Evaluation of Pain and Use of Analgesics during Medical Termination of Pregnancy in Real-Life Settings.

INTRODUCTION: Women frequently report pain associated with medical termination of pregnancy (MToP), and its management can differ largely between centres. This study aimed at evaluating in real-life settings pain related to MToP and its management in France. METHODS: This was a non-interventional prospective, longitudinal study run in 23 centres between 2015 and 2016 that included 893 pregnant women. Pain was reported by women prior any curative analgesic intake (CAI) through a five-level Likert scale (absence, mild, moderated, severe, extreme). Modalities of analgesic prophylaxis prescription (APP) and intake (API) and CAI were collected. Risk factors were investigated using ordinal logistic regression (for pain) or logistic regression (for CAI) with stepwise selection of variables. RESULTS: APP was prescribed to 657 (73.7%) women irrespective of the gestational age, among whom 386 (73.7%) took the treatment. Out of 740 women who documented their pain symptoms prior to any CAI, few declared no pain (n = 94, 12.7%) or intense pain (n = 88, 11.9%). The majority reported mild or moderate pain (n = 558, 75.4%). On multivariate analysis adjusted on gestational age, increasing initial [odds ratio (OR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.47] or total dose (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26) of misoprostol taken were independent factors associated with risk of more pain. When adjusting for gestational age, initial dose of misoprostol (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.45-2.66) and pain experienced (OR 3.58, 95% CI 2.82-4.55) were significantly associated with higher risk of CAI while API (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36; 0.75) was negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the women received an APP, but not all used it. API and gestational age were not related to different risks of more pain following MToP, whereas history of at least one child showed a negative association. Higher doses of misoprostol were strongly associated with both pain and CAI. API was associated with a decreased risk of CAI.

The uterine volume is dramatically decreased after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation during childhood regardless of the conditioning regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on the uterine volume of childhood acute leukemia (AL) survivor depending on age at HSCT and the type of myeloablative conditioning regimen. SETTING: Thirteen French University Teaching Hospitals. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENT(S): Eighty-eight women who underwent HSCT during childhood or adolescence for AL compared to a control group. INTERVENTION(S): A multicentric prospective national study compared the uterine volume in a cohort of childhood AL survivor adult women treated with HSCT, matched 1:1 to control women. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging scans included diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Scans were centralized for a double-blinded reading by 2 radiologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Uterine volume, uterine body-to-cervix ratio, and apparent diffusion coefficient. RESULT(S): The mean age at HSCT was 9.1 ± 0.3 years with a mean follow-up duration of 16.4 ± 0.5 years. The cohort of 88 HSCT survivor women was composed of 2 subgroups depending on the myeloablative conditioning regimen received: an alkylating agent-based regimen group (n = 34) and a total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimen group (n = 54). Among the 88 women, 77 were considered as having a "correct hormonal balance" with estrogens supplied by hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) or because of a residual ovarian function. In the control group (n = 88), the mean uterine volume was 79.7 ± 3.3 mL. The uterine volume significantly decreased in all HSCT survivor women. After the alkylating agent-based regimen, the uterine volume was 45.3 ± 5.6 mL, corresponding to a significant volume reduction of 43.1% (28.8-57.4%) compared with that of the control group. After TBI, the uterine volume was 19.6 ± 1.9 mL, corresponding to a significant volume reduction of 75.3% (70.5%-80.2%) compared with that of the control group. After the alkylating agent-based regimen, the uterine volume dramatically decreased in women with POI without HRT compared with that in those with a correct hormonal balance (15.2 ± 2.6 vs. 49.3 ± 6 mL). In contrast, after TBI, the uterine volume was similar in all women, with no positive effect of hormonal impregnation on the uterine volume (16.3 ± 2.6 vs. 20.1 ± 2.2 mL, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): The uterine volume was diminished after HSCT, regardless of the conditioning regimen. The physiopathology needs to be further investigated: specific impact of a high dose of an alkylating agent; impact of hormone deprivation around puberty; poor compliance to HRT; or different myometrial impact of HRT compared with endogenous ovarian estrogens? CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03583294 (enrollment of the first subject, November 11, 2017; enrollment of the last subject, June 25, 2021).

