Does closure of the direct hernia defect in laparoscopic inguinal herniotomy reduce the risk of recurrence and seroma formation?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Recurrence is a known complication to inguinal herniotomy with an incidence of 10 to 15 percent (Hernia Surge Group in Hernia 22:165, 2018). Previous studies have shown that direct hernia or large defects are risk factors for postoperative seroma formation (Morito et al. in Surg Endosc https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08814-2 , 2021). These types of defects are often closed during open herniotomy (Rosenberg et al. in Dan Med Bull 58: C4243, 2011). This is not routine during laparoscopic surgery. A recent study has indicated that closure of the medial defect during laparoscopy may reduce recurrence and seroma formation. As a result, we performed the present systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of this add on to the standard procedure. METHODS: An extensive search was carried out in PubMed and Embase. All studies involving adults undergoing laparoscopic direct hernioplasty were enrolled and screened with predefined inclusion criteria, to be part of a systematic review with data synthesis and meta-analysis. RESULTS: The search identified 108 publications of which four met the inclusion criteria. Two studies (Ng et al. in Hernia 24:1093-1098, 2020; Usmani et al. in Hernia 24:167-171, 2020) showed reduced risk of recurrence. The remaining studies (Zhu et al. in Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29:18-21, 2019; Li and Zhang in Surg Endosc 32:1082-1086, 2018) reported no recurrence in any of the patients included. Two articles (Usmani et al. in Hernia 24:167-171, 2020; Zhu et al. in Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29:18-21, 2019) showed a decrease in risk of postoperative seroma, one showed a significant increase (Ng et al. in Hernia 24:1093-1098, 2020). None of the included studies showed an increase in the risk of postoperative pain or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that closure versus non-closure of the medial hernia defect in laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty reduces the risk of recurrence and seroma formation without an increase in postoperative pain or complications. Further randomized controlled trials are needed for further evaluation.

Recurrence and complications after sliding inguinal hernia repair.

PURPOSE: Sliding hernia is a rare finding and it remains controversial if a laparoscopic or an open (Lichenstein) technique is preferable for repair of sliding hernias. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of post-operative complications and risk of reoperation due to recurrence in patients with sliding hernia based on surgical technique. METHOD: The study included male patients receiving hernia repair between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017. The data was obtained from the National Danish Hernia Database. RESULTS: A total of 32,396 hernia repairs were included. 13.5% presented with sliding hernia. No difference was found in postoperative complications comparing sliding and non-sliding lateral hernias (5.1% vs 4.2% at 90 days of follow up). Patients treated with a Lichenstein repair had a higher risk of minor complications compared to a laparoscopic repair, however the risk was overall low (1.9% vs 0.8%). Overall 3.1% had surgical repair of recurrence, a higher risk was found among patients with sliding hernia (4.3% vs 2.9%), particularly among those having a Lichenstein repair (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.11-3.85). CONCLUSION: A low risk of complications and recurrence after repair of both sliding and non-sliding hernia was found. Among patients with sliding hernia the risk of recurrence was lower in patient having hernia repair using laparoscopic technique although in both groups the risk was low. Sliding hernias can be treated safely using both Lichenstein and laparoscopic techniques.

Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether an open or laparoscopic approach results in the best outcomes for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rates of 90-day readmission and reoperation for complication, together with rate of operation for recurrence after either open or laparoscopic mesh repair for primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with defect widths above 1 cm. METHODS: A merge of data between the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patient Registry provided data from 2007 to 2018 on perioperative information, 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation for complication, and long-term operation for hernia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 6855 patients were included, of whom 4106 (59.9%) and 2749 (40.1%) patients had an open or laparoscopic repair, respectively. There were significantly more patients readmitted with a superficial surgical site infection 2.5% (102/4106) after open repair compared with laparoscopic repair (0.5% (15/2749), P < 0.001. The 90-day reoperation rate for complications was significantly higher for open repairs 5.0% (205/4106) compared with laparoscopic repairs 2.7% (75/2749), P < 0.001. The incidence of a reoperation for a severe condition was significantly increased after laparoscopic repair 1.5% (41/2749) compared with open repair 0.8% (34/4106), P = 0.010. The 4-year cumulative incidence of operation for hernia recurrence was 3.5% after open and 4.2% after laparoscopic repairs, P = 0.302. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates were comparable between open and laparoscopic repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Open repair was associated with a significantly higher rate of readmission and reoperation due to surgical site infection, whereas the rate of reoperation due to a severe complication was significantly higher after laparoscopic repair.

