Coronavirus Disease among Workers in Food Processing, Food Manufacturing, and Agriculture Workplaces.

We describe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) among US food manufacturing and agriculture workers and provide updated information on meat and poultry processing workers. Among 742 food and agriculture workplaces in 30 states, 8,978 workers had confirmed COVID-19; 55 workers died. Racial and ethnic minority workers could be disproportionately affected by COVID-19.

Update: COVID-19 Among Workers in Meat and Poultry Processing Facilities - United States, April-May 2020.

Meat and poultry processing facilities face distinctive challenges in the control of infectious diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (1). COVID-19 outbreaks among meat and poultry processing facility workers can rapidly affect large numbers of persons. Assessment of COVID-19 cases among workers in 115 meat and poultry processing facilities through April 27, 2020, documented 4,913 cases and 20 deaths reported by 19 states (1). This report provides updated aggregate data from states regarding the number of meat and poultry processing facilities affected by COVID-19, the number and demographic characteristics of affected workers, and the number of COVID-19-associated deaths among workers, as well as descriptions of interventions and prevention efforts at these facilities. Aggregate data on confirmed COVID-19 cases and deaths among workers identified and reported through May 31, 2020, were obtained from 239 affected facilities (those with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 case in one or more workers) in 23 states.* COVID-19 was confirmed in 16,233 workers, including 86 COVID-19-related deaths. Among 14 states reporting the total number of workers in affected meat and poultry processing facilities (112,616), COVID-19 was diagnosed in 9.1% of workers. Among 9,919 (61%) cases in 21 states with reported race/ethnicity, 87% occurred among racial and ethnic minority workers. Commonly reported interventions and prevention efforts at facilities included implementing worker temperature or symptom screening and COVID-19 education, mandating face coverings, adding hand hygiene stations, and adding physical barriers between workers. Targeted workplace interventions and prevention efforts that are appropriately tailored to the groups most affected by COVID-19 are critical to reducing both COVID-19-associated occupational risk and health disparities among vulnerable populations. Implementation of these interventions and prevention efforts† across meat and poultry processing facilities nationally could help protect workers in this critical infrastructure industry.

Molecular epidemiology of foodborne hepatitis a outbreaks in the United States, 2003.

BACKGROUND: Molecular epidemiologic investigations can link geographically separate foodborne hepatitis A outbreaks but have not been used while field investigations are in progress. In 2003, outbreaks of foodborne hepatitis A were reported in multiple states. METHODS: Case-control studies were conducted in 3 states. Hepatitis A virus was sequenced from serologic specimens from individuals associated with outbreaks and from individuals concurrently ill with hepatitis A in non-outbreak settings in the United States and Mexico. RESULTS: Case-control studies in Tennessee (TN), North Carolina (NC), and Georgia (GA) found green onions to be associated with illness among restaurant patrons (TN: odds ratio [OR], 65.5 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 8.9-482.5; NC: OR, 2.4 [95% CI, 0.3-21.9]; GA: OR, 20.9 [95% CI, 3.9-110.3]). Viral sequences from TN case patients differed by 2 nt, compared with those from case patients in NC and GA. A third sequence, differing from the TN and GA/NC sequences by 1 nt, was identified among case patients in a subsequent outbreak in Pennsylvania. Each outbreak sequence was identical to > or =1 sequence isolated from northern Mexican resident(s) with hepatitis A. The sources of green onions served in restaurants in TN and GA were 3 farms in northern Mexico. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing viral strain surveillance facilitated the rapid implementation of control measures. Incorporation of molecular epidemiologic methods into routine hepatitis A surveillance would improve the detection of hepatitis A outbreaks and increase our understanding of hepatitis A epidemiology in the United States.