Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Rehabil Med ; 45(5): 467-76, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23571642

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary foot-care, and to evaluate the methodological considerations of a trial of multidisciplinary care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. DESIGN: Exploratory randomised controlled trial. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Children/adolescents with juvenile idio-pathic arthritis and inflammatory joint disease affecting the foot/ankle. METHODS: Standard medical care was compared with a 12 month program of multidisciplinary foot-care informed by musculoskeletal ultrasound. This program was centred on strict disease control through rigorous examination and interventions delivered by a team comprised of a paediatric rheumatologist, podiatrist, physiotherapist and musculoskeletal ultrasonographer. Patients were assessed on foot impairment and disability scores using the Juvenile Arthritis Foot Disability Index. RESULTS: Forty-four participants, aged 3-17 years were randomly assigned to receive the experimental (n = 21) or usual care (n = 23) interventions. There was an overall improvement in levels of foot related impairments in both groups over 12 months. Between-group differences in change scores for the Juvenile Arthritis Foot Disability Index were not statistically significant at 6 or 12 month follow-ups. CONCLUSION: The integrated multidisciplinary foot care interventions described in this trial were safe, but did not improve foot impairment levels relative to usual care. This trial identified several methodological challenges including recruitment/retention, difficulties with outcome tools and potential confounders.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/complications , Foot Diseases/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Female , Foot Diseases/etiology , Humans , Male , Patient Care Team
2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 49(9): 1756-61, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20525742

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There is a need to improve competence of musculoskeletal system (MSS) examination in medical students and junior doctors. Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is a technique whereby students learn from and with each other. This study aimed to determine whether PAL can be integrated into standard undergraduate medical curricula to improve MSS examination using the gait, arms, legs, spine (GALS) screening tool. METHODS: Fifty final-year students (trainers) were trained using GALS for MSS examination while attending a standard clinical medical attachment at Glasgow Royal Infirmary. These students delivered GALS training to a further 159 students (trainees). Pre/post-confidence questionnaire (100-mm visual analogue scale) and written feedback were obtained. Final Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores from an MSS station were compared with a control group of 229 students randomized to other hospitals for the standard MSS training. RESULTS: Analysis of completed trainer questionnaires (30/50) showed increased confidence in all parts of GALS after training [<47 (19) cf. >88 (12); P < 0.005]. Similarly, confidence in trainees (136/159) who answered the questionnaire increased [<43 (19) cf. >85 (15); P < 0.005]. Written comments highlighted that students would recommend PAL. OSCE results showed 84% (192/229) of students in the control group passed the MSS station, with 87% (139/159) of trainees (P = 0.3) and 100% (50/50) of trainers (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MSS examination skills are improved by integrating PAL into the undergraduate medical curriculum, with student confidence being increased, and higher OSCE scores.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Curriculum/standards , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Educational Measurement/methods , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Rheumatology/education , Analysis of Variance , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/standards , Educational Measurement/standards , Humans , Musculoskeletal System , Peer Group , Physical Examination/methods , Physical Examination/standards , Scotland , Students, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 2: 21, 2009 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19566941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle problems are a common but relatively neglected manifestation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Studies of medical and non-medical interventions have shown that clinical outcome measures can be improved. However existing data has been drawn from small non-randomised clinical studies of single interventions that appear to under-represent the adult population suffering from juvenile idiopathic arthritis. To date, no evidence of combined therapies or integrated care for juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients with foot and ankle problems exists. METHODS/DESIGN: An exploratory phase II non-pharmacological randomised controlled trial where patients including young children, adolescents and adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and associated foot/ankle problems will be randomised to receive integrated podiatric care via a new foot care programme, or to receive standard podiatry care. Sixty patients (30 in each arm) including children, adolescents and adults diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited from 2 outpatient centres of paediatric and adult rheumatology respectively. Participants will be randomised by process of minimisation using the Minim software package. The primary outcome measure is the foot related impairment measured by the Juvenile Arthritis Disability Index questionnaire's impairment domain at 6 and 12 months, with secondary outcomes including disease activity score, foot deformity score, active/limited foot joint counts, spatio-temporal and plantar-pressure gait parameters, health related quality of life and semi-quantitative ultrasonography score for inflammatory foot lesions. The new foot care programme will comprise rapid assessment and investigation, targeted treatment, with detailed outcome assessment and follow-up at minimum intervals of 3 months. Data will be collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months from baseline. Intention to treat data analysis will be conducted.A full health economic evaluation will be conducted alongside the trial and will evaluate the cost effectiveness of the intervention. This will consider the cost per improvement in Juvenile Arthritis Disability Index, and cost per quality adjusted life year gained. In addition, a discrete choice experiment will elicit willingness to pay values and a cost benefit analysis will also be undertaken. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UKCRN5045.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL