Surgeon-performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Outcomes of 2392 procedures at two tertiary care centers.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a common procedure that, in the United States, is traditionally performed by gastroenterologists. We hypothesized that when performed by well-trained surgeons, ERCP can be performed safely and effectively. The objectives of the study were to assess the rate of successful cannulation of the duct of interest and to assess the 30-day complication and mortality rates. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 1858 patients who underwent 2392 ERCP procedures performed by five surgeons between August 2003 and June 2016 in two centers. Demographic and historical data, indications, procedure-related data and 30-day complication and mortality data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was 53.4 (range 7-102) years and 1046 (56.3%) were female. 1430 (59.8%) of ERCP procedures involved a surgical endoscopy fellow. The most common indication was suspected or established uncomplicated common bile duct stones (n = 1470, 61.5%), followed by management of an existing biliary or pancreatic stent (n = 370, 15.5%) and acute biliary pancreatitis (n = 173, 7.2%). A therapeutic intervention was performed in 1564 (65.4%), a standard sphincterotomy in 1244 (52.0%), stent placement in 705 (29.5%) and stone removal in 638 (26.7%). When cannulation was attempted, the rate of successful cannulation was 94.1%. When cannulation was attempted during the patient's first ERCP the cannulation rate was 92.4%. 94 complications occurred (5.4%); the most common complication was post-ERCP pancreatitis in 75 (4.2%), significant gastrointestinal bleeding in 7 (0.4%), ascending cholangitis in 11 (0.6%) and perforation in 1 (0.05%). 11 mortalities occurred (0.5%) but none of which were ERCP-related. CONCLUSION: When performed by well-trained surgical endoscopists, ERCP is associated with high success rate and acceptable complication rates consistent with previously published reports and in line with societal guidelines.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and histopathology correlation for chronic pancreatitis.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is debated as the gold standard for diagnosing and staging chronic pancreatitis (CP). The Cambridge classification grades CP on ECRP findings from normal (Grade I) to marked (Grade V). Comparison is needed with histopathology, which is considered the true gold standard to set the accuracy of any diagnostic test. A retrospective study included patients with CP who underwent ERCP and histopathology examination after surgical resection between 2001 and 2006. ERCP findings were staged according to the Cambridge classification. Thirty-one patients underwent initial diagnostic ERCP and surgical resection for chronic pancreatitis between 2001 and 2006 (61% women, 39% men). Patients with CP were diagnosed based on ERCP findings and the Cambridge classification as having normal (2 of 31 [6.5%]), equivocal (4 of 31 [13%]), mild (3 of 31 [9.7%]), moderate (15 of 31 [48%]), and marked (7 of 31 [23%]) pancreatitis. Patients experienced a mean of 5.5 ERCPs with pancreatic duct stenting before surgery and demonstrated a mean time of 25 months (range, 6 months to 3 years) between initial diagnosis and surgery. Surgeries for chronic pancreatitis included 13 (42%) subtotal pancreatectomies, 10 (32%) Whipples, and 8 (26%) distal pancreatectomies. The ERCP findings and histopathology reports correlated in 23 (74%) patients, whereas in eight (26%), findings did not correlate. The early disease group's (9 of 31 classified as normal, equivocal, or mild) ERCP findings correlated with histopathology in 6 of 9 patients (67%). Patients classified as moderate and marked had a correlation of 17 of 22 (77%). ERCP demonstrates a high correlation with pathology for assessing the severity of CP using the Cambridge classification grading system. Patients with normal, equivocal, or mild disease still represent a difficult patient subset for surgical decision-making. ERCP findings accurately predict pathology and thus should be used to help formulate the surgical plan.

Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of Fasciola hepatica presenting as biliary obstruction.

Human infection with the Fasciola hepatica liver fluke is a rare cause of biliary obstruction, especially within the United States. Humans can become accidental hosts of this parasite by ingesting contaminated drinking water or plants. Symptoms during the acute phase include fever, right upper quadrant pain, eosinophilia, and hepatomegaly. During the chronic stage of infection, the parasite may remain asymptomatic for many years. This article presents a case of biliary obstruction due to Fasciola hepatica that was diagnosed and treated successfully with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Pitfalls in achieving the Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines for hemodialysis access?

The Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (DOQI) mandates that 50% of permanent hemodialysis (HD) access be native arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs). Recent reports have shown that when these guidelines are followed, the percentage of new AVFs can exceed DOQI guidelines. From July 1998 to July 2001, 330 HD access procedures were performed in an academic tertiary care center. Patients were categorized into two groups. Group I followed DOQI guidelines and underwent history and physical examination; duplex vein mapping; use of basilic vein transposition; and a postoperative protocol to determine maturation and start needle access in a stepwise progression. Group II had history and physical examination and basilic vein transposition was not used. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 100 (31%) HD shunts were AVFs. Group I (42/183, 23%) had significantly less AVFs (p = 0.005) than group II (58/147, 39%). For first-time placement of HD access, there was no significant difference (p = 0.95) in the percentage of AVFs in group I (26/62, 42%) and group II (29/68, 43%). For patients with prior history of HD access, significantly less AVFs (p <0.001) were placed in group I (16/121, 13%) than in group II (29/79, 37%). Group I had significantly less first-time HDS (P = 0.03) than group II, 34% VS. 46%, respectively. AVF maturation for hemodialysis occurred in 79% of group I and 71% of group II (P = 0.52). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) when comparing age, gender, and incidence of diabetes between the two groups. AVF formation based largely on duplex vein mapping in group I and lack of basilic vein transposition in group II contributed to the inability to achieve DOQI guidelines. Integration of knowledge and practice among vascular surgeons may help to avoid these pitfalls.