Efficacy and safety of extended-release oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XR™) as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of once-daily 1200 mg and 2400 mg SPN-804 (Oxtellar XR™, Supernus Pharmaceuticals), an extended-release tablet formulation of oxcarbazepine (OXC), added to 1-3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization. METHODS: The Prospective, Randomized Study of OXC XR in Subjects with Partial Epilepsy Refractory (PROSPER) study was a multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group Phase 3 study. The primary efficacy endpoint was median percent reduction from baseline in monthly (28-day) seizure frequency for the 16-week double-blind treatment period in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with analyzable seizure data. Other efficacy analyses included proportion of patients with ≥ 50% seizure reduction, proportion of patients seizure free, and the relationship between clinical response and plasma concentration. RESULTS: Median percent reduction was -28.7% for placebo, -38.2% (P = 0.08 vs placebo) for once-daily SPN-804 1200 mg, and -42.9% (P = 0.003) for SPN-804 2400 mg. Responder rates were 28.1%, 36.1% (P = 0.08), and 40.7% (P = 0.02); 16-week seizure-free rates in a pragmatic ITT analysis were 3.3%, 4.9% (P = 0.59), and 11.4% (P = 0.008), respectively. When data were analyzed separately for study site clusters, a post hoc analysis demonstrated that both SPN-804 dosages were significantly superior to placebo in median percent seizure reduction (placebo: -13.3%; 1200 mg: -34.5%, P = 0.02; 2400 mg: -52.7%, P = 0.006) in the North American study site cluster. A concentration-response analysis also supported a clinically meaningful effect for 1200 mg. Adverse event types reflected the drug's established profile. Adverse event frequency was consistent with a pharmacokinetic profile in which SPN-804 produces lower peak plasma concentrations vs immediate-release OXC. Once-daily dosing was not associated with any new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive once-daily SPN-804 improved seizure control in patients with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures. Adverse event occurrence and discontinuations due to adverse events suggest improved tolerability vs previously published data with immediate-release OXC.

Evidence-based guideline: Antiepileptic drug selection for people with HIV/AIDS: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Ad Hoc Task Force of the Commission on Therapeutic Strategies of the International League Against Epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines for selection of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among people with HIV/AIDS. METHODS: The literature was systematically reviewed to assess the global burden of relevant comorbid entities, to determine the number of patients who potentially utilize AEDs and antiretroviral agents (ARVs), and to address AED-ARV interactions. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: AED-ARV administration may be indicated in up to 55% of people taking ARVs. Patients receiving phenytoin may require a lopinavir/ritonavir dosage increase of ~50% to maintain unchanged serum concentrations (Level C). Patients receiving valproic acid may require a zidovudine dosage reduction to maintain unchanged serum zidovudine concentrations (Level C). Coadministration of valproic acid and efavirenz may not require efavirenz dosage adjustment (Level C). Patients receiving ritonavir/atazanavir may require a lamotrigine dosage increase of ∼50% to maintain unchanged lamotrigine serum concentrations (Level C). Coadministration of raltegravir/atazanavir and lamotrigine may not require lamotrigine dosage adjustment (Level C). Coadministration of raltegravir and midazolam may not require midazolam dosage adjustment (Level C). Patients may be counseled that it is unclear whether dosage adjustment is necessary when other AEDs and ARVs are combined (Level U). It may be important to avoid enzyme-inducing AEDs in people on ARV regimens that include protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as pharmacokinetic interactions may result in virologic failure, which has clinical implications for disease progression and development of ARV resistance. If such regimens are required for seizure control, patients may be monitored through pharmacokinetic assessments to ensure efficacy of the ARV regimen (Level C).

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ezogabine (retigabine) in partial epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ezogabine (United States adopted name)/retigabine (international nonproprietary name) (EZG[RTG]) 1,200 mg/day as adjunctive treatment in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. METHODS: RESTORE 1 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Following a prospective 8-week baseline phase, patients entered an 18-week double-blind treatment period (6-week forced dose titration to EZG[RTG] 1,200 mg/day in 3 equally divided doses or placebo, followed by a 12-week maintenance phase). Results were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis for the entire 18-week period and for patients reaching the maintenance phase. RESULTS: In 306 patients randomized, 305 received EZG(RTG) 1,200 mg/day (n = 153) or placebo (n = 152). Median percent reduction in total partial-seizure frequency was 44.3% vs 17.5% (p < 0.001) for EZG(RTG) and placebo, respectively, during the 18-week double-blind period; responder rates (≥50% reduction in total partial-seizure frequency from baseline) were 44.4% vs 17.8% (p < 0.001). In 256 patients (EZG[RTG], 119; placebo, 137) entering the 12-week maintenance phase, median percent reduction in seizure frequency for EZG(RTG) vs placebo was 54.5% and 18.9% (p < 0.001), respectively; responder rates were 55.5% vs 22.6% (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients discontinuing due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 26.8% (EZG[RTG]) vs 8.6% (placebo). Dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, confusion, dysarthria, urinary tract infection, ataxia, and blurred vision were the most common TEAEs reported by more patients treated with EZG(RTG) than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that EZG(RTG) is effective as add-on therapy for reducing seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant partial-onset seizures. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that EZG(RTG) 1,200 mg/day is effective as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization.

