Dissociable contributions of the amygdala and ventral hippocampus to stress-induced changes in defensive behavior.

Severe stress can produce multiple persistent changes in defensive behavior. While much is known about the circuits supporting stress-induced associative fear responses, how circuit plasticity supports the broader changes in defensive behavior observed after severe stress remains unclear. Here, we find that stress-induced plasticity in the ventral hippocampus (vHC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) support doubly dissociable defensive behavioral changes. Stress-induced protein synthesis in the BLA was found to support lasting enhancements in stress sensitivity but not enhancements in exploratory anxiety-related behaviors, whereas protein synthesis in the vHC was found to support enhancements in anxiety-related behavior but not enhancements in stress sensitivity. Like protein synthesis, neuronal activity of the BLA and vHC were found to differentially support the expression of these same defensive behaviors. Lastly, blockade of associative fear had no impact on stress-induced changes in anxiety-related behavior. These findings highlight that multiple memory-systems support stress-induced defensive behavior changes.

Aversive experience drives offline ensemble reactivation to link memories across days.

Memories are encoded in neural ensembles during learning and stabilized by post-learning reactivation. Integrating recent experiences into existing memories ensures that memories contain the most recently available information, but how the brain accomplishes this critical process remains unknown. Here we show that in mice, a strong aversive experience drives the offline ensemble reactivation of not only the recent aversive memory but also a neutral memory formed two days prior, linking the fear from the recent aversive memory to the previous neutral memory. We find that fear specifically links retrospectively, but not prospectively, to neutral memories across days. Consistent with prior studies, we find reactivation of the recent aversive memory ensemble during the offline period following learning. However, a strong aversive experience also increases co-reactivation of the aversive and neutral memory ensembles during the offline period. Finally, the expression of fear in the neutral context is associated with reactivation of the shared ensemble between the aversive and neutral memories. Taken together, these results demonstrate that strong aversive experience can drive retrospective memory-linking through the offline co-reactivation of recent memory ensembles with memory ensembles formed days prior, providing a neural mechanism by which memories can be integrated across days.

Ensemble-specific deficit in neuronal intrinsic excitability in aged mice.

With the prevalence of age-related cognitive deficits on the rise, it is essential to identify cellular and circuit alterations that contribute to age-related memory impairment. Increased intrinsic neuronal excitability after learning is important for memory consolidation, and changes to this process could underlie memory impairment in old age. Some studies find age-related deficits in hippocampal neuronal excitability that correlate with memory impairment but others do not, possibly due to selective changes only in activated neural ensembles. Thus, we tagged CA1 neurons activated during learning and recorded their intrinsic excitability 5 hours or 7 days post-training. Adult mice exhibited increased neuronal excitability 5 hours after learning, specifically in ensemble (learning-activated) CA1 neurons. As expected, ensemble excitability returned to baseline 7 days post-training. In aged mice, there was no ensemble-specific excitability increase after learning, which was associated with impaired hippocampal memory performance. These results suggest that CA1 may be susceptible to age-related impairments in post-learning ensemble excitability and underscore the need to selectively measure ensemble-specific changes in the brain.

ezTrack-A Step-by-Step Guide to Behavior Tracking.

Tracking animal behavior by video is one of the most common tasks in neuroscience. Previously, we have validated ezTrack, a free, flexible, and easy-to-use software for the analysis of animal behavior. ezTrack's Location Tracking Module can be used for the positional analysis of an individual animal and is applicable to a wide range of behavioral tasks. Separately, ezTrack's Freeze Analysis Module is designed for the analysis of defensive freezing behavior. ezTrack supports a range of desirable tools, including options for cropping and masking portions of the field of view, defining regions of interest, producing summary data for specified portions of time, algorithms to remove the influence of electrophysiology cables and other tethers, batch processing of multiple videos, and video down-sampling. Moreover, ezTrack produces a range of interactive plots and visualizations to promote users' confidence in their results. In this protocols paper, we provide step-by-step instructions for the use of ezTrack, from tips for recording behavior to instructions for using the software for video analysis. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Software environment installation Basic Protocol 2: Using the Location Tracking Module Basic Protocol 3: Using the Freeze Analysis Module.