Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for chronic lesions: clinical experience with hamstring versus ligament advanced reinforcement system as graft.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and laximetric results in chronic, isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture repairs, using either a hamstring graft or an artificial ligament (ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS®)). METHODS: Sixteen patients presenting with an isolated unilateral PCL rupture were included in this retrospective study. Initially, eight underwent a PCL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft (hamstring group), and over a later period, eight further patients underwent a reconstruction using an artificial ligament with a new procedure. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were male and one female, with an average age of 29.3 years. All patients were operated on within an average time of 18 months post-injury. Pre-operative posterior laxity was equivalent (p = 0.309), 18.25 mm on average for the hamstring group and 18.75 mm for the LARS group. With an average follow-up of 24 months, residual posterior laxity was significantly improved, decreasing from 18.25 to 7.37 mm for the hamstring group (p < 0.05) with a median at 7.5 mm and from 18.75 to 5.25 mm for the LARS group (p < 0.05) with a median at 5 mm. The improvement in laxity for the hamstring group was 60% and 71.5% for the LARS group. The LARS group compares favourably (p = 0.003 and 0.01). Tegner activity level improved significantly following ligamentoplasty, with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.4). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the Lysholm and IKDC scores between the two groups (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION: The initial hypothesis of this study was proven correct. Nevertheless, a longer term study is necessary to assess the consequences of residual laxity in hamstring grafts and the long-term behaviour and tolerance of the LARS artificial ligament.

Epidemiology and treatment of acetabular fractures in a level-1 trauma centre: Retrospective study of 414 patients over 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies of acetabular fractures (AFs) are scarce and, to our knowledge, the most recent one from France, by Letournel and Judet, dates back to 1993. Studies have suggested a decrease in high-energy AFs contrasting with an increase in low-energy AFs due to the longer life expectancy. However, a French case-series study failed to confirm these data. We therefore conducted a 10-year retrospective study in a level-1 trauma centre to: (1) characterise the epidemiological profile of AF; (2) and to describe the treatment strategy. HYPOTHESIS: The epidemiological profile of AF in France is consonant with data from European case-series studies. METHOD: All patients managed for AF between 2005 and 2014 were included in this single-centre retrospective study. All patients were re-evaluated at our centre or another facility 6 months after the fracture. The epidemiological data were compared in the three treatment groups: non-operative, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and total hip arthroplasty (THA). RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2014, 414 patients were admitted for AF. Mean age was 49.4 years (range: 15-101 years). Treatment was non-operative in 231 (56%) older patients, most of whom had low-energy fractures involving the anterior wall. THA with or without acetabular reinforcement and screw-plate fixation was performed in 27 (7%) older patients, most of whom had posterior-wall fractures and experienced postoperative complications (26/27 patients, 96%). ORIF was used in 156 (38%) younger patients, most of whom had high-energy fractures of greater complexity. CONCLUSION: Our results reflect the current indications in AF management. The epidemiological characteristics in our population are comparable to those reported in the few recent European epidemiological studies. To our knowledge, this is the largest French epidemiological study since the landmark work by Letournel and Judet. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.