MiR-7-5p/KLF4 signaling inhibits stemness and radioresistance in colorectal cancer.

Resistance to radiotherapy remains a major unmet clinical obstacle in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are considered to mediate tumor development and radioresistance. However, the role of CSCs in regulating resistance to radiotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains largely unknown. We established two radioresistant CRC cell lines, HCT116-R and RKO-R, using fractionated irradiation. Analysis using miRNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR confirmed lower levels of miR-7-5p in both of the radioresistant cells compared to their parental cells. Subsequently, we validated that miR-7-5p expression was decreased in cancerous tissues from radiotherapy-resistant rectal cancer patients. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database analyses revealed that low miR-7-5p expression was significantly correlated with poor prognosis in CRC patients. Overexpression of miR-7-5p led to a rescue of radioresistance and an increase in radiation-induced apoptosis, and attenuated the stem cell-like properties in HCT116-R and RKO-R cells. Conversely, knocking down miR-7-5p in parental HCT116 and RKO cells suppressed the sensitivity to radiation treatment and enhance cancer cell stemness. Stemness-associated transcription factor KLF4 was demonstrated as a target of miR-7-5p. Rescue experiments revealed that miR-7-5p/KLF4 axis could induce radiosensitivity by regulating CSCs in colorectal cancer cells. Furthermore, we used CRC tumor tissues which exhibited resistance to neoadjuvant radiotherapy to establish a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model. Tail vein injection of magnetic nanoparticles carrying miR-7-5p mimics into the PDX mice significantly inhibited tumor growth with or without irradiation treatment in vivo. Our current studies not only demonstrate an anti-cancer function of miR-7-5p in regulating CSC properties and radiosensitivity in colorectal cancer, but also provide a novel potential strategy for delaying or reverse radiation resistance in preoperative radiotherapy of CRC patients.

Effect of Anterograde Lavage via Temporary Loop Ileostoma on the Recovery of Bowel Function in Patients Receiving Stoma Closure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of anterograde lavage in patients with rectal cancer who underwent anterior resection and plan to receive stoma closure is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of anterograde lavage on postoperative bowel function recovery in patients who underwent temporary loop ileostomy and stoma closure. DESIGN: This was a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer and were planning to receive stoma closure from March through December 2019 were included. INTERVENTIONS: The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received anterograde lavage before stoma closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term functional outcomes, including time to first passing of flatus, first defecation time, and recovery time to first meal, were compared between the groups. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, total cost of hospitalization, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 222 eligible participants were included in the analysis, including 114 in the lavage group and 108 in the nonlavage group. No statistically significant differences were found in age, sex ratio, or distance between the anastomotic line and dentate line. In the lavage group, patients' time to first passing of flatus (38 vs 42 h; p = 0.006), first defecation time (42 vs 48 h; p < 0.001), recovery time to first meal (48 vs 55.5 h; p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (5 vs 7 d; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter than those in the nonlavage group, and the total cost of hospitalization was significantly lower than that of the nonlavage group (25,000 vs 28,000 RMB; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (p = 0.067). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its relatively small sample size and retrospective design with single-center participants. CONCLUSIONS: Anterograde lavage before stoma closure is safe and noninvasive. For patients receiving anterior resection and planning to have stoma closure, this procedure can potentially help recover bowel function more rapidly. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C51. EFECTO DEL LAVADO ANTERGRADO MEDIANTE ILEOSTOMA TEMPORAL EN ASA SOBRE LA RECUPERACIN DE LA FUNCIN INTESTINAL EN PACIENTES QUE RECIBEN CIERRE DE ESTOMA UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO: ANTECEDENTES:No está claro el efecto del lavado anterógrado en pacientes con cáncer de recto con resección anterior que planean recibir el cierre del estoma.OBJETIVO:Investigar el efecto del lavado anterógrado en la recuperación de la función intestinal posoperatoria en pacientes que se sometieron a ileostomía en asa temporal y cierre de estoma.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo basado en el hospital.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a una resección anterior por cáncer de recto y que planeaban recibir el cierre del estoma desde marzo hasta diciembre de 2019.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes inscritos se dividieron en dos grupos según si recibieron lavado anterógrado antes del cierre del estoma.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados funcionales a corto plazo, incluido el tiempo de la primera evacuación de flatos, tiempo de la primera defecación y tiempo de recuperación hasta la primera comida, se compararon entre los grupos. Resultados secundarios incluyeron duración de la estancia hospitalaria, costo total de la hospitalización y complicaciones posoperatorias.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron en el análisis un total de 222 participantes elegibles, incluidos 114 en el grupo de lavado y 108 en el grupo de no lavado. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la edad, la proporción de sexos o la distancia entre la línea de anastomosis y la línea dentada. En el grupo de lavado, el tiempo de la primera evacuación de flatos de los pacientes (38 vs 42 h; p = 0,006), el tiempo de la primera defecación (42 vs 48 h; p < 0,001), el tiempo de recuperación hasta la primera comida (48 vs 55,5 h; p < 0,001) y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (5 vs 7 días; p < 0,001) fueron significativamente más cortos que los del grupo de no lavado, y el costo total de la hospitalización fue significativamente menor que el del grupo de no lavado (25000 vs 28000 RMB; p < 0,001). No hubo diferencia significativa en la incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias entre los dos grupos (p = 0,067).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño y su diseño retrospectivo con participantes de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:El lavado anterógrado antes del cierre del estoma es seguro y no invasivo. Para los pacientes que se someten a una resección anterior y planean cerrar el estoma, este procedimiento puede ayudar potencialmente a recuperar la función intestinal más rápidamente. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C51. (Traducción-Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Survival outcomes analysis according to mismatch repair status in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Background: The predictive role of mismatch repair (MMR) status for survival outcomes and sensitivity in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy settings for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has been inconclusive. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) was recruited. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, we used propensity score matching to reduce the effect of potential confounding factors on MMR status. The primary analysis was based on overall survival as the more important endpoint. Results: This study included 269 patients. Patients with defective MMR (dMMR) were younger (58.5% vs. 60.0%, p=0.0274) and had lower body mass indices (p=0.0091), higher differentiation grades (p=0.0889), and more advanced rectal cancers (clinical T4 or T4b, p=0.0851; M1, p=0.0055) than those with proficient MMR (pMMR). However, propensity score-matched patients with dMMR (p=0.0013) exhibited superior overall survival, even in the M1 subgroup. More importantly, patients with proficient MMR who undergo early pathological downstaging, especially lymph node pathological downstaging, can achieve a prognosis similar to that of patients with dMMR. Conclusion: The clinical significance of this retrospective study mainly includes two points: (1) Data from our study confirmed that LARC patients with dMMR status had better overall survival rates after nCRT, even in the M1 subgroup. (2) Similar survival outcomes were observed in older and female patients with early lymph node pathological downstaging, regardless of dMMR or pMMR.

Priority Management of Henle Trunk in Cranial-to-Caudal Approach for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolon Cancer Surgery.

This study aimed to compare the short-term clinical efficacy between prior and traditional approach of Henle trunk in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) for right colon cancer. A total of 161 patients underwent LRH for right colon cancer between June 2018 and December 2020 by the same group of physicians. The prior approach of Henle trunk (priority group) was used in 82 patients and traditional approach in 79 (traditional group). The demographics and clinicopathological characteristics were recorded and retrospectively analyzed. As compared to the traditional group, the mean blood loss reduced significantly [73.84 ± 17.31 mL vs. 83.42 ± 30.16 mL; P = 0.001], the operation time was markedly shorter [151.35 ± 6.75 min vs. 159.13 ± 18.85 min; P = 0.014], and the intraoperative vascular injury rate was significantly lower [6.1% (5/82). vs. 17.7% (14/79); P = 0.022]. There were no significant differences in the postoperative complications, first exhaust time, first defecation time, drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, quality evaluation of surgical specimens and pathological findings between two groups. Our study shows that the priority management of Henle trunk in the LRH for right colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure with less blood loss, shorter operation time and lower intraoperative vascular injury rate.

Up-regulated FNDC1 accelerates stemness and chemoradiation resistance in colorectal cancer cells.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by radical surgery is the preferred option for locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. However, chemo/radio-resistance remains a main obstacle in CRC therapy. In the study, we analyzed the mRNA expression profiling of CRC patients and revealed that the aberrant expression of fibronectin type III domain containing 1 (FNDC1) was associated with disease progression and poor prognosis in CRC. FNDC1 expression was consistently increased in multiple independent cohorts of CRC. Upregulated FNDC1 in pretreated primary tumor tissues predicted a poor response to nCRT, recurrence, and poor disease-free survival in nCRT-treated CRC patients. FNDC1 overexpression accelerated CRC cell survival on 5-FU or radiation treatment both in vitro and in vivo, whereas FNDC1 inhibition sensitized CRC cells to chemoradiation. In addition, FNDC1 accelerated stem cell-like properties of CRC cells. Furthermore, tumor tissues from non-responders exhibited higher activation of PI3K/Akt signaling than those from responders. FNDC1 depletion repressed 5-FU or irradiation-induced activation of PI3K/AKT in CRC cells. More importantly, pharmacological inhibition of PI3K/Akt signaling effectively decreased the effect of FNDC1 on chemoradiation resistance. Taken together, our study reveals the potential function of FNDC1 as a biomarker to predict nCRT sensitivity in CRC and a therapeutic target in CRC treatment.

Decreased E2F2 Expression Correlates with Poor Prognosis and Immune Infiltrates in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Growing evidence has revealed that the E2F family of transcription factor 2 (E2F2) participates in the tumorigenesis and progression of various tumors, but its role in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains largely unknown. Herein, the aim of our study was to investigate the exact role of E2F2 in CRC. The expression levels of E2F2 in CRC were appraised based on the Tumor Immune Estimate Resource (TIMER), Oncomine, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The results were further confirmed using CRC tumor tissues and normal controls by experimental assays including immunohistochemistry, qRT-PCR and western blot. The survival analysis of E2F2 in CRC was analyzed using PrognoScan database and TCGA data sets. In addition, the functional roles of E2F2 were examined by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and immune infiltration analysis. Our results illustrated that E2F2 was significantly downregulated in CRC samples. The low E2F2 expression in CRC was prominently correlated with N, M stage and pathological stage. Decreased E2F2 expression had an unfavorable overall survivial (OS), disease free survival (DFS), disease specific survival (DSS) and progress free interval (PFI). Multivariate cox regression showed E2F2 could be an independent prognostic factors of OS in CRC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that E2F2 may serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker for CRC patients. GSEA disclosed that E2F2 was probably involved in several pathways, including ATR pathway, ATM signalling pathway, mismatch repair, base excision repair, homologous recomibination, Fanconi Anemia pathway, multicancer invasiveness signature, and cancer stem cells. Moreover, E2F2 was significantly correlated with the infiltration level of Th2, aDC, Th17, NK CD56dim, T helper and pDC cells. The current study demonstrates that decreased E2F2 expression is closely associated with poor prognosis and immune cell infiltration in CRC, which can be a promising independent prognostic biomarker and potential treatment target for CRC.

Laparoscopic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study was to quantitatively synthesize data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of laparoscopic resection comparing natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) versus conventional laparoscopy (CL) in colorectal cancer. METHODS: We identified eligible RCTs by searching seven electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, CQVIP, Wanfang, and Sinomed). Mean differences (MDs) between groups with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for continuous outcomes. Event rate ratios (RRs) were also calculated with their 95% CIs. RESULTS: 1,569 citations were identified from electronic database as of June 2020, and finally, 21 RCTs involving 2,112 patients met the study eligibility criteria and were included. Compared to the CL group, NOSE had longer operation time (MD: 8.14 min, 95% CI: 3.02 to 13.25, and p < 0.01), less estimated blood loss (-10.64 ml, 95% CI: -14.92 to -6.36, and p < 0.01), less hospital stay after surgery (-2.21 days, 95% CI: -3.36 to -1.06, and p < 0.01), shorter time of gas passage after surgery (-0.58 days, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.34, and p < 0.01), better pain score (-1.06, 95% CI: -3.74 to -0.37, and p < 0.01), and improved cosmetic scores (1.93, 95% CI: 0.77 to 3.10, p < 0.01). Rate ratios of total complications, infection, and incision infection all favored NOSE surgery, with RRs (95% CIs) of 0.81 (0.71 to 0.93), 0.34 (0.21 to 0.54), and 0.24 (0.12 to 0.51), respectively. CONCLUSION: This report appeared the first comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs to synthesize data of laparoscopic resection with NOSE versus conventional laparoscopy. NOSE surgery seemed favorable with shorter hospital stay, less pain score, a shorter time to recover along with better cosmetic scores, and less postoperative complications.

Expression and mechanism of exosome-mediated A FOXM1 related long noncoding RNA in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) is an oncogene regulating tumor growth and metastasis. Exosome was suggested to mediate cell communication by delivering active molecules in cancers. However, the existence of FOXM1 in circulating exosomes and the role of exosome FOXM1 in gastric cancer (GC) were not clear. This study aims to investigate the potential role of FOXM1 related long noncoding RNA (FRLnc1) in exosomes in GC. RESULTS: The prepared CD63 immunomagnetic beads (CD63-IMB) had the characteristics of good dispersity and high magnetic response. The isolated exosomes were presented with elliptical membranous particles under a transmission electron microscope (TEM), with the particle size of 89.78 ± 4.8 nm. Western blot (WB) results showed that the exosomes were rich in CD9 and CD81. The Dil-labeled exosomes were distributed around cytoplasm and nucleus of cells by imaging flow cytometry (IFC) analysis. The results of quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) revealed that the FRLnc1 expressions were up-regulated in GC cells, tumor tissues, and serum of GC patients. An obviously up-regulated FRLnc1 expression was found in serum exosomes of GC patients. Up-regulation of FRLnc1 expression was closely correlated to lymph node metastasis (LNM) and TNM stage with the combination of relevant clinicopathological parameter analysis. The in vitro functional analyses demonstrated that FRLnc1 knockdown by RNA interference suppressed cell proliferation and migration in HGC-27 cells, whereas FRLnc1 overexpression promoted cell proliferation and migration in MKN45 cells. After exosome treatment, the FRLnc1 expression was significantly increased in MKN45 cells, and the MKN45 cells showed increased ability of proliferation and migration. CONCLUSION: GC cells-derived exosomes played roles in promoting the growth and metastasis of GC by transporting FRLnc1, suggesting that FRLnc1 in the exosomes may be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of GC. The delivery of FRLnc1 by the exosomes may provide a new way for the treatment of GC. Trial registration 2020-KYSB-094. Registered 23 March 2020-Retrospectively registered.

Factors influencing the application of transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction performed laparoscopically for colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A few factors influence the feasibility of transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgery for colorectal cancers. However, little is known about the underlying factors of NOSE surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients with rectal and sigmoid colon cancers treated laparoscopically between January 2014 and April 2017 were enrolled in this study. The transrectal NOSE performed laparoscopically was the first choice of all patients. When NOSE failed, the specimen was removed through a midline abdominal wall incision. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify challenging factors influencing the intraoperative specimen extraction. RESULTS: Overall, 412 consecutive patients were included. NOSE performed laparoscopically was successful in 278 patients (75.5%) and unsuccessful in 90 patients (24.5%). The multivariate analyses indicated that body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR] = 3.510, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.333-9.243, p = 0.011), mesenteric thickness (OR = 1.069, 95% CI: 1.032-1.107, p < 0.001), maximum tumor diameter (OR = 2.827, 95% CI: 1.094-7.302, p = 0.032), and tumor T stage (OR = 2.831, 95% CI: 1.258-6.369, p = 0.012) were the factors influencing the feasibility of NOSE surgery. CONCLUSION: A successful transrectal NOSE surgery was associated with a lower BMI, thinner mesentery, lesser tumor diameter, and earlier tumor T stage.

Nomogram for predicting the feasibility of natural orifice specimen extraction after laparoscopic rectal resection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The goal of this study was to develop a preoperative nomogram for predicting the feasibility of trans-anal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for rectal cancer. METHODS: The analysis included 201 patients who underwent trans-anal NOSE and 457 patients who failed to undergo trans-anal NOSE in Shanghai East Hospital. The data collected included age, gender, body mass index, presence of tumor obstruction, distance from anal verge; maximum tumor diameter and anteroposterior thickness of mesorectum (AP) measured by magnetic resonance imaging; interspinous diameter, intertuberous diameter (IT), anteroposterior diameter of the inlet (API), anteroposterior diameter of the midplane, anteroposterior diameter of the outlet (APO), sacral length and pelvic depth (PD) measured by computed tomography. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis suggested that a lower body mass index (P < 0.001), no tumor obstruction (P = 0.005), a shorter distance from anal verge (P < 0.001), a smaller tumor size (P < 0.001), a thinner AP (P < 0.001), a wider and shallower bony pelvis (API/PD, P < 0.001), and a wider and shorter pelvic outlet (IT/APO, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with an increased probability of trans-anal NOSE. Successful NOSE patients had a decreased time to liquid intake (P < 0.001), a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001), and fewer wound infections (P = 0.045). No significant difference in the rate of mortality or recurrence was observed. The nomogram model presented an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.85) and good calibration. CONCLUSION: We developed a nomogram model that has some predicative value for the feasibility of laparoscopic rectal resection with trans-anal NOSE, utilizing clinical and radiologic parameters, available in most institutions.

Clinical efficacy and quality of life after transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction for the treatment of middle and upper rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) avoids extra abdominal extraction incision during colorectal surgery. Some surgeons realized the benefits of NOSE on clinical efficacy. We compared the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic NOSE, laparoscopic non-NOSE and open surgery (OS) for short-term recovery and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A single randomized controlled trial of NOSE for middle and upper rectal cancer between April 2014 and February 2018. Preoperative and postoperative clinical variables were analyzed and compared between the groups. Preoperative and 6 months postoperative QoL was assessed with the SF-36 QoL questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients were enrolled, 334 patients randomly divided into NOSE group (n=104), non-NOSE group (n=119), OS group (n=111). The NOSE group was superior to the other two groups on the QoL after surgery. The NOSE group had the lowest postoperative VAS score between three groups. The postoperative time for bowel function recovery and the length of hospital stay was statistically significantly different among the three groups, with the NOSE group having the shortest time. The incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the NOSE group (12/104, 11.5%) than in the non-NOSE group (20/119, 16.8%), the difference was statistically significant. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve showed no statistically significant difference in the disease-free survival (DFS) rate between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing NOSE to non-NOSE and OS, the NOSE had significantly better functional recovery and better QoL. The NOSE group had a significant lower surgical complication rate than the non-NOSE group.

Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) With Oncological Safety: A Prospective and Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the present paper, we introduce our experience with the novel method during laparoscopic anterior resection of upper rectal or sigmoid colon cancer by transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE). METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed from June 2016 to May 2019. Patients with upper rectal or sigmoid colon cancer were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the NOSE group and the non-NOSE group. Preoperative and postoperative clinical variables were analyzed and compared between groups. Postoperative pain was analyzed utilizing a visual analog scale. Postoperative overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were enrolled, of whom 254 were randomly divided into the NOSE group (n = 122) and the conventional laparoscopic group (n = 119). NOSE failed in 22 cases, which were converted to transabdominal specimen extraction. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed, and these 22 cases were included in the NOSE group. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the NOSE group (11/122, 9%) than in the non-NOSE group (25/119, 21%). The NOSE group had a longer operation time, less blood loss, and a lower postoperative visual analog scale score than the non-NOSE group. The time for intestinal function recovery (ventilation) and the length of hospital stay were significantly longer in the non-NOSE group. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed no statistically significant difference in the disease-free survival rate between the NOSE group and the non-NOSE group. CONCLUSIONS: The novel NOSE method is safe and feasible to use in patients having colorectal cancer. Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, the postoperative complication rates of NOSE surgery were lower with an improved short-term clinical recovery.

Downregulation of miR-423-5p Contributes to the Radioresistance in Colorectal Cancer Cells.

Resistance to radiotherapy is the main reason causing treatment failure in locally advanced rectal cancer. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been well demonstrated to regulate cancer development and progression. However, how miRNAs regulate radiotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer remains unknown. Herein, we established two human colorectal cancer cell lines resistant to radiotherapy, named HCT116-R and RKO-R, using the strategy of fractionated irradiation. The radioresistant phenotypical changes of the two cell lines were validated by cell viability assay, colony formation assay and apoptosis assay. The miRNA expression profilings of HCT116-R and RKO-R were determined using RNA-seq analyses, and further confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. Multiple miRNAs, including miR-423-5p, miR-7-5p, miR-522-3p, miR-3184-3p, and miR-3529-3p, were identified with altered expression in both of the radiotherapy-resistant cells, compared to the parental cells. The downregulation of miR-423-5p was further validated in the rectal cancer tissues from radiotherapy-resistant patients. Silencing of miR-423-5p in parental HCT116 and RKO cells decreased the sensitivity to radiation treatment, and inhibited the radiation-induced apoptosis. In consistence, overexpression of miR-423-5p in HCT116-R and RKO-R cells partially rescued their sensitivity to radiotherapy, and promoted the radiation-induced apoptosis. Bcl-xL (Bcl-2-like protein 1) was predicted to be a potential target gene for miR-423-5p, and miR-423-5p/Bcl-xL axis could be a critical mediator of radiosensitivity in colorectal cancer cells. The current finding not only revealed a novel role of miR-423-5p in regulating the radiosensitivity in colorectal cancer, but also suggested miR-423-5p as a molecular candidate for combination therapy with radiation to treat colorectal cancer.

International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer.

In recent years, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in the treatment of colorectal cancer has attracted widespread attention. The potential benefits of NOSES including reduction in postoperative pain and wound complications, less use of postoperative analgesic, faster recovery of bowel function, shorter length of hospital stay, better cosmetic and psychological effect have been described in colorectal surgery. Despite significant decrease in surgical trauma of NOSES have been observed, the potential pitfalls of this technique have been demonstrated. Particularly, several issues including bacteriological concerns, oncological outcomes and patient selection are raised with this new technique. Therefore, it is urgent and necessary to reach a consensus as an industry guideline to standardize the implementation of NOSES in colorectal surgery. After three rounds of discussion by all members of the International Alliance of NOSES, the consensus is finally completed, which is also of great significance to the long-term progress of NOSES worldwide.

Expert consensus on multidisciplinary therapy of colorectal cancer with lung metastases (2019 edition).

The lungs are the second most common site of metastasis for colorectal cancer (CRC) after the liver. Rectal cancer is associated with a higher incidence of lung metastases compared to colon cancer. In China, the proportion of rectal cancer cases is around 50%, much higher than that in Western countries (nearly 30%). However, there is no available consensus or guideline focusing on CRC with lung metastases. We conducted an extensive discussion and reached a consensus of management for lung metastases in CRC based on current research reports and the experts' clinical experiences and knowledge. This consensus provided detailed approaches of diagnosis and differential diagnosis and provided general guidelines for multidisciplinary therapy (MDT) of lung metastases. We also focused on recommendations of MDT management of synchronous lung metastases and initial metachronous lung metastases. This consensus might improve clinical practice of CRC with lung metastases in China and will encourage oncologists to conduct more clinical trials to obtain high-level evidences about managing lung metastases.

Basic transcription factor 3 expression silencing attenuates colon cancer cell proliferation and migration in vitro.

Basic transcription factor 3 (BTF3) is an RNA polymerase II transcription factor that also regulates apoptosis. Numerous studies have identified that BTF3 is aberrantly expressed in several types of tumor. However, the function of BTF3 in colorectal cancer remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the function of BTF3 during colon cancer tumorigenesis. Applying a lentivirus-transfected short hairpin RNA approach, expression of BTF3 was dysregulated in the colon cancer HCT116 and HT-29 cell lines; knockdown efficiency was verified using the quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. To determine the function of BTF3 in colon cancer, cell proliferation was assessed using an MTT assay, cell apoptosis and the cell cycle were assessed using flow cytometry, and cell migration was assessed using a Transwell assay. Knockdown of BTF3 inhibited cell proliferation, possibly because BTF3 knockdown induced cell early apoptosis and arrested cells in G0-G1 phase. BTF3 knockdown also inhibited cell migration. The results of the present study identified that BTF3 expression is associated with colon cancer progress, and BTF3 may therefore be a molecular marker for diagnosis and treatment outcomes of human colon cancer.