Molecular determinants of the recognition of ulipristal acetate by oxo-steroid receptors.

The human progesterone receptor (PR) plays a key role in reproductive function in women. PR antagonists have numerous applications in female health care including regular and emergency contraception, and treatment of hormone-related pathological conditions such as breast cancer, endometriosis, and leiomyoma. The main factor limiting their long-term administration is the fact that they cross-bind to other oxo-steroid receptors. Ulipristal acetate (UPA), a highly potent PR antagonist, has recently come onto the market and is much more selective for PR than the other oxo-steroid receptors (androgen, AR, glucocorticoid, GR, and mineralocorticoid, MR receptors) and, remarkably, it displays lower GR-inactivating potency than RU486. We adopted a structural approach to characterizing the binding of UPA to the oxo-steroid receptors at the molecular level. We solved the X-ray crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human PR complexed with UPA and a peptide from the transcriptional corepressor SMRT. We used the X-ray crystal structure of the GR in its antagonist conformation to dock UPA within its ligand-binding cavity. Finally, we generated three-dimensional models of the LBD of androgen and mineralocorticoid receptors (AR and MR) in an antagonist conformation and docked UPA within them. Comparing the structures revealed that the network of stabilizing contacts between the UPA C11 aryl group and the LBD is responsible for its high PR antagonist potency. It also showed that it is the inability of UPA to contact Gln642 in GR that explains why it has lower potency in inactivating GR than RU486. Finally, we found that the binding pockets of AR and MR are too small to accommodate UPA, and allowed us to propose that the extremely low sensitivity of MR to UPA is due to inappropriate interactions with the C11 substituent. All these findings open new avenues for designing new PR antagonist compounds displaying greater selectivity.

Immediate pre-ovulatory administration of 30 mg ulipristal acetate significantly delays follicular rupture.

BACKGROUND: Current methods of hormonal emergency contraception (EC) are ineffective in preventing follicular rupture when administered in the advanced pre-ovulatory phase. This study was designed to determine the capacity of ulipristal acetate (UPA), a selective progesterone receptor modulator developed for EC, to block follicular rupture when administered with a follicle of >or=18 mm. METHODS: This was a double-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Thirty-five women contributed with UPA (30 mg. oral) and a placebo cycle. Serial blood sampling for luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol and progesterone measurements and follicular monitoring by ultrasound were performed before and for 5 days following treatment. Follicular rupture inhibition was assessed in the overall study population and in subgroups of women stratified by when treatment was administered in relation to LH levels (before the onset of the LH surge, after the onset of the surge but before the LH peak or after the LH peak). RESULTS: Follicular rupture failed to occur for at least 5 days following UPA administration in 20/34 cycles [59%; 95% confidence interval (CI) (40.7-75.4%)], whereas rupture took place in all cycles within 5 days of placebo intake. When UPA was administered before the onset of the LH surge, or after the onset but before the LH peak, follicle rupture had not occurred within 5 days in 8/8 (100%) and 11/14 [78.6%; 95% CI (49.2-95.3)] cycles, respectively. In contrast, when UPA was given after the LH peak, follicle rupture inhibition was only observed in 1/12 [8.3%; 95% CI (0.2-38.5)] cycles. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that UPA can significantly delay follicular rupture when given immediately before ovulation. This new generation EC compound could possibly prevent pregnancy when administered in the advanced follicular phase, even if LH levels have already begun to rise, a time when levonorgestrel EC is no longer effective in inhibiting ovulation.

Levonorgestrel pharmacokinetics in plasma and milk of lactating women who take 1.5 mg for emergency contraception.

BACKGROUND: Progestin-only methods are among the contraceptive options available for breastfeeding women, however the doses of progestin used in emergency contraception (EC) have not been evaluated in nursing mothers. We therefore investigated the pharmacokinetics of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (LNG) in lactating women. METHODS: Twelve healthy exclusively breastfeeding volunteers received 1.5 mg LNG. Women refrained from nursing for 72 h after dosing and fed their infants with milk frozen beforehand. Serial blood and milk samples were collected for 120 h and assayed for LNG and sex hormone binding globulin. RESULTS: LNG concentrations peaked in plasma and in milk 1-4 h and 2-4 h after dosing, respectively. Concentrations in milk (M) paralleled those in plasma (P) but were consistently lower (mean M:P ratio 0.28). Estimated infant exposure to LNG is 1.6 microg on the day of dosing (1 microg in the first 8 h), 0.3 microg on the second day and 0.2 microg on the third day. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing mothers may need EC. These results suggest that to limit infant exposure to the period of maximum LNG excretion in milk, mothers should discontinue nursing for at least 8 h, but not more than 24 h, after EC.

[A prospective study of the provision of emergency contraception in French family planning centers]. / Enquête prospective sur la délivrance de la contraception d'urgence dans les centres de planification et d'éducation familiale du Val-de-Marne.

OBJECTIVES: To describe emergency contraception provision, including the efficacy of the method, in family planning centers in suburban Paris two years after the method became available without a prescription. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study involving two questionnaires was conducted between September 2001 and July 2002 in 27 family planning centers in the Val-de-Marne region. The first questionnaire was completed at the time emergency contraception was dispensed and the second one upon a follow-up visit. Efficacy was calculated for both perfect use (only one act of unprotected intercourse in the current menstrual cycle, emergency contraception treatment initiated within 72 hours) and typical use (including multiple acts of unprotected intercourse in the cycle and/or treatment initiated after 72 hours). RESULTS: A total of 519 requests for emergency contraception was recorded, resulting in the provision of 518 treatments. The women requesting emergency contraception were young (96% under the age of 25) and cited unprotected intercourse and problems with condom use as the main reasons for the request. Information regarding the outcome of emergency contraception treatment was available in 77% of the cases, and a failure rate of 1.9% was observed with perfect use and 2.7% with typical use. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study of emergency contraception prescription in family planning centers confirms data on the efficacy and safety of the method observed in similar environments. The failure rate associated with typical use is higher than that observed with perfect use.

Levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception: real-world tolerance and efficacy.

Levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception was introduced onto the market in France in May 1999 on the heels of a large-scale clinical trial demonstrating its enhanced efficacy and tolerance over the combined estrogen-progestin reference method. To evaluate the product's real-world tolerance and efficacy in the more than 20 months that it has been on the market, a retrospective study was performed among large-scale prescribers in France. One hundred physicians were asked to complete a written questionnaire outlining their practices with regards to their prescription of the product as well as their knowledge and evaluation of the product's tolerance and efficacy. Results from 82 respondents representing over 2,000 administrations demonstrate that physicians judge levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception to be very well tolerated and without unexpected side effects. Further, respondents report a pregnancy rate similar to that chronicled in the large-scale clinical trial (less than 3%), thus substantiating conclusions regarding the product's considerable efficacy and its potential for reducing the rate of unintended pregnancies.

The pharmacokinetics of 750 microg levonorgestrel following administration of one single dose or two doses at 12- or 24-h interval.

The administration of two tablets of 750 microg levonorgestrel at a 12- to 24-h interval has been shown to be a safe and effective means of emergency contraception, and Norlevo/Vikela (N/V) is a dedicated product for this indication. The aim of this study was to characterize the plasma pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel following a single N/V tablet administration and following a second administration, 12 or 24 h after the first one in young, healthy, female volunteers under the same conditions as during clinical use. This was an open, observer-blind, randomized study with three parallel groups and three treatments performed in 24 white female volunteers randomized into three groups of eight participants, each receiving one of the following treatments: Group A, one tablet of 750 microg levonorgestrel at time -12 h and one tablet at time 0; Group B, one tablet of 750 microg levonorgestrel at time 0; Group C, one tablet of 750 microg levonorgestrel at time -24 h and one tablet at time 0. All treatments started between Day 2 and Day 6 of the menstrual cycle. Plasma levonorgestrel levels were measured at regular intervals from time 0 up to 36 h with a validated radioimmunoassay. The results of this study show that after either one single or two administrations of a tablet containing 750 microg levonorgestrel, levonorgestrel is rapidly absorbed. The absorption, distribution, and elimination profiles of levonorgestrel following the three different treatments were similar. It also indicates that 12 or 24 h after administration there remains a significant level of plasma levonorgestrel. In conclusion, this study reinforces clinical guidelines recommending that N/V tablets for emergency contraception be administered 12 to 24 h apart because levonorgestrel is present in plasma between the two administrations.