Procedural sedation by advanced care paramedics for emergency gastrointestinal endoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: At the QEII Health Sciences Centre Emergency Department (ED) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, advanced care paramedics (ACPs) perform procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for many indications, including orthopedic procedures. We have begun using ACPs as sedationists for emergent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy. This study compares ACP-performed ED PSA for UGI endoscopy and orthopedic procedures in terms of adverse events, airway intervention, vasopressor requirement, and PSA medication use. METHODS: A data set was built from an ED PSA quality control database matching 61 UGI endoscopy PSAs to 183 orthopedic PSAs by propensity scores calculated using age, gender, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. Outcomes assessed were hypotension (systolic BP30 sec), vomiting, arrhythmias, death, airway intervention, vasopressor requirement, and PSA medication use. RESULTS: UGI endoscopy patients experienced hypotension more frequently than orthopedic patients (OR=4.11, CI: 2.05-8.22) and required airway repositioning less often (OR=0.24, CI: 0.10-0.59). They received ketamine more frequently (OR=15.7, CI: 4.75-67.7) and fentanyl less often (OR=0.30, CI: 0.15-0.63) than orthopedic patients. Four endoscopy patients received phenylephrine, and one required intubation. No patient died in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In ACP-led sedation for UGI endoscopy and orthopedic procedures, adverse events were rare with the notable exception of hypotension, which was more frequent in the endoscopy group. Only endoscopy patients required vasopressor treatment and intubation. We provide preliminary evidence that ACPs can manage ED PSA for emergent UGI endoscopy, although priorities must shift from pain control to hemodynamic optimization.

Attentional dysfunction and recovery in concussion: effects on the P300m and contingent magnetic variation.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of concussion on indices of attention using magnetoencephalography. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Thirteen patients were recruited from the emergency department and scanned within 3-6 days of injury. Five returned for follow-up scans one and three months post-injury. Thirteen healthy controls also completed testing. During MEG acquisition, participants performed the Attention Network Test (ANT). Cognitive evoked responses to this task include a cue-evoked P300m, a contingent magnetic variation (CMV) and a target-evoked P300m. The Rivermead Postconcussion Symptom Questionnaire and Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT3) were administered in all sessions. RESULTS: Patients suffering from concussion had slower response times and benefitted more from spatial cues than did controls. Global activation for all three evoked responses was lower for patients than controls. In a small sample of patients who returned for follow-up, the CMV and target P300m improved with recovery. CONCLUSIONS: MEG-evoked responses to the ANT reveal neurophysiological evidence of attentional dysfunction within days of injury. A pattern of improvement was also observed over the course of three months for the P300m, while behavioural performance did not change significantly. Further development of this method may yield a useful adjunct to neurological examination for concussion diagnosis and monitoring.

Emergency department procedural sedation for primary electrical cardioversion - a comparison with procedural sedations for other reasons.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia treated in the emergency department (ED), with primary electrical cardioversion (PEC) the preferred method of rhythm control. Anecdotally, patients undergoing ED procedural sedation (EDPS) for PEC differ from those requiring EDPS for other procedures: they are at higher risk of adverse events, and require fewer drugs and lower doses. We attempt to verify this using an EDPS registry at a Canadian, tertiary care teaching hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients that underwent EDPS for the period of June 2006 to September 2014. We compared demographics, medication use and intra-procedural adverse events between those receiving EDPS for PEC for AF compared to that for other indications. We report the asssociation between AEs and predictors using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 4 867 patients were included, 714 for PEC for AF and 4 153 for other indications. PEC patients were more likely male (58.5% vs. 47.1%), older (59.5 years vs. 48.1 years), and less likely to be ASA I (46.6% vs. 69.0%). PEC patients received smaller doses of propofol and less likely to receive adjuvant analgesic therapy (11.5% vs. 78.2%). PEC patients were more likely to experience hypotension (27.6% vs. 16.5%) but respiratory AEs (apnea, hypoxia and airway intervention) were not different. CONCLUSION: EDPS for PEC differs from that conducted for other purposes: patients tend to be less healthy, receive smaller doses of medication and more likely to suffer hypotension without an increase in respiratory AEs. These factors should be considered when performing EDPS.

