Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30744813

ABSTRACT

Genotoxicity assays are characterized by a method, an in vitro or in vivo target, and an endpoint. Many cell types have been used as targets, including bacterial cells, cultured mammalian cells, and rodent cells in vivo. Human cells are the most important target for evaluating the risk to humans associated with exposure to chemicals. Almost exclusively, the human cells used in genotoxicity tests have been cultured cells. Here, we have tested human hepatocytes in PXB-mice®, chimeric mice in which the liver has been repopulated with human hepatocytes, as a source of target cells for in vivo genotoxicity assays. We applied the single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay to detect DNA damage and the micronucleus assay to evaluate chromosomal aberrations. These chimeric mice can serve as a valuable model system for genotoxicity assays.


Subject(s)
Chimera/physiology , Chromosome Aberrations , DNA Damage , Hepatocytes/pathology , Mutagenicity Tests/methods , Mutagens/adverse effects , Animals , Comet Assay , Hepatocytes/drug effects , Humans , Mice , Micronucleus Tests
2.
Exp Toxicol Pathol ; 69(4): 187-191, 2017 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28108073

ABSTRACT

According to the International Conference on Harmonization Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use (ICH S2(R1)), a positive response in any in vitro assay necessitates additional in vivo test(s) (other tissue/endpoint) in addition to the erythrocyte micronucleus test when Option 1 of the test battery is selected. When Option 2 of the test battery is selected, a bacterial gene mutation test and two in vivo tests with different tissues/endpoint are required. The in vivo alkaline comet assay is recommended as the second in vivo test because it can detect a broad spectrum of DNA damage in any tissue and can be combined with the erythrocyte micronucleus test. Considering animal welfare, a combination assay is preferable to an individual assay. Thus, we validated the protocol for the in vivo comet-micronucleus combination assay in rats with three daily administrations and determined the dose of the positive control (ethyl methanesulfonate; EMS, 200mg/kg/day). We also collected the negative control (vehicle) and positive control (EMS) data from the comet (liver, stomach, and kidney) and micronucleus (bone marrow) combination assay using male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. The negative control data were comparable to our historical control data obtained from stand-alone assays. The positive control data showed clear and consistent positive responses in both endpoints.


Subject(s)
Comet Assay/methods , Micronucleus Tests/methods , Mutagens/toxicity , Animals , Control Groups , Ethyl Methanesulfonate/toxicity , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25892622

ABSTRACT

Repeated-dose liver, bone marrow, and gastrointestinal tract micronucleus assays that use young adult rats were evaluated in a collaborative study that was organized by the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society-Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group. A genotoxic hepatocarcinogen quinoline was orally administered to independent groups of five Crl:CD (SD) male rats at doses of 30, 60 and 120mg/kg for 14 days and at doses of 15, 30 and 60mg/kg for 28 days. After treatment, the livers were harvested and hepatocytes were isolated by collagenase treatment. The frequency of micronucleated hepatocytes (MNHEPs) increased significantly in both the 14- and 28-day repeated dose studies. However, the frequency of micronucleated cells did not increase in the bone marrow, stomach or colon cells, which were not quinoline-induced carcinogenic target organs in the rats. These results indicate that a repeated-dose liver micronucleus (RDLMN) assay using young adult rats is capable of detecting the genotoxicity of quinoline at the target organ of carcinogenicity. The protocol may also permit the integration of the genotoxic endpoint into general repeated-dose toxicity studies. Furthermore, we elucidated that conducting the micronucleus assay in multiple organs could potentially assess organ specificity.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens/toxicity , Gastrointestinal Tract/drug effects , Hepatocytes/drug effects , Liver/drug effects , Micronucleus Tests , Quinolines/toxicity , Administration, Oral , Animals , Body Weight/drug effects , Bone Marrow/drug effects , Chromosome Aberrations/drug effects , Cooperative Behavior , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Hepatocytes/pathology , Humans , Japan , Liver/pathology , Male , Organ Specificity , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reticulocytes/drug effects , Societies, Pharmaceutical
4.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 64(1): 124-9, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22735368

ABSTRACT

The genotoxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) was evaluated in vivo using the comet assay after intratracheal instillation in rats. The SWCNTs were instilled at a dosage of 0.2 or 1.0mg/kg body weight (single instillation group) and 0.04 or 0.2mg/kg body weight once a week for 5weeks (repeated instillation group). As a negative control, 1% Tween 80 was instilled in a similar manner. As a positive control, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) at 500mg/kg was administered once orally 3h prior to dissection. Histopathologically, inflammation in the lung was observed for all the SWCNTs in both single and repeated groups. In the comet assay, there was no increase in% tail DNA in any of the SWCNT-treated groups. In the EMS-treated groups, there was a significant increase in% tail DNA compared with the negative control group. The present study indicated that a single intratracheal instillation of SWCNTs (1.0mg/kg) or repeated intratracheal instillation (0.2mg/kg) once a week for five weeks induced a clear inflammatory response (hemorrhage in the alveolus, infiltration of alveolar macrophages and neutrophiles), but no DNA damage, in the lungs in rats. Under the conditions of the test, SWCNTs were not genotoxic in the comet assay following intratracheal instillation in rats.


Subject(s)
Mutagens/toxicity , Nanotubes, Carbon/toxicity , Animals , Comet Assay , DNA Damage , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Lung/drug effects , Lung/pathology , Male , Mutagens/administration & dosage , Mutagens/classification , Nanotubes, Carbon/classification , Pneumonia/chemically induced , Pneumonia/pathology , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains
5.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 62(1): 1-6, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22198002

ABSTRACT

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is widely used as a white pigment in paints, plastics, inks, paper, creams, cosmetics, drugs and foods. In the present study, the genotoxicity of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles was evaluated in vivo using the comet assay after a single or repeated intratracheal instillation in rats. The nanoparticles were instilled intratracheally at a dosage of 1.0 or 5.0 mg/kg body weight (single instillation group) and 0.2 or 1.0 mg/kg body weight once a week for 5 weeks (repeated instillation group) into male Sprague-Dawley rats. A positive control, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) at 500 mg/kg, was administered orally 3 h prior to dissection. Histopathologically, macrophages and neutrophils were detected in the alveolus of the lung in the 1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg TiO2 groups. In the comet assay, there was no increase in % tail DNA in any of the TiO2 groups. In the EMS group, there was a significant increase in % tail DNA compared with the negative control group. TiO2 nanoparticles in the anatase crystal phase are not genotoxic following intratracheal instillation in rats.


Subject(s)
Nanoparticles/toxicity , Pneumonia/chemically induced , Titanium/toxicity , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Comet Assay , Male , Pneumonia/pathology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Toxicity Tests, Acute , Toxicity Tests, Subacute
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL