analysed in blood and CSF. A repeated-measures analysis of variance will be used for elaborating results. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat. Ethics and dissemination: The study and protocols have been approved by the ethics committee of centres. The study is conducted according to good clinical practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Trial registration numbers: NCT05287503, EudraCT 2021-004565-13.

Asynchronous combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD) in a girl with anti-MOG positivity: A case report and review of the literature.

The occurrence of combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD) is rare, data are limited to small case and cohort studies, mainly concerning adults. In few patients positivity to anti MOG antibody is reported, thus widening the spectrum of anti-MOG associated disorders (MOGAD). We describe a 7-year-old girl with optic neuritis followed 8 years later by peripheral demyelination, with fluctuating anti-MOG antibody positivity at cell-based assay. From the review of the literature, MOGAD-CCPD appear very rare in childhood, especially with asynchronous course. Clinicians should keep this possibility in mind to better define diagnosis in atypical demyelination syndromes, with therapeutical implications.

Visual System Involvement in Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy: Two Case Reports and a Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibodies can associate with an astrocytopathy often presenting as a meningoencephalitis. Visual involvement has been reported but scarcely defined. We describe 2 cases of GFAP astrocytopathy with predominant visual symptoms and present a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: We describe 2 patients with GFAP astrocytopathy from our neurology department. We performed a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines, including all patients with this disease and available clinical data, focusing on visual involvement. RESULTS: Patient 1 presented with bilateral optic disc edema and severe sudden bilateral loss of vision poorly responsive to therapy. Patient 2 showed bilateral optic disc edema, headache, and mild visual loss with complete recovery after steroids. We screened 275 records and included 84 articles (62 case reports and 22 case series) for a total of 592 patients. Visual involvement was reported in 149/592 (25%), with either clinical symptoms or paraclinical test-restricted abnormalities. Bilateral optic disc edema was found in 80/159 (50%) of patients investigated with fundoscopy, among which 49/80 (61%) were asymptomatic. One hundred (100/592, 17%) reported visual symptoms, often described as blurred vision or transient visual obscurations. Optic neuritis was rare and diagnosed in only 6% of all patients with GFAP astrocytopathy, often without consistent clinical and paraclinical evidence to support the diagnosis. Four patients (including patient 1) manifested a severe, bilateral optic neuritis with poor treatment response. In patients with follow-up information, a relapsing disease course was more frequently observed in those with vs without visual involvement (35% vs 11%, p = 0.0035, OR 3.6 [CI 1.44-8.88]). DISCUSSION: Visual system involvement in GFAP astrocytopathy is common and heterogeneous, ranging from asymptomatic bilateral optic disc edema to severe bilateral loss of vision, but optic neuritis is rare. GFAP CSF antibody testing should be considered in patients with encephalitis/meningoencephalitis or myelitis and bilateral optic disc edema, even without visual symptoms, and in patients with severe bilateral optic neuritis, especially when AQP4 antibodies are negative. Visual symptoms might associate with a higher relapse risk and help to identify patients who may require chronic immunosuppression.

Acute pediatric encephalitis: etiology, course, and outcome of a 12-year single-center immunocompetent cohort.

BACKGROUND: Encephalitis is an uncommon but severe disorder due to an inflammation of the brain parenchyma, usually diagnosed on clinical, laboratory, electroencephalographic, and neuroradiological features. New causes of encephalitis have been reported in recent years, so diagnostic criteria have changed over time. We report on a single-center experience of a pediatric Hospital, the hub of its region, over 12 years (2008-2021), with the evaluation of all children managed for acute encephalitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical, laboratory, neuroradiological, and EEG data from the acute phase and outcome of all immunocompetent patients diagnosed with acute encephalitis. According to the newly proposed criteria for pediatric autoimmune encephalitis, we divided patients into infectious, definite autoimmune, probable autoimmune, and possible autoimmune, and performed a comparison between the different groups. RESULTS: 48 patients (26 females, mean age 4.4 years), 19 with infections, and 29 with autoimmune encephalitis, were included. Herpes simplex virus 1 encephalitis was the most frequently identified etiology followed by anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Movement disorders at onset and a longer hospital stay were observed more frequently in autoimmune compared to infectious encephalitis (p p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Among the autoimmune group, children who started immunomodulatory treatment earlier (within 7 days from onset) had more frequent complete functional recovery (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Herpes virus and anti-NMDAR encephalitis are the most frequent etiologies within our cohort. Clinical onset and course are extremely variable. Since early immunomodulatory treatment was associated with a better functional outcome, our data confirm that a timely diagnostic classification in definite, probable, or possible autoimmune encephalitis can help the clinician in a successful therapeutic approach.

Functional outcome in patients with traumatic or hemorrhagic brain injuries undergoing decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy and 6-month rehabilitation.

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and craniotomy (CT) to treat increased intracranial pressure after brain injury are common but controversial choices in clinical practice. Studying a large cohort of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS) on rehabilitation pathways, we aimed to determine the impact of DC and CT on functional outcome/mortality, and on seizures occurrence. This observational retrospective study included patients with either TBI, or HS, who underwent DC or CT, consecutively admitted to our unit for 6-month neurorehabilitation programs between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018. Neurological status using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and rehabilitation outcome with Functional Independence Measure, both assessed at baseline and on discharge, post-DC cranioplasty, prophylactic antiepileptic drug use, occurrence of early/late seizures, infectious complications, and death during hospitalization were evaluated and analyzed with linear and logistic regression models. Among 278 patients, DC was performed in 98 (66.2%) with HS, and in 98 (75.4%) with TBI, whilst CT in 50 (33.8%) with HS, and in 32 (24.6%) with TBI. On admission, GCS scores were lower in patients treated with CT than in those with DC (HS, p = 0.016; TBI, p = 0.024). Severity of brain injury and older age were the main factors affecting functional outcome, without between-group differences, but DC associated with worse functional outcome, independently from severity or type of brain injury. Unprovoked seizures occurred post-DC cranioplasty more frequently after HS (OR = 5.142, 95% CI 1.026-25.784, p = 0.047). DC and CT shared similar risk of mortality, which associated with sepsis (OR = 16.846, 95% CI 5.663-50.109, p < 0.0001), or acute symptomatic seizures (OR = 4.282, 95% CI 1.276-14.370, p = 0.019), independently from the neurosurgery procedures. Among CT and DC, the latter neurosurgical procedure is at major risk of worse functional outcome in patients with mild-to-severe TBI, or HS undergoing an intensive rehabilitation program. Complications with sepsis or acute symptomatic seizures increase the risk of death.

Antibody response elicited by the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster in patients with multiple sclerosis: Who gains from it?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although two doses of COVID-19 vaccine elicited a protective humoral response in most persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), a significant group of them treated with immunosuppressive disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) showed less efficient responses. METHODS: This prospective multicenter observational study evaluates differences in immune response after a third vaccine dose in pwMS. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-three pwMS were analyzed. Compared to untreated patients, there was a 50-fold decrease (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.3-100.0, p < 0.001) in serum SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in those on rituximab, a 20-fold decrease (95% CI = 8.3-50.0, p < 0.001) in those on ocrelizumab, and a 2.3-fold decrease (95% CI = 1.2-4.6, p = 0.015) in those on fingolimod. As compared to the antibody levels after the second vaccine dose, patients on the anti-CD20 drugs rituximab and ocrelizumab showed a 2.3-fold lower gain (95% CI = 1.4-3.8, p = 0.001), whereas those on fingolimod showed a 1.7-fold higher gain (95% CI = 1.1-2.7, p = 0.012), compared to patients treated with other DMTs. CONCLUSIONS: All pwMS increased their serum SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels after the third vaccine dose. The mean antibody values of patients treated with ocrelizumab/rituximab remained well below the empirical "protective threshold" for risk of infection identified in the CovaXiMS study (>659 binding antibody units/mL), whereas for patients treated with fingolimod this value was significantly closer to the cutoff.

