Observational study investigating tooth extraction and the shortened dental arch approach.

The shortened dental arch (SDA) provides a cost-effective dentition, considering the population is ageing and retaining teeth for longer. The aims were to observe the reasons and sites of tooth extraction and assess the functional dentition over 15 years in dental practice. Subjects were recruited who required permanent tooth extractions between 2000 and 2015. The reasons for extractions were chosen from twelve extraction codes. Data were also collected for demographics, tooth position, root treated teeth and functional pairs remaining. Patient-centred factors on reasons for tooth extraction and comments on chewing ability and aesthetics following extractions were recorded. Nine hundred and fifty-one teeth were extracted in 900 patients. The mean age was 60 years (SD 20, SE 7, 95% CI 46, 74). Reasons for extraction were periodontal disease (n = 361, 38%), periapical infection (n = 288, 34%) or tooth and tooth-root fractures (15%). Extractions included 201 (21%) second molars, 179 (19%) first molars, 152 (16%) second premolars, 95 (10%) first incisors, 86 (9%) second incisors, 76 (8%) canines and 67 (7%) first premolars. Following extractions, median functional pairs were 12, interquartile range (IQR) 19-7. Individuals with ≥10 functional pairs including anterior teeth (60%, n = 571) had no complaints with chewing ability or aesthetics. They did not require additional prostheses. Periodontal disease and periapical infection were the main causes for the extraction. First and second molars followed by second premolars were the most commonly extracted teeth. This study supports the SDA in creating a cost effective, functional dentition in an aging population, provided remaining teeth and restorations are preserved/maintained, oral health is promoted, and anterior aesthetic tooth replacement is ensured.

Impact of wearing an intra-oral lubricating device on oral health in dry mouth patients.

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether an intra-oral lubricating device for dry mouth alters the oral environment. DESIGN: A single-blind randomized cross-over study. METHOD: Twenty-nine dentate subjects from the Sjogren's syndrome clinic attended on five occasions at 4-week intervals. They were randomized, having the device fitted on either the second or the fourth visit for the experimental period, whilst using their preferred method of lubrication throughout the rest of the study. The preferred methods of lubrication were either water (group 1, n = 10) or saliva substitute (group 2, n = 9) or sugar-free chewing gum (group 3, n = 10). At each visit microbiological, unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples were collected. Dry mouth score, speech test and periodontal indices were recorded. RESULTS: The water lubrication group (1) had a resting salivary flow greater than lubrication groups (2 and 3) by post-ANOVA contrasts (P < 0.001). The postdevice data also demonstrated a salivary flow greater than lubrication group (3) by post-ANOVA contrasts (P < 0.05). The epithelial cell count using the Spearman correlation was high, possibly reflecting increased viscosity of the saliva (P = 0.044). The speech test indicated that the experimental subjects had difficulty in speaking (P = 0.001). This was slightly easier postdevice wear. Streptococcus mutans (P = 0.009) and Lactobacillus (P = 0.058) increased in the saliva after wearing the device. Salivary flow rate, Candida albicans, oral dryness, speaking and periodontal indices were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The oral environment was altered by wearing a lubricating device with an increase in the numbers of Strep. mutans and Lactobacillus. Clinical dryness and speech test correlated with the mean whole salivary flow suggesting a screening method for xerostomia.

Patient preferences in a preliminary study comparing an intra-oral lubricating device with the usual dry mouth lubricating methods.

OBJECTIVE: To compare an intra-oral device to relieve oral dryness with the other methods of lubricating the mouth at night. DESIGN: Multidisciplinary single blind randomised cross over study. SETTING: The subjects were drawn from patients attending a dry mouth clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four dentate subjects attended on five occasions at intervals of 4 weeks. At the first visit the teeth were scaled and impressions were recorded. The device was fitted either on the second or the fourth visit. At all visits samples were taken of the resting and stimulated saliva for volumetric analysis and the dry mouth score recorded. Data were collected from the lubrication timings and the questionnaire. RESULTS: Ten water, nine saliva substitute and ten sugar-free chewing gum lubricators completed the study. There were 27 female and two male subjects with an average age of 62 years. Nine out of 10 of those lubricating with chewing gum preferred wearing the device (P = 0.037). After the device wearing period the subjects' self assessment of mouth dryness (P = 0.056), speech (P = 0.009) and swallowing (P = 0.031) were more favourable when compared with the alternative lubrication with 66% preferring the intra-oral device to their alternative method of lubrication. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the subjects preferred wearing the device at night compared with their normal method of lubrication. Subjects' perception of dryness, speech and swallowing became closer to the clinician's assessment after wearing the device.

A preliminary assessment of intra-oral lubricating systems for dry mouth patients.

OBJECTIVE: To provide extended intra-oral delivery of a saliva substitute. INTERVENTION: Three different types of prostheses containing saliva substitute were designed and assessed: a two-part device resembling a mandibular complete denture sealed by cobalt-samerium magnets, a one-part clear resin device for the edentate patients and a flexible mouth guard type of appliance containing a lubricant releasing bubble for the dentate patients. SETTING: A teaching hospital Oral Medicine and Rheumatology Clinic. SUBJECTS: 8 edentate and 3 dentate Sjogren Syndrome sufferers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective dryness after a week of wearing the lubricating appliance. RESULTS: The majority of the subjects wore the appliances for 6-12 hours during each 24 hours. The initial dryness severity diminished after wearing the lubricating prosthesis. The patients preferred to wear the appliance at night. CONCLUSION: All criteria were fulfilled on designing a saliva substitute lubricating appliance and some of the subjects have worn this prosthesis successfully for up to 3 years. Particular benefit was obtained by night-time wear.

New design for an artificial saliva reservoir for the mandibular complete denture.

Wearing dentures can be an extremely uncomfortable experience for people with xerostomia. Despite several ingenious designs, the problem of combining saliva substitutes with a simple, effective, and readily cleanable dispensing system has not been satisfactorily resolved. The previous difficulties were analyzed and methods of overcoming them were devised. A new design for a reservoir denture is presented that maximizes capacity and is easily maintained by the wearer.