Immunohistochemistry Critical Assay Performance Controls (ICAPC) Reduce Interobserver Variability in the Interpretation of BRAFV600E Immunohistochemistry.

The utility of prognostic and predictive immunohistochemistry biomarkers in the context of cancer is plagued by inconsistent interpretation of results which can lead to poor rates of adoption or inappropriate use of novel therapeutic strategies. To monitor immunohistochemistry assay performance, a new on-slide control motif, Immunohistochemistry Critical Assay Performance Controls (ICAPC) was developed. We hypothesized that the use of these controls by the diagnosing pathologist to interpret BRAFV600E would result in reduced interobserver and intraobserver interpretation errors. A cross-sectional, sequentially obtained sample of surgical pathology cases stained for BRAFV600E was assembled from a single hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia. Half of the cases had normal on-slide controls and the remainder with ICAPC. Results from 6 independent and blinded readers were compared with each other and to the gold-standard pathologic diagnosis with the goal of demonstrating superior interrater agreement with ICAPC relative to standard on-slide controls. Cohen's κ was used to compute pair-wise reader agreements, whereas Fleiss' κ was used to compare to the gold standard. The implementation of ICAPC resulted in statistically significant improvements in the interobserver agreement of BRAF mutation status ascertained by BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry. Half of the readers demonstrated significant improvements in agreement with the gold-standard diagnosis with the addition of ICAPC. Across all readers, the mean increase in κ was 0.14 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.01-0.28 (P=0.04). This study demonstrates that the addition of ICAPC serves to significantly reduce interobserver variability in the assessment of BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry. As such, we recommend that this approach should be used as part of a comprehensive quality management strategy in the setting of histopathology.

Immunophenotyping of ampullary carcinomata allows for stratification of treatment specific subgroups.

BACKGROUND: Ampullary carcinomata (AC) can be separated into intestinal (IT) or pancreatobiliary (PB) subtypes. Although morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular differentiation of IT and PB have been well documented; the prognostic significance of histological subtype and whether patients with either subtype benefit from differential chemotherapeutic regimens remains unclear. METHODS: As part of a larger cohort study, patients who underwent resection for AC or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathological covariates and outcome were obtained and MUC1, MUC2, CDX2 and CK20 were assessed with immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Of 99 ACs, the resultant immunophenotypes indicated 48% and 22% were IT and PB, respectively. Thirty (30%) cases were quadruple negative (QN). Within the PDAC cohort (N = 257), the most prevalent immunophenotype was QN (53%). Subsequently, all QN ACs were classified as PB immunohistochemically yielding 47.5% and 52.5% classified as IT and PB, respectively. Involved regional lymph nodes and elevated T-stage were significantly associated with PB compared with IT AC (p = 0.0032 and 0.0396, respectively). Progression-free survival revealed inferior survival for PB versus IT AC (p = 0.0156). CONCLUSIONS: AC can be classified into prognostic groups with unique clinicopathological characteristics using immunohistochemistry. Immunophenotypical similarity of PB and PDAC suggests that treatment regimens similar to those used in PDAC should be explored.

Nucleic acid quantity and quality from paraffin blocks: defining optimal fixation, processing and DNA/RNA extraction techniques.

Although the extraction and analysis of nucleic acids from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues is a routine and growing part of pathology practice, no generally accepted recommendations exist to guide laboratories in their selection of tissue fixation, processing and DNA/RNA extraction techniques. The aim of this study was to determine how fixation method and length, paraffin embedding, processing conditions and nucleic acid extraction methods affect quality and quantity of DNA and RNA, and their performance in downstream applications. Nine tissue samples were subjected to freezing, fixation in formalin for <24 h and 7 days followed by conventional processing, and fixation in molecular fixative for <24 h and 7 days followed by rapid processing. DNA and RNA were isolated using in-house extraction and commercial kits, and assessed by PCR reactions for amplicons with varying sizes ranging from 268 to 1327 bp and one-step RT-PCR for 621 bp and 816 bp amplicons of housekeeping genes. Molecular fixative (MF) appeared to perform well under nearly all circumstances (extraction methods, fixation lengths and longer amplicons), often performing as well as frozen samples. Formalin fixation generally performed well only for shorter length amplicons and short fixation (<24 h). WaxFree kit showed consistently higher success rates for DNA and poorer rates for RNA. RecoverAll kit generally performed suboptimally in combination with prolonged formalin fixation. In conclusion, the Molecular Fixative regardless of fixation length, and the rapid tissue processing system were able to preserve large DNA and RNA fragments in paraffin blocks, making these techniques preferable for use in downstream molecular diagnostic assays.