Clinic and Community: The Road to Integration.

INTRODUCTION: There is growing recognition of the important role that social and environmental conditions play in health, and of the interaction needed between clinical providers and the broader community in which patients live, work, play, and manage their health. Through the Safety Net Enhancement Initiative, the Kresge Foundation funded demonstration projects in eight vulnerable communities to address health inequities and increase integration between clinical and community systems. METHODS: In 2014, integration efforts in 2011-2013 were qualitatively analyzed within and between sites to identify common features. The series of steps taken by sites during the 3-year implementation period that were necessary to move toward integration were then analyzed. RESULTS: Safety Net Enhancement Initiative sites increased capacities within clinics, including policy and practice changes that expanded the way "health" is defined by clinical providers and the implementation of onsite programs/services. Several sites changed clinic policies to support referral to community programs with partner organizations. Several sites also successfully changed local community policies and practices. Moving toward integration, mechanisms were created to link newly developed or identified community resources to the clinical system. CONCLUSIONS: As an established system organized around disease treatment, not prevention, certain changes need to be made within the clinical system to prepare for integration. These changes require shifting perspectives, changing behaviors, and developing novel administrative models. Similarly, integration requires changes within and among community systems, including organizations, services, and residents. Ultimately, there is the need to find ways for these two very different environments to interact and coordinate.

Asthma coalition effects on vulnerable sub groups of children: the most frequent users of health care and the youngest.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of Allies Against Asthma, community-based coalitions working to improve asthma outcomes, on vulnerable children: those with the most urgent health care use and those of youngest age. METHODS: Allies zip codes were matched with comparison communities on demographic factors. Five years of Medicaid data (n = 26,836) for significant health care events: hospitalizations, ED and urgent care facility visits, were analyzed. Longitudinal analyses using generalized estimating equations and proportional hazards models compared Allies and comparison group children. RESULTS: In the two start-up years of Allies, odds of having a significant event were greater for Allies children than for comparison children (p < 0.05). During the third and fourth years when Allies activities were fully implemented, for frequent health care users at baseline, odds of an asthma event were the same for both Allies and comparison children, yet in the less frequent users, odds of an event were lower in Allies children (p < 0.0001). In the initial year of Allies efforts, among the youngest, the Allies children had greater odds than comparison children of an event (p < 0.01), but by the fourth year the Allies group had lower odds (p = 0.02) of an event. Hazard ratios over all years of the study for the youngest Allies children and most frequent baseline users of urgent care were lower than for comparison children (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: Mobilizing a coalition of diverse stakeholders focused on policy and system change generated community-wide reductions over the long-term in health care use for vulnerable children.

Policy and system change and community coalitions: outcomes from allies against asthma.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed policy and system changes and health outcomes produced by the Allies Against Asthma program, a 5-year collaborative effort by 7 community coalitions to address childhood asthma. We also explored associations between community engagement and outcomes. METHODS: We interviewed a sample of 1477 parents of children with asthma in coalition target areas and comparison areas at baseline and 1 year to assess quality-of-life and symptom changes. An extensive tracking and documentation procedure and a survey of 284 participating individuals and organizations were used to ascertain policy and system changes and community engagement levels. RESULTS: A total of 89 policy and system changes were achieved, ranging from changes in interinstitutional and intrainstitutional practices to statewide legislation. Allies children experienced fewer daytime (P = .008) and nighttime (P = .004) asthma symptoms than comparison children. In addition, Allies parents felt less helpless, frightened, and angry (P = .01) about their child's asthma. Type of community engagement was associated with number of policy and system changes. CONCLUSIONS: Community coalitions can successfully achieve asthma policy and system changes and improve health outcomes. Increased core and ongoing community stakeholder participation rather than a higher overall number of participants was associated with more change.