ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Students with disabilities often experience numerous challenges in terms of finding employment. Given the important role of vocational rehabilitation counselors in supporting employment activities for these students, a need exists for identifying effective strategies that increase employment outcomes for this population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to examine and describe successful research- based interventions on pre-employment transition services for students with disabilities that can be used by vocational rehabilitation counselors. METHODS: The search strategy examined literature from 1998 through 2017 focused on vocational rehabilitation counselors, students with disabilities, and elements related to pre-employment transition services. Articles included American, European, and Australian literature published in English. RESULTS: This review identified a number of research-based interventions that support employment outcomes for students with disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The research-based interventions identified in this scoping review can help vocational rehabilitation counselors consider effective strategies for increasing employment outcomes for students with disabilities.
ABSTRACT
Preventing influenza infections is a national health priority, particularly among geriatric and adults with frailty who reside in post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) settings. Older adults account for more than 70% of deaths from influenza, a reflection of decreased vaccine effectiveness in that age group. Annually vaccinating health care personnel (HCP) working with these patients against influenza is critical to reducing influenza morbidity and mortality among patients. PALTC HCP have the lowest influenza vaccination rate when compared to HCP in other settings. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that all HCP receive an annual influenza vaccination, including those who do not have direct patient care responsibilities. Here, we discuss the importance of influenza vaccination for HCP, detail recommendations for influenza vaccination practice and procedures for PALTC settings, and offer support to PALTC settings and their staff on influenza vaccinations.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudence , Advisory Committees , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & controlABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Cancer Care Survey is a systematic assessment of health care experiences of patients with cancer. It supports comparisons among all cancer treatment settings and modalities. METHODS: Formative research included 16 focus groups with patients receiving treatment and family members; advice from a panel of oncology and quality improvement experts; and interviews with stakeholders representing oncology associations, accredited cancer centers, and community oncology practices. We conducted cognitive tests of the instrument and field tests at six cancer centers and four community oncology practices, after which the survey was finalized and obtained the CAHPS trademark. RESULTS: The survey includes 56 questions that form six core composite measures (Getting Timely Care; Supporting Patient Self-Management; Available to Provide Care and Information; Provider Communication; Care Coordination; and Courteous Office Staff); two single-item measures of family participation in care and interpreter services; and two global ratings of cancer care and the treatment team. Sixteen additional items form three supplemental composite measures: Shared Decision-Making, Keeping Patients Informed, and Access to Care. CONCLUSION: Mail-only, mail-telephone mixed-mode, and Web-mail mixed-mode data collection methods are recommended. The questionnaires and instructions for use are free and available in English and Spanish on the CAHPS Website (www.ahrq.gov/cahps).
Subject(s)
Communication , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Health Care Surveys/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Professional-Patient Relations , Quality Improvement , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Telephone , United StatesABSTRACT
In response to a rising concern for multidrug resistance and Clostridium difficile infections, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) will require all long-term care (LTC) facilities to establish an antibiotic stewardship program by November 2017. Thus far, limited evidence describes implementation of antibiotic stewardship in LTC facilities, mostly in academic- or hospital-affiliated settings. To support compliance with CMS requirements and aid facilities in establishing a stewardship program, the Infection Advisory Committee at AMDA-The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, has developed an antibiotic stewardship policy template tailored to the LTC setting. The intent of this policy, which can be adapted by individual facilities, is to help LTC facilities implement an antibiotic stewardship policy that will meet or exceed CMS requirements. We also briefly discuss implementation of an antibiotic stewardship program in LTC settings, including a list of free resources to support those efforts.
Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship/organization & administration , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Health Policy , Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Female , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Humans , Infection Control , Male , Policy Making , Program Evaluation , Skilled Nursing Facilities , United StatesABSTRACT
Efforts at preventing pneumococcal disease are a national health priority, particularly in older adults and especially in post-acute and long-term care settings The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that all adults ≥65 years of age, as well as adults 18-64 years of age with specific risk factors, receive both the recently introduced polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine against 13 pneumococcal serotypes as well as the polysaccharide vaccine against 23 pneumococcal serotypes. Nursing facility licensure regulations require facilities to assess the pneumococcal vaccination status of each resident, provide education regarding pneumococcal vaccination, and administer the appropriate pneumococcal vaccine when indicated. Sorting out the indications and timing for 13 pneumococcal serotypes and 23 pneumococcal serotypes administration is complex and presents a significant challenge to healthcare providers. Here, we discuss the importance of pneumococcal vaccination for older adults, detail AMDA-The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine (The Society)'s recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination practice and procedures, and offer guidance to postacute and long-term care providers supporting the development and effective implementation of pneumococcal vaccine policies.
Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Nursing Homes , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Humans , Long-Term Care , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Vaccines, Conjugate , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are highly utilized in nursing homes. The aim of the study was to test the effectiveness of a decision-making aid for urinary tract infection management on reducing antibiotic prescriptions for suspected bacteriuria in the urine without symptoms, known as asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in twelve nursing homes in Texas. METHOD: A pre- and post-test with comparison group design was used. The data was collected through retrospective chart review. The study sample included 669 antibiotic prescriptions for suspected urinary tract infections ordered for 547 nursing home residents. The main measurement for the outcome variable was whether an antibiotic was prescribed for suspected urinary tract infections with no symptoms present. RESULTS: Most of the prescriptions for antibiotics UTIs were written without documented symptoms - thus for asymptomatic bacteuria (ASB) (71 % during the pre-intervention period). Exposure to the decision-making aid decreased the number of prescriptions written for ASB (from 78 % to 65 % in the low-intensity homes and from 65 % to 57 % in the high-intensity homes), and decreased odds of a prescription being written for ASB (OR = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.25 - 1.60 for low-intensity homes; OR = 0.79, 95 % CI = 0.33 - 1.88 for high-intensity homes). The odds of a prescription being written for ASB decreased significantly in homes that succeeded in implementing the decision-making aid (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI = 0.16-0.76), compared to homes with no fidelity. CONCLUSIONS: The decision-making aid improved antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Decision Support Techniques , Homes for the Aged , Nursing Homes , Prescription Drug Overuse/nursing , Prescription Drug Overuse/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Urinary Tract Infections/nursing , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteriuria/diagnosis , Bacteriuria/drug therapy , Bacteriuria/nursing , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , United States , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most commonly treated infection among nursing home residents. Even in the absence of specific (e.g., dysuria) or non-specific (e.g., fever) signs or symptoms, residents frequently receive an antibiotic for a suspected infection. This research investigates factors associated with the use of antibiotics to treat asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) among nursing home residents. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving multi-level multivariate analyses of antibiotic prescription data for residents in four nursing homes in central Texas. Participants included all nursing home residents in these homes who, over a six-month period, received an antibiotic for a suspected UTI. We investigated what factors affected the likelihood that a resident receiving an antibiotic for a suspected UTI was asymptomatic. RESULTS: The most powerful predictor of antibiotic treatment for ASB was the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. Over 80 percent of antibiotic prescriptions written for catheterized individuals were written for individuals with ASB. For those without a catheter, record reviews identified 204 antibiotic prescriptions among 151 residents treated for a suspected UTI. Almost 50% of these prescriptions were for residents with no documented UTI symptoms. Almost three-quarters of these antibiotics were ordered after laboratory results were available to clinicians. Multivariate analyses indicated that resident characteristics did not affect the likelihood that an antibiotic was prescribed for ASB. The only statistically significant factor was the identity of the nursing home in which a resident resided. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the findings of earlier research indicating frequent use of antibiotics for ASB in nursing homes, especially for residents with urinary catheters. In this sample of nursing home residents, half of the antibiotic prescriptions for a suspected UTI in residents without catheters occurred with no documented signs or symptoms of a UTI. Urine studies were performed in almost all suspected UTI cases in which an antibiotic was prescribed. Efforts to improve antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes must address clinical decision-making solely on the basis of diagnostic testing in the absence of signs or symptoms of a UTI.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Asymptomatic Diseases/therapy , Bacteriuria/drug therapy , Homes for the Aged , Nursing Homes , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asymptomatic Diseases/epidemiology , Bacteriuria/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To complement a nursing home resident survey, the team developed a survey asking family members about their experiences with nursing homes. Although a family member does not receive care directly from a nursing home, their experiences at the nursing home and with staff can contribute to understanding nursing home quality. OBJECTIVES: To describe how the nursing home family member instrument was developed, refined, tested, and finalized. RESEARCH DESIGN: The team developed a draft survey using information from a literature review, 12 focus groups with family members involved in choosing a nursing home for someone, review of nursing home surveys, and expert/stakeholder input. The survey went through 2 rounds of cognitive interviews (n=54) and revisions and was fielded in 15 nursing homes. Data from the pilot survey (n=885) were subjected to psychometric analyses to evaluate the measurement properties of items as well as the reliability and validity of the resulting composites. On the basis of these analyses and input from experts, the survey was finalized. RESULTS: Focus groups and experts provided input into discerning important indicators of quality, although in some cases family members were not the best sources of information. Cognitive testing refined the survey and eliminated some of the proxy items. The field test analysis and input from experts eliminated 10 items. The final survey included 21 items organized into 4 composites. CONCLUSIONS: This survey measures family members' experiences of nursing home care, and the results contribute to the understanding of quality of care in nursing homes.
Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Health Care Surveys/methods , Nursing Homes/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Family , Focus Groups , Health Care Surveys/standards , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vulnerable PopulationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To develop and test a tool for obtaining patient evaluations of the quality of pharmacy services provided in ambulatory settings. DESIGN: Descriptive, exploratory, nonexperimental study. SETTING: United States from June 1, 2006, through May 31, 2007. PARTICIPANTS: 895 individuals who obtained prescription medications from participating pharmacies. INTERVENTION: Items were evaluated for inclusion in composite scales based on factor analysis and frequency of missing data. Standard psychometric methods were used to assess the reliability and construct validity of the resulting three composite and three global-item measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient assessment of the quality of ambulatory care pharmacy services. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a subset of 15 items measuring three aspects of pharmacy services (General Staff Communication, Health- and Medication-Focused Communication, and Clarity of Written Information about Medications) provided excellent fit to the data. Cronbach's alphas for these scales were greater than 0.80. The three scales and corresponding three global ratings of quality reliably described differences among providers of pharmacy services. CONCLUSION: These data provide support for the reliability and validity of the Consumer Assessment of Pharmacy Services survey. Although preliminary results regarding reliability and validity are promising, further study of the survey is warranted.
Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Pharmaceutical Services , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Drug Prescriptions , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmaceutical Services/standards , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , United StatesABSTRACT
People aging into Medicare need to choose a health plan. Several challenges exist for consumers in choosing a Medicare health plan, including limited knowledge of Medicare, limited experience in using comparative health plan quality information, and limited experience and ability to pull together and use plan information from different sources like employers and the Medicare program. The Choose with Care System was developed to help consumers aging into Medicare make informed Medicare health plan choices. Choose with Care is an innovative decision support tool for employers to use to assist people approaching age 65 to learn about their Medicare health plan options and how to incorporate information on the quality of care and services offered by health plans into their choices. Employers are the targeted channel for distributing the Choose with Care materials because they are one of the most recognized and accessible formal intermediaries for information about health insurance. We used multiple methods to test the Choose with Care products. Product testing showed that the Choose with Care materials increase older consumers' knowledge of Medicare and how it relates to retiree health insurance and improves their comprehension and use of comparative quality information when choosing a health plan.