Oversedation Zero as a tool for comfort, safety and intensive care unit management. / Sobresedación Zero como herramienta de confort, seguridad y gestión en la unidades de cuidados intensivos.

Sedation is necessary in the management of critically ill patients, both to alleviate suffering and to cure patients with diseases that require admission to the intensive care unit. Such sedation should be appropriate to the patient needs at each timepoint during clinical evolution, and neither too low (undersedation) nor too high (oversedation). Adequate sedation influences patient comfort, safety, survival, subsequent quality of life, bed rotation of critical care units and costs. Undersedation is detected and quickly corrected. In contrast, oversedation is silent and difficult to prevent in the absence of management guidelines, collective awareness and teamwork. The Zero Oversedation Project of the Sedation, Analgesia and Delirium Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units aims to offer a practical teaching and collective awareness tool for ensuring patient comfort, safety and management with a view to optimizing the clinical outcomes and minimizing the deleterious effects of excessive sedation. The tool is based on a package of measures that include monitoring pain, analgesia, agitation, sedation, delirium and neuromuscular block, keeping patients pain-free, performing dynamic sedation according to clinical objectives, agreeing upon the multidisciplinary protocol to be followed, and avoiding deep sedation where not clinically indicated.

Appropriateness of magnetic resonance imaging requested by primary care physicians for patients with knee pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriateness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee requested by primary care physicians. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Six primary care centres in the Elche Department of Health of the Valencian Community, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred patients with knee pain who were prescribed MRI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected from the electronic clinical history, which allowed us to assess the appropriateness and inappropriateness of the MRI requests for the knee based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with an inappropriate request. RESULTS: About 45% (41-49%) of knee MRI prescriptions were assessed as inappropriate. The frequency was higher in female patients (odds ratio, OR = 1.96; P = 0.03). A history of knee trauma and urgent use of MRI were associated with a lower frequency of inappropriate requests (OR = 0.14, P < 0.001 and OR = 0.32, P = 0.03, respectively). In 82% of cases, the request for MRI was deemed inappropriate because it was used as the initial imaging test. The availability of a previous radiograph of the knee significantly reduced the rate of inappropriate requests (OR = 0.05, P < 0.001); only 47% of the patients had a previous radiograph. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of inappropriate knee MRI prescriptions is high. Protocols should be put in place to improve the appropriateness of MRI requests by promoting understanding of the appropriate use of MRI among primary care physicians.