Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
J Radiat Res ; 64(2): 412-419, 2023 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36763980

ABSTRACT

Recently, the question of whether cancer risk is only accelerated but not increased by radiation exposure has been raised. To explore this matter, we analyzed whether the cumulative mortality of irradiated mice could be explained by x-axis (age) shifted cumulative mortality of nonirradiated mice. We reanalyzed publicly available data on observed cumulative mortality or prevalence in irradiated female B6C3F1 mice that lived their entire lifespan. The results showed that the irradiated curve was well matched to uniformly shifted nonirradiated curve for the cumulative mortality of all causes of death but not for the cumulative mortality of all solid tumors and prevalence of ovarian tumors as is. After adjusting lifetime mortalities, it was also well matched for all solid and ovarian tumors. The shifted days by irradiation were 71-116 days for all causes of death, 56-135 days for all solid tumors, and 41-140 days for ovarian tumors in the 1.9 Gy-irradiated group. The response was switched between irradiation at 35 and 105 days consistently for all the above indexes, supporting the hypothesis that radiation sensitivity differs between juvenile and adults. The shifted days of all causes of death showed a tendency of linear response to dose. This concept of shifting the age of death can be applied not only for all cause of death but also for mortality of all solid tumors after adjusting the magnitude. These findings contribute to the discussion on the application of the 'shifting age of death' concept to radiation protection.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Ovarian Neoplasms , Animals , Female , Mice , Humans , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Longevity/radiation effects , Whole-Body Irradiation/adverse effects
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 198(13-15): 1115-1119, 2022 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36083761

ABSTRACT

Radiation response differs depending on the dose and dose rate in intestinal stem cells; however, the underlying mechanisms are not clear. To understand the effects of low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation, the authors established an organoid system that mimics the in vivo environment and sporadic low-dose-rate irradiation conditions in vitro. Organoid-forming potential and the number of stem cells in the organoids derived from 1 Gy-irradiated cells were lower than those from non-irradiated cells; however, the difference was not significant, although 1 Gy-irradiated stem cells exhibited significant growth disadvantage in the mixed-organoid with non-irradiated and irradiated stem cells. Furthermore, the authors irradiated a cell with X-ray microbeams and performed time-lapse observations and found that irradiated cells did not remain in the organoid. These results suggest that radiation-induced stem cell competition can occur in intestinal organoids and contribute to a low risk of cancers at low-dose-rate exposures.


Subject(s)
Organoids , Stem Cells , Stem Cells/radiation effects , X-Rays
3.
J Radiat Res ; 63(2): 166-173, 2022 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34977948

ABSTRACT

Intestinal organoids are an in vitro cultured tissue model generated from intestinal stem cells, and they contain a mixture of epithelial cell types. We previously established an efficient 'one cell/well' sorting method, and defined organoid-forming potential (OFP) as a useful index to evaluate the stemness of individual cells. In this study, we assessed the response to radiation dose and dose-rate by measuring both OFP and the percentage of stem cells in the crypts. After high-dose-rate (HDR, 0.5 Gy/min) irradiation in vivo, the percentage of stem cells in the harvested crypt cells decreased, and the replenishment of cycling stem cells originating from dormant cells was enhanced, but OFP increased in cells irradiated with a total dose of >1 Gy. In contrast, at a total dose of 0.1 Gy the percentage of stem cells reduced slightly, but neither replenishment rate nor OFP changed. Furthermore, the response to 1 Gy of low-dose-rate (LDR) irradiation was similar to the response to 0.1 Gy HDR irradiation. These results suggest that 0.1 Gy HDR irradiation or 1 Gy LDR irradiation does not alter stemness. Additionally, the OFP increase in the colon in response to irradiation was smaller than that in the duodenum, similar to the percentage of stem cells. Understanding the differences in the response of stem cells between the colon and the duodenum to radiation is important to clarify the mechanisms underlying the development of radiation-associated intestinal cancers.


Subject(s)
Organoids , Radiation, Ionizing , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Intestines , Radiation Dosage , Stem Cells/radiation effects
4.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 20297, 2019 12 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31889051

ABSTRACT

Stem cell competition could shed light on the tissue-based quality control mechanism that prevents carcinogenesis. To quantitatively evaluate stem cell competition in vitro, we developed a two-color intestinal organoid forming system. First, we improved a protocol of culturing organoids from intestinal leucine-rich-repeat containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5)- enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)high stem cells directly sorted on Matrigel without embedding. The organoid-forming potential (OFP) was 25% of Lgr5-EGFPhigh cells sorted at one cell per well. Using this culture protocol with lineage tracing, we established a two-color organoid culture system by mixing stem cells expressing different fluorescent colors. To analyze stem cell competition, two-color organoids were formed by mixing X-ray-irradiated and non-irradiated intestinal stem cells. In the two-color organoids, irradiated stem cells exhibited a growth disadvantage, although the OFP of irradiated cells alone did not decrease significantly from that of non-irradiated cells. These results suggest that stem cell competition can be evaluated quantitively in vitro using our new system.


Subject(s)
Intestines/cytology , Organoids/cytology , Stem Cells/cytology , Stem Cells/metabolism , Tissue Culture Techniques , Animals , Biomarkers , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Gene Expression , Genes, Reporter , Immunophenotyping , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Tissue Engineering
5.
J Radiat Res ; 59(suppl_2): ii18-ii22, 2018 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29281035

ABSTRACT

We previously found that high-dose-rate radiation induced a replenishment of the colonic Lgr5+ stem cell pool, whereas low-dose-rate radiation did not. To identify key molecules that determine the dose-rate effects on this stem cell pool, we harvested colonic Lgr5+ stem cells by cell sorting at 2 weeks after exposure to 1 Gy of high-dose-rate (30 Gy/h) or low-dose-rate (0.003 Gy/h) radiation and analyzed their gene expression profiles using RNA-Seq. We found that pathways related to DNA damage response, cell growth, cell differentiation and cell death were upregulated in Lgr5+ stem cells irradiated with high dose rates, whereas pathways related to apical junctions and extracellular signaling were upregulated in low-dose-rate-irradiated colonic Lgr5+ stem cells. Interestingly, biological events involving apical junctions are known to play an important role in the exclusion of transformed cells that are surrounded by normal epithelial cells through 'cell competition'. We speculated that cell competition, through apical junctions and extracellular ligands, might contribute to the dose-rate effect on Lgr5+ cell replenishment. To understand this mechanism, we focused on 69 genes that were significantly upregulated in low-dose-rate-irradiated cells, which we named DREDGE (Dose-Rate Effect Determining GEnes). Based on these findings, we propose a possible mechanism underlying the dose-rate effect observed in the colonic stem cell pool.


Subject(s)
Colon/cytology , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Gene Expression Profiling , Radiation Exposure , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/metabolism , Stem Cells/cytology , Stem Cells/radiation effects , Animals , Carcinogenesis/radiation effects , Humans , Stem Cells/metabolism
6.
Cancer Lett ; 368(2): 262-74, 2015 Nov 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25687882

ABSTRACT

Ionizing radiation is a proven human carcinogen and cataractogen. The crystalline lens of the eye is among the most radiosensitive tissues in the body. A clouding of the normally transparent lens (i.e., cataract) is very common. Conversely, the lens continues to grow throughout life without developing tumors, suggesting that the lens possesses strong anti-carcinogenesis mechanisms. There is mounting evidence that mutations of oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, DNA repair genes involved in base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, and DNA double-strand break repair, and genes involved in intercellular interactions (e.g., via connexin gap junctions), and inflammation affect cataract development. Associations of these factors with cancer have long been recognized, highlighting that cataractogenesis shares some common mechanisms with carcinogenesis. This paper briefly overviews the current knowledge on the potential involvement of tumor related factors, DNA repair factors, intercellular interactions and inflammation in spontaneous cataractogenesis, and discusses its implications for cataractogenesis induced by targeted and nontargeted effects of ionizing irradiation.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenesis/radiation effects , Cataract/etiology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Humans , Inflammation/immunology , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects
7.
J Radiat Res ; 55(5): 831-46, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24824673

ABSTRACT

In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection issued a statement on tissue reactions (formerly termed non-stochastic or deterministic effects) to recommend lowering the threshold for cataracts and the occupational equivalent dose limit for the crystalline lens of the eye. Furthermore, this statement was the first to list circulatory disease (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease) as a health hazard of radiation exposure and to assign its threshold for the heart and brain. These changes have stimulated various discussions and may have impacts on some radiation workers, such as those in the medical sector. This paper considers emerging issues associated with cataracts and cardiovascular disease. For cataracts, topics dealt with herein include (i) the progressive nature, stochastic nature, target cells and trigger events of lens opacification, (ii) roles of lens protein denaturation, oxidative stress, calcium ions, tumor suppressors and DNA repair factors in cataractogenesis, (iii) dose rate effect, radiation weighting factor, and classification systems for cataracts, and (iv) estimation of the lens dose in clinical settings. Topics for cardiovascular disease include experimental animal models, relevant surrogate markers, latency period, target tissues, and roles of inflammation and cellular senescence. Future research needs are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Cataract/epidemiology , Cataract/physiopathology , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Radiation Injuries/physiopathology , Animals , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cataract/prevention & control , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Prevalence , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Protection , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
8.
PLoS One ; 9(5): e98154, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24840866

ABSTRACT

Over the past century, ionizing radiation has been known to induce cataracts in the crystalline lens of the eye, but its mechanistic underpinnings remain incompletely understood. This study is the first to report the clonogenic survival of irradiated primary normal human lens epithelial cells and stimulation of its proliferation. Here we used two primary normal human cell strains: HLEC1 lens epithelial cells and WI-38 lung fibroblasts. Both strains were diploid, and a replicative lifespan was shorter in HLEC1 cells. The colony formation assay demonstrated that the clonogenic survival of both strains decreases similarly with increasing doses of X-rays. A difference in the survival between two strains was actually insignificant, although HLEC1 cells had the lower plating efficiency. This indicates that the same dose inactivates the same fraction of clonogenic cells in both strains. Intriguingly, irradiation enlarged the size of clonogenic colonies arising from HLEC1 cells in marked contrast to those from WI-38 cells. Such enhanced proliferation of clonogenic HLEC1 cells was significant at ≥2 Gy, and manifested as increments of ≤2.6 population doublings besides sham-irradiated controls. These results suggest that irradiation of HLEC1 cells not only inactivates clonogenic potential but also stimulates proliferation of surviving uniactivated clonogenic cells. Given that the lens is a closed system, the stimulated proliferation of lens epithelial cells may not be a homeostatic mechanism to compensate for their cell loss, but rather should be regarded as abnormal. This is because these findings are consistent with the early in vivo evidence documenting that irradiation induces excessive proliferation of rabbit lens epithelial cells and that suppression of lens epithelial cell divisions inhibits radiation cataractogenesis in frogs and rats. Thus, our in vitro model will be useful to evaluate the excessive proliferation of primary normal human lens epithelial cells that may underlie radiation cataractogenesis, warranting further investigations.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Epithelial Cells/radiation effects , Fibroblasts/radiation effects , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Colony-Forming Units Assay , Diploidy , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Lens, Crystalline/cytology , Lung/cytology , Models, Biological , Radiation, Ionizing
9.
J Radiat Res ; 55(4): 629-40, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24794798

ABSTRACT

Radiation exposure causes cancer and non-cancer health effects, each of which differs greatly in the shape of the dose-response curve, latency, persistency, recurrence, curability, fatality and impact on quality of life. In recent decades, for dose limitation purposes, the International Commission on Radiological Protection has divided such diverse effects into tissue reactions (formerly termed non-stochastic and deterministic effects) and stochastic effects. On the one hand, effective dose limits aim to reduce the risks of stochastic effects (cancer/heritable effects) and are based on the detriment-adjusted nominal risk coefficients, assuming a linear-non-threshold dose response and a dose and dose rate effectiveness factor of 2. On the other hand, equivalent dose limits aim to avoid tissue reactions (vision-impairing cataracts and cosmetically unacceptable non-cancer skin changes) and are based on a threshold dose. However, the boundary between these two categories is becoming vague. Thus, we review the changes in radiation effect classification, dose limitation concepts, and the definition of detriment and threshold. Then, the current situation is overviewed focusing on (i) stochastic effects with a threshold, (ii) tissue reactions without a threshold, (iii) target organs/tissues for circulatory disease, (iv) dose levels for limitation of cancer risks vs prevention of non-life-threatening tissue reactions vs prevention of life-threatening tissue reactions, (v) mortality or incidence of thyroid cancer, and (vi) the detriment for tissue reactions. For future discussion, one approach is suggested that classifies radiation effects according to whether effects are life threatening, and radiobiological research needs are also briefly discussed.


Subject(s)
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cataract/etiology , Cataract/prevention & control , Humans , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Protection , Risk Factors , Skin/radiation effects , Stochastic Processes
10.
J Radiat Res ; 53(5): 641-71, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22843368

ABSTRACT

An earthquake and tsunami of historic proportions caused massive damage across the northeastern coast of Japan on the afternoon of 11 March 2011, and the release of radionuclides from the stricken reactors of the Fukushima nuclear power plant 1 was detected early on the next morning. High levels of radioiodines and radiocesiums were detected in the topsoil and plants on 15 March 2011, so sampling of food and water for monitoring surveys began on 16 March 2011. On 17 March 2011, provisional regulation values for radioiodine, radiocesiums, uranium, plutonium and other transuranic α emitters were set to regulate the safety of radioactively contaminated food and water. On 21 March 2011, the first restrictions on distribution and consumption of contaminated items were ordered. So far, tap water, raw milk, vegetables, mushrooms, fruit, nut, seaweeds, marine invertebrates, coastal fish, freshwater fish, beef, wild animal meat, brown rice, wheat, tea leaves and other foodstuffs had been contaminated above the provisional regulation values. The provisional regulation values for radioiodine were exceeded in samples taken from 16 March 2011 to 21 May 2011, and those for radiocesiums from 18 March 2011 to date. All restrictions were imposed within 318 days after the provisional regulation values were first exceeded for each item. This paper summarizes the policy for the execution of monitoring surveys and restrictions, and the outlines of the monitoring results of 220 411 samples and the enforced restrictions predicated on the information available as of 31 March 2012.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination, Radioactive/legislation & jurisprudence , Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Water Pollution, Radioactive/legislation & jurisprudence , Animals , Environmental Monitoring/history , Environmental Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Food Contamination, Radioactive/analysis , Food Contamination, Radioactive/prevention & control , Food Safety/methods , History, 21st Century , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Water Pollution, Radioactive/analysis , Water Pollution, Radioactive/history , Water Pollution, Radioactive/prevention & control , Water Supply/history , Water Supply/legislation & jurisprudence , Water Supply/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL