ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Coccydynia is pain in the coccyx that typically occurs idiopathically or from trauma. Most forms are self-limiting. However, if symptoms persist, non-surgical treatment options can include offloading, NSAIDs, physical therapy, and steroid injections. If all treatment options fail, a growing body of evidence supports a coccygectomy for symptomatic relief. The standard approach for a coccygectomy involves a midline incision cephalad to the anus along the gluteal cleft. Historically, this method has had high rates of infection. PURPOSE: To improve healing and decrease infection rate, we propose the paramedian approach to a coccygectomy. This approach has the benefit of distancing the surgical site from the anus, diminishing the crevice effect of the incision, and increasing the dermal and subdermal thickness for improved surgical closure. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: We present a case series study of 41 patients who underwent the paramedian approach coccygectomy using a 4 to 6 cm incision, approximately 0.5 to 1.5 cm lateral to the midline, for coccyx removal. These patients were evaluated postoperatively to determine infection rate and various outcome measures. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-one patients suffering from refractory coccydynia had a coccygectomy via the paramedian approach between 2011 and 2022 by the senior author. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included self-reported measures (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scale and satisfaction with procedure), physiologic measures (presence of infection and treatment provided) and functional measures (return to vocation/avocation) METHODS: Data was compiled and transferred to Microsoft Excel and analyzed. Two-tailed T-tests were used to compare the patient improvement in VAS and ODI as appropriate for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The patients' average age was 45.8 years. Patients' average body mass index was 27.9, with 71% of patients overweight or obese. A total of 68% of patients were female. Trauma was the most common precipitating factor (75.6%). Five patients presented with postoperative complications (12.1%), one requiring an incision and drainage, and four others were treated with antibiotics for wound erythema. Postoperative evaluations showed continual improvement, with the most significant improvement reported greater than 1-year postoperatively. The Visual Analogue Scale for pain dropped from 7.5 to 2.3 (p<.001), and the Oswestry Disability Index improved from 30.1 to 9.6 (p<.001). A total of 86.7% of patients reported either a good or excellent result. CONCLUSION: Coccygectomies via the midline approach have a variable infection rate, likely due to proximity of the incision to the anus and due to the crevice effect of the gluteal cleft in terms of aeration. These contributing factors are overcome in the paramedian approach, making it an effective option for treating refractory coccydynia that is non-responsive to conservative management.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Acute exertional compartment syndrome (AECS) is a condition with the potential for devastating outcomes if not promptly treated. Physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating patients presenting with pain, swelling, decreased range of motion, and numbness within a muscle compartment. However, AECS is frequently misdiagnosed due to a multitude of factors, leading to a delay in treatment. In this case report, we would like to shed light on a rare case of bilateral upper-extremity AECS and suggest the treatment paradigm we believe will help prevent negative outcomes. Case Report: A previously healthy 33-year-old male presented with bilateral weakness, tingling, tenderness, swelling, and pain upon movement in the trapezius and deltoid muscles. The symptoms started after he performed "burpees" for 18 h following a 12-h forest-fire firefighting shift. The patient's rapidly developing clinical presentation warranted compartmental pressure checks for suspicion of AECS. Being able to quickly determine the elevated trapezius, deltoid, and supraspinatus compartmental pressures allowed us to perform immediate bilateral fasciotomies with delayed primary closure to relieve compartment pressure. Conclusion: The delay in treatment for patients presenting with AECS is multifactorial and may lead to devastating outcomes if not promptly addressed. The lack of literature regarding bilateral upper-extremity AECS makes the treatment for this condition even more difficult. For our patient, having a proper criterion for performing compartmental pressure checks played a vital role in ensuring an accurate diagnosis and timely medical intervention.
ABSTRACT
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an autoimmune arthritic condition that presents with inflammation of the axial skeleton and oligoarthritis of the peripheral joints. While its pathophysiology is not fully understood, the condition can lead to kyphosis and spontaneous intervertebral synostosis of the spine. AS is managed through both non-operative and operative means, but fractures in patients with AS are more complicated in those with synostosis. We present a case of a patient who is a tribal elder and Salish language instructor, with kyphotic AS with synostosis of C2-sacrum, and mobility confined to occiput-C1 and C1-C2. The patient suffered a low-energy fall backward from bed and presented to the orthopedic clinic approximately a month after his injury complaining of torticollis and neck pain. He was diagnosed to have a dens fracture, a right C2 pars/facet fracture, and a right lateral mass fracture with C1-C2 stenosis and cervical myelopathy. After the failure of conservative management, the patient required a full occiput-T3 fusion due to the osteoporosis and fragile AS synostosis of the spine, to mitigate transitional zone stresses that can occur with a shorter fusion. The fusion was successful, and it minimized the pain, corrected the torticollis, and allowed the patient to resume his tribal roles.