Adjunctive brivaracetam for refractory partial-onset seizures: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To explore efficacy and safety/tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV), a novel, high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, which also inhibits neuronal voltage-dependent sodium channels, in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures (POS). METHODS: This was an exploratory, phase IIb, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study in patients 16-65 years with epilepsy experiencing > or =4 POS during 4-week baseline despite 1-2 concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to placebo, BRV 5 mg/day (BRV5), BRV 20 mg/day (BRV20), or BRV 50 mg/day (BRV50), administered BID without uptitration during a 7-week treatment period. Primary efficacy endpoint was POS frequency/week during the treatment period relative to placebo. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients constituted the intention-to-treat population; 197 completed the study. Estimated percentage reductions over placebo in POS frequency/week were 9.8% (BRV5; p = 0.240), 14.9% (BRV20; p = 0.062), and 22.1% (BRV50; p = 0.004). Median percent reductions from baseline in POS frequency/week were 21.7% (placebo), 29.9% (BRV5; p = 0.086), 42.6% (BRV20; p = 0.014), and 53.1% (BRV50; p < 0.001); > or =50% responder rates were 16.7% (placebo), 32.0% (BRV5; p = 0.047), 44.2% (BRV20; p = 0.002), and 55.8% (BRV50; p < 0.001); seizure freedom rates (POS) during the 7-week treatment period were 1.9% (placebo), 8.0% (BRV5; p = 0.193), 7.7% (BRV20; p = 0.193), and 7.7% (BRV50; p = 0.201). BRV was well-tolerated. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and occurred with similar incidence in placebo and BRV groups, and discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events were infrequent (placebo 3.7%; BRV 2.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This interventional study provides preliminary Class I evidence that adjunctive BRV was efficacious and well-tolerated in patients aged 16-65 years with POS.

Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breastfeeding: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including preconceptional folic acid use, prenatal vitamin K use, risk of hemorrhagic disease of the newborn, clinical implications of placental and breast milk transfer of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), risks of breastfeeding, and change in AED levels during pregnancy. METHODS: A 20-member committee evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review and classification of relevant articles published between 1985 and October 2007. RESULTS: Preconceptional folic acid supplementation is possibly effective in preventing major congenital malformations in the newborns of WWE taking AEDs. There is inadequate evidence to determine if the newborns of WWE taking AEDs have a substantially increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Primidone and levetiracetam probably transfer into breast milk in amounts that may be clinically important. Valproate, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine probably are not transferred into breast milk in clinically important amounts. Pregnancy probably causes an increase in the clearance and a decrease in the concentration of lamotrigine, phenytoin, and to a lesser extent carbamazepine, and possibly decreases the level of levetiracetam and the active oxcarbazepine metabolite, the monohydroxy derivative. RECOMMENDATIONS: Supplementing women with epilepsy with at least 0.4 mg of folic acid before they become pregnant may be considered (Level C). Monitoring of lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and phenytoin levels during pregnancy should be considered (Level B) and monitoring of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine (as monohydroxy derivative) levels may be considered (Level C). A paucity of evidence limited the strength of many recommendations.

Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including the risk of pregnancy complications or other medical problems during pregnancy in WWE compared to other women, change in seizure frequency, the risk of status epilepticus, and the rate of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy. METHODS: A 20-member committee including general neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review and classification of relevant articles published between 1985 and February 2008. RESULTS: For WWE taking antiepileptic drugs, there is probably no substantially increased risk (greater than two times expected) of cesarean delivery or late pregnancy bleeding, and probably no moderately increased risk (greater than 1.5 times expected) of premature contractions or premature labor and delivery. There is possibly a substantially increased risk of premature contractions and premature labor and delivery during pregnancy for WWE who smoke. Seizure freedom for at least 9 months prior to pregnancy is probably associated with a high likelihood (84%-92%) of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy. RECOMMENDATIONS: Women with epilepsy (WWE) should be counseled that seizure freedom for at least 9 months prior to pregnancy is probably associated with a high rate (84%-92%) of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy (Level B). However, WWE who smoke should be counseled that they possibly have a substantially increased risk of premature contractions and premature labor and delivery during pregnancy (Level C).

Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy. METHODS: Systematic review of relevant articles published between January 1985 and June 2007. RESULTS: It is highly probable that intrauterine first-trimester valproate (VPA) exposure has higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) compared to carbamazepine and possible compared to phenytoin or lamotrigine. Compared to untreated WWE, it is probable that VPA as part of polytherapy and possible that VPA as monotherapy contribute to the development of MCMs. It is probable that antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy as compared to monotherapy regimens contributes to the development of MCMs and to reduced cognitive outcomes. For monotherapy, intrauterine exposure to VPA probably reduces cognitive outcomes. Further, monotherapy exposure to phenytoin or phenobarbital possibly reduces cognitive outcomes. Neonates of WWE taking AEDs probably have an increased risk of being small for gestational age and possibly have an increased risk of a 1-minute Apgar score of <7. RECOMMENDATIONS: If possible, avoidance of valproate (VPA) and antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be considered to decrease the risk of major congenital malformations (Level B). If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy throughout pregnancy should be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes (Level B). If possible, avoidance of phenytoin and phenobarbital during pregnancy may be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes (Level C). Pregnancy risk stratification should reflect that the offspring of women with epilepsy taking AEDs are probably at increased risk for being small for gestational age (Level B) and possibly at increased risk of 1-minute Apgar scores of <7 (Level C).

Pregnancy registries in epilepsy: a consensus statement on health outcomes.

Most pregnant women with epilepsy require antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. Present guidelines recommend optimizing treatment prior to conception, choosing the most effective AED for seizure type and syndrome, using monotherapy and lowest effective dose, and supplementing with folate. The Epilepsy Therapy Project established the international Health Outcomes in Pregnancy and Epilepsy (HOPE) forum to learn more about the impact of AEDs on the developing fetus, particularly the role of pregnancy registries in studying AED teratogenicity. The primary outcome of interest in these registries is the occurrence of major congenital malformations, with some data collected on minor malformations. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes are often beyond the timeframe for follow-up of these registries and require independent study. The HOPE consensus report describes the current state of knowledge and the limitations to interpretations of information from the various sources. Data regarding specific risks for both older and newer AEDs need to be analyzed carefully, considering study designs and confounding factors. There is a critical need for investigations to delineate the underlying mechanisms and explain the variance seen in outcomes across AEDs and within a single AED.

Germ-line chimerism and paternal care in marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii).

The formation of viable genetic chimeras in mammals through the transfer of cells between siblings in utero is rare. Using microsatellite DNA markers, we show here that chimerism in marmoset (Callithrix kuhlii) twins is not limited to blood-derived hematopoietic tissues as was previously described. All somatic tissue types sampled were found to be chimeric. Notably, chimerism was demonstrated to be present in germ-line tissues, an event never before documented as naturally occurring in a primate. In fact, we found that chimeric marmosets often transmit sibling alleles acquired in utero to their own offspring. Thus, an individual that contributes gametes to an offspring is not necessarily the genetic parent of that offspring. The presence of somatic and germ-line chimerism may have influenced the evolution of the extensive paternal and alloparental care system of this taxon. Although the exact mechanisms of sociobiological change associated with chimerism have not been fully explored, we show here that chimerism alters relatedness between twins and may alter the perceived relatedness between family members, thus influencing the allocation of parental care. Consistent with this prediction, we found a significant correlation between paternal care effort and the presence of epithelial chimerism, with males carrying chimeric infants more often than nonchimeric infants. Therefore, we propose that the presence of placental chorionic fusion and the exchange of cell lines between embryos may represent a unique adaptation affecting the evolution of cooperative care in this group of primates.

Rank-related maternal effects of androgens on behaviour in wild spotted hyaenas.

Within any hierarchical society, an individual's social rank can have profound effects on its health and reproductive success, and rank-related variation in these traits is often mediated by variation in endocrine function. Maternal effects mediated by prenatal hormone exposure are potentially important for non-genetic inheritance of phenotypic traits related to social rank, and thus for shaping individual variation in behaviour and social structure. Here we show that androgen concentrations in wild female spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta) are higher during late gestation in dominant females than in subordinate females. Furthermore, both male and female cubs born to mothers with high concentrations of androgens in late pregnancy exhibit higher rates of aggression and mounting behaviour than cubs born to mothers with lower androgen concentrations. Both behaviours are strongly affected in other mammals by organizational effects of androgens, and both have important effects on fitness in hyaenas. Therefore, our results suggest that rank-related maternal effects of prenatal androgen exposure can adaptively influence offspring phenotype in mammals, as has previously been shown to occur in birds. They also suggest an organizational mechanism for the development of female dominance and aggressiveness in spotted hyaenas, traits that may offset the costs of extreme virilization.

Atomistic molecular modeling of the effect of chromophore concentration on the electro-optic coefficient in nonlinear optical polymers.

We employ fully atomistic molecular modeling to investigate the concentration dependence of the electro-optic coefficient of two guest-host polymer composites. Using classical molecular dynamics, we record the time-evolution of the guest-host system under the application of an external electric field. Through analysis of the orientation of the nonlinear optical chromophores in the guest-host composite with respect to the direction of the external electric field, we calculate the orientational parameter N < cos(3)theta >, with N being the number density of chromophores in the composite. This parameter is directly proportional to the electro-optic coefficient. We find agreement between the concentration dependence of the electro-optic coefficient calculated through our simulation and that from experimental data and also from Monte Carlo models.

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: treatment of new onset epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide-reviewed in the order in which these agents received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration) in the treatment of children and adults with newly diagnosed partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee, including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy, evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until September 2002, with selected manual searches up until 2003. RESULTS: There is evidence either from comparative or dose-controlled trials that gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine have efficacy as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adolescents and adults with either partial or mixed seizure disorders. There is also evidence that lamotrigine is effective for newly diagnosed absence seizures in children. Evidence for effectiveness of the new AEDs in newly diagnosed patients with other generalized epilepsy syndromes is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: treatment of refractory epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide) in the treatment of children and adults with refractory partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until March 2003. RESULTS: All of the new AEDs were found to be appropriate for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in adults. Gabapentin can be effective for the treatment of mixed seizure disorders, and gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate for the treatment of refractory partial seizures in children. Limited evidence suggests that lamotrigine and topiramate are also effective for adjunctive treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in adults and children, as well as treatment of the Lennox Gastaut syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of AED depends upon seizure and/or syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with refractory epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Dose-response trial of pregabalin adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin is an alpha(2)-delta ligand that has anxiolytic, analgesic, and anticonvulsant properties. OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pregabalin administered twice-daily (BID) without dose titration as adjunctive treatment in patients with partial seizures and to confirm the dose-response relationship. METHODS: This 76-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisted of an 8-week baseline and a 12-week double-blind phase. Patients with refractory partial seizures on one to three antiepileptic drugs were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups (placebo or 50, 150, 300, and 600 mg/d pregabalin, all administered BID). Efficacy was assessed using seizure frequency reduction and responder rate (> or =50% seizure reduction from baseline). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 453 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The median baseline seizure rate was 10 per month. Seizure frequency reductions from baseline were 7% (placebo; n = 100), 12% (50 mg/d; n = 88), 34% (150 mg/d; n = 86), 44% (300 mg/d; n = 90), and 54% (600 mg/d; n = 89). Responder rates (> or =50% seizure reduction) were 14% (placebo), 15% (50 mg/d), 31% (150 mg/d), 40% (300 mg/d), and 51% (600 mg/d). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5% (placebo), 7% (50 mg/d), 1% (150 mg/d), 14% (300 mg/d), and 24% (600 mg/d). The 150-, 300-, and 600-mg/d pregabalin groups were associated with greater reductions in seizures (p < or = 0.0001) and greater responder rates compared with the placebo group (p < or = 0.006). There was a favorable dose-response trend for both seizure reductions (p < or = 0.0001) and responder rate (p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive therapy with pregabalin 150, 300, and 600 mg/d, given in twice-daily doses without titration, is significantly effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with partial seizures as demonstrated in patients with refractory partial seizures.

Postmarketing experience with topiramate and cognition.

Ideal antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are designed to stop seizures with limited central nervous system (CNS) side effects. However, CNS-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) often occur in patients receiving AEDs. Topiramate (TPM) is an AED proven to be safe and effective as adjunctive treatment for epilepsy patients with partial seizures. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials demonstrated potential effects on cognition. The P.A.D.S. (post-marketing antiepileptic drug survey) group, a cooperative group of 14 epilepsy centers that collaborate on obtaining data about new AEDs and devices, prospectively collected standardized data forms before and during treatment with TPM for epilepsy, and analyzed the postmarketing experience of CNS TEAEs with TPM. Our results from 701 treated patients show that cognitive complaints were the most common reason to discontinue TPM. The presence of complaints did have predictive value if the patient would discontinue TPM, although was not specific as to when discontinuation would occur. The spectrum of complaints in our open-label prospective multicenter postmarketing study was similar to those observed in controlled clinical trials. We were unable to demonstrate a specific population, dose titration, or concomitant AED that was at risk to discontinue treatment. We conclude that most patients treated with TPM will continue therapy beyond 6 months. Cognitive complaints and not efficacy reflect the primary reason for discontinuing therapy. Psychomotor slowing was the most common complaint, yet most patients elect to continue treatment, with "better" or "much better" ratings of both seizure and global improvement during treatment.

Detection of mesial temporal lobe hypoperfusion in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy by use of arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interictal hypometabolism has lateralizing value in cases of temporal lobe epilepsy and positive predictive value for seizure-free outcome after surgery to treat epilepsy. Alterations in regional cerebral metabolism can also be inferred from measurements of regional cerebral perfusion. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of detecting cerebral blood flow (CBF) asymmetries in the mesial temporal lobes using continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MR imaging, which is a noninvasive method for calculating regional CBF. METHODS: Twelve patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent preoperative evaluation for temporal lobectomy and 12 normal control participants were studied retrospectively. Absolute and normalized mesial temporal CBF measurements were compared between the patient and control groups. Lateralization based on a perfusion asymmetry index was compared with metabolic ((18)[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) and hippocampal volumetric asymmetry indices and with clinical lateralization. RESULTS: Mesial temporal CBF was more asymmetric in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy than in normal control participants, although asymmetric mesial temporal CBF was also found in normal participants, with the left side dominant. Ipsilateral mesial temporal CBF was significantly decreased compared with contralateral mesial temporal CBF in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Global CBF measurements were significantly decreased in patients compared with control participants. Asymmetry in mesial temporal blood flow in patients persisted after normalization to global CBF. Lateralization using continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MR imaging asymmetry index significantly correlated with lateralization based on (18)[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography hypometabolism, hippocampal volumes, and clinical evaluation. CONCLUSION: Continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MR imaging can detect interictal asymmetries in mesial temporal lobe perfusion in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. This technique is readily combined with routine structural assessment and potentially offers an inexpensive and noninvasive means of screening for asymmetries in interictal mesial temporal lobe function.

Proof of efficacy trials: endpoints.

Seizure frequency data are difficult to work with because they are so variable both between and within patients. Seizures can come in clusters, thereby adding to the variation in seizure frequency. Also, seizure frequency data are non-parametric in nature, making them difficult to analyze by some statistical techniques without transforming them. Therefore, to improve data analysis in proof of efficacy studies, manipulations of seizure frequency are commonly used, such as the proportion of responders above an arbitrary threshold, or the response ratio. Other useful endpoints are time to nth seizure, number of seizure-free days, proportion of seizure-free patients, and assessment of seizure severity using rating scales. The choice of endpoint(s) will depend upon the design of the study.

The role of new antiepileptic drugs.

For many years, epileptologists had few choices for treating seizures. Within the past 20 years several "new generation" antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were introduced. The most recent additions include oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide. New agents have been shown in clinical trials to offer similar efficacy compared with older, more established AEDs, but the new agents offer important improvements in safety. Although clinical trials to specifically measure the efficacy of the new AEDs in treating idiopathic generalized epilepsy are rare, the new agents have demonstrated efficacy in treating generalized tonic-clonic convulsions. Data for treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome indicate a clear effect with lamotrigine or topiramate and possibly some effect with zonisamide and levetiracetam. Studies of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and absence seizures suggest that zonisamide, lamotrigine, topiramate, and levetiracetam may be effective. Each of the new AEDs is effective in controlling partial seizures. These agents may also be appropriate choices for newly diagnosed patients or those whose conditions are refractory to treatment. In clinical trials, patients who are refractory to treatment are often given escalated doses to gain effect, but higher doses also result in more adverse events and higher withdrawal rates. Generally, the higher the dose, the greater the odds of withdrawal, with the exception of levetiracetam, which is not associated with increased withdrawal rates at high doses. Newly diagnosed patients are likely to be controlled with the first therapy given to them. It is therefore important to select an agent with the best safety, efficacy, and tolerability profile possible.