Single-Center Experience on the Elective Hybrid Combination of Single Perclose + Angio-Seal VIP 8F Compared With Standard Dual Perclose During Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: This single-center study aimed to assess patients who underwent intentional percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (pEVAR) with Hybrid Technique combining a single Perclose (Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) Suture-Mediated Closure Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) and compare outcomes with the standard Dual Perclose technique. Materials and Methods: Consecutive elective pEVAR patients treated from November 2022 to November 2023, with healthy femoral accesses and introducer sheaths ≤20 French (F) outer diameter, were included. Coin-toss randomization determined whether a combination of single Perclose Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F (Hybrid Technique) or the standard double Perclose Devices (Dual Perclose) was used. In Hybrid Technique, a single Perclose device was positioned at 12 o'clock; a single Angio-Seal VIP 8F was placed after sheaths removal. Dual Perclose followed standard procedure. Primary endpoints included immediate hemostasis, sheath diameter differences, access conversion rate, technical success, and cost analysis. RESULTS: The study involved 60 pEVAR patients (median age=78, interquartile range [IQR]=72-85 years) within the inclusion criteria. In 14 (24%) cases, only 1 femoral access was studied. There were 106 pEVAR accesses, with 58 (54.7%) in the Hybrid Technique group and 48 (45.3%) in the Dual Perclose group. Both groups exhibited homogeneity in pre-operative characteristics and sheath diameter (Hybrid Technique-16F vs Dual Perclose-18F; p=0.202). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the Hybrid Technique group vs 87.5% for the Dual Perclose group (p=0.006). Surgical access conversion was unnecessary. Technical success was 100%, with all 6 femoral bleeding cases after Dual Perclose resolved endovascularly, using additional devices. Cost analysis showed a median cost of 330 euros (IQR=0) for the Hybrid Technique group vs 384 euros (IQR=360-456) for the Dual Perclose group (p<0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 3%, in 2 fragile patients, without access-related complications. Multivariate analysis identified Dual Perclose access (odds ratio [OR]=35.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]=18.3-36.8; p<0.001) and obesity (OR=19.7; 95% CI=1.4-23.9.5; p<0.001) as independent risk factors for immediate hemostasis failure. Median follow-up was 134 days (IQR=41-227), with 1 Hybrid Technique case (2%) successfully treated with thrombin injection for a small femoral pseudoaneurysm after 62 days. CONCLUSIONS: The elective Hybrid Technique with combination of single Perclose Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F during pEVAR in selected patients appears to be non-inferior to the standard Dual Perclose procedure. It demonstrates a positive trend in reducing immediate hemostasis failure and costs. Both procedures achieved technical success and avoiding surgical access conversions. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study introduces a novel elective hybrid technique combining a single Perclose device with a single Angio-Seal VIP 8Fr for percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic interventions. Results for hybrid technique showed 100% technical success and efficient immediate hemostasis, while costing less than standard dual Perclose procedure. Both procedures did not require surgical conversions. Despite being a single-center study, it demonstrates potential benefits of the intentional application of this hybrid technique towards minimally invasiveness. Obesity and dual Perclose technique were identified as independent risk factors for hemostasis failure, reaffirming the hybrid technique procedure's efficacy as well as and non-inferiority to standard procedure.

External Scaffold for Venous Graft to Treat Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Results of the FRAME Vascular Support.

Background: The surgical treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and optimal conduit choice are extensively debated. The presence of suboptimal autologous material, such as varicosities or venous aneurysms, might impair long-term outcomes. Therefore, kink-resistant external supports have been advocated in the recent literature to improve the conduit quality and outcomes. This study analyzes the FRAME external support in venous ectasic grafts in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Methods: From September 2017 to September 2023, a total of sixteen patients underwent CLTI surgery with FRAME external support for venous grafts. The inclusion criteria for FRAME applications were varicose or ectasic autologous material with a diameter ≥ 4.5 and ≤ 8 mm in an isolated segment or in the entire vein and a higher risk of bypass extrinsic compression (e.g., extra-anatomical venous bypass course). Results: Technical success and intraoperative patency were achieved in all cases. At 30 days, the limb salvage and survival rates were 100%. The primary bypass patency was 93.7% due to an early graft occlusion. No graft infection was registered. In one case, dehiscence of the surgical wound was treated by surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy. Minor amputation was required in four patients. Over a median follow-up of 32 months, two occlusions were observed; one was treated with reoperation and the other with major amputation. The primary patency was 68.7% and the assisted primary patency was 75%. Limb salvage rates observed during the entire follow-up period were 87.5%. No graft infections or dilatation of the reinforced veins were registered. Conclusions: For patients with CLTI undergoing infrainguinal bypass, satisfactory results in terms of patency and limb salvage rates were achieved using the autologous venous material, even if ectasic or varicose, with the vascular external support FRAME.

Subclavian artery revascularization with subclavian-carotid transposition for TEVAR and non-TEVAR patients.

BACKGROUND: Subclavian artery revascularization (SAR) has become an increasingly performed technique in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR), in order to optimize the proximal landing zone, or in patients with significant atherosclerotic diseases. SAR was usually achieved through carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB) which is daunted by graft and patency-related issues, or through subclavian carotid transposition (SCT) which has recently been reconsidered as a potential solution. Nowadays, multiple endovascular strategies including parallel grafts, chimney graft and branch-fenestrated repair, are available in patients unfit for open SAR. However, there is no consensus on the preferable technique in both TEVAR- and non TEVAR-patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience with SCT in terms of overall postoperative adverse events and mid-term patency rate. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study, including all patients who underwent SCT between June 2014 and March 2020 at our Division. Preoperative risk factors, symptoms, intraoperative details, postoperative outcomes and follow-up data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were included in this study. Indications for SCT included aortic arch debranching for TEVAR for thoracic aortic aneurysm and type B dissection and symptomatic subclavian steal syndrome (SSS). There were no major perioperative adverse events or major neurological complications; five minor adverse events occurred (18.5%) (3 Horner' Syndrome, 1 hematoma requiring reoperation,1 pneumothorax). Peripheral nerve injuries and lymphatic lesions were not recorded. On a mean follow-up of 21±16 months, SCT patency was confirmed in all patients and no deaths occurred. Comparison of baseline and operative characteristics and intraoperative details between groups of patients with or without adverse events did not found differences. CONCLUSIONS: SCT should be considered a feasible, effective and safe technique for SAR, with low perioperative complications and optimal mid-term patency. This surgical technique appears to provide a lower risk of neurological events and mortality, particularly in TEVAR patients, reducing the complications caused by the coverage of the left subclavian artery.

Tissue Engineering and Targeted Drug Delivery in Cardiovascular Disease: The Role of Polymer Nanocarrier for Statin Therapy.

Atherosclerosis-related coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. This requires effective primary and secondary prevention in reducing the complications related to CAD; the regression or stabilization of the pathology remains the mainstay of treatment. Statins have proved to be the most effective treatment in reducing adverse effects, but there are limitations related to the administration and achievement of effective doses as well as side effects due to the lack of target-related molecular specificity. The implemented technological steps are polymers and nanoparticles for the administration of statins, as it has been seen how the conjugation of drug delivery systems (DDSs) with statins increases bioavailability by circumventing the hepatic-renal filter and increases the related target specificity, enhancing their action and decreasing side effects. Reduction of endothelial dysfunction, reduced intimal hyperplasia, reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury, cardiac regeneration, positive remodeling in the extracellular matrix, reduced neointimal growth, and increased reendothelialization are all drug-related effects of statins enhanced by binding with DDSs. Recent preclinical studies demonstrate how the effect of statins stimulates the differentiation of endogenous cardiac stem cells. Poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) seems to be the most promising DDS as it succeeds more than the others in enhancing the effect of the bound drug. This review intends to summarize the current evidence on polymers and nanoparticles for statin delivery in the field of cardiovascular disease, trying to shed light on this topic and identify new avenues for future studies.

SARS-COV-2 Pandemic for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Peripheral Arterial Disease: Impact of Interruption to Access According to Gender in a Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the impact of interrupted services for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients and especially women in a single north-eastern Italian center over a period of 3 months prior to the pandemic, during the first (2020) and the second (2021) wave of contagion in northern Italy. METHODS: Patients with PAD at Rutherford stages 3 to 6 that required revascularization between March 2019 and March 2021 were classified into 3 groups, according to the period of treatment: the prepandemic period, the pandemic-20 period, and the pandemic-21 period. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were treated in the prepandemic period, 21 in the pandemic-20 period, and 39 in the pandemic-21 period. It was observed that in the both pandemic periods patients presented with more severe stages of limb ischemia, Rutherford 5 and 6 stages. During pandemic-20, patients underwent mostly open surgery, followed by hybrid procedures. No differences were observed between the 3 groups in major amputations, length of hospital stay, type of discharge, limb salvage and mortality. During long-term follow-up, limb salvage appeared to be significantly better in the pandemic-21 group. The gender analysis revealed a significantly reduced female proportion of overall treated patients in 2020 and 2021 compared to the prepandemic period. In the pandemic-20 this difference appears even more evident since treatments on females represented 19% of the total while in the same period of the previous year the male/female percentage was comparable (54% vs. 46%). The women admitted presented higher stages of disease and tended to have a longer hospital stay than men. At 12-month follow-up, limb salvage was similar between the 2 genders but was slightly worse in women. CONCLUSIONS: An efficient reorganization of the vascular surgery services during the pandemic period guaranteed the quality and standard of treatment offered in the preceding periods. Among patients suffering from PAD the impact of the pandemic was greater for the female gender. It is therefore important that in addition to a reorganization of hospital services to provide adequate care for patients with ACOP in the pandemic period, greater information and awareness of women.

Duplex and Angiographic-Assisted Evaluation of Outcomes of Endovascular Embolization after Surgical Deep Vein Arterialization for the Treatment No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To report early and mid-term outcomes of the arterialization of the deep venous system in no-option critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) using duplex ultrasound and angiographic evaluation to improve limb perfusion. METHODS: A single-center prospective study of patients with no-option CLTI treated with hybrid surgical arterialization of the deep venous circulation and staged endovascular embolization of the venous collateral. Embolization was performed using a controlled-release spiral, within two weeks after bypass surgery. Patients were assessed for clinical status, wound healing, median transcutaneous partial pressure of O2 (TcPO2), and post-operative duplex ultrasound evaluating peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and resistance index (RI) to assess foot perfusion and bypass features. Primary endpoint analysis was primary technical success, limb salvage, patency rates, and clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints were 30-day and long-term mortality, major cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction or stroke, and serious adverse events (SAE). RESULTS: Five patients with no-option CLTI were treated at our center using the hybrid deep vein arterialization technique. Clinical stage was grade 3 in one patient and grade 4 in the remaining four. Mean age was 65.8 years (range 49-76 years), and two patients were affected by Buerger's disease. Primary technical success was achieved in all patients, and all the bypasses were patent at the angiographic examination. At 30-day and at average follow-up of 9.8 months (range 2-24 months), mortality, major cardiovascular events (MACE), and serious adverse events (SAE) were not reported, with a primary patency and limb salvage rates of 100%. Three patients required minor amputation. Clinical improvement was demonstrated in all patients with granulation, resolution of rest pain, or both. Median TcPO2 values rose from 10 mm Hg (range 4-25) before the procedure to 35 (range 31-57) after surgery, and to 59 mm Hg (range 50-76) after the staged endovascular procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In our initial experience, the arterialization of the deep venous circulation, with subsequent selective embolization of the venous escape routes from the foot, seems a feasible and effective solution for limb salvage in patients with no-option CLTI and those in the advanced wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) clinical stage.

First case of aorto-bi-iliac endograft thrombotic infection by Listeria monocytogenes: A case report.

Listeria monocytogenes may cause serious vascular and graft infections. In the present case report, a 71-year-old man underwent partial prosthetic endograft replacement due to high-flow endoleak and limb occlusion. Following surgery, a multiple empiric antibiotic regime was initiated due to fever, malaise, abdominal tenderness and signs of an acute abdomen; however, in spite of this, the clinical condition of the patient worsened. An aorto-enteric fistula was discovered, and duodenal resection with duodeno-jejunal anastomosis packaging was performed. Gastrointestinal bleeding originating from this anastomosis both complicated and prolonged the clinical course, necessitating appropriate parenteral support and endoscopic hemostasis. The growth of Candida lusitanae in the drained abdominal and pleural effusion, and the isolation of L. monocytogenes from the thrombus inside the removed abdominal aorto-bi-iliac endograft allowed for establishment of a specific antibiotic treatment. After a suitable period of clinical improvement, the patient was transferred to a clinical rehabilitation center. At the present time, the patient maintains a good condition. To the best of our knowledge, the present study represents the first described case of thrombotic infection of an aorto-bi-iliac endograft by L. monocytogenes. In the event of graft thrombotic occlusion, L. monocytogenes infection should be considered as a potential cause. In case of complications requiring open conversion, even if not suspected from the medical history of the patient, the possibility of an underlying and occult infection should always be excluded with an in-depth preoperative work-up.

Below-the-Ankle Orbital Atherectomy in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients as a Bailout Strategy for Limb Salvage: Early Clinical Experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and early outcomes of below the ankle orbital atherectomy in chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients with calcified foot arteries. METHODS: 12 patients (mean age 69.4 ± 14.7; range 57 to 85 years) who were affected by diabetes underwent orbital atherectomy below the knee and ankle arterial segments. Technical success was defined as orbital atherectomy passage and debulked the calcified lesion, delivery of adjunctive therapy, and < 30% residual stenosis at final angiogram. The procedural outcome included complications, amputation-free survival, and freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization at 30-days and 6-months of follow-up. RESULTS: Orbital atherectomy was performed in 3 cases in Anterior tibial (AT) and dorsalis pedis (Ped) arteries + Posterior tibial (PT) and Lateral Plantar (Lat Plan), 5 cases in PT and Lat Plan arteries, 1 case of PT and Medial Plantar, 1 case of Peroneal and Plan Lat, and 2 cases of AT and Ped. After atherectomy, we used a drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. Technical success was achieved in 11 (91.6%) cases. No deaths were registered during the follow-up. The limb salvage rate was 100%, and no major amputations were registered. Amputation-free survival was 50%. Freedom from CD-TLR was 100% at 30 days and 91.7% at 6-months. One patient underwent a TLR at three months. No major cardiovascular events, limb events, or significant procedure-related complications were registered. CONCLUSIONS: CSI orbital atherectomy and DCB angioplasty appear a feasible and promissor treatment options in diabetic CLTI patients.

Biomarkers in EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications.

Circulating biomarkers have been recently investigated among patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Considering the plethora of small descriptive studies reporting potential associations between biomarkers and clinical outcomes, this review aims to summarize the current literature considering both the treated disease (post EVAR) and the untreated disease (AAA before EVAR). All studies describing outcomes of tissue biomarkers in patients undergoing EVAR and in patients with AAA were included, and references were checked for additional sources. In the EVAR scenario, circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a marker of inflammatory reaction which might predict postoperative morbidity; cystatin C is a promising early marker of post-procedural acute kidney injury; plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) concentration after 3 months from EVAR might help in detecting post-procedural endoleak. This review also summarizes the current gaps in knowledge and future direction of this field of research. Among markers used in patients with AAA, galectin and granzyme appear to be promising and should be carefully investigated even in the EVAR setting. Larger prospective trials are required to establish and evaluate prognostic models with highest values with these markers.