Efficacy of mifepristone - Prostaglandin analogue combination in medical termination of pregnancy up to and beyond 7 weeks of amenorrhea: The RYMMa study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, in real-life conditions, the success rate of the protocol mifepristone 600 mg / prostaglandin analogue (PG) in women requesting medical termination of pregnancy (MToP) either up to or beyond 7 weeks of amenorrhea (WA). STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed between 2015 and 2016. This was a non-interventional prospective, multicentre, longitudinal study conducted in France, among a sample of public and/or private centres dealing with MToP. Characteristics of women, term of Mtop, modality of PG used were reported. The primary outcome was success of MToP, defined as complete abortion without surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 893 pregnant women with less than the legal term of 14 WA were included in this study: 490 (54.9 %) ≤7 WA and 403 (45.1 %) >7 WA comprising 29 > 9 WA. The mean age of women was 28.1 ± 6.8 years and the one of pregnancy was 7.0 WA ± 1.3 WA. The most frequently used PG combined to mifepristone 600 mg was misoprostol 400 µg (57.0 % ≤7 WA and 35.1 % >7 WA) or 800 µg per os (oral or oral transmucosal) (27.5 % ≤7 WA and 40.1 % >7 WA). Vaginal misoprostol (6.4 %, N = 48) and gemeprost (5.2 %, N = 39) were less used. In women ≤7 WA (N = 422) and women >7 WA (N = 354) for whom result of the MToP was collected, success rates were 94.5 % (95 %CI 91.9 %-96.5 %) and 92.4 % (95 %CI 89.1 %-94.9 %), respectively (p = 0.219). In multivariate regression analysis, three factors were significantly associated with a higher risk of MToP failure: increased number of previous pregnancies (OR = 1.233; 95 %CI 1.086-1.401 for one pregnancy), increased number of previous surgical ToPs (OR = 1.563; 95 %CI 1.036-2.359 for one ToP) and increased interval between mifepristone and PG intake (OR = 1.061; 95 %CI 1.012-1.112 for one hour). Term of pregnancy (OR = 1.497; 95 %CI 0.833-2.690 for ≤7 WA vs >7WA), administration route (OR = 1.553; 95 %CI 0.488-4.936 for oral vs oral transmucosal; and OR = 1.216; 95 %CI 0.625-2.366 for vaginal vs oral transmucosal), and dose of misoprostol (OR = 1.000; 95 %CI 0.999-1.001), were not associated with the risk of failure. Overall, tolerance was good. CONCLUSION: This study showed, in real-life settings, a high rate of success for MToP using mifepristone 600 mg, independent of the pregnancy term and the therapeutic protocol used. MToP was safe and well tolerated however only a small number of women beyond 9 WA have been included.

National survey on the opinions of French specialists in assisted reproductive technologies about social issues impacting the future revision of the French Bioethics laws.

INTRODUCTION: France is known for its conservative and unique position in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). At the eve of the future revision of French Bioethics laws, we decided to conduct a national survey to examine the opinions of French specialists in ARTs about social issues. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive study conducted in May 2017 in a university teaching hospital using an anonymous online questionnaire on current issues in ARTs. The questionnaire was sent by email to 650 French ARTs specialists, both clinicians and embryologists. RESULTS: After 3 reminders, 408 responses were collected resulting in a participation rate of 62.7% (408/650). Concerning pre-implantation genetic testing, 80% of the physicians were in favor of expanding the indications, which in France are presently limited to incurable genetic diseases. Authorizing elective Fertility Preservation was supported by 93.4% of the specialists, but without social coverage for 86.3% of them. Concerning gamete donation, 77.4% of the French ARTs specialists were in favor of giving a financial compensation to donors, 92% promoted preserving their anonymity and 80.9% were against a directed donation. ARTs for single heterosexual women were supported by 63.4% of the French specialists and by 72.5% for lesbian couples. The legalization of surrogacy was requested by 55.2%. DISCUSSION: Pending the revision of the French Bioethics laws, this survey provides an overview of the opinion of the specialists in ARTs on expanding ARTs for various social indications.Because of the evolution of social values, a more liberal and inclusive ART program is desired by the majority of ART specialists in France.

Decrease in pregnancy rate after endometrial scratch in women undergoing a first or second in vitro fertilization. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does endometrial scratch in women undergoing a first or second IVF/ICSI attempt improve the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometrial scratch (ES) in women undergoing their first or second IVF/ICSI attempt does not enhance the CPR under the technical conditions of our study. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have suggested that physical scratch of the endometrium before an IVF attempt could improve embryo implantation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a randomized controlled multi-center, two-arm, parallel trial. Inclusions started in February 2010 and stopped prematurely in July 2014 after an unplanned interim analysis. At the time of study closure, 191 of the planned 358 patients had been included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients included in the study were randomly assigned to either the ES arm or the non-ES arm. Local ES was performed between Day 20 and Day 24 of the cycle preceding ovarian stimulation using a device for endometrial biopsy. Ovarian stimulation used a combination of recombinant FSH and either an GnRH agonist protocol or a GnRH antagonist protocol without any estrogen pre-treatment. CPR was analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. All comparisons between the two groups were done using a logistic regression model adjusted for age, BMI and infertility etiology. Differences between the two arms were considered statistically significant at P value of less than 0.0446 for the primary outcome only. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Sixty-eight embryo transfers were performed in the ES arm and sixty-four in the non-ES arm. CPR was 23.5% (16/68) in the ES arm and 35.9% (23/64) in the non-ES arm (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.18-1.02; P = 0.0568). The implantation rate was 19.1% and 24.0% in the ES arm and in the non-ES arm, respectively. Two miscarriages and one ectopic pregnancy were reported in each arm. The multiple pregnancy rate was higher in the scratch arm (50.0% vs 20.0%), but the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) = 4.54; 95% CI, 0.50-40.93; P = 0.1349). The endometrial biopsy procedure was well tolerated in most women. Of 50 patients in the ES arm having received the embryo transfer, 40 (80.0%) patients reported having felt pain during the procedure, the pain resolving quickly for 31 of them. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: An interim analysis of the primary endpoint was conducted and an independent data monitoring committee agreed on stopping the inclusions. This analysis was prompted by the tendency towards lower pregnancy rates observed in the ES arm. Consequently, the study suffered from a lower inclusion rate and failed to reach the planned sample size. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Under the technical condition employed in this study, ES in the luteal phase of the cycle preceding the ovarian stimulation does not improve CPR in patients undergoing a first or second IVF/ICSI attempt. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by a grant from Ministère de la Santé Français (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 2009). There are no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01064193. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 08-Feb-2010. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 08-Feb-2010.