Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Spines at Risk During Nonspine Surgery: A 9-Year Review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with certain spinal anomalies are at risk for rare but devastating spinal cord injuries under anesthesia. We created a Spine at Risk (SAR) program to evaluate and recommend precautions for such patients, including intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) use for the highest-risk patients. We aimed to review all monitored nonspine procedures to determine rate of potential spinal cord injuries avoided in those who would otherwise have been unmonitored. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional SAR program from 2011 to 2019 to analyze the number of nonspine anesthetized procedures that were done under IONM, the characteristics of those that had an IONM alert; and the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 3,453 patients flagged for SAR review, 1121 (33%) received a precaution recommendation, and 359 (10% of all flagged) were given IONM recommendations. Of those, 57 patients (16% of recommendations, 2% of all flagged) had a total of 102 nonspine anesthetized procedures done under IONM. Seven patients had a total of 10 cases with IONM alerts. Two cases were aborted when improved signals could not be obtained after working through a checklist; one of these patients woke with transient neurological deficits. Signals improved to baseline in 7 cases by working through a signal loss checklist. One case was aborted preoperatively when monitorable baseline signals could not be obtained. CONCLUSIONS: In the highest-risk spinal anomaly patients, we monitored an average of 11.7 nonspine cases per year, with a 10% rate of IONM alerts, and no permanent neurological deficits. Although the majority of patients remain safe during procedures, in the most critical patients IONM allowed the team to identify and react to alerts that may have otherwise led to permanent neurological injury. This is the largest series of spinal cord-monitored nonspine pediatric cases. It is important for pediatric orthopedic surgeons to evaluate at-risk patients and recommend IONM where appropriate, to protect both patients and our procedural colleagues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level IV.

The pediatric "Spine at Risk" program: 9-year review of a novel safety screening tool.

PURPOSE: We implemented an EMR-based "Spine at Risk" (SAR) alert program in 2011 to identify pediatric patients at risk for intraoperative spinal cord injury (SCI) and prompt an evaluation for peri-operative recommendations prior to anesthetic. SAR alerts were activated upon documentation of a qualifying ICD-9/10 diagnosis or manually entered by providers. We aimed to determine the frequency of recommended precautions for those auto-flagged by diagnosis versus by provider, the frequency of precautions, and whether the program prevented SCIs during non-spinal surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients from 2011 to 19 with an SAR alert. We recorded how the chart was flagged, recommended precautions, and reviewed data for SCIs at our institution during non-spinal operations. RESULTS: Of the 3453 patients with an SAR alert over the 9-year study period, 1963 were auto-flagged by diagnosis and 1490 by manual entry. Only 38.7% and 24.3% of the patients in these respective groups were assigned precaution recommendations, making the auto-flag 62.8% better than providers at identifying patients needing precautions. Cervical spine positioning precautions were needed most frequently (86.7% of diagnosis-flagged; 30.0% of provider-flagged), followed by intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) (25.2%; 6.1%), thoracolumbar positioning restrictions (16.1%; 7.9%), and fiberoptic intubation (13.9%; 5.7%). There were no SCIs in non-spinal procedures during the study. CONCLUSION: EMR-based alerts requiring evaluation by a Neurosurgeon or Orthopaedic surgeon prior to anesthesia can prevent SCIs during non-spinal procedures. The majority of identified patients are not found to be at risk, and will not require special precautions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.