Risks and benefits of sentinel lymph node evaluation in the management of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Endometroid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a premalignant lesion to endometrial cancer. Increasing number of gynecologic oncologists are performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation during hysterectomy for EIN to ensure complete staging if there is cancer on the final specimen. However, there are no clear guidelines and the benefits and risks to performing SLN evaluation for EIN patients are unclear. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review examines the advantages and disadvantages of SLN evaluation for EIN patients and provides an algorithm to assist clinicians in selectively applying the procedure for maximal patient benefit. Relevant articles up to March 2024 were obtained from a PubMed search on SLN use with endometrial pathology. EXPERT OPINION: Sentinel lymph node evaluation for patients with EIN is safe, feasible, and particularly important for the approximately 10% of patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma on final pathology. However, as most diagnosed carcinomas are low-risk, SLN evaluation would have limited oncologic benefit. While SLN assessment may overtreat most patients with EIN, a significant minority of patients will be improperly staged. We propose an algorithm highlighting the importance of maximal preoperative endometrial sampling and stratifying patients via risk factors to selectively identify those who would benefit most from SLN evaluation.

Endometroid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a premalignant lesion to endometrial cancer, the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States. The definitive treatment for EIN is hysterectomy. An increasing number of gynecologic oncologists are performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment during surgery for EIN since 30­40% of patients with EIN will have underlying carcinoma. For those patients, lymph node evaluation is important for cancer staging, especially if high-risk or advanced stage disease is found on the pathologic specimen. The SLN procedure cannot be performed post-hysterectomy, so an improperly staged patient may require a second operation for lymphadenectomy; this has a greater chance of morbidity compared to an SLN biopsy. However, an SLN evaluation still confers perioperative risk and comes at an additional monetary cost, especially when most patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer after EIN will ultimately have low-risk, stage IA disease. We propose an algorithm for clinicians to help determine which patients with EIN would best benefit from the SLN procedure; this includes maximizing preoperative endometrial sampling and considering selective criterion with risk factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma including age, endometrial thickness, obesity, and molecular classification.

Racial and ethnic differences in early death among gynecologic malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic differences in early death after cancer diagnosis have not been well studied in gynecologic malignancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess population-level trends and characteristics of early death among patients with gynecologic malignancy based on race and ethnicity in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried to examine 461,300 patients with gynecologic malignancies from 2000 to 2020, including uterine (n=242,709), tubo-ovarian (n=119,989), cervical (n=68,768), vulvar (n=22,991), and vaginal (n=6843) cancers. Early death, defined as a mortality event within 2 months of the index cancer diagnosis, was evaluated per race and ethnicity. RESULTS: At the cohort level, early death occurred in 21,569 patients (4.7%), including 10.5%, 5.5%, 2.9%, 2.5%, and 2.4% for tubo-ovarian, vaginal, cervical, uterine, and vulvar cancers, respectively (P<.001). In a race- and ethnicity-specific analysis, non-Hispanic Black patients with tubo-ovarian cancer had the highest early death rate (14.5%). Early death racial and ethnic differences were the largest in tubo-ovarian cancer (6.4% for Asian vs 14.5% for non-Hispanic Black), followed by uterine (1.6% for Asian vs 4.9% for non-Hispanic Black) and cervical (1.8% for Hispanic vs 3.8% to non-Hispanic Black) cancers (all, P<.001). In tubo-ovarian cancer, the early death rate decreased over time by 33% in non-Hispanic Black patients from 17.4% to 11.8% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.85) and 23% in non-Hispanic White patients from 12.3% to 9.5% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.85), respectively. The early death between-group difference diminished only modestly (12.3% vs 17.4% for 2000-2002 [adjusted odds ratio for non-Hispanic White vs non-Hispanic Black, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.65] and 9.5% vs 11.8% for 2018-2020 [adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.78]). CONCLUSION: Overall, approximately 5% of patients with gynecologic malignancy died within the first 2 months from cancer diagnosis, and the early death rate exceeded 10% in non-Hispanic Black individuals with tubo-ovarian cancer. Although improving early death rates is encouraging, the difference among racial and ethnic groups remains significant, calling for further evaluation.

Recurrent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Excision Procedure Versus Loop Procedure With Top Hat.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate single-pass loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP-SP) versus LEEP with top hat (LEEP-TH) in terms of treatment failure defined as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology within 2 years' follow-up. METHODS: This single-institution cohort study used a prospectively collected cervical dysplasia database including all patients who underwent LEEP-SP or LEEP-TH for biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between 2005 and 2019. RESULTS: Of 340 patients included, 178 underwent LEEP-SP and 162 LEEP-TH. The LEEP-TH patients were more likely to be older (mean age, 40.4 vs 36.5 years; p < .001) and have a positive preprocedure endocervical sampling (68.5% vs 11.8%; p < .001). Positive margins were found in 23 LEEP-SP (12.9%) and in 25 LEEP-TH (15.4%; p = .507). There was no significant difference in depth of excision between LEEP-SP (13.21 ± 23.19 mm) and LEEP-TH (17.37 ± 28.26 mm; p = .138). At 2 years, there was no difference in the rates of HSIL cytology (5.2% vs 6.3%; p = .698), any positive human papillomavirus test, or HSIL cytology (25% vs 15%; p = .284). The 57 patients undergoing repeat excision were more likely to be older (mean age, 40.95 vs 37.52 years; p = .023), have had a LEEP-TH (26.3% vs 73.7%; p < .001), and have initial cytologic HSIL (64.9% vs 35.0%; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-institution study, there is no difference in the rate of recurrent HSIL in patients undergoing LEEP-SP versus LEEP-TH. A LEEP-TH may have limited additional benefit over a LEEP-SP in the treatment of cervical HSIL.

Increasing trends of cervical conization with lymph node evaluation for fertility-sparing surgery in early cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine uptake, characteristics, and survival outcome of less-radical fertility-sparing surgery with cervical conization and lymph node evaluation (Cone-LN) in reproductive age patients with early cervical cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The study population included 407 patients aged <50 years with stage IA-IB2 (≤4 cm) cervical cancer who received fertility-sparing surgery from 2004 to 2019. The exposure was fertility-sparing surgery type: Cone-LN (n = 196) or trachelectomy with lymph node evaluation (Trach-LN, n = 211). The main co-outcomes were (i) temporal trends of surgery type, assessed with Cochran-Armitage test, and (ii) clinical and tumor characteristics, assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression model. The secondary outcome was overall survival, assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. RESULTS: The number of patients receiving Cone-LN increased from 43.5% in 2004-2007 to 58.4% in 2016-2019 (P-trend = 0.005). Patients receiving conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy alone increased from 0% to 14.4% (P-trend < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, patients in the Cone-LN group were more likely to undergo SLN biopsy (aOR 6.04) compared to those in the Trach-LN group whereas those with adenocarcinoma (aOR 0.49) and T1b tumors (aOR for ≤2 cm 0.21, and aOR for 2.1-4.0 cm 0.10) were less likely to receive Cone-LN. In a propensity score-weighted model, the Cone-LN and Trach-LN groups had comparable overall survival (7-year rates, 98.9% vs 97.8%). Similar associations were observed for patients with squamous, adenocarcinoma / adenosquamous, T1a classification, and T1b(≤2 cm) classification. CONCLUSION: The current population-based analysis suggests that the performance of cervical conization with lymph node evaluation, particularly with SLN biopsy, is gradually increasing for early cervical cancer patients desiring future fertility.