In-vivo characterization of macro- and microstructural injury of the subventricular zone in relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis.

Introduction: The subventricular zone (SVZ) represents one of the main adult brain neurogenesis niche. In-vivo imaging of SVZ is very challenging and little is known about MRI correlates of SVZ macro- and micro-structural injury in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Methods: The aim of the present study is to evaluate differences in terms of volume and microstructural changes [as assessed with the novel Spherical Mean Technique (SMT) model, evaluating: Neurite Signal fraction (INTRA); Extra-neurite transverse (EXTRATRANS) and mean diffusivity (EXTRAMD)] in SVZ between relapsing-remitting (RR) or progressive (P) MS patients and healthy controls (HC). We are also going to explore whether SVZ microstructural injury correlate with caudate (a nucleus that is in the vicinity of the SVZ) or thalamus (another well-defined grey matter area which is further from SVZ than caudate) volume and clinical disability. Clinical and brain MRI data were prospectively acquired from 20 HC, 101 RRMS, and 50 PMS patients. Structural and diffusion metrics inside the global SVZ, normal appearing (NA-) SVZ, caudate and thalamus were collected. Results: We found a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of NA-SVZ EXTRAMD (PMS>RRMS>HC; p = 0.002), EXTRATRANS (PMS>RRMS>HC; p<0.0001), and INTRA (HC>RRMS>PMS; p = 0.009). Multivariable models showed that NA-SVZ metrics significantly predicted caudate (R 2 = 0.21, p < 0.0001), but not thalamus, atrophy. A statistically significant correlation between EXTRAMD and EXTRATRANS of the NA-SVZ and EDSS (r=0.25, p=0.003 and r=0.24, p = 0.003, respectively) was found. These findings were confirmed in analyses restricted to RRMS, but not to PMS patients. Discussion: In conclusion, the microstructural damage we observed within the NA-SVZ of MS patients - reflecting higher free water content (higher EXTRAMD), cytoarchitecture disruption and astrogliosis (higher EXTRATRANS and lower INTRA) - was more evident in the progressive as compared to the relapsing phases of MS. These abnormalities were significantly associated with a more pronounced caudate atrophy and higher clinical disability scores. Our findings may support the neuroprotective role of SVZ in MS patients.

Contactin-1 links autoimmune neuropathy and membranous glomerulonephritis.

Membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults, mediated by glomerular antibody deposition to an increasing number of newly recognised antigens. Previous case reports have suggested an association between patients with anti-contactin-1 (CNTN1)-mediated neuropathies and MGN. In an observational study we investigated the pathobiology and extent of this potential cause of MGN by examining the association of antibodies against CNTN1 with the clinical features of a cohort of 468 patients with suspected immune-mediated neuropathies, 295 with idiopathic MGN, and 256 controls. Neuronal and glomerular binding of patient IgG, serum CNTN1 antibody and protein levels, as well as immune-complex deposition were determined. We identified 15 patients with immune-mediated neuropathy and concurrent nephrotic syndrome (biopsy proven MGN in 12/12), and 4 patients with isolated MGN from an idiopathic MGN cohort, all seropositive for IgG4 CNTN1 antibodies. CNTN1-containing immune complexes were found in the renal glomeruli of patients with CNTN1 antibodies, but not in control kidneys. CNTN1 peptides were identified in glomeruli by mass spectroscopy. CNTN1 seropositive patients were largely resistant to first-line neuropathy treatments but achieved a good outcome with escalation therapies. Neurological and renal function improved in parallel with suppressed antibody titres. The reason for isolated MGN without clinical neuropathy is unclear. We show that CNTN1, found in peripheral nerves and kidney glomeruli, is a common target for autoantibody-mediated pathology and may account for between 1 and 2% of idiopathic MGN cases. Greater awareness of this cross-system syndrome should facilitate earlier diagnosis and more timely use of effective treatment.

CD19+ B cell values predict the increase of anti-SARS CoV2 antibodies in fingolimod-treated and COVID-19-vaccinated patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with fingolimod for multiple sclerosis (MS) reduces the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination. The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate whether main lymphocyte subsets and demographic features correlated to the subsequent increase in anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies following the third dose of COVID-19 vaccination in fingolimod-treated MS patients. METHODS: This was a prospective single-center observational exploratory study including a subgroup of adult patients with MS (pwMS) in treatment with fingolimod who underwent COVID-19 vaccination. The association of anti-SARS-CoV2 antibody levels (reported as the Log10 of the difference between the post and pre third dose levels) with the total number and percentage of CD3+ T and CD19+ B was assessed by a linear regression model adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: We found that peripheral blood CD19+ B lymphocytes before the third dose of vaccination in pwMS treated with fingolimod predict the subsequent increase of anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies. CONCLUSION: This work suggests that evaluating the percentage of CD19+ B cells may be important to identify patients at risk of not producing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, with possible reduced protection from COVID-19.

Comparison of Fixed and Live Cell-Based Assay for the Detection of AChR and MuSK Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Live cell-based assay (CBA) can detect acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) or muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies (Abs) in a proportion of patients with radioimmunoassay (RIA)-double seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSN-MG). A commercial fixed CBA for AChR and MuSK Abs has recently become available; however, comparative studies on fixed and live CBAs are lacking. In this study, we compared the performance of fixed and live CBAs in patients with RIA-dSN MG and assessed their sensitivity in RIA-positive MG samples and their specificity. METHODS: AChR and MuSK Abs were tested in 292 serum samples from 2 Italian MG referral centers by live and fixed CBAs: 192 from patients with MG and 100 from controls. All samples had been previously assessed by RIA: 66 were AChR positive, 40 MuSK positive, and 86 dSN. All controls were negative. Two independent raters assessed the CBA results. Fixed and live CBAs were compared with the McNemar test; interrater and interlaboratory agreement were assessed with Cohen's kappa or interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), as appropriate. RESULTS: In 86 RIA-dSN samples, fixed CBA detected Abs in 10 cases (11.6%, 95% CI 5.7-20.3), whereas live CBA detected Abs in 16 (18.6%, 95% CI 11.0-28.5) (p = 0.0143). Of these sera, those positive by fixed CBA were also positive by live CBA. In addition, live CBA could detect MuSK Abs in 4 and AChR Abs in 2 samples that were negative by fixed CBA, providing an 8% (95% CI 2.9-16.6) further increase in the Ab detection rate. These results were confirmed by flow cytometry. In the RIA-positive cohort, the sensitivity for AChR Abs was 98.5% (95% CI 91.9%-99.9%) for fixed CBA and 100% (95% CI 94.6-100) for live CBA (p = 0.1573). For both assays, the sensitivity for MuSK Abs was 100% (95% CI 91.2-100), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI 96.4-100). Interrater agreement was almost perfect for live and fixed CBAs (Cohen's kappa 0.972 and 0.978, respectively), alike interlaboratory agreement. Interrater agreement for the CBA score ranged from good to excellent (ICC: 0.832-0.973). DISCUSSION: Fixed CBA represents a valuable alternative to RIA for AChR and MuSK Ab detection in patients with MG and could be considered as a first-step diagnostic test. Live CBA can be useful in the serologic evaluation of RIA- and fixed CBA-negative samples.

Prognostic relevance of quantitative and longitudinal MOG antibody testing in patients with MOGAD: a multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: IgG antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) define a subset of associated disorders (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disorders (MOGAD)) that can have a relapsing course. However, information on relapse predictors is scarce. The utility of retesting MOG-IgG over time and measuring their titres is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of longitudinal MOG-IgG titre measurement to predict relapses in patients with MOGAD. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre Italian cohort study, we recruited patients with MOGAD and available longitudinal samples (at least one >3 months after disease onset) and tested them with a live cell-based assay with endpoint titration (1:160 cut-off). Samples were classified as 'attack' (within 30 days since a disease attack (n=59, 17%)) and 'remission' (≥31 days after attack (n=295, 83%)). RESULTS: We included 102 patients with MOGAD (57% adult and 43% paediatric) with a total of 354 samples (83% from remission and 17% from attack). Median titres were higher during attacks (1:1280 vs 1:640, p=0.001). Median onset titres did not correlate with attack-related disability, age or relapses. Remission titres were higher in relapsing patients (p=0.02). When considering the first remission sample available for each patient, titres >1:2560 were predictors of relapsing course in survival (log rank, p<0.001) and multivariate analysis (p<0.001, HR: 10.9, 95% CI 3.4 to 35.2). MOG-IgG seroconversion to negative was associated with a 95% relapse incidence rate reduction (incidence rate ratio: 0.05, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent MOG-IgG positivity and high remission titres are associated with an increased relapse risk. Longitudinal MOG-IgG titres could be useful to stratify patients to be treated with long term immunosuppression.

Impact of seizures and their prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs on rehabilitation course of patients with traumatic or hemorrhagic brain injury.

Objective: To determine whether, in patients undergoing rehabilitation after traumatic or hemorrhagic brain injury, seizures and the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) negatively impact on functional outcome, and, in turn, whether prophylactic AED therapy can prevent the development of seizures. Design: Observational retrospective study. Setting: Highly specialized inpatient neurorehabilitation clinic. Participants: Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), or hemorrhagic stroke (HS) consecutively admitted to our neurorehabilitation unit between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018. Main measures and variables: Patients' demographic data, neurological status (Glasgow Coma Scale), and rehabilitation outcome (Functional Independence Measure scale), both assessed on admission and on discharge, associated neurosurgical procedures (craniectomy, or cranioplasty), AED use, early or late seizures occurrence, and death during hospitalization. Results: Of 740 patients, 162 (21.9%) had seizures, and prophylactic AEDs were started in 192 (25.9%). Multivariate logistic regression identified severity of brain injury as a risk factor for acute symptomatic seizures (ASS) in HS (OR = 1.800, 95%CI = 1.133-1.859, p = 0.013), and for unprovoked seizures (US) in TBI (OR = 1.679, 95%CI = 1.062-2.655, p = 0.027). Prophylaxis with AEDs reduced ASS frequency, but, if protracted for months, was associated with US occurrence (HS, p < 0.0001; TBI, p = 0.0002; vs. untreated patients). Presence of US (ß = -0.12; p < 0.0001) and prophylaxis with AEDs (ß = -0.09; p = 0.002), were associated with poor functional outcome, regardless of age, severity of brain insult, and HS vs. TBI subtype. Conclusions: Severity of brain injury and occurrence of seizures during neurorehabilitation are the main driver of poor outcome in both HS and TBI. The possible detrimental role on the epileptogenic and functional outcome played by seizures prophylaxis with AEDs, nonetheless useful to prevent ASS if administered over the first week after the brain injury, warrants further investigation.

Healthcare Worker Study Cohort to Determine the Level and Durability of Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses after Two Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.

We prospectively studied immunological response against SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination among healthcare workers without (group A) and with previous infection (group B). The analyses were collected at T0 (before the BNT162b2), T1 (before the second dose), T2 and T6 (1 and 6 months after the second dose). For cellular immune response, the activation-induced cell marker assay was performed with CD4 and CD8 Spike peptide megapools expressed as Stimulation Index. For humoral immune response, we determined antibodies to Spike-1 and nucleocapsid protein. The linear mixed model compared specific times to T0. The CD4+ Spike response overall rate of change was significant at T1 (p = 0.038) and at T2 (p < 0.001), while decreasing at T6. For CD8+ Spike reactivity, the interaction between the time and group was significant (p = 0.0265), and the p value for group comparison was significant at the baseline (p = 0.0030) with higher SI in previously infected subjects. Overall, the anti-S Abs significantly increased from T1 to T6 compared to T0. The group B at T6 retained high anti-S titer (p < 0.001). At T6, in both groups we found a persistent humoral response and a high CD4+ T cell response able to cross recognize SARS-COV-2 variants including epsilon, even if not a circulating virus at that time.