Effect of acute exposure to moderate altitude on muscle power: hypobaric hypoxia vs. normobaric hypoxia.

When ascending to a higher altitude, changes in air density and oxygen levels affect the way in which explosive actions are executed. This study was designed to compare the effects of acute exposure to real or simulated moderate hypoxia on the dynamics of the force-velocity relationship observed in bench press exercise. Twenty-eight combat sports athletes were assigned to two groups and assessed on two separate occasions: G1 (n = 17) in conditions of normoxia (N1) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) and G2 (n = 11) in conditions of normoxia (N2) and normobaric hypoxia (NH). Individual and complete force-velocity relationships in bench press were determined on each assessment day. For each exercise repetition, we obtained the mean and peak velocity and power shown by the athletes. Maximum power (Pmax) was recorded as the highest P(mean) obtained across the complete force-velocity curve. Our findings indicate a significantly higher absolute load linked to P(max) (∼ 3%) and maximal strength (1 RM) (∼ 6%) in G1 attributable to the climb to altitude (P<0.05). We also observed a stimulating effect of natural hypoxia on P(mean) and P(peak) in the middle-high part of the curve (≥ 60 kg; P<0.01) and a 7.8% mean increase in barbell displacement velocity (P<0.001). No changes in any of the variables examined were observed in G2. According to these data, we can state that acute exposure to natural moderate altitude as opposed to simulated normobaric hypoxia leads to gains in 1 RM, movement velocity and power during the execution of a force-velocity curve in bench press.

Sodium nitrate supplementation does not enhance performance of endurance athletes.

PURPOSE: Supplementation with inorganic nitrate has been suggested to be an ergogenic aid for athletes as nitric oxide donor. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ingestion of inorganic sodium nitrate benefits well-trained athletes performing a 40-min exercise test in laboratory conditions. In addition, we investigated the effect of this supplement on plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and in nitrated proteins. METHODS: Thirteen trained athletes participated in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. They performed a 40-min cycle ergometer distance-trial test after two 3-d periods of dietary supplementation with sodium nitrate (10 mg·kg of body mass) or placebo. RESULTS: Concentration of plasma nitrate (256 ± 35 µM) and nitrite (334 ± 86 nM) increased significantly (P < 0.05) after nitrate supplementation compared with placebo (nitrate: 44 ± 11 µM; nitrite: 187 ± 43 nM). In terms of exercise performance, there were no differences in either the mean distance (nitrate: 26.4 ± 1.1 km; placebo: 26.3 ± 1.2 km; P = 0.61) or mean power output (nitrate: 258 ± 28 W; placebo: 257 ± 28 W; P = 0.89) between treatments. Plasma ET-1 increased significantly (P < 0.05) just after exercise in nitrate (4.0 ± 0.8 pg·mL) and placebo (2.4 ± 0.4 pg·mL) conditions. This increase was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in the nitrate group. Levels of nitrated proteins did not differ between treatments (nitrate: preexercise, 91% ± 23%; postexercise, 81% ± 23%; placebo: preexercise, 95% ± 20%; postexercise, 99% ± 19%). CONCLUSION: Sodium nitrate supplementation did not improve a 40-min distance-trial performance in endurance athletes. In addition, concentration of plasma ET-1 increased significantly after exercise after supplementation with sodium nitrate.

Parámetros cardiorrespiratorios durante ejercicio submáximo en hipoxia aguda hipobárica y normobárica / Cardiorespiratory parameters during submaximal exercise under acute exposure to normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia

Siete jóvenes sanos y en buena condición física realizaron dos pruebas de tolerancia a hipoxia a una altitud simulada de 3.000 m. La primera fue en cámara hipobárica, mientras que la segunda se efectuó en una tienda hipóxica. Se registraron varios parámetros cardiorrespiratorios y la variabilidad de la frecuencia cardiaca. En comparación con las condiciones de normoxia, se observó un decremento significativo del 6% al 8% en la saturación de oxígeno arterial (SpO2) en reposo en ambas condiciones de hipoxia. El ejercicio desencadenó descensos de un 10% en SpO2 pese a un incremento del 27% del volumen minuto ventilatorio. Tanto los componentes de baja (LF) como alta frecuencia (HF) de la variabilidad del ritmo cardiaco cambiaron significativamente en hipoxia hipobárica (LF: 49,1, HF: 50,6, LF/HF: 1,96) respecto a normoxia (LF: 37,1, HF: 62,9, LF/HF: 1,27). Estos cambios no se apreciaron en condiciones de hipoxia normobárica, lo cual apoya la hipótesis de que la hipoxia hipobárica y normobárica no suponen igual estímulo para los sistemas respiratorio y cardiovascular. Se ha observado una correlación entre la modulación vagal y simpática en normoxia y la SpO2 durante ejercicio en cámara hipobárica. Los sujetos con mayor modulación simpática (LF%) en normoxia presentan mayor SpO2 en ejercicio en la cámara (r=0,808, p<0,05) y los individuos con mayor modulación vagal (HF%) en normoxia tienden a SpO2 más bajas en ejercicio en hipobaria (r=−0,636, p=0,125). Surge la posibilidad de utilizar esta asociación como herramienta predictiva de la capacidad individual de aclimatación a la altura(AU)

Seven healthy young men were submitted twice to a hypoxia tolerance test at a simulated altitude (3000m). Their first acute exposure was in a hypobaric chamber; and the second, in a hypoxic tent. Cardiorespiratory parameters and heart rate variability measurements were obtained under each hypoxic condition. A significant decrease of 6% to 8% compared to normal oxygen conditions was observed in arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) in both hypoxic conditions at rest; whereas exercise led to decreases of 10% in SpO2 despite an increase of 27% in respiratory minute volume. The low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) components of heart rate variability significantly changed from normoxia (LF: 37.1, HF: 62.9, LF/HF: 1.27) to hypobaric hypoxia (HH) (LF: 49.1, HF: 50.6, LF/HF: 1.96). However, these changes were not observed under normobaric hypoxia. Thus, heart rate variability behaved differently in the two hypoxic conditions, supporting the hypothesis that normobaric hypoxia and hypobaric hypoxia are not equal stimuli to the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. A correlation was found between sympathetic and vagal modulations in normoxia and SpO2 at exercise under hypobaric hypoxia (HH). Individuals with higher sympathetic modulation (LF%) in normoxia had higher SpO2 at exercise under HH (r=0.808, P<0.05) and individuals with higher vagal modulation (HF%) in normoxia showed a trend to lower SpO2 in exercise under HH (r=−0.636, P=0.125). This opens up the possibility of using this correlation as a tool for predicting the individual capacity to altitude acclimatization(AU)

Comparison of different theoretical models estimating peak power output and maximal oxygen uptake in trained and elite triathletes and endurance cyclists in the velodrome.

The aim of this study was to assess which of the equations that estimate peak power output and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in the velodrome adapt best to the measurements made by reference systems. Thirty-four endurance cyclists and triathletes performed one incremental test in the laboratory and two tests in the velodrome. Maximal oxygen uptake and peak power output were measured with an indirect calorimetry system in the laboratory and with the SRM training system in the velodrome. The peak power output and VO2max of the field test were estimated by means of different equations. The agreement between the estimated and the reference values was assessed with the Bland-Altman method. The equation of Olds et al. (1995) showed the best agreement with respect to the peak power output reference values, and that of McCole et al. (1990) was the only equation to show good agreement with respect to the VO2max reference values. The VO2max values showed a higher coefficient of determination with respect to maximal aerobic speed when they were expressed in relative terms. In conclusion, the equations of Olds et al. (1995) and McCole et al. (1990) were best at estimating peak power output and VO2max in the velodrome, respectively.