Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
An. pediatr. (2003, Ed. impr.) ; 75(2): 96-102, ago. 2011. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-92443

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Principales: evaluar la seguridad y la efectividad (mediante el análisis de la conducta del paciente) con el uso de óxido nitroso durante la realización de procedimientos dolorosos en los servicios de urgencias pediátricos (SUP); secundarios: evaluar su manejabilidad y su aceptación por el equipo médico y el paciente. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio post-autorización, prospectivo, observacional, multicéntrico, no aleatorizado y abierto (noviembre 2007-diciembre 2008), en el que participaron 7 SUP nacionales. Se incluyó a los pacientes de 2-18 años en los que se utilizó óxido nitroso para la realización de procedimientos dolorosos. Resultados: Se incluyó a 213 pacientes (27,2% < 5 años). La conducta del paciente fue considerada «buena/muy buena» en el 79,7%. El porcentaje de casos con conducta «mala/acepta con dificultad» fue mayor en < 5 años (33,3% vs. 15,1%; p=0,006), no detectándose diferencias significativas en función del procedimiento. Se registraron efectos adversos en 17 casos (7,9%), sin diferencias significativas en función de la edad, estar o no en ayunas ni la asociación de otros fármacos. Los más frecuentes fueron mareo y/o cefalea (10), seguido de vómitos (3). La administración fue considerada fácil por parte del equipo médico en el 96,6%. En el 92,7%, los padres aceptarían que volviera a ser utilizado en su hijo en una situación similar. Conclusiones: La administración de óxido nitroso logra una adecuada sedoanalgesia para la realización de procedimientos dolorosos, sobre todo en niños mayores de 5 años. Los efectos adversos registrados son escasos, leves y conocidos. La mayoría de los padres aceptaría nuevamente su uso en condiciones similares (AU)


Objectives: Primary objectives: to assess the safety and the effectiveness (analysing the behaviour of the patient) with the use of nitrous oxide during the performance of painful procedures in the Paediatric Emergency Departments (PED); secondary objectives: to evaluate the manageability of the method and its acceptance by both the medical team and the patient. Patients and methods: Post-marketing observational, prospective, multicentre, non-randomised and open (November 2007-December 2008) study, which involved seven national PED. We included patients between 2 and 18 years-old on whom a painful procedure was performed in the PED and nitrous oxide was used. Results: A total 213 patients were included (27,2% < 5years). Patient behaviour was considered «good/very good» in 79,7%, with no statistically significant difference in relation to the procedure performed. Patient behaviour was more often classified as «bad/accept with difficulty» among those < 5years (33.3% vs 15.1%, P=0.006). Adverse events occurred in 17 cases (7.9%), with no significant difference in the rate in relation to the age, fasting or not or in association with other drugs; the most frequent were dizziness and/or headache (10), followed by vomiting (3). The administration was considered easy by the medical team in the 96.6% of the cases. Parents would accept the use of nitrous oxide in their child in a similar situation in 92.7% of the cases. Conclusions: Administration of nitrous oxide achieves proper sedation and analgesia during painful procedures, especially in children older than 5years. Adverse events reported were few, mild and expected. Most parents would accept its use again in a similar situation (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Analgesia/methods , Pain/drug therapy , Nitrous Oxide/therapeutic use , Emergency Treatment/methods , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Effectiveness
2.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 75(2): 96-102, 2011 Aug.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21440518

ABSTRACT

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: to assess the safety and the effectiveness (analysing the behaviour of the patient) with the use of nitrous oxide during the performance of painful procedures in the Paediatric Emergency Departments (PED); secondary objectives: to evaluate the manageability of the method and its acceptance by both the medical team and the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post-marketing observational, prospective, multicentre, non-randomised and open (November 2007-December 2008) study, which involved seven national PED. We included patients between 2 and 18 years-old on whom a painful procedure was performed in the PED and nitrous oxide was used. RESULTS: A total 213 patients were included (27,2% < 5 years). Patient behaviour was considered «good/very good¼ in 79,7%, with no statistically significant difference in relation to the procedure performed. Patient behaviour was more often classified as «bad/accept with difficulty¼ among those < 5 years (33.3% vs 15.1%, P=.006). Adverse events occurred in 17 cases (7.9%), with no significant difference in the rate in relation to the age, fasting or not or in association with other drugs; the most frequent were dizziness and/or headache (10), followed by vomiting (3). The administration was considered easy by the medical team in the 96.6% of the cases. Parents would accept the use of nitrous oxide in their child in a similar situation in 92.7% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of nitrous oxide achieves proper sedation and analgesia during painful procedures, especially in children older than 5 years. Adverse events reported were few, mild and expected. Most parents would accept its use again in a similar situation.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Conscious Sedation , Emergency Treatment , Nitrous Oxide/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...