Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 93
Filter
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2350091, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757631

ABSTRACT

Although previous studies have shown no increased mortality risk after the primary series of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, reports on booster doses are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate mortality risk after the mRNA vaccine boosters in addition to the primary series. This nested case-control study included two age-specific cohorts (18-64 and ≥65 years as of February 1, 2021) in two municipalities. All deaths were identified and matched five controls for each case at each date of death (index date) with risk set sampling according to municipality, age, and sex. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mRNA vaccines (first to fifth doses) were estimated by comparing with no vaccination within 21 and 42 days before the index date using a conditional logistic regression model. The 18-64-years cohort comprised 431 cases (mean age, 57.0 years; men, 58.2%) and 2,155 controls (mean age, 56.0; men, 58.2%), whereas the ≥65-years cohort comprised 12,166 cases (84.0; 50.2%) and 60,830 controls (84.0, 50.2%). The aORs (95% CI) in 0-21 days after the third and fourth doses in the 18-64-years cohort were 0.62 (0.24, 1.62) and 0.38 (0.08, 1.84), respectively. The aORs (95% CI) after the third to fifth doses in the ≥65 years cohort were 0.36 (0.31, 0.43), 0.30 (0.25, 0.37), and 0.26 (0.20, 0.33), respectively. In conclusion, booster doses of mRNA vaccines do not increase mortality risk. These findings could help subsequent vaccine campaigns and alleviate vaccine hesitancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , SARS-CoV-2 , mRNA Vaccines , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Young Adult , Japan/epidemiology , Adolescent , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
2.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0299849, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713670

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Secondary healthcare data use has been increasing in the dental research field. The validity of the number of remaining teeth assessed from Japanese dental claims data has been reported in several studies, but has not been tested in the general population in Japan. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of the number of remaining teeth assessed from Japanese dental claims data and assess its predictability against subsequent health deterioration. METHODS: We used the claims data of residents of a municipality that implemented oral health screening programs. Using the number of teeth in the screening records as the reference standard, we assessed the validity of the claims-based number of teeth by calculating the mean differences. In addition, we assessed the association between the claims-based number of teeth and pneumococcal disease (PD) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) in adults aged ≥65 years using Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Of the 10,154 participants, the mean number of teeth assessed from the claims data was 20.9, that in the screening records was 20.5, and their mean difference was 0.5. During the 3-year follow-up, PD or AD onset was observed in 10.4% (3,212/30,838) and 5.3% (1,589/30,207) of participants, respectively. Compared with participants with ≥20 teeth, those with 1-9 teeth had a 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.43) or 1.19 (95% CI: 1.04-1.36) times higher risk of developing PD or AD, respectively. CONCLUSION: High validity of the claims-based number of teeth was observed. In addition, the claims-based number of teeth was associated with the risk of PD and AD.


Subject(s)
Tooth Loss , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Female , Aged , Male , Tooth Loss/epidemiology , Longevity , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Oral Health , Aged, 80 and over
3.
J Epidemiol ; 2024 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The influence of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on dental care utilization may have differed according to individual characteristics or type of dental care provision. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in dental care utilization and per-attendance costs by age group and type of dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. METHODS: This time-series study used healthcare insurance claims data from 01/07/2019 to 09/27/2021 (143 weeks) from nine municipalities in Japan. Dental care utilization rate per week and average dental care cost per attendance by age groups (0-19y/20-64y/65-74y/≥ 75y) and types of dental care (outpatient/visiting) were used as outcome variables. COVID-19 pandemic waves in Japan were used as predictors: 1st (03/23/2020-05/17/2020), 2nd (06/22/2020-09/27/2020), 3rd (10/26/2020-02/21/2021), 4th (02/22/2021-06/07/2021), and 5th (07/05/2021-09/13/2021) waves. Fixed effect models were employed to estimate the proportional changes. RESULTS: In the fixed effect model, we observed large declines in dental care utilization during the 1st (17.0-22.0%) and 2nd waves (3.0-13.0%) compared to the non-pandemic wave period in all age groups. In contrast, the average dental care cost per attendance increased in all age groups by 5.2-8.6% during the 1st wave. CONCLUSIONS: During the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, dental care utilization decreased in all age groups, whereas the average dental care cost per attendance increased. The COVID-19 pandemic may have changed the dental care provision pattern towards less frequent and more concentrated dental care to avoid the risk of infection.

4.
J Psychiatr Res ; 174: 12-18, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598975

ABSTRACT

This retrospective cohort study examined the incidence of post-COVID psychiatric disorders in older adults according to hospitalization status and SARS-CoV-2 variant period in Japan. Claims data, COVID-19 case-related information, and vaccination records were obtained from three Japanese municipalities. We identified individuals aged ≥65 years who had COVID-19 or other respiratory tract infection (RTI) between March 2021 and December 2022. Participants were categorized into non-hospitalized and hospitalized patients, and the study period was divided into the Alpha (March to May 2021), Delta (June to December 2021), Omicron BA.1/BA.2 (January to June 2022), and Omicron BA.5 (July to December 2022) periods. Modified Poisson regression analyses were performed to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for the occurrence of psychiatric disorders (organic mental disorders, psychotic disorders, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and insomnia) three months after COVID-19 (reference: other RTI). For overall psychiatric disorders, we analyzed 19,489 non-hospitalized patients (COVID-19: 6,728, Other RTI: 12,761) and 2925 hospitalized patients (COVID-19: 1,036, Other RTI: 1889). When compared with other RTI cases, COVID-19 cases had significantly lower IRRs for overall psychiatric disorders in both non-hospitalized (IRR: 0.59, P < 0.001) and hospitalized cases (IRR: 0. 83, P = 0.045) during the Omicron BA.1/BA.2 period, but only in non-hospitalized cases (IRR: 0.45, P < 0.001) during the Omicron BA.5 period. The incidences of the individual post-COVID psychiatric disorders varied according to disorder type, hospitalization status, and SARS-CoV-2 variant period. These findings provide a foundation for further research to explore these variations and improve the provision of psychiatric care in future epidemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Mental Disorders , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Male , Female , Aged , Incidence , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Japan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over
5.
IJID Reg ; 11: 100353, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38590627

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of scabies and its outbreaks in Japanese households, residential care facilities (RCFs), and hospitals using claims data. Methods: This descriptive epidemiological study was conducted using claims data from eight municipalities in Japan. Scabies cases were identified using a combination of recorded diagnoses and administered medications. The study period was from April 2015 to March 2019. Outbreaks were defined as ≥2 cases of scabies occurring within a calendar month at a single household, RCF, or hospital. Results: We identified 857 scabies cases for analysis. The annual prevalence of scabies ranged from 40 to 67 per 100,000 beneficiaries. The annual attack rate of scabies was found to be highest in RCFs (21 per 1000 RCFs), followed by hospitals (11 per 1000 hospitals) and households (0.25 per 1000 households). The annual outbreak attack rate was also highest in RCFs (4.0 per 1000 RCFs), followed by hospitals (1.6 per 1000 hospitals) and household (0.027 per household). The patterns of outbreaks varied widely among the RCFs. Conclusions: The study showcases the potential of claims data for detecting infectious disease outbreaks, which could provide valuable insight for the future management and prevention of scabies. Infection control of scabies in RCFs is crucial in aging societies.

6.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 98(1): 197-207, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363608

ABSTRACT

Background: The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasing in Japan due to population aging. The association between sensory impairment and incident AD remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of sensory impairment on incident AD. Methods: We analyzed residents of five municipalities participating in the Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence (LIFE) Study. The participants comprised individuals who had newly applied for long-term care needs certification between 2017 and 2022 and had no cognitive impairment upon application or AD diagnosis within the preceding six months. Participants were classified according to sensory impairment status: visual impairment (VI), hearing impairment (HI), neither sensory impairment (NSI), and dual sensory impairment (DSI). The month succeeding the certification application was set as the index month, and the interval from that month until AD onset was assessed. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to calculate the risk of AD onset according to sensory impairment status while adjusting for sex, age, dependence level, self-reliance level, and comorbidities. Results: Among 14,186 participants, we identified 1,194 (8.4%) who developed AD over a median follow-up period of 22.6 months. VI and HI only were not associated with incident AD. However, DSI conferred a significantly higher risk (HR: 1.6, CI: 1.1-2.2, p = 0.008) of AD onset than NSI. Conclusions: Individuals with concurrent DSI have a higher risk of developing AD than those with single or NSI. Preventing and treating sensory impairment may not only improve functional outcomes, but could also help to reduce the future risk of AD.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Hearing Loss , Humans , Longevity , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Vision Disorders/complications , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/complications , Aging
7.
Brain Behav Immun ; 117: 521-528, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38355026

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The associations between COVID-19 vaccination and post-COVID psychiatric disorders are unclear. Furthermore, it is uncertain if these associations differ depending on the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant at the time of infection. This retrospective cohort study aimed to clarify the associations between COVID-19 vaccination and incident psychiatric disorders after breakthrough infection according to the different variant periods in Japan. METHODS: Medical claims data, COVID-19 case-related information, and vaccination records were collected from three Japanese municipalities. The study population comprised public insurance enrollees aged ≥65 years who developed COVID-19 between June 2021 and December 2022. The study exposure was each participant's vaccination status 14 days before infection, and the outcomes were the occurrence of psychiatric disorders within three months of infection. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of vaccination for the occurrence of psychiatric disorders. Analyses were conducted for the Delta period (June to December 2021), Omicron BA.1/BA.2 period (January to June 2022), and Omicron BA.5 period (July to December 2022). RESULTS: We analyzed 270 participants (vaccinated: 149) in the Delta period, 2,963 participants (vaccinated: 2,699) in the Omicron BA.1/BA.2 period, and 7,723 participants (vaccinated: 7,159) in the Omicron BA.5 period. During the Delta period, vaccinated participants had significantly lower odds for psychotic disorders (OR: 0.23, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.88, P = 0.032) than unvaccinated participants. During the Omicron BA.5 period, vaccinated participants had significantly lower odds for organic mental disorders (OR: 0.54, 95 % CI: 0.30-0.95, P = 0.033), psychotic disorders (OR: 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.19-0.53, P < 0.001), mood disorders (OR: 0.53, 95 % CI: 0.29-0.99, P = 0.046), and insomnia (OR: 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.32-0.72, P < 0.001) than unvaccinated participants. There were no significant differences in psychiatric disorders between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups during the Omicron BA.1/BA.2 period. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that the associations between COVID-19 vaccination and post-COVID psychiatric disorders vary among the different variant periods. Future studies on these associations should be conducted with consideration to the prevalent circulating variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Vaccination
8.
Vaccine ; 42(7): 1542-1548, 2024 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320932

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Although COVID-19 no longer constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, vaccination remains an important tool for reducing disease burden and mitigating future outbreaks. However, little is known about the impact of vaccination on medical expenditures and hospitalization duration after breakthrough infection. This study aimed to examine this impact during the Delta wave in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using medical care claims data, vaccination records, and COVID-19-related information. COVID-19 cases in three municipalities were categorized into two age groups: 20-64 years and ≥65 years. For each group, we constructed linear regression models with a generalized estimating equation. We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of COVID-19 vaccination for total medical expenditures and hospitalization duration after adjusting for sex, comorbidities, and municipality. RESULTS: We analyzed 618 cases aged 20-64 years (mean age: 38.4 years, women: 45.1%) and 208 cases aged ≥65 years (76.4 years, 53.8%). The RRs (95% CIs) of vaccination for total medical expenditures were 0.53 (0.44-0.64) in the 20-64 years age group and 0.51 (0.39-0.66) in the ≥65 years age group. Next, the RRs (95% CIs) of vaccination for hospitalization duration were 0.59 (0.42-0.83) in the 20-64 years age group and 0.69 (0.49-0.98) in the ≥65 years age group. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower total medical expenditures and hospitalization duration after breakthrough infection, with a more pronounced effect in older persons.


Subject(s)
Breakthrough Infections , COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Age Factors , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Health Expenditures , Hospitalization , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination , Vaccine Efficacy , Male
9.
J Hypertens ; 42(4): 718-726, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38230627

ABSTRACT

Hypertension is the leading cardiovascular risk factor worldwide. However, in Japan, only 30% of patients have their blood pressure controlled under 140/90 mmHg, and nonadherence to antihypertensives is thought to be a reason for the poor control of hypertension. We therefore sought to assess the adherence to hypertension treatment and to evaluate factors influencing patients' adherence in a large, representative sample of the Japanese population. To this end, we analyzed claims data from the LIFE Study database, which includes 112 506 Japanese adults with newly diagnosed hypertension. Medication adherence was measured for a year postdiagnosis using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method. Factors associated with adherence to antihypertensives were also assessed. Among the total 112 506 hypertensive patients, the nonadherence rate (PDC ≤ 80%) for antihypertensives during the first year after initiation of the treatment was 26.2%. Younger age [31-35 years: odds ratio (OR), 0.15; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.12-0.19 compared with 71-74-year-old patients], male gender, monotherapy, and diuretics use [OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91 compared with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs)] were associated with poor adherence in the present study. Cancer comorbidity (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91 compared with no comorbidity), prescription at a hospital, and living in a medium-sized to regional city were also associated with poor adherence. Our present findings showing the current status of adherence to antihypertensive medications and its associated factors using claims data in Japan should help to improve adherence to antihypertensives and blood pressure control.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Hypertension , Adult , Humans , Male , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Japan/epidemiology , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Medication Adherence , Retrospective Studies
10.
PeerJ ; 12: e16780, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282861

ABSTRACT

Background: Post-authorization safety studies (PASSs) of vaccines are important. PASSs enable the evaluation of association between vaccination and adverse events following immunization through common study designs. Clinical trials during vaccine development typically include a few thousand to 10,000 participants while a PASS might aim to detect a few adverse events per 100,000 vaccine recipients. While all available data may be utilized, prior consideration of power analyses are nonetheless crucial for interpretation in cases where statistically significant differences are not found. Methods: This research primarily examined cohort study design and self-controlled case series (SCCS) design, estimating the power of a PASS under plausible conditions. Results: Both the cohort study and SCCS designs necessitated large sample sizes or high event counts to guarantee adequate power. The SCCS design is particularly suited to evaluating rare adverse events. However, extremely rare events may not yield sufficient occurrences, thereby resulting in low power. Although the SCCS design can more efficiently control for time-invariant confounding in principle, it solely estimates relative measures. A cohort study design might be preferred if confounding can be adequately managed as it also estimates absolute measures. It may be an easy decision to use all the data at hand for either design. We found it necessary to estimate the sample size and number of events to be used in the study based on a priori information and anticipated results.


Subject(s)
Immunization , Vaccination , Humans , Cohort Studies , Immunization/adverse effects , Research Design , Vaccination/adverse effects
11.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 135, 2024 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38287337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bivalent COVID-19 vaccines have been implemented worldwide since the booster vaccination campaigns of autumn of 2022, but little is known about their effectiveness. Thus, this study holistically evaluated the effectiveness of bivalent vaccines against infection in older adults in Japan. METHODS: We adopted the test-negative design using COVID-19 test data of individuals, aged ≥ 65 years, residing in three municipalities in Japan, who underwent tests in medical institutions between October 1 and December 30, 2022. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds of testing positive according to vaccination status. Vaccine effectiveness was defined as (1 - odds ratio) × 100%. RESULTS: A total of 3,908 positive and 16,090 negative results were included in the analyses. Receiving a bivalent dose in addition to ≥ 2 monovalent doses was 33.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.8, 44.3%) more effective than receiving no vaccination, and 18.2% (95% CI: 9.4, 26.0%) more effective than receiving ≥ 2 monovalent doses but not receiving a bivalent vaccination. In addition, the effectiveness peaked at 14-20 days after administration and then gradually declined over time. Furthermore, a bivalent booster dose provided 18.6% (95% CI: 9.9, 26.5%) additional protection among those vaccinated with ≥ 2 monovalent doses, in the absence of a previous infection history. However, we did not find sufficient evidence of effectiveness of bivalent vaccines among previously infected older adults. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalent vaccines are effective against COVID-19 infections among older adults without a history of infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Japan/epidemiology , Vaccine Efficacy , RNA, Messenger , Vaccines, Combined
12.
Vaccine ; 42(6): 1268-1274, 2024 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of physical activity (PA) and PPSV23 vaccination on pneumonia-related hospitalizations. This study examined the association between regular PA and pneumonia-related hospitalization according to PPSV23 vaccination status in older adults. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using health checkup data, medical care claims data, and vaccination records from two Japanese municipalities. Residents aged ≥65 years who had undergone a health checkup between April 2016 and March 2021 were categorized into a PPSV23 vaccinated or unvaccinated cohort. Each cohort was further divided into a PA group and no PA group. The hazard ratio (HR) of PA for pneumonia-related hospitalization was calculated for each cohort while adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, and metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: The vaccinated cohort comprised 16,295 participants (no PA: 5,139, PA: 11,156), and the unvaccinated cohort comprised 7,998 participants (no PA: 2,671, PA: 5,327). In the vaccinated cohort, the PA group had a significantly lower hazard for pneumonia-related hospitalization than the no PA group (adjusted HR: 0.58, P = 0.004). However, PA was not associated with pneumonia-related hospitalization in the unvaccinated cohort (adjusted HR: 0.70, P = 0.270). CONCLUSIONS: PA can reduce the risk of pneumonia-related hospitalization in vaccinated persons. Interventions that increase both vaccination rates and PA habits may help to reduce these hospitalizations in older adults.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Pneumococcal , Humans , Aged , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Hospitalization , Proportional Hazards Models , Vaccination , Pneumococcal Vaccines/therapeutic use
13.
J Epidemiol ; 34(3): 112-118, 2024 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36967119

