Oncological liver resection in elderly - A retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Due to demographic changes and higher life expectancy especially in industrial nations, the number of liver resections in patients ≥70 years is rising. It is known that older age is associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgery under general anesthesia. The aim of this analysis is to compare the postoperative outcome after liver resections for malignancies in patients aged below and above 70 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively collected electronic database of 1034 liver resections between January 2013 and December 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Comparative analysis of patients <70 and ≥ 70 years receiving liver resections for malignancies included 889 operations in 703 patients. Analysis of postoperative outcome and uni- and multivariate analyses of associated risk factors were performed. RESULTS: Median age of the whole cohort was 65 years (range 18-87 years). N = 582 liver resections (65.7%) were performed in patients <70 years with 42.8% major hepatectomies and n = 307 (34.3%) liver resections in patients ≥70 years with 50.5% major hepatectomies (p = 0.034). Relevant postoperative morbidity of the whole cohort was 27.9%. The 30-day mortality was 3.9% and re-operation rate 14.8%. Patients ≥70 years had significantly higher postoperative morbidity and mortality rates than patients <70 years. Major resections, longer operating time, need of intraoperative transfusions of blood products as well as biliodigestive anastomosis (BDA) and inferior vena cava (IVC) resection were independent risk factors for worse postoperative outcome. CONCLUSION: Liver resections in patients ≥70 years are associated with a worse postoperative course after. Parenchyma sparing resections should be preferred in those patients.

Risk Stratification for the Intensive Care Unit Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy. / Risikostratifizierung für intensivmedizinische Betreuung nach Pankreatoduodenektomie.

INTRODUCTION: In view of the limited capacities in intensive care units and the increasing economic burden, identification of risk factors could allow better and more efficient planning. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess independent risk factors for the duration of intensive care unit stay after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: 147 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in the time period from 2013 to 2015 were identified from a prospective database and a retrospective analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was length of time spent in the ICU. A retrograde analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. All pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters were considered in the analysis. RESULTS: The median time spent in the intensive care unit (ICU) is one day. The univariate analysis demonstrated increased pack years, cerebrovascular events, anticoagulation, elevated creatinine and CA 19-9 as preoperative risk factors. In multivariate analysis, antihypertensive medication (AHT; OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.57 - 3.87; p = 0.05), operation time (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00 - 1.01; p = 0.03), extended LAD (OR 5.46; 95% CI 2.77 - 10.75; p = 0.01) and severe PPH (OR 4.01; 95% CI 2.07 - 7.76; p = 0.04) are significant risk factors for longer ICU stay. DISCUSSION: Patients with cardiovascular risk factors and elevated preoperative creatinine level are at greater risk for a prolonged ICU stay. Risk and benefit of an extended LAD should be weighed during the operation. Median duration on ICU/IMC after PD is one day or less for patients without risk factors. Whether routine monitoring in the ICU/IMC after PD is necessary must be clarified in further studies.

Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in Pancreatic Head Resections-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

(1) Background: The postoperative morbidity rate after pancreatic head resection remains high, partly due to infectious complications. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the influence of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) on the postoperative infection rate after pancreatic surgery. (2) Methods: From January 2019, the standard of care for patients undergoing pancreatic head resections at the Department for Visceral, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Dresden was the preoperative oral administration of SDD. The influence of SDD was evaluated for patients operated on between January 2019 and June 2020 in comparison to a propensity score-matched cohort, extracted from an existing database including all pancreatic resections from 2012 to 2018. The primary endpoint of the study was the shift of the bacterial load on the intraoperative bile swab test. The secondary endpoint was the association of SDD with postoperative complications. (3) Results: In total, 200 patients either with SDD (n = 100; 50%) or without SDD (non-SDD, n = 100; 50%) were analyzed. In the patient group without a preoperative biliary stent, 44% (n = 11) of the non-SDD group displayed positive bacterial results, whereas that was the case for only 21.7% (n = 10) in the SDD group (p = 0.05). Particularly, Enterobacter species (spp.) were reduced from 41.2% (n = 14) (non-SDD group) to 23.5% (n = 12) (SDD group) (p = 0.08), and Citrobacter spp. were reduced by 13.7% (p = 0.09) from the non-SDD to the SDD cohort. In patients with a preoperative biliary stent, the Gram-negative Enterobacter spp. were significantly reduced from 52.2% (n = 12) in the non-SDD group to 26.8% (n = 11) in the SDD group (p = 0.04). Similarly, Citrobacter spp. decreased by 20.6% from 30.4% (n = 7) to 9.8% (n = 4) in the non-SDD compared to the SDD group (p = 0.04). In general, deep fluid collection and abscesses occurred more frequently in the non-SDD group (36%; n = 36 vs. 27%; n = 27; p = 0.17). (4) Conclusions: Adoption of SDD before pancreatic head surgery may reduce the bacterial load in bile fluid. SDD administration does not significantly affect the postoperative infectious complication rate after pancreatic head resections.

Evaluation of Postoperative Quality of Life After Pancreatic Surgery and Determination of Influencing Risk Factors.

OBJECTIVES: The postoperative quality of life (QoL) after pancreatic surgery is frequently impaired. The aim of this study was to evaluate the QoL after pancreatic surgery and its influencing risk factors. Furthermore, an age-adjusted comparison with the normal population of Germany was performed. METHODS: A total of 94 patients were surveyed. The Short Form-36 questionnaire was sent to all patients undergoing pancreatic surgery between 2013 and 2017. All pathologies and types of pancreatic resections were included. Statistical analyses were performed, and an analysis by the Robert Koch-Institute to determine the health-related age-adjusted QoL in Germany served as control group. RESULTS: Response rate was 29%. Median time of survey was 28 months. As compared with a normative population, QoL after pancreaticoduodenectomy was significantly impaired. Distal pancreatic resection showed no significant differences. Univariate and Lasso analyses showed that the following factors had a negative impact: coronary artery disease, chronic pancreatitis, and open access. Postoperative enzyme supplementation seemed to have a positive impact. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic surgery leads to long-lasting negative effect on QoL. Distal pancreatic resections and laparoscopic access seemed to be the best tolerated. Complications seems to have less impact, whereas maintaining exocrine and endocrine function seems to have a positive effect.

A simple preoperative stratification tool predicting the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) can be associated with severe postoperative morbidity. This study aims to develop a preoperative POPF risk calculator that can be easily implemented in clinical routine. METHODS: Patients undergoing PD were identified from a prospectively-maintained database. A total of 11 preoperative baseline and CT-based radiological parameters were used in a binominal logistic regression model. Parameters remaining predictive for grade B/C POPF were entered into the risk calculator and diagnostic accuracy measures and ROC curves were calculated for a training and a test patient cohort. The risk calculator was transformed into a simple nomogram. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients undergoing PD in the period from 2012 to 2018 were included. CT-imaging-based maximum main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter (p = 0.047), CT-imaging-based pancreatic gland diameter at the anticipated resection margin (p = 0.002) and gender (p = 0.058) were the parameters most predictive for grade B/C POPF. Based on these parameters, a risk calculator was developed to identify patients at high risk of developing grade B/C POPF. In a training cohort of PD patients this risk calculator was associated with an AUC of 0.808 (95%CI 0.726-0.874) and an AUC of 0.756 (95%CI 0.669-0-830) in the independent test cohort. A nomogram applicable as a visual risk scale for quick assessment of POPF grade B/C risk was developed. CONCLUSION: The preoperative POPF risk calculator provides a simple tool to stratify patients planned for PD according to the risk of developing postoperative grade B/C POPF. The nomogram visual risk scale can be easily integrated into clinical routine and may be a valuable model to select patients for POPF-preventive therapy or as a stratification tool for clinical trials.