Emergency department procedural sedation for primary electrical cardioversion — a comparison with procedural sedations for other reasons / 世界急诊医学杂志（英文）

@#BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia treated in the emergency department (ED), with primary electrical cardioversion (PEC) the preferred method of rhythm control. Anecdotally, patients undergoing ED procedural sedation (EDPS) for PEC differ from those requiring EDPS for other procedures:they are at higher risk of adverse events, and require fewer drugs and lower doses. We attempt to verify this using an EDPS registry at a Canadian, tertiary care teaching hospital. METHODS:This is a retrospective review of patients that underwent EDPS for the period of June 2006 to September 2014. We compared demographics, medication use and intra-procedural adverse events between those receiving EDPS for PEC for AF compared to that for other indications. We report the asssociation between AEs and predictors using logistic regression. RESULTS:A total of 4867 patients were included, 714 for PEC for AF and 4153 for other indications. PEC patients were more likely male (58.5％vs. 47.1％), older (59.5 years vs. 48.1 years), and less likely to be ASA I (46.6％ vs. 69.0％). PEC patients received smaller doses of propofol and less likely to receive adjuvant analgesic therapy (11.5％ vs. 78.2％). PEC patients were more likely to experience hypotension (27.6％vs. 16.5％) but respiratory AEs (apnea, hypoxia and airway intervention) were not different. CONCLUSION:EDPS for PEC differs from that conducted for other purposes:patients tend to be less healthy, receive smaller doses of medication and more likely to suffer hypotension without an increase in respiratory AEs. These factors should be considered when performing EDPS.

End-tidal capnometry during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized trial was undertaken to evaluate the utility of adding end-tidal capnometry (ETC) to pulse oximetry (PO) in patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: The patients were randomized to monitoring with or without ETC in addition to the current standard of care. Primary endpoints included respiratory adverse events, with secondary endpoints of level of sedation, hypotension, other PSA-related adverse events and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 986 patients, 501 were randomized to usual care and 485 to additional ETC monitoring. In this series, 48% of the patients were female, with a mean age of 46 years. Orthopedic manipulations (71%), cardioversion (12%) and abscess incision and drainage (12%) were the most common procedures, and propofol and fentanyl were the sedative/analgesic combination used for most patients. There was no difference in patients experiencing de-saturation (SaO2<90%) between the two groups; however, patients in the ETC group were more likely to require airway repositioning (12.9% vs. 9.3%, P=0.003). Hypotension (SBP<100 mmHg or <85 mmHg if baseline <100 mmHg) was observed in 16 (3.3%) patients in the ETC group and 7 (1.4%) in the control group (P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ETC does not appear to change any clinically significant outcomes. We found an increased incidence of the use of airway repositioning maneuvers and hypotension in cases where ETC was used. We do not believe that ETC should be recommended as a standard of care for the monitoring of patients undergoing PSA.

End-tidal capnometry during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized, controlled study / 世界急诊医学杂志（英文）

@#BACKGROUND:This prospective, randomized trial was undertaken to evaluate the utility of adding end-tidal capnometry (ETC) to pulse oximetry (PO) in patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS:The patients were randomized to monitoring with or without ETC in addition to the current standard of care. Primary endpoints included respiratory adverse events, with secondary endpoints of level of sedation, hypotension, other PSA-related adverse events and patient satisfaction. RESULTS:Of 986 patients, 501 were randomized to usual care and 485 to additional ETC monitoring. In this series, 48％ of the patients were female, with a mean age of 46 years. Orthopedic manipulations (71％), cardioversion (12％) and abscess incision and drainage (12％) were the most common procedures, and propofol and fentanyl were the sedative/analgesic combination used for most patients. There was no difference in patients experiencing de-saturation (SaO2<90％) between the two groups; however, patients in the ETC group were more likely to require airway repositioning (12.9％ vs. 9.3％,P=0.003). Hypotension (SBP<100 mmHg or <85 mmHg if baseline <100 mmHg) was observed in 16 (3.3％) patients in the ETC group and 7 (1.4％) in the control group (P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS:The addition of ETC does not appear to change any clinically significant outcomes. We found an increased incidence of the use of airway repositioning maneuvers and hypotension in cases where ETC was used. We do not believe that ETC should be recommended as a standard of care for the monitoring of patients undergoing PSA.

Emergency Procedural Sedation With Propofol in Older Teenagers: Any Cause for Concern?

INTRODUCTION: Propofol is a standard for adult emergency department procedural sedation (EDPS). Use in pediatric patients remains controversial. Our primary objective was to investigate whether adverse events occurred more frequently in teenage pediatric patients receiving propofol for EDPS. METHODS: This retrospective study examines records from the Halifax Procedural Sedation Registry, collected between January 1, 2006 and May 31, 2013. Patients undergoing EDPS using propofol were divided into those aged 16 to 19 years (teenagers), 20 to 65 years (adults), and older than 65 years (seniors). The primary outcomes were the incidences of hypotension and hypoxia. RESULTS: Four thousand sixty-three EDPSs were included in the analysis, of which 230 involved teenagers, 2853 adults (mean age, 43.0 years), and 980 seniors (mean age, 77.1). The teenage group was significantly less likely to develop hypotension or hypoxia. These differences were confirmed on multivariate analysis. Patients in the teenage group received higher doses of propofol per kilogram/minute than the other groups. No other differences met statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Teenage patients receiving EDPS with propofol had a lower incidence of adverse events, and both received and tolerated larger adjusted doses of medication than older patients. Satisfaction and duration of EDPS were similar. Concerns about propofol use in younger patients have not been supported by this study. We believe that these findings support the use of propofol for EDPS in older teenagers.

Impact of the age of stored blood on trauma patient mortality: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the age of stored red blood cells on mortality in patients sustaining traumatic injuries requiring transfusion of blood products is unknown. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and describe the available literature on the use of older versus newer blood in trauma patient populations. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Lilac and the Cochrane Database for published studies comparing the transfusion of newer versus older red blood cells in adult patients sustaining traumatic injuries. Studies included for review reported on trauma patients receiving transfusions of packed red blood cells, identified the age of stored blood that was transfused and reported patient mortality as an end point. We extracted data using a standardized form and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Seven studies were identified (6780 patients) from 3936 initial search results. Four studies reported that transfusion of older blood was independently associated with increased mortality in trauma patients, while 3 studies did not observe any increase in patient mortality with the use of older versus newer blood. Three studies associated the transfusion of older blood with adverse patient outcomes, including longer stay in the intensive care unit, complicated sepsis, pneumonia and renal dysfunction. Studies varied considerably in design, volumes of blood transfused and definitions applied for old and new blood.. CONCLUSION: The impact of the age of stored packed red blood cells on mortality in trauma patients is inconclusive. Future investigations are warranted.

CONTEXTE: On ne connaît pas l'incidence de la durée de stockage des globules rouges sur la mortalité des patients atteints de lésions traumatiques qui ont besoin de transfusions de produits sanguins. L'objectif de cette revue systématique était de trouver et d'analyser la documentation scientifique qui compare les transfusions de sang chez les patients adultes victimes de trauma en fonction de la durée de stockage du sang. MÉTHODES: Nous avons effectué des recherches sur PubMed, Embase et Lilac et dans la Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Les études retenues portaient sur des transfusions de concentré de globules rouges chez les patients atteints de lésions traumatiques, tenaient compte de la durée de stockage du sang transfusé et faisaient état des décès de patients. Nous avons extrait les données à l'aide d'un formulaire normalisé et évalué la qualité des études selon l'échelle Newcastle­Ottawa. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons sélectionné 7 études (totalisant 6780 patients) parmi les 3936 résultats de la recherche initiale. D'un côté, 4 études rapportaient que la transfusion de sang dont la durée de stockage était longue était indépendamment associée à l'augmentation de la mortalité chez les patients atteints de lésions traumatiques; de l'autre, 3 études ne faisaient état d'aucune augmentation de la mortalité en fonction de la durée de stockage du sang transfusé. Trois études associaient la transfusion de sang stocké depuis longtemps à des résultats indésirables, notamment un séjour prolongé aux soins intensifs ainsi que la septicémie compliquée, la pneumonie et l'insuffisance rénale. Le modèle d'étude, le volume des transfusions et les définitions de ce qui constitue une longue ou une courte durée de stockage du sang variaient considérablement d'une étude à l'autre. CONCLUSION: Les résultats de cette revue systématique des effets de la durée de stockage des concentrés de globules rouges sur la mortalité des patients atteints de lésions traumatiques ne sont pas concluants. D'autres recherches devront être menées pour éclaircir la question.

Patient management in the emergency department by advanced care paramedics.

We describe an emergency department process using Advanced Care Paramedics in the management of patients identified as ambulatory and low acuity, or those able to be managed without an emergency nurse. Patients streamed in this way had shorter stays than other emergency patients, without affecting the care of the latter. The process was associated with improved patient flow indicators in spite of an increased patient burden.