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess whether the United States-developed Claims-based Frailty Index (CFI) can be implemented in Japanese older adults using claims data. METHODS: We used the monthly claims data and certification of long-term care (LTC) insurance data of residents from 12 municipalities from April 2014 to March 2019. The 12 months from first recording was defined as the "baseline period," and the time thereafter as the "follow-up period". Participants aged ≥65 years were included, and those with no certified LTC insurance or who died at baseline were excluded. New certification of LTC insurance and all-cause mortality during the follow-up period were defined as outcome events. CFI categorization consisted of three steps including: 1) using 12 months deficit-accumulation approach that assigned different weights to each of the 52 items; 2) the accumulated score to derive the CFI; and 3) categorizing the CFI as "robust" (<0.15), "prefrail" (0.15-0.24), and "frail" (≥0.25). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between CFI and outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: There were 519,941 participants in total. After adjusting for covariates, the severe CFI category had a high risk of certification of LTC insurance (prefrail: HR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.27-1.39 and frail: HR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.53-1.68) and all-cause mortality (prefrail: HR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.29-1.60 and frail: HR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.66-2.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CFI can be implemented in Japanese claims data to predict the certification of LTC insurance and mortality.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly , Frailty , Aged , Humans , United States , Cohort Studies , Frailty/epidemiology , Japan/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment
14.
Vaccine ; 42(2): 239-245, 2024 Jan 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087713

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate individual and environmental vaccination-related factors among the older adults in Japan, using administrative data. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study and included people who reached the relevant age (≥65 years) for routine pneumococcal vaccination of older adults between April 2015 and March 2020. Monthly data of residents in the two municipalities from April 2014 to March 2020 and vaccination records from April 2015 to March 2020 were used. We defined five cohorts according to the year in which routine vaccinations were available. Each cohort was followed for a total of two years, with the first year being the "baseline period" and second year being the "vaccine follow-up period." Pneumococcal vaccination data was extracted from vaccination records at "first dose." Age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, hospital visit history, hospitalization history, Specific Health Check-ups participation, and information on contracted hospitals for pneumococcal vaccination were used as covariates. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to investigate the relationship between pneumococcal vaccination and vaccination-related factors. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Analysis included 17,991 patients. Vaccination coverage was 33.6 % for all subjects. Multivariate analysis found the following as significant vaccination-related factors: female (OR: 1.18, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.26), not low income (1.76, 1.17-2.76), hospital visits: ≥once/month (1.27, 1.19-1.35), and Specific Health Check-ups participation (2.10, 1.95-2.27). No significant results were found for hospitals that contracted pneumococcal vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Individual factors, such as sex and Specific Health Check-ups participation, were found to be important factors affecting pneumococcal vaccination among older adults in Japan. Environmental factors, such as the characteristics of residential areas, should be evaluated in further investigations.


Subject(s)
Pneumococcal Infections , Vaccination Coverage , Humans , Female , Aged , Japan , Cohort Studies , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Vaccination , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Pneumococcal Vaccines
15.
Vaccine ; 42(1): 4-7, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38044244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To address the lack of an active vaccine safety surveillance system in Japan, the Vaccine Effectiveness, Networking, and Universal Safety (VENUS) study was initiated in 2021 as a pilot system using existing health insurance claims data and vaccination records. METHODS: This study evaluated the value of the VENUS study by assessing the incidence of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following vaccination with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) design. RESULTS: Incidence rate ratios for ITP during 28-day and 42-day risk periods were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-6.4), and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.081-4.2), respectively. Neither was statistically significant. Incidence rate ratios could not be estimated for GBS due to the limited sample size. CONCLUSION: The VENUS study can provide valuable insights to facilitate the establishment of an advanced vaccine monitoring system in Japan.


Subject(s)
Guillain-Barre Syndrome , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic , Humans , Antibodies, Bacterial , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/chemically induced , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/epidemiology , Japan/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Polysaccharides , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/chemically induced , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccine Efficacy
16.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 97(2): 871-881, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An association between poor oral health and cognitive decline has been reported. Most of these studies have considered the number of teeth as a criterion, only a few studies have analyzed the relationship between occlusal status and Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: To elucidate whether posterior occlusal contact is associated with AD, focusing on the Eichner classification, among an older population aged 65 years or older in Japan. METHODS: This study used monthly claims data of National Health Insurance in Japan from April 2017 to March 2020. The outcome was newly diagnosed AD defined according to ICD-10 code G30. The number of teeth was estimated by dental code data, and occlusal contact was divided into three categories, namely A, B, and C, according to the Eichner classification. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between a new diagnosis of AD and the Eichner classification. RESULTS: A total of 22,687 participants were included, 560 of whom had newly diagnosed AD during a mean follow-up period of 12.2 months. The AD participants had a lower proportion of Eichner A and a higher proportion of Eichner C. After adjusting for covariates, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) with Eichner B and C were 1.34 (1.01-1.77) and 1.54 (1.03-2.30), respectively. CONCLUSION: In older people aged≥65 years old, reduced posterior occlusal contact as well as tooth loss have an impact on AD. This study emphasizes the importance of paying attention to occlusal contacts to reduce the risk of AD.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Malocclusion , Tooth Loss , Tooth , Humans , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Japan/epidemiology , Tooth Loss/epidemiology
17.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 38(12): e6029, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38041399

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have investigated that anticholinergic drugs cause cognitive impairment. However, the risk of dementia associated with anticholinergics has not been extensively investigated in the super-aging society of Japan. We conducted this study to assess the association between anticholinergic drugs and the risk of dementia in older adults in Japan. METHODS: This nested case-control study used data from the Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence Study, which includes claim data in Japan from 2014 to 2020. We included 66,478 cases of diagnosed dementia and 328,919 matched controls aged ≥65 years, matched by age, sex, municipality, and cohort entry year. Primary exposure was the total cumulative anticholinergic drugs prescribed from cohort entry date to event date or matched index date, which was the total standardized daily doses for each patient, calculated by adding the total dose of different types of anticholinergic drugs in each prescription, divided by the World Health Organization-defined daily dose values. Odds ratios for dementia associated with cumulative exposure to anticholinergic drugs were calculated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for confounding variables. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) age at index date was 84.3 (6.9), and the percentage of women was 62.1%. From cohort entry date to event date or matched index date, 18.8% of the case patients and 13.7% of the controls were prescribed at least one anticholinergic drug. In the multivariable-adjusted model, individuals with anticholinergic drugs prescribed had significantly higher odds of being diagnosed with dementia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50 [95% confidence interval, 1.47-1.54]). Among specific types of anticholinergic drugs, a significant increase in risk was observed with the use of antidepressants, antiparkinsonian drugs, antipsychotics, and bladder antimuscarinics in a fully multivariable-adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: Several types of anticholinergic drugs used by older adults in Japan are associated with an increased risk of dementia. These findings suggest that the underlying risks should be considered alongside the benefits of prescribing anticholinergic drugs to this population.


Subject(s)
Cholinergic Antagonists , Dementia , Humans , Female , Aged , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/drug therapy , Case-Control Studies , Japan/epidemiology , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use
18.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(12): 2976-2982, 2023 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897719

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza vaccination might be considered an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) countermeasure because it can reduce unnecessary antimicrobial use for acute respiratory infection by mitigating the burden of such diseases. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between seasonal influenza vaccination and antimicrobial use (AMU) in Japan at the community level and to examine the impact of influenza vaccination on the frequency of unnecessary antimicrobial prescription for upper respiratory infection. METHODS: For patients who visited any healthcare facility in one of the 23 wards of Tokyo, Japan, due to upper respiratory infection and who were aged 65 years or older, we extracted data from the Vaccine Effectiveness, Networking, and Universal Safety (VENUS) study database, which includes all claims data and vaccination records from the 2015-16 to 2020-21 seasons. We used the average treatment effect (ATE) with 1:1 propensity score matching to examine the association of vaccination status with frequency of antibiotic prescription, frequency of healthcare facility consultation, risk of admission and risk of death in the follow-up period of the same season (from 1 January to 31 March). RESULTS: In total, 244 642 people were enrolled. Matched data included 101 734 people in each of the unvaccinated and vaccinated groups. The ATE of vaccination was -0.004 (95% CI -0.006 to -0.002) for the frequency of antibiotic prescription, -0.005 (-0.007 to -0.004) for the frequency of healthcare facility consultation, -0.001 (-0.002 to -0.001) for the risk of admission and 0.00 (0.00 to 0.00) for the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that seasonal influenza vaccination is associated with lower frequencies of unnecessary antibiotic prescription and of healthcare facility consultation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Seasons , Japan , Vaccine Efficacy , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Vaccination , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
19.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(10): ofad475, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37869405

ABSTRACT

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron BA.5 became prevalent in July 2022 in Japan. Bivalent messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines were approved as booster doses for individuals who received the primary series or booster dose by monovalent vaccines. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of bivalent vaccines in Japanese adults aged ≥65 years. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using data collected from January 2019 to February 2023 in Japan. We included individuals aged ≥65 years in a municipality who received the first or second booster dose of monovalent mRNA vaccines. We estimated the effectiveness of the second or third booster dose of bivalent mRNA vaccines during the Omicron BA.5-predominant period (July-December 2022), compared with ≥90 days after the booster dose of monovalent vaccines. We used a Cox proportional hazard regression model with vaccination status as a time-dependent covariate. Results: A total of 81 977 individuals aged ≥65 years (mean [standard deviation] age, 78.3 [7.4] years; 33 487 male [40.8%]) were included in the study cohort. Among them, 57 396 were vaccinated with the second or third dose of bivalent vaccines (BA.1 or BA.4/5). The effectiveness against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was estimated to be 57.9% (95% confidence interval, 52.7%-62.5%) for ≥14 days after the second or third bivalent booster dose, compared with 90 days after the first or second monovalent booster dose. Conclusions: The study showed that the bivalent mRNA vaccines as the second and third doses would provide protection against COVID-19 among adults ≥65 years in Japan.

20.
J Epidemiol ; 2023 Sep 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37743530

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against infection, symptomatic infection, and hospitalization in older people during the Delta-predominant period (July 1 to September 30, 2021). METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study in an older adult population aged ≥65 years using data from the Vaccine Effectiveness, Networking, and Universal Safety Study conducted from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2021, in Japan. We matched BNT162b2 vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in a 1:1 ratio on the date of vaccination of the vaccinated individual. We evaluated the effectiveness of the vaccine against infection, symptomatic infection, and COVID-19-related hospitalization by comparing the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. We estimated the risk ratio and risk difference using the Kaplan-Meier method with inverse probability weighting. The vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1 - risk ratio) × 100%. RESULTS: The study included 203,574 matched pairs aged ≥65 years. At 7 days after the second dose, the vaccine effectiveness (95% confidence interval) of BNT162b2 against infection, symptomatic infection, and hospitalization was 78.1% (65.2 to 87.8%), 79.1% (64.6 to 88.9%), and 93.5% (83.7 to 100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BNT162b2 was highly effective against infection, symptomatic infection, and hospitalization in Japan's older adult population aged ≥65 years during the Delta-predominant period.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...