Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 117
Filter
1.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 24(10): 851, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38079185
2.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(5)2023 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37237811

ABSTRACT

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common adverse event occurring in surgical patients. Optimal prevention of SSIs requires the bundled integration of a variety of measures before, during, and after surgery. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is an effective measure for preventing SSIs. It aims to counteract the inevitable introduction of bacteria that colonize skin or mucosa into the surgical site during the intervention. This document aims to guide surgeons in appropriate administration of SAP by addressing six key questions. The expert panel identifies a list of principles in response to these questions that every surgeon around the world should always respect in administering SAP.

4.
World J Emerg Surg ; 17(1): 17, 2022 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35300731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the study were to investigate the organizational characteristics of acute care facilities worldwide in preventing and managing infections in surgery; assess participants' perception regarding infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, antibiotic prescribing practices, and source control; describe awareness about the global burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and IPC measures; and determine the role of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on said awareness. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted contacting 1432 health care workers (HCWs) belonging to a mailing list provided by the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery. The self-administered questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team. The survey was open from May 22, 2021, and June 22, 2021. Three reminders were sent, after 7, 14, and 21 days. RESULTS: Three hundred four respondents from 72 countries returned a questionnaire, with an overall response rate of 21.2%. Respectively, 90.4% and 68.8% of participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary IPC team or a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team. Local protocols for antimicrobial therapy of surgical infections and protocols for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis were present in 76.6% and 90.8% of hospitals, respectively. In 23.4% and 24.0% of hospitals no surveillance systems for surgical site infections and no monitoring systems of used antimicrobials were implemented. Patient and family involvement in IPC management was considered to be slightly or not important in their hospital by the majority of respondents (65.1%). Awareness of the global burden of AMR among HCWs was considered very important or important by 54.6% of participants. The COVID-19 pandemic was considered by 80.3% of respondents as a very important or important factor in raising HCWs awareness of the IPC programs in their hospital. Based on the survey results, the authors developed 15 statements for several questions regarding the prevention and management of infections in surgery. The statements may be the starting point for designing future evidence-based recommendations. CONCLUSION: Adequacy of prevention and management of infections in acute care facilities depends on HCWs behaviours and on the organizational characteristics of acute health care facilities to support best practices and promote behavioural change. Patient involvement in the implementation of IPC is still little considered. A debate on how operationalising a fundamental change to IPC, from being solely the HCWs responsibility to one that involves a collaborative relationship between HCWs and patients, should be opened.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , COVID-19 , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Models, Organizational , Pandemics/prevention & control
5.
J Patient Saf ; 17(5): e440-e447, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28234727

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to develop risk-adjusted models and apply them for comparisons of hospital performance to define potentially preventable adverse outcomes (OAs) in Medicare lung resection surgery. METHODS: The Medicare Limited Data Set for 2010-2012 was used to design predictive risk models for the four OAs of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day postdischarge deaths without hospital readmission, and 90-day readmissions after removal of unrelated readmission events. The probability of adverse events for each hospital was used to compute the hospital-specific standard deviation (SD) tailored to patient risk profiles. Observed versus predicted adverse events divided by the hospital-specific SD identified the z score for each hospital. Risk-adjusted OA rates were then computed for comparing hospital performance. RESULTS: A total of 39,405 lung resection patients from 739 hospitals had 768 inpatient deaths (1.9%), 3147 had prolonged LOS (8.0%), 514 had 90-day postdischarge deaths without readmission (1.3 %), and 7701 had one or more 90-day readmissions (19.5%); 10,924 patients (27.7%) had one or more of these OAs. Twenty-six hospitals were two SDs better than predicted and 34 hospitals were two SDs poorer than predicted. When evaluated by deciles of risk-adjusted OAs, the top performing decile of hospitals had rates of 14.3% and the poorest performing decile had OA rates of 41.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in risk-adjusted comparative outcomes between top- and suboptimal-performing hospitals in lung resections define the potential opportunities for care improvement. Identification of risk factors associated with OAs and causes for readmissions provides direction for specific areas of care redesign for improvement.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Medicare , Aged , Humans , Length of Stay , Lung , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission , Risk Adjustment , United States
6.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 21(4): 332-343, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32364879

ABSTRACT

Background: Surgical research is potentially invasive, high-risk, and costly. Research that advances medical dogma must justify both its ends and its means. Although ethical questions do not always have simple answers, it is critically important for the clinician, researcher, and patient to approach these dilemmas and surgical research in a thoughtful, conscientious manner. Methods: We present four ethical issues in surgical research and discuss the opposing viewpoints. These topics were presented and discussed at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Surgical Infection Society as pro-con debates. The presenters of each opinion developed a succinct summary of their respective reviews for this publication. Results: The key subjects for these pro-con debates were: (1) Should patients be enrolled for time-sensitive surgical infection research using an opt-out or an opt-in strategy? (2) Should patients who are being enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing surgery with a non-operative intervention pay the costs of their treatment arm? (3) Should the scientific community embrace open access journals as the future of scientific publishing? (4) Should the majority of funding go to clinical or basic science research? Important points were illustrated in each of the pro-con presentations and illustrated the difficulties that are facing the performance and payment of infection research in the future. Conclusions: Surgical research is ethically complex, with conflicting demands between individual patients, society, and healthcare economics. At present, there are no clear answers to these and the many other ethical issues facing research in the future. Answers will only come from continued robust dialogue among all stakeholders in surgical research.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Research , Surgical Procedures, Operative/ethics , Communication , Congresses as Topic , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/standards , Open Access Publishing/ethics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/ethics , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Time Factors
8.
World J Emerg Surg ; 14: 8, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30858872

ABSTRACT

In the last three decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has increased in incidence and severity in many countries worldwide. The increase in CDI incidence has been particularly apparent among surgical patients. Therefore, prevention of CDI and optimization of management in the surgical patient are paramount. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its guidelines for management of CDI in surgical patients according to the most recent available literature. The update includes recent changes introduced in the management of this infection.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/pathogenicity , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/etiology , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/prevention & control , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/trends , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Incidence , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/trends , Risk Factors
10.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 20(2): 129-134, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30657416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The alcohol rub has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional surgical scrub in preparing the hands for surgical procedures. Few reviews have examined critically the evidence that favors or discredits the use of the alcohol rub instead of the traditional scrub. METHODS: A review of available published literature was undertaken to define the evidence for the best methods for hand preparation before surgical procedures. The focus of this literature review was to compare the bacteriologic and clinical outcomes of conventional surgical scrubbing of the hands compared with alcohol rubs. RESULTS: The bacteriologic studies of the hands after the conventional scrub versus the alcohol rub demonstrated consistently comparable or superior reductions in bacterial presence on the hand with the alcohol rub. Only four clinical studies were identified that compared the scrub versus the rub in the frequency of surgical site infections. No difference in surgical site infections were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The alcohol rub appears to have comparable results to the surgical scrub and is a reasonable alternative in preparation of the hands for surgical procedures.


Subject(s)
Hand Disinfection/methods , Operating Rooms , Preoperative Care/methods , Alcohols/administration & dosage , Disinfectants/administration & dosage , Humans
11.
Neurosurgery ; 85(1): E109-E115, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30137526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Interpretation of hospital quality requires objective evaluation of both inpatient and postdischarge adverse outcomes (AOs). OBJECTIVE: To develop risk-adjusted predictive models for inpatient and 90-d postdischarge AOs in elective craniotomy and apply those models to individual hospital performance to provide benchmarks to improve care. METHODS: The Medicare Limited Dataset (2012-2014) was used to define all elective craniotomy procedures for mass lesions in patients ≥65 yr. Predictive logistic models were designed for inpatient mortality, inpatient prolonged length of stay, 90-d postdischarge deaths without readmission, and 90-d readmissions after exclusions. The total observed patients with one or more AOs were then compared to predicted AO values, and z-scores were computed for each hospital that met minimum volume requirements. Risk-adjusted AO rates allowed stratification of eligible hospitals into deciles of performance. RESULTS: The hospital evaluation was performed for 223 facilities with 7624 patients that met criteria. A total of 849 patients (11.1%) died inclusive of 90 d postdischarge; 635 (8.3%) were 3σ length-of-stay outliers; and 1928 patients (25.3%) with one or more 90-d readmissions; 2716 patients experienced one or more AOs (35.6%). Six hospitals were 2 z-scores better than average, and 8 were 2 z-scores poorer. The median risk-adjusted AO rate was 18% for the first decile and 53.4% for the 10th decile. CONCLUSION: There was a 35% difference between best and suboptimal performing hospitals for this operation. Hospitals must know their risk-adjusted AO rates and benchmark their results to inform processes of care redesign.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Craniotomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications , Aged , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , United States
13.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 19(8): 804-811, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30265592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bacterial resistance to available antibiotics has resulted in enhanced efforts at antibiotic stewardship but also has led to investigation into alternative methods for managing surgical infections. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are naturally occurring compounds produced by all prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells that have potential as an alternative to conventional antibiotics. METHODS: The published literature was reviewed for investigations that were relevant to infections commonly seen by surgeons and the potential applicability of AMPs for surgical care. RESULTS: Antimicrobial peptides are low-molecular-weight peptides with activity against bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Experimental evidence shows that AMPs have activity against highly resistant bacteria identified from human infections. Furthermore, these peptides can be designed as semi-synthetic or totally synthetic constructs for potential clinical use. Antimicrobial peptides appear to have in vivo activity in limited animal studies, but the experimental models for evaluation of these peptides need more clinical relevance. These products are in clinical evaluation at present but are limited in number and are being evaluated primarily for topical applications. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial peptides have considerable in vitro evidence that supports their use for the prevention and treatment of surgical infections. Better experimental and clinical trial efforts are needed to move this technology toward applicability in surgical care.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides/pharmacology , Administration, Topical , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
14.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(37): e12269, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30212962

ABSTRACT

It is important that actual outcomes of care and not surrogate markers, such as process measures, be used to evaluate the quality of inpatient care. Because of the heterogenous composition of patients, risk-adjustment is essential for the objective evaluation of outcomes following inpatient care. Comparative evaluation of risk-adjusted outcomes can be used to identify suboptimal performance and can provide direction for care improvement initiatives.We studied the risk-adjusted outcomes of 6 medical conditions during the inpatient and 90-day post-discharge period to identify the opportunities for care improvement. The Medicare Limited Dataset for 2012 to 2014 was used to identify acute myocardial infarction (AMI), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia (PNEU), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH). Stepwise logistic predictive models were developed for the adverse outcomes (AOs) of inpatient deaths, 3-sigma prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day post-discharge deaths, and 90-day readmissions after unrelated events were excluded. Observed and predicted AOs were determined for each hospital with ≥75 cases for each of the 6 medical conditions. Z-scores and risk-adjusted AO rates for each hospital permitted comparative analysis of outcomes after adjusting for covariance among the medical conditions.There were a total of 1,811,749 patients from 973 acute care hospitals with the 6 medical conditions. A total of 41% of all patients had ≥1 AO events. One or more readmissions were identified in 29.8% of patients. A total of 64 hospitals (6.4%) were 2 standard deviations better than the mean for risk-adjusted outcomes, and 72 (7.4%) were 2 standard deviations poorer. The best performing decile of hospitals had mean AO rates of 35.1% (odds ratio = 0.766; 95% confidence interval (CI) CI: 0.762-0.771) and the poorest performing decile a mean AO rate of 48.5% (odds ratio = 1.357; 95% CI: 1.346-1.369). Volume of qualifying cases ranged from 670 to 9314; no association was identified for increased volume of patients (P < .40).Risk-adjusted AO rates demonstrated nearly a 14% opportunity for care improvement between top and suboptimal performing hospitals. Hospitals must be able to benchmark objective measurement of outcomes to inform quality initiatives.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Benchmarking , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Patient Readmission , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Risk Adjustment , United States
15.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 37, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30140304

ABSTRACT

Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of best practices of infection prevention and management, many surgeons worldwide fail to implement them. Evidence-based practices tend to be underused in routine practice. Surgeons with knowledge in surgical infections should provide feedback to prescribers and integrate best practices among surgeons and implement changes within their team. Identifying a local opinion leader to serve as a champion within the surgical department may be important. The "surgeon champion" can integrate best clinical practices of infection prevention and management, drive behavior change in their colleagues, and interact with both infection control teams in promoting antimicrobial stewardship.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Infection Control/methods , Surgeons/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Surgeons/standards , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , United States
16.
Surgery ; 164(4): 831-838, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29941284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Risk-adjusted outcomes of elective major vascular surgery that is inclusive of inpatient and 90-day post-discharge adverse outcomes together have not been well studied. METHODS: We studied 2012-2014 Medicare inpatients who received open aortic procedures, open peripheral vascular procedures, endovascular aortic procedures, and percutaneous angioplasty procedures of the lower extremity for risk-adjusted adverse outcomes of inpatient deaths, 3-sigma prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day post-discharge deaths without readmission, and 90-day post-discharge associated readmissions after excluding unrelated events. Observed and predicted total adverse outcomes for hospitals meeting minimum risk-volume criteria were assessed and hospital-specific z-scores and risk-adjusted adverse outcomes were calculated to compare performance. RESULTS: The total adverse-outcome rate was 27.8% for open aortic procedures, 31.5% for open peripheral vascular procedures, 19.6% for endovascular aortic procedures, and 36.4% for percutaneous angioplasty procedures. The difference in risk-adjusted adverse-outcome rates between the best- and the poorest-performing deciles were 32.2% for open aortic procedures, 29.5% for open peripheral vascular procedures, 21.5% for endovascular aortic procedures, and 37.1% for percutaneous angioplasty procedures. The 90-day post-discharge deaths and readmissions were the major driver of overall adverse-outcome rates. CONCLUSION: The variability in risk-adjusted outcomes among best- and poorest-performing hospitals is over 20% in all major vascular procedures and indicates that a large opportunity exists for improvement in results.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Vascular Diseases/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Elective Surgical Procedures/mortality , Humans , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Risk Adjustment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality
17.
Am Surg ; 84(1): 12-19, 2018 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29428014

ABSTRACT

More than 90 per cent of cholecystectomies are performed laparoscopically and this has resulted in concern that surgeons will not have sufficient experience to perform open procedures when clinical circumstances require it. We reviewed the open cholecystectomies (OCs) of Medicare patients from 2010 to 2012 in hospitals with 20 or more cases, created risk-adjusted models for adverse outcomes which were evaluated for 90-days after discharge, and compared the hospital-level outcomes with laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in the same hospitals for the same period of time. Results demonstrated that inpatient deaths, inpatient prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day postdischarge deaths without readmission, and 90-day readmissions were statistically the same with an overall adverse outcome rate of 21.6 per cent in OC versus 20.9 per cent in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Conversion of laparoscopic to open procedures was not associated with increased adverse outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides patients with many advantages, but when clinical circumstances are necessary, OC continues to be performed with the same overall adverse outcome rates, and the conversion process is not associated with poorer results in this high-risk population of patients.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy , Hospital Mortality , Length of Stay , Medicaid , Medicare , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cholecystectomy/adverse effects , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Conversion to Open Surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
19.
Am J Surg ; 215(3): 430-433, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28954711

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regional differences in utilization of services in healthcare are commonly understood, but risk-adjusted evaluation of outcomes has not been done. METHODS: Risk-adjusted adverse outcomes (AOs) for elective Medicare colorectal resections were studied for 2012-2014. Risk-adjusted metrics were inpatient deaths, prolonged postoperative length-of-stay, 90-day post-discharge deaths, and 90-day relevant post-discharge readmissions. The nine Census Bureau regions of the U.S. were evaluated by using standard deviations of predicted adverse outcomes to evaluate observed versus expected events. RESULTS: Overall AO rate was 24.3% from 86,624 patients in 1497 hospitals. Region 9 (Pacific) had the best outcomes (z-score = -3.06; risk-adjusted AO rate = 22.9%) and Region 1 (New England) the poorest (z-score = +1.86; risk-adjusted AO rate = 25.4%). CONCLUSIONS: A 4.9 SD difference exists among the best and poorest performing regions in risk-adjusted colorectal surgery outcomes. Alternative Payment Models should consider regional benchmarks as a variable for the evaluation of quality and pricing of episodes of care.


Subject(s)
Colectomy , Elective Surgical Procedures , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Medicare , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Proctectomy , Risk Adjustment , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colectomy/standards , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Proctectomy/standards , United States
20.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 61(1): 6-7, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29219914
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...