Open versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: nationwide database study.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias decreases the incidence of wound complications compared with open repair, there has been rising concern related to intraperitoneal mesh placement. The aim of this study was to examine outcomes after open or laparoscopic elective incisional hernia mesh repair on a nationwide basis. METHODS: This study analysed merged data from the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patient Registry on perioperative information, 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation for complication, and long-term operation for hernia recurrence among patients who underwent primary repair of an incisional hernia between 2007 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 3090 (57.5 per cent) and 2288 (42.5 per cent) patients had surgery by a laparoscopic and open approach respectively. The defect was closed in 865 of 3090 laparoscopic procedures (28.0 per cent). The median follow-up time was 4.0 (i.q.r. 1.8-6.8) years. Rates of readmission (502 of 3090 (16.2 per cent) versus 442 of 2288 (19.3 per cent); P = 0.003) and reoperation for complication (216 of 3090 (7.0 per cent) versus 288 of 2288 (12.5 per cent); P < 0.001) were significantly lower for laparoscopic than open repairs. Reoperation for bowel obstruction or bowel resection was twice as common after laparoscopic repair compared with open repair (20 of 3090 (0.6 per cent) versus 6 of 2288 (0.3 per cent); P = 0.044). Patients were significantly less likely to undergo repair of recurrence following laparoscopic compared with open repair of defect widths 2-6 cm (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair for incisional hernia should still be considered for fascial defects between 2 and 6 cm, because of decreased rates of early complications and repair of hernia recurrence compared with open repair.

Differential recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: importance of a nationwide registry-based mesh surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Identification of suboptimal mesh products is essential to improve the outcome after hernia surgery. This study investigated whether a national clinical database combined with administrative registries may serve as a tool for postmarketing evaluation of mesh products for hernia surgery. METHODS: This was a propensity score-matched case-control cohort study comparing outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with either one particular mesh or any other synthetic mesh. Data on patients registered in the Danish Ventral Hernia Database between 2010 and 2016 were combined with administrative data from the Danish National Patient Registry. The primary outcome was operation for recurrence. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation for complications (excluding hernia recurrence), and mortality after 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: In total, 740 patients who underwent repair with one particular mesh were matched with 1479 patients who received any other synthetic mesh. The rate of repair for hernia recurrence was significantly higher in the particular mesh group than in the reference group: 12·8 versus 6·3 per cent respectively (hazard ratio 2·09, 95 per cent c.i. 1·57 to 2·79; P < 0·001). Use of the particular mesh increased the risk of readmission (odds ratio (OR) 1·53, 1·16 to 2·01; P = 0·002) and reoperation for a complication (OR 1·60, 1·03 to 2·47, P = 0·030). No difference in mortality was found. CONCLUSION: Clinical registries with prospectively collected data can provide long-term surveillance of commercial mesh. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with one particular mesh was associated with an increased rate of short-term complications and double the risk of repair for recurrence.

ANTECEDENTES: Es esencial identificar los productos subóptimos referidos a las mallas para mejorar los resultados en la cirugía de la hernia. Este estudio analizó si un registro clínico nacional combinado con registros de bases de datos administrativos puede servir como herramienta para la evaluación post-comercialización de productos de mallas para cirugía de la hernia. MÉTODOS: Se efectuó un estudio de emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión de una cohorte de casos y controles en el que se comparaban los resultados de la malla Physiomesh® frente a cualquier otra malla sintética en pacientes sometidos a una reparación laparoscópica de una eventración. Se combinaron los datos de los pacientes del registro danés de hernia entre 2010 y 2016 con los datos administrativos del registro nacional de pacientes de Dinamarca. La variable principal fue la reintervención por recidiva. Las variables secundarias fueron el reingreso a 30 días, la reoperación a 30 días por complicaciones (excluyendo la recidiva de la hernia) y la mortalidad a 30 y 90 días. RESULTADOS: Para la reparación herniaria se utilizó la malla Physiomesh® en 740 pacientes, que se emparejaron mediante el análisis por puntaje de propensión con 1.479 pacientes en los que se colocó otra malla sintética. La reintervención por recidiva herniaria fue significativamente mayor en el grupo Physiomesh® (12,8%) que en el grupo de referencia (6,3%); cociente de riesgos instantáneos (hazard ratio, HR): 2,09 (i.c. del 95%: 1,57-2,79), P < 0,001. El riesgo de reingreso (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR: 1,53, 1,16-2,01, P = 0,002)) y de reoperación por una complicación (OR: 1,60, 1,03-2,47, P = 0,030) fueron superiores en el grupo Physiomesh®. No hubo diferencia en la mortalidad. CONCLUSIÓN: Los grandes registros clínicos con datos recogidos de forma prospectiva pueden ser útiles para efectuar el seguimiento a largo plazo de una malla comercializada para garantizar la seguridad del producto y su calidad quirúrgica. La reparación laparoscópica de una eventración con la malla Physiomesh® se asociaba con un riesgo doble de recidiva y un aumento de la tasa de complicaciones a corto plazo.

The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The Accreditation and Certification of Hernia Centers and Surgeons (ACCESS) Group of the European Hernia Society (EHS) recognizes that there is a growing need to train specialist abdominal wall surgeons. The most important and relevant argument for this proposal and statement is the growing acceptance of the increasing complexity of abdominal wall surgery due to newer techniques, more challenging cases and the required 'tailored' approach to such surgery. There is now also an increasing public awareness with social media, whereby optimal treatment results are demanded by patients. However, to date the complexity of abdominal wall surgery has not been properly or adequately defined in the current literature. METHODS: A systematic search of the available literature was performed in May 2019 using Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Springer Link, and the Cochrane Library, with 75 publications identified as relevant. In addition, an analysis of data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry was performed. The percentage of patients with hernia- or patient-related characteristics which unfavorably impacted the outcome of inguinal and incisional hernia repair was also calculated. RESULTS: All present guidelines for abdominal wall surgery recommend the utilization of a 'tailored' approach. This relies on the prerequisite that any surgical technique used has already been mastered, as well as the recognized learning curves for each of the several techniques that can be used for both inguinal hernia (Lichtenstein, TEP, TAPP, Shouldice) and incisional hernia repairs (laparoscopic IPOM, open sublay, open IPOM, open onlay, open or endoscopic component separation technique). Other hernia- and patient-related characteristics that have recognized complexity include emergency surgery, obesity, recurrent hernias, bilateral inguinal hernias, groin hernia in women, scrotal hernias, large defects, high ASA scores, > 80 years of age, increased medical risk factors and previous lower abdominal surgery. The proportion of patients with at least one of these characteristics in the Herniamed Hernia Registry in the case of both inguinal and incisional hernia is noted to be relatively high at around 70%. In general surgery training approximately 50-100 hernia repairs on average are performed by each trainee, with around only 25 laparo-endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: A tailored approach is now employed and seen more so in hernia surgery and this fact is referred to and highlighted in the contemporaneous hernia guidelines published to date. In addition, with the increasing complexity of abdominal wall surgery, the number of procedures actually performed by trainees is no longer considered adequate to overcome any recognized learning curve. Therefore, to supplement general surgery training young surgeons should be offered a clinical fellowship to obtain an additional qualification as an abdominal wall surgeon and thus improve their clinical and operative experience under supervision in this field. Practicing general surgeons with a special interest in hernia surgery can undertake intensive further training in this area by participating in clinical work shadowing in hernia centers, workshops and congresses.

Accreditation and certification requirements for hernia centers and surgeons: the ACCESS project.

INTRODUCTION: There is a need for hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons because of the increasing complexity of hernia surgery procedures due to new techniques, more difficult cases and a tailored approach with an increasing public awareness demanding optimal treatment results. Therefore, the requirements for accredited/certified hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons should be formulated by the international and national hernia societies, while taking account of the respective health care systems. METHODS: The European Hernia Society (EHS) has appointed a working group composed of 18 hernia experts from all regions of Europe (ACCESS Group-Hernia Accreditation and Certification of Centers and Surgeons-Working Group) to formulate scientifically based requirements for hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons while taking into consideration different health care systems. A consensus was reached on the key questions by means of a meeting, a telephone conference and the exchange of contributions. The requirements formulated below were deemed implementable by all participating hernia experts in their respective countries. RESULTS: The ACCESS Group suggests for an adequately equipped hernia center the following requirements: (a) to be accredited/certified by a national or international hernia society, (b) to perform a higher case volume in all types of hernia surgery compared to an average general surgery department in their country, (c) to be staffed by experienced hernia surgeons who are beyond the learning curve for all types of hernia surgery recommended in the guidelines and are responsible for education and training of hernia surgery in their department, (d) to treat hernia patients according to the current guidelines and scientific recommendations, (e) to document each case prospectively in a registry or quality assurance database (f) to perform follow-up for comparison of their own results with benchmark data for continuous improvement of their treatment results and ensuring contribution to research in hernia treatment. To become a specialist hernia surgeon, the ACCESS Group suggests a general surgeon to master the learning curve of all open and laparo-endoscopic hernia procedures recommended in the guidelines, perform a high caseload and additionally to implement and fulfill the other requirements for a hernia center. CONCLUSION: Based on the above requirements formulated by the European Hernia Society for accredited/certified hernia centers and hernia specialist surgeons, the national and international hernia societies can now develop their own programs, while taking account of their specific health care systems.

Polypropelene-mesh properties and type of anchoring do not influence strength of parietal ingrowth.

PURPOSE: In laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, parietal ingrowth of the mesh is of crucial importance. Until significant ingrowth occurs integrity of the repair depends solely on mesh overlap and anchoring device. Relatively few studies have addressed the effect of mesh properties and anchoring device on long-term parietal ingrowth. METHODS: In 20 sheep, using laparoscopy, we inserted two different polypropylene-based meshes, Physiomesh™ and Ventralight™ ST, anchored with Protack™, SecureStrap™, or Glubran™. After 6 and 12 months, 10 sheep at each time point were euthanized, and we harvested the meshes with corresponding fascia. Mesh with fascia was attached on an Alwetron™ materials testing machine and pulled apart obtaining the peel-off energy (kilojoule (kJ)). RESULTS: The strength of parietal ingrowth at 6 months was 5.99 ± 0.54 kJ (mean ± SEM), 4.94 ± 0.54 kJ and 7.35 ± 0.55 kJ when anchored with Protack™, Glubran™, or SecureStrap™, respectively. At 6 months, the strength of parietal ingrowth of SecureStrap™ was significantly higher than Glubran™ (p = 0.04). No significant difference was seen between any other combinations. Parietal ingrowth at 12 months was 7.05 ± 0.56 kJ, 7.55 ± 0.54 kJ, and 5.73 ± 0.54 kJ when anchored with Protack™, Glubran™, and SecureStrap™, respectively. No significant difference in strength of parietal ingrowth was seen between the three types of anchoring, (p = 1.00, p = 1.00, and p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: At 12 months, the strength of parietal ingrowth was the same for all comparisons. The two polypropylene meshes showed equal strength of parietal ingrowth independent of mesh properties and anchoring devices used.

Mesh shrinkage depends on mesh properties and anchoring device: an experimental long-term study in sheep.

PURPOSE: The choice of mesh and anchoring device in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is controversial. Clinically important long-term properties of mesh and anchoring device such as mesh shrinkage have been sparsely investigated. Furthermore, the effect of various anchoring devices on mesh properties has never been examined. METHODS: In 20 sheep, using laparoscopy, we inserted three PhysiomeshTM (large pore, lightweight) and three VentralightTMST (small pore, mediumweight), anchored with ProTackTM, SecurestrapTM or GlubranTM, respectively. After 6 and 12 months, 10 sheep at each time-point, we euthanized the animals, harvested the meshes with fascia, and measured the exact size and area of the mesh, expressing mesh shrinkage as a percentage of the initial area. RESULTS: The shrinkage of PhysiomeshTM was 35.7 %, 23.8 % and 17.7 % when anchored with ProtackTM, GlubranTM or SecurestrapTM, respectively. Shrinkage with ProtackTM was significantly higher than with either GlubranTM or SecurestrapTM, respectively (p<0.01 and p<0.01). The shrinkage of VentralightTMST was 19.3 %, 22.2 % and 19.6 % when anchored with ProtackTM, GlubranTM and SecurestrapTM, respectively (p>0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). Overall shrinkage of PhysiomeshTM anchored with ProtackTM was significantly higher for all comparisons (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that mesh shrinkage in sheep takes place within 6 months after implantation. A significant interaction between mesh and type of anchoring indicates that shrinkage may depend on both mesh properties and anchoring device. The results of the current study imply that the combined effect of mesh and anchoring device should be evaluated in future studies.

Modified laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh in complicated inguinal hernia surgery.

PURPOSE: To analyse the recurrence rate and postoperative complications in inguinal hernia patients where the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (IPOM) was used due to preperitoneal fibrosis. METHODS: Patients who had undergone inguinal herniotomy with the IPOM technique at Horsens Regional Hospital during the calender years of 2004 through 2010 filled out a questionnaire specific for recurrence and postoperative complications and had a clinical examination. Furthermore the medical records and national databases were analysed for reoperations for recurrent hernias. RESULTS: 37 patients (38 hernias) were operated. Two patients had a recurrent hernia (5 %), four patients (11 %) reported chronic pain and six patients (16 %) reported various bowel symptoms after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal treatment of these relatively rare and complicated patients is still an issue of debate, but in the light of the present study it seems that the IPOM technique is equal to or has a better profile compared to Lichtenstein in terms of re-recurrence and chronic pain. We believe that the IPOM technique has a place in the treatment of these patients.

DynaMesh® in the repair of laparoscopic ventral hernia: a prospective trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate mesh-related complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using DynaMesh®. METHODS: In the period 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2010, 181 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in our day surgery unit using DynaMesh® were entered prospectively in the National Danish Hernia Database. Data concerning abdominal reoperations after hernia repair were later collected on all 181 patients from the National Danish Health Registry. Postoperative telephone interviews were conducted estimating postoperative pain and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Six % (11 patients) were reoperated because of mesh-related complications. Three had small bowel obstruction and one had a colonic fistula with mesh infection, all causing bowel resection and mesh removal. Mesh-related cutaneous fistula was seen in one patient. Six patients had a symptomatic recurrence requiring reoperation. Abdominal wall hematomas were seen in two cases, while two other patients had symptomatic large seromas, of which one was drained surgically. After a median follow-up of 34 months (range 12-63) in 140 patients, 66 % were pain free (0 on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)). Of 26 patients with moderate to severe pain (NRS > 3) at follow-up, only 4 regretted the operation. Sixteen patients thought they had a recurrence, of these only 3 regretted the operation. CONCLUSION: The use of DynaMesh® in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair was associated with a 6 % risk of mesh-related reoperation in a high volume setting. Despite chronic pain in 19 %, after 34 months follow-up patient satisfaction was high.

Laparoscopic repair of perforated ulcer in Western Denmark - a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: to report the distribution and results of laparoscopic repair of perforated ulcer surgery in surgical departments in a major region in Denmark and compare it with the results from the national database regarding mortality and morbidity. METHOD: case charts from all patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of perforated ulcer in Western Denmark in the period 1 January 2003 - 1 July 2007 were collected. Demographical data, surgical details, morbidity, 30-day mortality, and length of stay were recorded. For comparison, data from the National Health Registry (NIP) describing all patients who had an operation due to perforated ulcer in this period was obtained. RESULTS: no more than 51 out of 818 patients undergoing operation for perforated ulcer in the region had a laparoscopic operation. Mortality in the laparoscopic group was 4% compared to 26% reported from the national database (NIP). The laparoscopic group had a higher reperforation rate but length of stay was equal. No formal criteria concerning surgeon or patients selection for laparoscopic surgery were met. CONCLUSION: laparoscopic repair of perforated ulcer was done without any selection criteria in few surgical departments in Western Denmark and was associated with a low mortality but a higher risk of reperforation.

Shrinkage of intraperitoneal onlay mesh in sheep: coated polyester mesh versus covered polypropylene mesh.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the laparoscopic placement of intraperitoneal mesh constitutes an acceptable option in the management of ventral hernia. To date, relatively little has been published on the consequences of intra-abdominal placement of a mesh with respect to the decrease of mesh size (shrinkage). METHODS: In each of 16 sheep, four meshes (dimensions 10 × 10 cm), two based on polyester and two on polypropylene, were placed laparoscopically on intact peritoneum and fixed with either non-absorbable or absorbable tacks. After 3, 6, 12, and 18 months, four animals, respectively, underwent a new laparoscopy with the harvesting of mesh and fascia. Quantitative measurement of the mesh size was performed and expressed as percentage shrinkage. Random core biopsies of mesh and adjacent tissue were obtained and histologically examined. RESULTS: There was a significant difference of the two meshes with respect to shrinkage at all time points. The coated polyester-based mesh was exposed to more shrinkage compared to the polypropylene mesh covered with anti-adhesive material. Random biopsies at 3 months showed an increased foreign body reaction to the coated polyester mesh. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first long-term experimental study on mesh shrinkage after the laparoscopic placement of mesh. The polyester-based mesh induced a more intense foreign body reaction and was exposed to significantly more shrinkage than the covered polypropylene mesh.

Functional cine MRI and transabdominal ultrasonography for the assessment of adhesions to implanted synthetic mesh 5-7 years after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has gained worldwide acceptance, due to its minimally invasive character, feasibility and low rate of complications. Animal experiments have shown marked adhesions to the intraperitoneal mesh (IPM), the clinical consequences being unclear. This study aimed to describe the extension of adhesions to the mesh, 5-7 years after LVHR, using two validated non-invasive radiologic methods. METHODS: Real-time transabdominal ultrasonography (TAU) and cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was applied to 30 patients with prior LVHR and implantation of IPM (Intramesh W3, Cousin Biotech, France). The visceral slide was measured in nine predefined abdominal segments. Values

Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model.

PURPOSE: Current hernia literature shows that the use of mesh in ventral hernia repair reduces the risk of recurrence significantly. In laparoscopic repair, the mesh is placed intraperitoneally. Accordingly, the close contact between mesh and viscera involves a risk of adhesion formation. In this experimental study, we examined the degree of de novo adhesion formation over time to currently available meshes. METHODS: Sixteen sheep each received laparoscopic placement of four (10 x 10 cm) meshes on intact peritoneum. Two different mesh materials (coated vs. non-coated) and two different fixation devices (absorbable/non-absorbable) were investigated. (Parietex Composite, DynaMesh IPOM, ProTack and AbsorbaTack). After 3, 6, 12 and 18 months, four animals, respectively, underwent a new laparoscopy to determine the extent of adhesions to the mesh. RESULTS: Parietex Composite significantly reduced the formation of intraabdominal adhesions compared to DynaMesh IPOM. The mean extent of adhesions increases over time without reaching a steady state within the first 12 months after laparoscopic placement. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first long-term (18 months) experimental study on adhesion formation in sheep after laparoscopic placement of mesh and may serve as a template for future studies on meshes before marketing.

Establishment and initial experiences from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database.

PURPOSE: Outcome after ventral hernia repair is not optimal. The surgical technique relies on personal preferences or evidence from small-scale studies, rather than large-scale prospective data with high external validity. The purpose of this paper was to describe the establishment and potential of the Danish Ventral Hernia Database (DVHD). Furthermore, the first 2-year data from 2007 to 2008 are presented. METHODS: Registrations were based on surgeons' web registrations and validated by cross checking with data from the Danish National Patient Register. RESULTS: The DVHD was established in June 2006 and is based on prospective online web-registration of perioperative data, and individualised tracking of follow up data. During the first 2 years (2007-2008) data showed a large variation in almost all aspects of ventral hernia repair regarding surgical technique, use of open versus laparoscopic technique, use of mesh or no mesh, type of suture material, and placement of the mesh. A total of 5,629 elective and 661 acute ventral hernia repairs were registered. After the first 2 years the registration rate was 70%. CONCLUSION: The first national ventral hernia database has been established. Preliminary results call for large-scale prospective and randomised studies to improve outcomes. Overall, the DVHD may facilitate identification of surgical technical problems and contribute to improved outcomes. The initial registration rate of 70% is inadequate and initiatives have been undertaken to reach >95% of all hernia repairs as in the Danish Inguinal Hernia Database.

Nationwide study of early outcomes after incisional hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: There are no nationwide studies on early outcomes after incisional hernia repair. METHODS: This study included all patients aged 18 years or more who had surgery for incisional hernia in Denmark between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2006, and analysed clinical outcomes within 30 days of surgery. Patients having acute operations and those whose hernia repair was secondary to other procedures were excluded. RESULTS: Of a total of 2896 incisional hernia repairs (1872 open, 1024 laparoscopic), 2754 (95.1 per cent) were for primary hernia and 142 (4.9 per cent) for recurrence. The median hospital stay was 1 (range 0-88) day (open, 1 day; laparoscopic, 2 days); 10.0 per cent stayed for more than 6 days. Some 11.2 per cent of patients were readmitted (open, 10.1 per cent; laparoscopic, 13.1 per cent). Major complications were observed in 3.5 per cent (open, 2.8 per cent; laparoscopic, 4.8 per cent) with a total morbidity rate of 10.7 per cent (open, 10.1 per cent; laparoscopic, 11.8 per cent). The mortality rate was 0.4 per cent (open, 0.2 per cent; laparoscopic, 0.7 per cent). Morbidity and mortality were not related to surgical volume. CONCLUSION: Outcomes after incisional hernia repair seem unsatisfactory.

Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is a well established procedure in the treatment of ventral hernias. It is our clinical experience that patients suffer intense postoperative pain, but this issue and other recovery parameters have not been studied in detail. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with hernias >3 cm prospectively underwent LVHR using "double-crown" titanium tack mesh fixation. Pre- and postoperative pain was measured on a 0-100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and health-related quality of life was measured using the Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36). Several other recovery parameters were measured systematically in the 6 months follow-up period. RESULTS: We observed no recurrences or severe complications in the follow-up period (n = 31 at day 30 and n = 28 after 6 months). The median in-hospital stay was 2 days (range 0-5). Patients reported significantly more pain during activity than at rest at all times (p < 0.05). The median VAS-pain score during activity vs. at rest at discharge was 60 and 31, respectively. The median VAS-pain score during activity on the day of operation (day 0) was 78; it returned to baseline values at day 30 (p = 0.148) and, after 6 months, it was below the preoperative score (p = 0.01). The scores for general well-being and fatigue returned to baseline values at days 3 and 30, respectively, and at 6 months, they had both significantly improved compared with preoperative values (p = 0.005). The SF-36 scores were significantly worse in three domains at day 30 (p < 0.005). After 6 months, the bodily pain score had increased significantly compared with preoperative values (p < 0.005) and all eight scales were comparable to the Danish reference population scores. Patients resumed normal daily activities after a median of 14 days (range 1-38). Smokers and patients with hard physical demands at work took a significantly longer amount of time to resume work compared with non-smokers (30 vs. 9 days, p < 0.005) and patients with light work demands (29 vs. 9 days, p < 0.05), respectively. VAS-pain scores were strongly correlated to general well-being (r = -0.8, p < 0.001), patient satisfaction (r = -0.67, p < 0.001) and quality of life (r = -0.63, p < 0.001). We found no significant correlation between the number of tacks used (median 59) and postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: LVHR was associated with considerable postoperative pain and fatigue in the first postoperative month, prolonging the time of convalescence and significantly affecting patients' quality of life up to 6 months postoperatively. Mesh fixation with fibrin glue or other non-invasive/degradable products seems promising for reducing pain and it should be investigated in future randomised trials.