Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 56(7): 543-553, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) are at risk of having CIED infection, pocket infection or endocarditis. To avoid treatment failures, guidelines recommend that the CIED should be extracted in all cases of SAB butrecent studies indicate low extraction rates and low risk of relapse. The aim of the study was to describe a Swedish population-based cohort of patients with CIED and SAB, the rate of extraction, and treatment failure measured as recurrent SAB. METHODS: Patients identified to have SAB in the Karolinska Laboratory database, serving a population of 1.9 million, from January 2015 through December 2019 were matched to the Swedish ICD and Pacemaker Registry. Patients with CIED and SAB were included. Clinical data were collected from medical records. RESULTS: A cohort of 274 patients was identified and 38 patients (14%)had the CIED extracted. Factors associated with extraction were lower age, lower Charlson comorbidity index, shorter time since CIED implantation, and non-nosocomial acquisition, but not mortality. No patient was put on lifelong antibiotic treatment. Sixteen patients (6%) had a recurrent SAB within one year, two in patients subjected to extraction (5%) and 14 in patients not subjected to CIED-extraction (6%). Three of the 14 patients were found to have definite endocarditis during the recurrent episode. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a low extraction rate, there were few recurrences. We suggest that extraction of the CIED might be omitted if pocket infection, changes on the CIED, or definite endocarditis are not detected.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Staphylococcal Infections , Staphylococcus aureus , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Sweden/epidemiology , Pacemaker, Artificial/microbiology , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Device Removal , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
2.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 18, 2024 01 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38184588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increased risk of severe tachyarrhythmias is reported in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to explore if treatment with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) such as implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy- pacemaker and -defibrillator (CRT-P/CRT-D) differed in patients with vs. without T2DM. A secondary aim was to identify patient characteristics indicating an increased CIED treatment. METHOD: 416 162 adult patients with T2DM from the Swedish National Diabetes Registry and 2 081 087 controls from the Swedish population, matched for age, sex and living area, were included between 1/1/1998 and 31/12/2012 and followed until 31/12/2013. They were compared regarding prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) at baseline and the risk of receiving a CIED during follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the risk of CIED-treatment and factors identifying patients with such risk. RESULTS: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) (0.1% vs 0.0004%) and (VT) (0.2% vs. 0.1%) were more frequent among patients with T2DM compared to controls. CIED-treatment was significantly increased in patients with T2DM both in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. HR and 95% CI, after adjustment for sex, age, marital status, income, education, country of birth, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure, were 1.32 [1.21-1.45] for ICD, 1.74 [1.55-1.95] for CRT-P and 1.69 [1.43-1.99] for CRT-D. Blood-pressure and lipid lowering therapies were independent risk factors associated to receiving CIED, while female sex was protective. CONCLUSIONS: Although the proportion of VT/VF was low, patients with T2DM had a higher prevalence of these conditions and increased risk for treatment with CIED compared to controls. This underlines the importance of recognizing that T2DM patients have an increased need of CIED.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Adult , Humans , Female , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Heart , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Ventricular/epidemiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Ventricular Fibrillation
3.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ; 24(1): 30-34, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37981254

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pediatric pacing is usually performed as epicardial pacing in small children in need of pacemaker therapy. Epicardial pacing compared with transvenous pacing for pediatric complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) has different strengths and weaknesses. The epicardial left ventricular wall position of the lead has been considered superior, in terms of contraction pattern, compared to a transvenous right ventricular stimulation. We aimed to compare QRS duration and cardiac function before and after the switch from epicardial to transvenous pacing in a pediatric population. METHODS: Pediatric patients with congenital or acquired CAVB, who underwent a switch from epicardial-to transvenous pacing at our center from 2005 to 2021, were identified through the national ICD- and Pacemaker Registry. Data regarding clinical status, ECG, and echocardiography before and after the switch and at last follow-up were collected. RESULTS: We included 15 children. The median age at the switch was 6.7 (4.4-11.7) years with a median weight of 21 (15-39) Kg. The median QRS duration with the transvenous systems was 136 (128-152) ms vs. a QRS duration during epicardial stimulation of 150 (144-170) ms with a median difference in QRS duration of 14 (6-20) ms. Children with a post-surgical AV block had a broader QRS duration, both with epicardial and endocardial stimulation. Before the switch, there was one patient with impaired left ventricular function (LVF) but with normal left ventricular end-diastolic diameters. After the switch, one patient developed symptomatic LV dysfunction with the recovery of LVF at the last follow-up after being implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy device. CONCLUSIONS: Our report of pediatric patients after switching from epicardial to transvenous pacing shows how transvenous pacing is not inferior to epicardial pacing in terms of QRS duration and no significant deterioration of cardiac function was detectable.

4.
Europace ; 25(7)2023 07 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37403689

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) might be the first finding of cardiovascular diseases but also the prerequisite for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The prognosis for patients with LBBB and the implications of CRT in an unselected real-world setting are the focus of our study. METHODS AND RESULTS: A central electrocardiogram (ECG) database and national registers have been screened to identify patients with LBBB. Predictors of HF and the use of CRT were identified with Cox models. The hazard ratios (HRs) of death, cardiovascular death (CVD), and HF hospitalization (HFH) were estimated according to CRT use. Of 5359 patients with LBBB and QRS > 150 ms, median age 76 years, 36% were female. At the time of index ECG, 41% had a previous history of HF and 27% developed HF. Among 1053 patients with a class I indication for CRT, only 60% received CRT with a median delay of 137 days, and it was associated with a lower risk of death [HR: 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.57], CVD (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35-0.63), and HFH (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.48-0.66). The age of over 75 years and the diagnosis of dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were predictors of CRT non-use, while having a pacing/defibrillator device independently predicted CRT use. CONCLUSION: In an unselected LBBB population, CRT is underused but of great value for HF patients. Therefore, it is crucial to find ways of better implementing and understanding CRT utilization and characteristics that influence the management of our patients.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Failure , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Bundle-Branch Block , Heart Failure/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Stroke Volume , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Prognosis , Electrocardiography
5.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 42(5): 583-591, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36920628

ABSTRACT

Patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) are at risk of having infective endocarditis (IE). The objectives were to describe a Swedish population-based cohort of patients with CIED and SAB, to identify risk factors, and to construct a predictive score for IE. Patients over 18 years old in the Stockholm Region identified to have SAB in the Karolinska Laboratory database from January 2015 through December 2019 were matched to the Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator ICD Registry to identify the study cohort. Data were collected from study of medical records. A cohort of 274 patients with CIED and SAB was identified and in 38 episodes (14%) IE were diagnosed, 19 with changes on the CIED, and 35 with changes on the left side of the heart. The risk factors predisposition for IE, community acquisition, embolization, time to positivity of blood cultures, and growth in blood culture after start of therapy in blood cultures were independently associated to IE. A score to identify patients with IE was constructed, the CTEPP score, and the chosen cut-off generated a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 25%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. The score was externally validated in a population-based cohort of patients with CIED and SAB from another Swedish region. We found that 14% of patients with CIED and SAB had definite IE diagnosed. The CTEPP-score can be used to predict the risk of IE and, when negative, the risk is negligible.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Defibrillators, Implantable , Endocarditis, Bacterial , Endocarditis , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Staphylococcus aureus , Endocarditis/epidemiology , Endocarditis/etiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/etiology , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Defibrillators, Implantable/microbiology
7.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 56(1): 316-324, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35941825

ABSTRACT

Gender differences in symptoms and perceived health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) referred to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been reported previously. Women experience a lower HRQOL, faster heart rate, and more symptoms such as palpitation and dyspnea than men. Furthermore, they experience worse physical functioning independently of other heart diseases or age. This study evaluates referral patterns and symptoms, morbidity, functional impairment, and HRQOL from a gender perspective in patients with AF before and 6 months after PVI. The study includes 242 patients (121 men), mean age 62 ± 9 years, referred for PVI. Symptoms were assessed with the Symptom Checklist: Frequency and Severity (SCL), HRQOL with Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the functional impairment with Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The patients' own experiences of the referral process and history of their disease were evaluated with a supplementary questionnaire. The results showed that women improved more than men in HRQOL, SIP, and SCL 6 months post PVI. There were no sex differences in proportion of paroxysmal and persistent AF or ablation outcome. At baseline, women scored higher than men in both scales of the SCL (p < 0.001), scored lower in all components in SF-36, and scored higher in five categories of the SIP. Women were not more reluctant to accept referral for ablation when offered. The conclusion is that women with AF undergoing PVI are more symptomatic but also improve more in HRQOL and in symptom burden than men.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Pulmonary Veins , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Sickness Impact Profile , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 76(25): 2926-2936, 2020 12 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334420

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is high early after myocardial infarction (MI). Current knowledge and guidelines mainly rely on results from older clinical trials and registry studies. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) alone has not been proven a reliable predictor of SCD. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify the incidence and additional predictors of SCD early after MI in a contemporary nationwide setting. METHODS: The authors used data from SWEDEHEART, the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry, and the Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Registry. Cases of MI, which had undergone coronary angiography and were discharged alive between 2009 to 2017 without a prior ICD, were followed up to 90 days. Cox regression models were used to assess associations between clinical parameters and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). RESULTS: Among 121,379 cases, OHCA occurred in 349 (0.29%) and non-OHCA death in 2,194 (1.8%). A total of 6 variables (male sex, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, Killip class ≥II, new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter, and impaired LVEF [reference ≥50%] categorized as 40% to 49%, 30% to 39%, and <30%) were identified as independent predictors, were assigned points, and were grouped into 3 categories, where the incidence of OHCA ranged from 0.12% to 2.0% and non-OHCA death from 0.76% to 11.7%. Stratified by LVEF <40% alone, the incidence of OHCA was 0.20% and 0.76% and for non-OHCA death 1.1% and 4.9%. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, the incidence of OHCA within 90 days after MI was <0.3%. A total of 5 clinical parameters in addition to LVEF predicted OHCA and non-OHCA death better than LVEF alone.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Diabetes Mellitus , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Myocardial Infarction , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/diagnosis , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Sweden/epidemiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/epidemiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology
10.
CJC Open ; 2(5): 354-359, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32995720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) infections is increasing due to an increased number of ICD implants, higher-risk patients, and more frequent replacement procedures, which carry a higher risk of infection. Reducing the morbidity, mortality, and cost of ICD-related infections requires an understanding of the current rate of this complication and its predictors. METHODS: The Shock Implant Evaluation Trial (SIMPLE) trial randomized 2500 ICD recipients to defibrillation testing or not. Over an average of 3.1 years, patients were seen every 6 months and examined for evidence of ICD infection, which was defined as requiring device removal and/or intravenous antibiotics. RESULTS: Within 24 months, 21 patients (0.8%) developed infection. Fourteen patients (67%) with infection presented within 30 days, 20 patients by 12 months, and only 1 patient beyond 12 months. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with primary electrical disorders (3 patients, P = 0.009) and those with a secondary prevention indication (13 patients, P = 0.0009) were more likely to develop infection. Among the 2.2% of patients who developed an ICD wound hematoma, 10.4% developed an infection. Among the 8.3% of patients requiring an ICD reintervention, 1.9% developed an infection. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of ICD recipients at high-volume centres have a low risk of device-related infection. However; strategies to reduce wound hematoma and the need for ICD reintervention could further reduce the rate of infection.


CONTEXTE: L'incidence des cas d'infection du défibrillateur cardioverteur implantable (DCI) augmente en raison du nombre accru d'implantations, de l'emploi de ces dispositifs chez des patients exposés à un risque très élevé et de l'augmentation de la fréquence des interventions de remplacement, qui sont associées à un plus grand risque d'infections. Pour parvenir à réduire la morbidité, la mortalité et les coûts associés aux infections liées à un DCI, il faut connaître la fréquence de cette complication et les facteurs qui permettent de la prédire. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Lors de l'essai S hock Impl ant E valuation Trial (SIMPLE), 2 500 patients ayant reçu un DCI ont été répartis aléatoirement en deux groupes, l'un subissant des tests de défibrillation et l'autre, non. Sur une période de 3,1 ans en moyenne, les patients ont été vus en consultation tous les 6 mois et examinés à la recherche de signes d'infection du DCI, définie comme étant une infection exigeant le retrait du dispositif et/ou l'administration d'antibiotiques par voie intraveineuse. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 21 patients (0,8 %) ont présenté une infection dans les 24 mois suivant l'implantation. Quatorze patients (67 %) ont présenté une infection dans les 30 jours suivant l'intervention; à 12 mois, 20 patients avaient présenté une infection. Un seul patient a présenté une infection plus de 12 mois après l'intervention. Les résultats d'une analyse univariée ont démontré qu'une infection était plus probable chez les patients qui présentaient un trouble électrique primaire (3 patients, p = 0,009) et chez ceux qui avaient reçu un dispositif en prévention secondaire (13 patients, p = 0,0009). Parmi les patients qui présentaient un hématome après l'implantation du DCI (2,2 %), 10,4 % ont présenté une infection. Parmi les patients qui ont eu besoin d'une nouvelle intervention relative au DCI (8,3 %), 1,9 % ont présenté une infection. CONCLUSIONS: Les patients de cette cohorte ayant reçu un DCI dans des établissements à haut volume étaient exposés à un faible risque d'infection du défibrillateur. Des stratégies visant à réduire les hématomes et la nécessité d'une nouvelle intervention sur les DCI pourraient toutefois contribuer à réduire encore plus la fréquence des infections.

11.
Diabetes Care ; 43(11): 2853-2858, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32887704

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, including arrhythmias. The prevalence of bradyarrhythmia and the subsequent need for treatment with pacemakers (PMs) is less well explored in a contemporary patient population. The current study explores 1) whether patients with type 2 diabetes have an increased demand for PM implantation compared with an age- and sex-matched control population without diabetes and 2) patient characteristics associated with an increased demand for receiving a PM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this population-matched registry study, a total of 416,247 patients with type 2 diabetes from the Swedish National Diabetes Registry and 2,081,235 age- and sex-matched control subjects selected from the general population were included between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2012 and followed until 31 December 2013. Mean follow-up time was 7 years. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to estimate the demand of PM treatment and the factors identifying patients with such demand. RESULTS: Type 2 diabetes was associated with an increased need of PM treatment (hazard ratio 1.65 [95% CI 1.60-1.69]; P < 0.0001), which remained (1.56 [1.51-1.60]; P < 0.0001) after adjustments for age, sex, educational level, marital status, country of birth, and coronary heart disease. Risk factors for receiving a PM included increasing age, HbA1c, BMI, diabetes duration, and lipid- and blood pressure-lowering medication. CONCLUSIONS: The need for PM treatment is higher in patients with type 2 diabetes than in matched population-based control subjects. Age, diabetes duration, and HbA1c seem to be risk factors for PM treatment.


Subject(s)
Bradycardia/complications , Bradycardia/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Pacemaker, Artificial , Registries , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Bradycardia/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sweden/epidemiology
12.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 26: 100452, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32140548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the study were to describe positron emission tomography (PET) parameters, using the tracers 15O-water at rest/stress, 11C-acetate, and 11C-HED, with regard to nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). PET offers quantitative assessment of pathophysiology throughout the left ventricular segments, including the endocardium/epicardium. The potential use PET in risk stratification remains to be elucidated. NSVT provides a marker for sudden cardiac death. METHODS: Patients with a validated diagnosis of HCM who had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator were interrogated at 12 months and independently of PET-examinations. RESULTS: In total, 25 patients (mean age 56.8 ±â€¯12.9 years, 76% males) were included and 10 reported NSVT. Mean myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest was 0.91 ml/g/min and decreased at stress, 1.59 ml/g/min. The mean gradient (endocardium/epicardium quotient) at rest was 1.14 ±â€¯0.09, while inverse at stress (mean 0.92 ±â€¯0.16). Notably, MBF gradient at stress was significantly lower in patients with NSVT (p = 0.022) and borderline at rest (p = 0.059) while global MBF at rest and stress were not. Mean myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) was 0.088 ml/g/min (higher in NSVT, p = 0.023) and myocardial external efficiency 18.5%. Using 11C-HED, the mean retention index was 0.11 min-1 and a higher volume of distribution (p = 0.089) or transmural gradient of clearance rate (p = 0.061) or lower clearance rate (p = 0.052) showed a tendency of association of NSVT. CONCLUSIONS: The endocardium/epicardium MBF gradient at stress is significantly lower in HCM patients with NSVT. This provides a novel approach to further refine risk stratification of sudden cardiac death.

13.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 54(4): 239-247, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32054352

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) first implants in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in a Swedish tertiary university hospital. Design: Clinical and technical data on pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) first implants performed in HCM patients at the Karolinska University Hospital from 2005 to 2016 were extracted from the Swedish Pacemaker and ICD Registry. Echocardiographic data were obtained by review of hospital recordings. Results: The number of first pacemaker implants in HCM patients was 70 (1.5% of total pacemaker implants). The mean age of HCM pacemaker patients was 71 ± 10 years. Pacemaker implants were almost uniformly distributed between genders. Dual-chamber pacemakers with or without CRT properties were prevalent (6 and 93%, respectively). The number of first ICD implants in HCM patients was 99 (5.1% of total ICD implants). HCM patients receiving an ICD were 53 ± 15 years and prevalently men (70%). Sixty-five (66%) patients were implanted for primary prevention. Dual-chamber ICDs with or without CRT were 21 and 65%, respectively. Obstructive HCM was present in 47% pacemaker patients and 25% ICD patients with available pre-implant echo. Conclusions: This retrospective registry-based study provides a picture of CIED first implants in HCM patients in a Swedish tertiary university hospital. ICDs were the most commonly implanted devices, covering 59% of CIED implants. HCM patients receiving a pacemaker or an ICD had different epidemiological and clinical profiles.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/trends , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Electric Countershock/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/trends , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/trends , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/diagnostic imaging , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/epidemiology , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Female , Hospitals, University/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Sweden/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/trends , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
Europace ; 21(11): 1717-1724, 2019 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609447

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate pacing system survival and complications to pacemaker (PM) therapy in children with isolated complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a nationwide retrospective study of children diagnosed before 15 years of age with isolated CAVB and PM treatment. Between 1983 and 2012, 127 patients underwent PM-implantations at 3.2 (0-17) [median (range)] years and were followed for 11 (0.6-19) years. An endocardial or epicardial PM system was implanted in 72 and 55 patients, respectively. A total of 306 pacing leads (76% steroid-eluting) were implanted. Pacing system survival was significantly affected by age, with a higher risk of a new intervention for children aged <1 month at first implantation. Lead survival of the steroid-eluting leads at 5 and 10 years was 90 and 81%, respectively, with no difference between epicardial and endocardial systems. Complications leading to revision of the pacing system occurred in 24% of the patients. Patients aged <1 month at first PM implantation had a five-fold increased risk for a complication to occur. Dividing the cohort according to year of first procedure showed that those who had their first implantation ≥2002 had fewer complications and also lead- and pacing system survival was better in the later cohort. CONCLUSION: Pacing system survival and complications to PM therapy in young patients with isolated CAVB were significantly affected by age, with low age at PM implantation constituting a risk factor. Endocardial and epicardial pacing systems showed no significant differences in performance.


Subject(s)
Atrioventricular Block/therapy , Forecasting , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Risk Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Atrioventricular Block/mortality , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Failure , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Sweden/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
17.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 30(7): 1078-1085, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30945798

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dual-coil leads (DC-leads) were the standard of choice since the first nonthoracotomy implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD). We used contemporary data to determine if DC-leads offer any advantage over single-coil leads (SC-leads), in terms of defibrillation efficacy, safety, clinical outcome, and complication rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Shockless IMPLant Evaluation study, 2500 patients received a first implanted ICD and were randomized to implantation with or without defibrillation testing. Two thousand and four hundred seventy-five patients received SC-coil or DC-coil leads (SC-leads in 1025/2475 patients; 41.4%). In patients who underwent defibrillation testing (n = 1204), patients with both lead types were equally likely to achieve an adequate defibrillation safety margin (88.8% vs 91.2%; P = 0.16). There was no overall effect of lead type on the primary study endpoint of "failed appropriate shock or arrhythmic death" (adjusted HR 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86-1.62; P = 0.300), and on all-cause mortality (SC-leads: 5.34%/year; DC-leads: 5.48%/year; adjusted HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.94-1.43; P = 0.168). However, among patients without prior heart failure (HF), and SC-leads had a significantly higher risk of failed appropriate shock or arrhythmic death (adjusted HR 7.02; 95% CI, 2.41-20.5). There were no differences in complication rates. CONCLUSION: In this nonrandomized evaluation, there was no overall difference in defibrillation efficacy, safety, outcome, and complication rates between SC-leads and DC-leads. However, DC-leads were associated with a reduction in the composite of failed appropriate shock or arrhythmic death in the subgroup of non-HF patients. Considering riskier future lead extraction with DC-leads, SC-leads appears to be preferable in the majority of patients.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Defibrillators, Implantable , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Primary Prevention/instrumentation , Secondary Prevention/instrumentation , Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Cause of Death , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Electric Countershock/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
18.
Lakartidningen ; 1152018 06 11.
Article in Swedish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29893985

ABSTRACT

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the most common cardiogenetic disease affecting 1/500-1/1 000 individuals. Dyspnea is common but chest pain, dizziness or fainting may also cause considerable limitation for the patient. The diagnosis can be suspected from ECG. Echocardiography confirms hypertrophy of at least 15 mm, usually in the septum. If the obstruction of the outflow tract is severe, myectomy or alcohol ablation can relieve symptoms. Genetic evaluation of family members is advisable. To reduce symptoms, betablockers are used; verapamil or disopyramide are alternatives. Atrial fibrillation is often prevalent and requires special attention concerning anticoagulation and rhythm or rate control. An end-stage heart failure warrants advanced treatment options such as cardiac resynchronization therapy, ventricular assist devices or heart transplant. Sudden cardiac death is unpredictable and evaluation of risk markers is important to identify potential candidates for an implantable defibrillator.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Familial , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Familial/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Familial/diagnostic imaging , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Familial/epidemiology , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Familial/therapy , Catheter Ablation , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Defibrillators, Implantable , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography , Genetic Counseling , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
19.
Europace ; 20(12): 1882-1897, 2018 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29757390

ABSTRACT

In recent years an extension of devices longevity has been obtained for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), including ICDs for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) through improved battery chemistry and device technology and this implies important clinical benefits (reduced need for device replacements and associated complications, particularly infections), as well as economic benefits, in line with patient preferences and needs. From a clinical point of view, the availability of this improvement in technology allows to better tune the choice of the device to be implanted, taking into account that the reasons supporting the value of an extended device longevity as a clinical priority may differ according to the clinical setting (purely electrical diseases or left ventricular dysfunction/heart failure, respectively). From an economic point of view, extension of device longevity may have an important impact in reducing long-term costs of device therapy, with substantial daily savings in favour of devices with extended longevity, up to 30%, depending on clinical scenarios. In studies based on projections, an extension of device longevity allowed to calculate that the cost per day of ICDs may be substantially reduced, and this allows to overcome the frequent perception of ICD and CRT-D devices as treatments with unaffordable costs and to overturn the misconception that up-front costs are the only metric with which to value device treatments. In view of its clinical and economic value, device longevity should be a determining factor in device choice by physicians and healthcare commissioners and should be appropriately considered and valued in comparative tenders.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Electric Power Supplies , Equipment Failure , Heart Failure/therapy , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/economics , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/economics , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/economics , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Defibrillators, Implantable/economics , Device Removal , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Electric Countershock/economics , Electric Power Supplies/economics , Equipment Failure/economics , Health Care Costs , Heart Failure/economics , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left
20.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 52(3): 120-126, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29537317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore sex differences regarding indication for atrio-ventricular junction ablation (AVJ), choice of pacing system, complications to pacemaker treatment, long-term outcome, and cause of death after AVJ ablation. DESIGN: 700 patients who had undergone AVJ ablation between January 1990 and December 2010 were included. Data were retrieved from the patients´ medical records and the Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry. Information about admission to hospital and cause of death was retrieved from the National Board of Health and Welfare. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 90 ± 64 months. Indication for AVJ ablation, choice of pacing system, and outcome after AVJ ablation differed between the sexes. The men had more often permanent atrial fibrillation, p = .0001, and a VVIR pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implanted prior to ablation, p = .0001. Heart failure was present in 44% of the men vs. 28% of the women, p = .0001. LVEF decreased slightly in the whole cohort after the AVJ ablation. There were no sex differences in complication rates due to the pacemaker/ICD treatment, p = .3 or mortality due to AVJ ablation. CONCLUSION: In this long-term follow-up in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with AVJ ablation and pacing, indication, choice of pacing system, and morbidity differed but there were no sex differences regarding survival or primary cause of death found. The main factor influencing survival was age at the time of ablation. Women less often received treatment with ICD and/or CRT when indication was present compared with men.


Subject(s)
Ablation Techniques , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrioventricular Node/surgery , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Pacemaker, Artificial , Ablation Techniques/adverse effects , Ablation Techniques/mortality , Action Potentials , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrioventricular Node/physiopathology , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/adverse effects , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/mortality , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices , Clinical Decision-Making , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Registries , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Stroke Volume , Sweden , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...