Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 39(7): 1045-51, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19236410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reports of allergy to lupine derivatives (as de novo sensitization or cross-reactivity in subjects allergic to peanut) are increasing as their use in food products increases. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess: (1) lupine tolerance in a group of children allergic to peanut, using lupine enriched-pasta instead of raw flour as has been done in previous clinical studies; (2) whether technological treatments of lupine modify its cross-reactivity or co-sensitization with peanut; (3) the role of lupine seed proteins in sensitization, and (4) to identify the eliciting doses (EDs) by using double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC). METHODS: Twelve patients with a history of clinical allergic reactions to peanut were evaluated by skin prick tests (SPTs), the ImmunoCAP test, immunoblotting, and DBPCFC. The 12 selected subjects were included in a trial where lupine-enriched pasta and placebo pasta were administered in a DBPCFC protocol. RESULTS: Positive clinical reactions were observed in two children, the EDs being 0.2 and 6.4 g of pasta, corresponding to 50 mg and 1.6 g of lupine proteins, respectively. Beta-conglutin was the protein most involved in SPT positivity. CONCLUSION: Lupine-enriched pasta can be tolerated by most subjects suffering from peanut allergy, but a sizeable minority (2/12 of them in this case) can develop potentially dangerous clinical reactions. Information about possible reactions to lupine derivatives by those allergic to peanuts must be included in the labelling of lupine-enriched products to protect consumers at risk.


Subject(s)
Arachis/immunology , Food, Fortified , Lupinus/adverse effects , Lupinus/immunology , Peanut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Adolescent , Arachis/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Dietary Proteins , Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Skin Tests
2.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 20(1): 119-28, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17346435

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in the care of low-birth-weight and preterm neonates have stimulated research into the best dietetic program to improve their survival and short/long term outcome. Some components of human milk that cannot be included in artificial formulas may be critical for survival. Of these, immunoglobulins are important, and in particular secretory immunoglobulins A (sIgA). The concentration of secretory IgA was measured by immunoblotting (an immunoelectrophoretic technique having high specificity and reliability) in milk from mothers delivering at term (TM) or prematurely (PM). In both groups, IgA concentrations were high very early on but quickly decreased during the first week of lactation. The early IgA mean concentration was higher in PM than in TM but, because of high variability in PM milk, the difference rarely reached statistical significance. This variability during lactation reflects the important role of human milk in supplying immunological factors to cope with the gastrointestinal absorption of high molecular weight proteins in the first days of life. Immunological protection is particularly critical for a preterm baby, so it is important to promote feeding with its own mothers milk if possible, paying strict attention to the timing of milk collection.


Subject(s)
Immunoglobulin A/analysis , Milk, Human/immunology , Obstetric Labor, Premature/immunology , Adult , Birth Weight , Buffers , Colostrum/chemistry , Colostrum/immunology , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Immunoblotting , Milk Proteins/chemistry , Milk, Human/chemistry , Nitrogen/analysis , Parturition , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL