Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Popul Health Manag ; 24(3): 385-392, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32924796

ABSTRACT

Mobile health tools may overcome barriers to social needs screening; however, there are limited data on the feasibility of using these tools in clinical settings. The objective was to determine the feasibility of using a mobile health system to screen for patients' social needs. In one large primary care clinic, the authors tested a tablet-based system that screens patients for social needs, transmits results to the electronic health record, and alerts providers. All adult patients presenting for a nonurgent visit were eligible. The authors evaluated the feasibility of the system and conducted follow-up surveys to determine acceptability and if patients accessed resources through the process. All providers were surveyed. Of the 252 patients approached, 219 (86.9%) completed the screen. Forty-three (19.6%) required assistance with the tablet, and 150 (68.5%) screened positive for at least 1 unmet need (food, housing, or transportation). Of the 150, 103 (68.7%) completed a follow-up survey. The majority agreed that people would learn to use the tablet quickly. Forty-eight patients (46.6%) reported contacting at least 1 community organization through the process. Of the 27 providers, 23 (85.2%) completed a survey and >70% agreed the system would result in patients having better access to resources. It was feasible to use a tablet-based system to screen for social needs. Clinics considering using mobile tools will need to determine how to screen patients who may need assistance with the tool and how to connect patients to resources through the system based on the burden of unmet needs.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Primary Health Care , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Technology
2.
J Agromedicine ; 24(3): 257-267, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30860961

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This analysis documents the use of conventional health-care providers, traditional healers, and complementary therapies by Mexican farmworkers; identifies the purposes and perceived helpfulness of these modalities; and delineates variation in the use of traditional healers and complementary therapies. Methods: Two-hundred Mexican farmworkers in North Carolina completed interviews May-September, 2017. The International Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire (I-CAM-Q) elicited use of conventional health-care providers, traditional healers, and complementary therapies in the previous 12 months. Results: Most of the farmworkers had been treated by a conventional provider (63.0%). One-in-five had been treated by any traditional healer; 19.5% had been treated by a sobador, 4.5% by a curandero, 2.0% by an herbalist, and 2.0% by a spiritual healer. Conventional providers (69.8%) and sobadores (84.6%) most often treated acute conditions; 62.5% had used an herb, 46.0% a vitamin, 57.0% an over-the-counter medicine, and 13.5% a home remedy. Participants used various self-care practices, including music (36.5%), sleep (18.0%), prayer for health (15.0%), and social media (14.0%). Education was inversely associated with the use of a traditional healer and herbs; treatment by a conventional health-care provider was positively associated with using a traditional healer and vitamins. Conclusions: Mexican farmworkers use conventional health-care providers as well as traditional healers and complementary therapies. Research on how use of complementary therapies and a system of medical pluralism affects farmworker health is needed. Health-care providers need to recognize complementary therapy use and provide patient education about ineffective or harmful therapies.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Farmers , Medicine, Traditional/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico/ethnology , Middle Aged , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , North Carolina , Phytotherapy , Plants, Medicinal , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data
3.
Health Promot Pract ; 20(3): 445-454, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29597873

ABSTRACT

The human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine is an effective but underused cancer prevention tool. This study assessed knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccine initiation among Mexican-born farmworkers in North Carolina. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were conducted with 100 Latino farmworkers and 100 nonfarmworker Latino North Carolina residents in 2015 as part of an ongoing community-based participatory research project. Farmworkers had low levels of knowledge about HPV and the HPV vaccine. They had a similar amount of HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge compared to nonfarmworkers. Farmworkers and nonfarmworkers learned about the HPV vaccine from different sources. Adolescent children of farmworkers and nonfarmworkers had low HPV vaccine initiation. However, for children living in the United States with farmworker parents, vaccine initiation was high. To prevent HPV-related cancers and improve health equity, interventions are needed in order to increase HPV education and vaccine initiation among children of Mexican-born farmworkers and nonfarmworkers. Public health programs should look for partners outside the traditional health care setting to reach underserved populations. Other key strategies include promoting catch-up vaccines, improving patient-provider communication, and providing case management services.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health/ethnology , Farmers/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Communication , Community-Based Participatory Research , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mexico , North Carolina , Papillomavirus Infections/psychology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , United States
4.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 21(3): 515-521, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948650

ABSTRACT

Latino farmworkers are exposed to a number of carcinogens in the workplace. Cancer survival rates for Latinos are below average. This paper describes Mexican immigrant farmworkers' knowledge of colorectal, breast, and testicular cancer, and compares farmworkers' cancer knowledge to that of other Mexican immigrants. Survey interviews for this study were conducted with 100 farmworkers and 100 non-farmworkers in 2015 in North Carolina as part of an ongoing community-based participatory research project. We found low to moderate levels of knowledge about colorectal, breast, and testicular cancer among farmworkers. Compared to non-farmworkers, farmworkers had similar levels of knowledge about breast and testicular cancer, but slightly lower knowledge about colorectal cancer (p = 0.0087). Few studies have used quantitative methods to assess farmworkers' knowledge of specific types of cancer. Our results demonstrate a need for increased dissemination of existing cancer education programs and further research to develop additional educational tools.


Subject(s)
Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/ethnology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Community-Based Participatory Research , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , North Carolina , Socioeconomic Factors , Testicular Neoplasms/ethnology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL