Smoking history and pulmonary arterial hypertension: Demographics, onset, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence and its association with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) outcomes have not been described in patients in the United States. METHODS: Using the US-based Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL), the prevalence, demographics, and outcomes in ever- versus never-smokers with PAH were determined. RESULTS: Ever-smoking status was more prevalent in males (61.7%) than in females (42.9%) enrolled in REVEAL. Ever-smokers were older than never-smokers at the time of PAH diagnosis and REVEAL enrollment. The time to first hospitalization, transplant-free survival, and survival did not differ between ever- and never-smokers overall; however, in newly diagnosed males, ever-smoking was associated with earlier death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.0; p = 0.0199), the composite of transplant or death (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.6; p = 0.0008), and first hospitalization (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7; p = 0.0063), though smoking exposure (pack-years) did not differ between newly and previously diagnosed males. CONCLUSIONS: REVEAL PAH data demonstrate that smoking prevalence in male PAH patients is disproportionate. The prevalence of cigarette smoking was significantly higher in males than females enrolled in REVEAL. Ever-smoking status was associated with increased age at PAH diagnosis and, in newly diagnosed male PAH patients, earlier time to hospitalization and shorter survival after PAH diagnosis.

The echocardiographic course of pretransplant pulmonary hypertension following kidney transplantation and associated outcomes.

The post 3 kidney transplant course of pretransplant echocardiographically-defined pulmonary hypertension (PH) was reviewed in 115 patients. Of these 61 patients (the largest cohort reported to date), underwent 160 "for indication" echocardiograms posttransplant (mean echocardiograms per patient: 2.6 ± 2.3). Patients undergoing posttransplant echocardiograms demonstrated greater risks for worse outcomes than those without posttransplant echocardiograms; however, there was no difference in mortality, death-censored graft failure or the composite of death or graft failure between these two groups. Of patients tested, 36 (59%) showed resolution of PH at a median of 37.5 months. Six patients (16.7%) in whom PH resolved (at a median of 29 months), experienced recurrence of PH after an interval of 48 months. No pretransplant demographic or echocardiographic characteristics distinguished those in whom PH persisted versus resolved. Though there was no difference in the risk for mortality or death-censored graft loss between the two groups at 3 and 5 years, there was a higher risk for the composite of mortality or graft loss at three but not at five years in the group with persistent PH. In conclusion, echocardiographically defined PH resolved in 59% of patients following kidney transplantation; but irrespective of resolution there was no clear association with worse outcome.

Application of the REVEAL risk score calculator 2.0 in the CHEST study.

BACKGROUND: Currently there are no risk assessment recommendations for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk score (RRS), developed for risk assessment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, has previously predicted outcomes in CTEPH. RRS 2.0 was developed to refine the RRS. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the CHEST study (n = 237), which assessed riociguat in patients with inoperable and persistent/recurrent CTEPH, evaluated RRS 2.0 and its relationship with survival and clinical worsening-free survival (CWFS). RESULTS: At CHEST-1 Week 16, RRS 2.0 significantly improved and more patients moved into the low-risk stratum with riociguat versus placebo; these improvements were maintained at CHEST-2 Week 12. RRS 2.0 at CHEST-1 baseline and Week 16, and change in RRS 2.0 from CHEST-1 baseline to Week 16 were significant predictors of survival and CWFS in CHEST-2. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that RRS 2.0 may have utility in predicting outcomes and monitoring treatment response in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH.

Change in REVEAL Lite 2 risk score predicts outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the PATENT study.

BACKGROUND: Risk assessment is essential in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management. We investigated the effect of riociguat on REVEAL Lite 2 score, an abridged version of the REVEAL risk score, and its association with long-term outcomes in PATENT. METHODS: PATENT-1 was a randomized, double-blind study of riociguat vs placebo in patients with PAH. In the PATENT-2 open-label extension, all patients received riociguat up to 2.5 mg three times daily (n = 396). REVEAL Lite 2 scores were calculated at baseline, PATENT-1 Week 12, and PATENT-2 Week 12, with patients stratified as low- (1-5), intermediate- (6-7), or high-risk (≥8). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses assessed association of riociguat with survival and clinical worsening-free survival (CWFS). RESULTS: REVEAL Lite 2 score improved with riociguat 2.5 mg at PATENT-1 Week 12 (least-squares mean difference vs placebo: -0.8; p = 0.0004). More patients receiving riociguat 2.5 mg stabilized or improved risk stratum at PATENT-1 Week 12 vs placebo (p = 0.0005) and achieved low-risk status. REVEAL Lite 2 score at baseline and PATENT-1 Week 12 were associated with survival and CWFS (all p < 0.0001), as was change in score from baseline to Week 12 (p = 0.0002 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Survival and CWFS differed between risk strata at baseline (p < 0.0001) and PATENT-1 Week 12 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the risk-reduction benefits of riociguat in patients with PAH and further contributes to the validation of REVEAL Lite 2 in facilitating PAH risk assessment.

Defining Vasoplegia Following Durable, Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

This study aimed to develop a definition of vasoplegia that reliably predicts clinical outcomes. Vasoplegia was evaluated using data from the electronic health record for each 15-minute interval for 72 hours following cardiopulmonary bypass. Standardized definitions considered clinical features (systemic vascular resistance [SVR], mean arterial pressure [MAP], cardiac index [CI], norepinephrine equivalents [NEE]), threshold strategy (criteria occurring in any versus all measurements in an interval), and duration (criteria occurring over multiple consecutive versus separated intervals). Minor vasoplegia was MAP < 60 mm Hg or SVR < 800 dynes⋅sec⋅cm-5 with CI > 2.2 L/min/m2 and NEE ≥ 0.1 µg/kg/min. Major vasoplegia was MAP < 60 mm Hg or SVR < 700 dynes⋅sec⋅cm-5 with CI > 2.5 L/min/m2 and NEE ≥ 0.2 µg/kg/min. The primary outcome was incidence of vasoplegia for eight definitions developed utilizing combinations of these criteria. Secondary outcomes were associations between vasoplegia definitions and three clinical outcomes: time to extubation, time to intensive care unit discharge, and nonfavorable discharge. Minor vasoplegia detected anytime within a 15-minute period (MINOR_ANY_15) predicted the highest incidence of vasoplegia (61%) and was associated with two of three clinical outcomes: 1 day delay to first extubation (95% CI: 0.2 to 2) and 7 day delay to first intensive care unit discharge (95% CI: 1 to 13). The MINOR_ANY_15 definition should be externally validated as an optimal definition of vasoplegia.

Optimization of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Time Definitions Using the Electronic Health Record: A First Step in Automating In-Hospital AKI Detection.

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury (AKI) definitions were evaluated for cases detected and their respective outcomes using expanded time windows to 168 h. AKI incidence and outcomes with expanded time intervals were identified in the electronic health records (EHRs) from 126,367 unique adult hospital admissions (2012-2014) and evaluated using multivariable logistic regression with bootstrap sampling. The incidence of AKI detected was 7.4% (n = 9357) using a 24-h time window for both serum creatinine (SCr) criterion 1a (≥0.30 mg/dL) and 1b (≥50%) increases from index SCr, with additional cases of AKI identified: 6963 from 24-48 h.; 2509 for criterion 1b from 48 h to 7 days; 3004 cases (expansion of criterion 1a and 1b from 48 to 168 h). Compared to patients without AKI, adjusted hospital days increased if AKI (criterion 1a and 1b) was observed using a 24-h observation window (5.5 days), 48-h expansion (3.4 days), 48-h to 7-day expansion (6.5 days), and 168-h expansion (3.9 days); all are p < 0.001. Similarly, the adjusted risk of in-hospital death increased if AKI was detected using a 24-h observation window (odds ratio (OR) = 16.9), 48-h expansion (OR = 5.5), 48-h to 7-day expansion (OR = 4.2), and 168-h expansion (OR = 1.6); all are p ≤ 0.01. Expanding the time windows for both AKI SCr criteria 1a and 1b standardizes and facilitates EHR AKI detection, while identifying additional clinically relevant cases of in-hospital AKI.

Application of the REVEAL risk score calculator 2.0 in the PATENT study.

BACKGROUND: Regular risk assessment is recommended in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management to improve patient outcomes. The REVEAL risk score (RRS) predicts survival in patients with PAH, including those from the PATENT study, which assessed riociguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator approved for PAH treatment. An updated version, RRS 2.0, has been developed to further refine risk prediction. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of PATENT-1 and its open-label extension PATENT-2 (n = 396) assessed RRS 2.0 score and risk stratum and their association with survival and clinical worsening-free survival (CWFS). RESULTS: At PATENT-1 Week 12, riociguat improved RRS 2.0 versus placebo (least-squares mean difference versus placebo: -1.0 [95% confidence interval - 1.4 to -0.6; p < 0.0001]) and more patients improved risk stratum with riociguat (57%) versus placebo (42%). These improvements were maintained at PATENT-2 Week 12. RRS 2.0 score and risk strata at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 were significantly associated with survival and CWFS in PATENT-2 (p < 0.0001); change in RRS 2.0 score from PATENT-1 baseline to Week 12 was also significantly associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that RRS 2.0 has clinical utility in predicting long-term outcomes and monitoring treatment response in patients with PAH.

United States Pulmonary Hypertension Scientific Registry: Baseline Characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The treatment, genotyping, and phenotyping of patients with World Health Organization Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have evolved dramatically in the last decade. RESEARCH QUESTION: The United States Pulmonary Hypertension Scientific Registry was established as the first US PAH patient registry to investigate genetic information, reproductive histories, and environmental exposure data in a contemporary patient population. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Investigators at 15 US centers enrolled consecutively screened adults diagnosed with Group 1 PAH who had enrolled in the National Biological Sample and Data Repository for PAH (PAH Biobank) within 5 years of a cardiac catheterization demonstrating qualifying hemodynamic criteria. Exposure and reproductive histories were collected by using a structured interview and questionnaire. The biobank provided genetic data. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2018, a total of 499 of 979 eligible patients with clinical diagnoses of idiopathic PAH (IPAH) or familial PAH (n = 240 [48%]), associated PAH (APAH; n = 256 [51%]), or pulmonary venoocclusive disease/pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis (n = 3 [1%]) enrolled. The mean age was 55.8 years, average BMI was 29.2 kg/m2, and 79% were women. Mean duration between symptom onset and diagnostic catheterization was 1.9 years. Sixty-six percent of patients were treated with more than one PAH medication at enrollment. Past use of prescription weight loss drugs (16%), recreational drugs (27%), and oral contraceptive pills (77%) was common. Women often reported miscarriage (37%), although PAH was rarely diagnosed within 6 months of pregnancy (1.9%). Results of genetic testing identified pathogenic or suspected pathogenic variants in 13% of patients, reclassifying 18% of IPAH patients and 5% of APAH patients to heritable PAH. INTERPRETATION: Patients with Group 1 PAH remain predominately middle-aged women diagnosed with IPAH or APAH. Delays in diagnosis of PAH persist. Treatment with combinations of PAH-targeted medications is more common than in the past. Women often report pregnancy complications, as well as exposure to anorexigens, oral contraceptives, and/or recreational drugs. Results of genetic tests frequently identify unsuspected heritable PAH.

The Association of Pretransplant Pulmonary Hypertension With Patient and Graft Survival After Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been well characterized in end-stage kidney disease and carries a grave prognosis. Its relationship to kidney transplantation outcomes is uncertain. The purpose of the present study was to characterize PH in kidney transplant candidates and to evaluate the relationship of PH to post-transplantation outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records and echocardiographic findings in all patients listed and transplanted at a large urban academic medical center from 2010 to 2015 was undertaken. PH (defined as echocardiographic evidence of pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥ 35 mm Hg) was assessed along with demographics, and comorbidities for its relationship to patient, and graft survival by univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Of 733 patients, 15.6% (115) had PH. PH in this population was primarily due to left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction. Patient survival (78.3% vs 89.6%, P = .02) and the composite of patient and graft survival (70.7% vs 85.0%, P = .04) was reduced at 5 years in patients with PH as compared to patients with No PH, respectively. However, multivariable analysis suggested that age at presentation, race, and left ventricular systolic function but not PH were significantly associated with patient mortality or graft loss. CONCLUSION: Reduced patient and graft survival seen in patients with pulmonary hypertension appears to be related to risk factors other than the pulmonary hypertension itself; therefore, pretransplant PH should not be considered as a barrier to kidney transplantation.

Outcomes of kidney transplantation using deceased donors with history of diabetes.

Deceased diabetic kidneys are increasingly utilized in transplantation. The relationship of donor's history of diabetes to clinical and histological outcomes was examined. Forty-nine diabetic deceased donor kidneys (D-DM) were transplanted into 26 normal (R-N/D-DM) and 23 diabetic recipients (R-DM/D-DM) and compared to 211 diabetic recipients of normal kidneys(R-DM/D-N) and 466 normal recipients of normal kidneys (R-N/D-N). Patient survival at 5 years was 89.7% in R-N/D-N, 96.2% in R-N/D-DM, 80.1% in R-DM/D-N, and a 71.6% in R-DM/D-DM (P = .008). Death-censored graft survival at 5 years was 86.3% in R-N/D-N, 87.4% in R-N/D-DM, 93.5% in R-DM/D-N, and 87.5% in R-DM/D-DM (P = .24). Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared to non-diabetic recipients, diabetic recipients had a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of mortality. In this cohort, there was no impact on death-censored graft survival of diabetic donor status. Only 6 of 26 post-perfusion biopsies showed evidence of diabetic nephropathy (

Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with and without cardiovascular risk factors: Results from the AMBITION trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension enrolled in the AMBITION trial with (excluded from the primary analysis set [ex-primary analysis set]) and without (primary analysis set) multiple risk factors for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension were randomized to once-daily ambrisentan and tadalafil combination therapy, ambrisentan monotherapy, or tadalafil monotherapy. The primary end point was time from randomization to first adjudicated clinical failure event. RESULTS: Primary analysis set patients (n = 500), compared with ex-primary analysis set patients (n = 105), were younger (mean, 54.4 vs 62.1 years) with greater baseline 6-minute walk distance (median, 363.7 vs 330.5 meters) and fewer comorbidities (e.g., hypertension and diabetes). Treatment effects of initial combination therapy vs pooled monotherapy were directionally the same for both populations, albeit of a lower magnitude for ex-primary analysis set patients. Initial combination therapy reduced the risk of clinical failure compared with pooled monotherapy in primary analysis set patients (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.72), whereas the effect was less clear in ex-primary analysis set patients (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.37). Overall, primary analysis set patients had fewer clinical failure events (25% vs 33%), higher rates of satisfactory clinical response (34% vs 24%), and lower rates of permanent study drug withdrawal due to adverse events (16% vs 31%) than ex-primary analysis set patients. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of initial combination therapy vs pooled monotherapy was directionally similar for primary analysis set and ex-primary analysis set patients. However, ex-primary analysis set patients (with multiple risk factors for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction) experienced higher rates of clinical failure events and the response to combination therapy vs monotherapy was attenuated. Tolerability was better in primary analysis set than ex-primary analysis set patients.

Clinical outcomes stratified by baseline functional class after initial combination therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil reduced the risk of clinical failure events for treatment-naïve participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as compared to monotherapy. Previous studies in PAH have demonstrated greater treatment benefits in more symptomatic participants. METHODS: AMBITION was an event-driven, double-blind study in which participants were randomized 2:1:1 to once-daily initial combination therapy with ambrisentan 10 mg plus tadalafil 40 mg, ambrisentan 10 mg plus placebo, or tadalafil 40 mg plus placebo. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis, we compared the efficacy data between those with functional class (FC) II vs. FC III symptoms at baseline. RESULTS: This analysis included 500 participants in the previously defined primary analysis set (n = 155 FC II, n = 345 FC III). Comparing combination therapy to pooled monotherapy, the risk of clinical failure events was reduced by 79% (hazard ratio, 0.21 [95% confidence interval: 0.071, 0.63]) for FC II patients and 42% (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% confidence interval: 0.39, 0.86]) for FC III patients. In a post-hoc analysis, the risk of first hospitalization for worsening PAH was also reduced by combination therapy, particularly for FC II patients (0 combination vs. 11 [14%] pooled monotherapy). Adverse events were frequent but comparable between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment benefit from initial combination therapy appeared at least as great for FC II as for FC III participants. Hospitalizations for worsening PAH were not observed in FC II participants assigned to combination. The present data support an initial combination strategy for newly diagnosed patients even when symptoms are less severe. Funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline; AMBITION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01178073.

United States Pulmonary Hypertension Scientific Registry (USPHSR): rationale, design, and clinical implications.

Diagnostic World Health Organization (WHO) Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and Diagnostic Group 1' pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) and/or pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis (PCH) are progressive and fatal disorders. Past registries provided important insights into these disorders, but did not include hormonal exposures or genomic data. The United States Pulmonary Hypertension Scientific Registry (USPHSR) will provide demographic, physiologic, anorexigen and hormone exposure, genomic, and survival data in the current therapeutic era for 499 patients diagnosed with PAH, PVOD, or PCH. The USPHSR also will explore the relationship between pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic, and dietary hormonal exposures and the increased risk for women to develop idiopathic or heritable PAH.

Predicting Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The REVEAL Risk Score Calculator 2.0 and Comparison With ESC/ERS-Based Risk Assessment Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive, fatal disease. Published treatment guidelines recommend treatment escalation on the basis of regular patient assessment with the goal of achieving or maintaining low-risk status. Various strategies are available to determine risk status. This analysis describes an update of the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk calculator (REVEAL 2.0) and compares it with recently published European Society of Cardiology/Respiratory Society guideline-derived risk assessment strategies. METHODS: A subpopulation from the US-based registry REVEAL that survived ≥ 1 year postenrollment (baseline for this cohort) was analyzed. For REVEAL 2.0, point values and cutpoints were reassessed, and new variables were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival at 12 months postbaseline; discrimination was quantified using the c-statistic. Mortality estimates and discrimination were compared between REVEAL 2.0 and Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) and French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (FPHR) risk assessment strategies. For this comparison, a three-category REVEAL 2.0 score was computed in which patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk. RESULTS: REVEAL 2.0 demonstrated similar discrimination as the original calculator in this subpopulation (c-statistic = 0.76 vs 0.74), provided excellent separation of risk among the risk categories, and predicted clinical worsening as well as mortality in patients who were followed ≥ 1 year. The REVEAL 2.0 three-category score had greater discrimination (c-statistic = 0.73) than COMPERA (c-statistic = 0.62) or FPHR (c-statistic = 0.64). Compared with REVEAL 2.0, COMPERA and FPHR both underestimated and overestimated risk. CONCLUSIONS: REVEAL 2.0 demonstrates greater risk discrimination than the COMPERA and FPHR risk assessment strategies in patients enrolled in REVEAL. After external validation, the REVEAL 2.0 calculator can assist clinicians and patients in making informed treatment decisions on the basis of individual risk profiles. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan + tadalafil on pulmonary arterial hypertension‒related hospitalization in the AMBITION trial.

BACKGROUND: In the randomized, double-blind, event-driven AMBITION study, initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil was associated with a 50% reduction in risk of clinical failure (first occurrence of all-cause death, hospitalization for worsening pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH], disease progression, or unsatisfactory long-term clinical response) vs pooled monotherapy. These results were primarily driven by a reduction in PAH-related hospitalization in the combination therapy group, although a significant effect was not observed in a post-hoc analysis of all-cause hospitalization. METHODS: The effect of initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil in AMBITION was further explored to study PAH-related hospitalization, which was not reported in the primary publication. RESULTS: Initial combination therapy was associated with a 63% reduction in risk of PAH-related hospitalization when compared with pooled monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.372, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.217 to 0.639, p = 0.0002). For every 9 patients treated with combination therapy vs monotherapy, 1 PAH-related hospitalization could be prevented over a 1-year period. Serious adverse events leading to hospitalization, not necessarily PAH-related, occurred in 87 of 253 (34%) and 89 of 247 (36%) of patients on combination therapy and pooled monotherapy, respectively (post-hoc summary). CONCLUSIONS: Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil was found to reduce the risk of PAH-related hospitalization by 63% compared with pooled monotherapy.

Risk-stratified outcomes with initial combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Application of the REVEAL risk score.

BACKGROUND: The multinational AMBITION study demonstrated a 50% risk reduction in time to first clinical failure event (TtCF, a composite of death, hospitalization for worsening pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH], disease progression, or unsatisfactory long-term clinical response) in treatment-naive Functional Class II and III PAH patients initiated on combination therapy (ambrisentan and tadalafil) vs monotherapy. A post-hoc analysis of AMBITION data by risk stratification, as determined by baseline REVEAL risk score, was undertaken to better assess the impact of combination therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to initial combination therapy with ambrisentan 10 mg plus tadalafil 40 mg vs either drug plus placebo, respectively. Baseline REVEAL risk scores in the 605 patients were grouped by low, intermediate, or high risk. Adjudicated outcomes (TtCF and post-hoc composite end-point of time to first PAH hospitalization or death) were assessed by risk group and treatment assignment. RESULTS: At baseline, risk groups were similarly represented across treatment assignments as low (16%), intermediate (46%), and high (38%) risk. Greater risk was associated with worse outcome. At each level of risk, patients on combination therapy had significantly fewer TtCF or PAH hospitalization/death events relative to those on monotherapy, and discontinuations due to adverse events were not higher on combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This post-hoc analysis comparing outcomes by REVEAL risk group has shown that, at all levels of risk, patients enrolled in AMBITION receiving initial combination therapy have superior outcomes and, even in those assessed as low risk, initial combination therapy was clinically beneficial.

Use of supplemental oxygen in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in REVEAL.

BACKGROUND: Supplemental low-flow oxygen is recommended by treatment guidelines as supportive therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), based largely on expert opinion. Reduced diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide (DLCO) is associated with increased mortality in PAH. Reduced DLCO is also associated with relative hypoxemia, making the effects of supplemental oxygen use of particular interest in this sub-population. METHODS: Patients in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL), a 5-year observational study of Group 1 PAH, were categorized by presence or absence of supplemental oxygen use and by degree of DLCO reduction. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated by group. RESULTS: Of 3,046 patients, 57% used supplemental oxygen and 43% did not. Supplemental oxygen users had worse prognostic factors and more PAH-specific medication use. Of the 424 patients with severe DLCO reduction (<40% of predicted), 76% used oxygen and 24% did not. Patients with severe DLCO reduction who used supplemental oxygen had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality than those who did not (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.83; p = 0.0033). This was true for newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed patients. There was no relationship between oxygen use and outcomes in patients with no, mild, or moderate DLCO reduction. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, the risk of death was significantly lower for patients with severe DLCO reduction who received supplemental oxygen compared with those who did not. A randomized trial is warranted to further investigate the relationship between supplemental oxygen use and outcomes in PAH.

Baseline and Serial Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level Predicts 5-Year Overall Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Data From the REVEAL Registry.

BACKGROUND: Plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level is a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Its impact on long-term overall survival (OS) was investigated in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL), a 5-year observational, multicenter, US registry of patients with PAH. METHODS: Patients were ≥ 18 years of age, met right heart catheterization criteria at rest, had World Health Organization group I PAH, and had BNP measurement at enrollment. Optimal BNP threshold was obtained via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. OS was compared in patients with low (≤ 340 pg/mL) vs high (> 340 pg/mL) BNP at baseline; changes between baseline and last assessment were also examined. Patients were categorized based on baseline (low or high) and follow-up (low or high) BNP values; hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were estimated and compared using Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall, 1,426 patients were analyzed. Mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with baseline high vs low BNP (HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 3.0-4.2). BNP change analysis at ≤ 1 year postenrollment demonstrated that the low-low group had the lowest and the high-high group had the highest 5-year mortality risk (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.19-0.27). Changes in BNP score also correlated with change of risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline BNP threshold of 340 pg/mL strongly predicted survival up to 5 years in patients with PAH. A BNP reduction at 1 year since enrollment was associated with decreased mortality risk, whereas an increase in BNP at 1 year was associated with an increased mortality risk, supporting BNP as a surrogate marker of PAH survival.

Impact of declining renal function on outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A REVEAL registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is associated with abnormal cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, in-hospital death and poor survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and thus it may be a prognostic biomarker. In our analysis we assess the relationship between change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and outcomes in PAH patients in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL). METHODS: Overall 2,368 patients were classified into chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages based on baseline eGFR: normal or Stages 1 or 2 (n = 1,699); Stage 3a (n = 399); Stage 3b (n = 196); and Stages 4 or 5 (n = 74). We evaluated the relationship between baseline CKD stage and survival, as well as the composite end-point of survival and freedom from all-cause hospitalization. The relationships between change in eGFR at ≥1 year and these clinical end-points were also evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with a ≥10% decline in eGFR from baseline over ≥1 year had a significantly increased risk of death (hazard ratio 1.66; p < 0.0001) and the composite of all-cause hospitalization and death (hazard ratio 1.33; p = 0.002). This decline predicted survival independently of changes in 6-minute walk distance and functional class. However, a ≥10% increase in eGFR was not significantly associated with either end-point. CONCLUSION: In REVEAL, a ≥10% decline in eGFR over ≥1 year independently predicted poorer survival. Thus, eGFR may be a simple and economical biomarker in PAH.